Mini 583! BAMPEG!!!....IS THIS THE END???

[JDodge]

A scotmany lynch is also fine.

[Erg0]

The 3 scum thing isn't much of a tell, I've seen that one plenty of times. It does pique my interest in dahill, but not much more than that.

I've played with WhoMe once before, but I can't remember which game, or what his role was. Think I might go and look for that.

My vote is staying there at the moment for the metagame on an "ongoing" game that dahill1 provided or not provided, whichever works.

I don't understand this sentence. What's your point here?

[scotmany12]

Yeah, since there is hardly anything to go on at this point, if I find something that can even be considered a slight scumtell, I'm going to pursue it.

[chaotic_diablo]

The 3 scum thing isn't much of a tell, I've seen that one plenty of times. It does pique my interest in dahill, but not much more than that.

I've played with WhoMe once before, but I can't remember which game, or what his role was. Think I might go and look for that.

My vote is staying there at the moment for the metagame on an "ongoing" game that dahill1 provided or not provided, whichever works.

I don't understand this sentence. What's your point here?

The usual argument I hear with metagaming is that "a particular person acts the same way in either alignment". dahill didn't provide a good point for this argument; one ongoing game isn't enough to justify a metagame defense. I find this strange, so my vote is sticking on whome?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Guys guys, let's put our differences aside and lynch Erg0

[Tamuz]

Why?

[Coron]

I like my vote.

[You Give Love A Bad Name]

If anyone wants me to prod people let me know.

[pickemgenius]

Fuck thats me.

[dahill1]

the secret is out!

[Erg0]

I think we knew that already.

chaotic_diablo: based on your reply above, how are you feeling about dahill right now?

[Flameaxe]

Sup?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Why?

The question is: Why not?

[Tamuz]

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

[WhoMe?]

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

gonna be very hard for youi to get logic involved, when no one is willing to give their thoughts and reasoning behing their votes. There is no proof that

anyone

is scum, which is why we need some insight into peoples motivations, and is why I am suspicious of those not willing to be more open.

[JDodge]

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

Can't grill someone without lighting the grill, now can you?

[scotmany12]

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

And there is enough proof that whome? is scum?

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

JDodge is getting it. Why can't you? He's your buddy?

[Tamuz]

Because there is not proof that Erg0 is scum. Mafia isn't run on your whims, its run on best case scenarios in regards to solid logic.

gonna be very hard for youi to get logic involved, when no one is willing to give their thoughts and reasoning behing their votes. There is no proof that

anyone

is scum, which is why we need some insight into peoples motivations, and is why I am suspicious of those not willing to be more open.

Pstt kids, I asked for logic explaining why I should vote Erg-. Me making a seemingly logicless vote based on my own decision is one thing. Following someone else's seemingly logicless vote based on nothing is another. That second thing is bad.
You will not get me to vote something else by "why not" if you construct a case, maybe. I do, however reserve my own right to vote in accordance to how I feel. People should not carte blanc vote with me how I feel though (applying to the entirety of players as well). I'd think it more concerning if people just leapt on Scopes "reasoning". Then they have a mindless vote, and they can hide behind scum. Neither are good for the town.

Whome?, I can certainly get logic involved. It why I'm voting you.

JDodge/scumbuddy: Why is it exactly that we want to grill Erg0 in the first place. I agree we can't grill him without lighting the grill, but I'd certainly hate to grill a boot because you tell me to and then realize as I bite into it that it isn't a juicy stake

[dahill1]

Why is it exactly that we want to grill Erg0 in the first place

yeah i'm not against it, but i don't see the point in it when we already have 2 possible lynch candidates

[pickemgenius]

Sup?

So I hear you have a blog assignment due Friday.

What is the topic this time?

Prods will go out tomorrow along with votecount(unless it hasnt changed)

[Erg0]

I'm feeling very pressured right now.

[KaleiÐoscøpe]

You should be.

I'm actuallly wondering why people

aren't

trusting me on this.

[roffman]

vote kaleidoscop

i'm around 90% certain that ergo isn't scum.

[dahill1]

vote kaleidoscop

i'm around 90% certain that ergo isn't scum.

why?