Mr Stoofer wrote:
Here is a question for you: list every question I have failed to answer.
Since you insist...
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tVoD, in post 90, wrote:
What bandwagon is this. I am the only one to have a vote on lord_hur at the moment as everyone else unvoted, how is this a band wagon.
tVoD, in post 110, wrote:
Mr Stoofer why do you wish to have on record you want to lynch someone who has not posted yet in this game?
tVoD, in post 114, wrote:
@Mr Stoofer do you wish to comment on my post or would you rather ignore it?
tVoD, in post 153, wrote:
Why was it a new point that lord_hur was scummy?
What is of more pointitude is what makes him appear to have more information, appear to be in the informed minority; appear to be scummy?
tVoD, in post 197, wrote:
@Mr Stoofer why do you think I am hurting town.........please explain this
tVoD, in post 232, wrote:
Ok, I dont deserve to live thank you kind sir but by your explanation you were happy to let me live another day if someone else who (you deem) deserves also not to live would be easier to lynch?
tVoD, in post 275, wrote:
Also where did hasfgad stand on your list when you voted for him and where does he stand now?
tVoD, in post 279, wrote:
I conceded you a point on that, is that terribly wrong?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SlySly, in post 160, wrote:
Would he not know that Bugs Bunny existed where the rest of us didn't?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At least you didn't ignore this one, you just didn't answer it. I would like you to answer it when you get a chance.
Guardian, in post 165, wrote:
Why?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PyroDwarf, in post 172, wrote:
Stoofer, what are you talking about with guardian? Are you trying to imply that you have more information than the town?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hasdgfas, in post 184, wrote:
Is it because Guardian didn't explicitly "insist"? Or is it because he wanted to just get off the issue? Or is there another reason?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Musher, in post 241, wrote:
Trying to save Guardian much?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These are reminders that you never answered post 90.
SlySly, in post 135, wrote:
In post 89, you falsely accuse tVoD of jumping on a bandwagon, a bandwagon that only exists in your scummy imagination, that only he was a part of, seeing how he was the ONLY person voting on that person at that time. He very clearly pointed this out to you. I couldn't help but notice how you have conveniently avoided commenting on it.
SlySly, in post 160, wrote:
Honestly, at the moment, I am more interested in hearing why Mr. Stoofer called tVoD's lone vote a bandwagon than I am in hearing tVoD's answers to, IMO, less important questions
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
184 posts later and you finally take the time to answer post 90.
Mr. Stoofer, in post 274, wrote:
Now, to answer tvod's question: a bandwagon consists of more than just votes. When I said that you were joining lor_hur's bandwagon (or whatever I said), I meant that you were joining in with those who were attacking him.
I, for one, have never heard anyone call attacks a bandwagon unless it was backed up with a vote. You are really reaching with this.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I hope my list is comprehensive enough for you, Mr. Stoofer. I hope I haven't missed any.