In post 1899, Flubbernugget wrote:
1778 is what's bothering me. There's no rhyme or reason as to who they ISO'd, and the fact that they can make a read on texcat while not being able to say anything on higher impact players like egg just shows an inability to fake transparency to me. I definitely like my other two scum reads more, but I am still not a fan of nictis's play.
I'm not a fan of my post either, I lost interest in it before starting on Egg and didn't feel like changing it to reflect that. I kinda just left it there for me to finish later.
However there are a few things wrong with your statement.
There's no rhyme or reason as to who they ISO'd
I very clearly said that I was doing an ISO on all the people Pine put in italics.
and the fact that they can make a read on texcat while not being able to say anything on higher impact players like egg just shows an inability to fake transparency to me.
I said I got distracted and it was obviously going in order.
but I am still not a fan of nictis's play.
What part of this is a play? I'm honestly unsure on what you could see as a play from a post with framework, notes saying where I didn't do anything, and a basic ISO on two players with relatively small post counts.
This post seems like a reach, I can understand not liking my post since I don't like my post, but reading it as an attempt to fake transparency... I don't see how that post could have been read as anything other than someone walking away from it halfway.