Qman wrote:Holy wrote:Somehow true... But that kind of action seems attracting attentions, I still have a doubt that a scum would attract attention like that.
Sure they would, for that exact reason. WIFOM
That just careless in my eyes. Fine, it happens, the careless scum would, but a good scum gain it from others willingly without much controversy from their 'good' appearance' on townies eyes.
Qman wrote:Holy wrote:farside22 wrote:@Holy:
How would it be pro-town to vote for yourself for immunity?
A townie knew that him/herself is innocents but didn't have insight of his/her other innocents ally, we didn't know who to trust but ourselves of course. I didn't say it was a pro-town move, but he might be just didn't trust anybody at all for now (yes, I doubt scum would do that as the first, but after this whole discussion maybe they might do that someday), that's it.
Scum would do the same thing.
So would a townie. Do you have anything more than this repetitive of 'who would do what' things? Why don't you brought that up before, why do you wait 'till now to "discuss" it?
Qman wrote:Holy wrote:Yesterday, near deadline, around page 9 and 10, I found the wagon was between hasdgfas and Akonas, the possibility of Akonas and hasdgfas lynch was somewhat 50-50 on the air. But with hasdgfas himself (that turned out indeed was the mafia) supporting the Akonas lynch and then with his vote history on Akonas, I don't think that Akonas is the mafia because the high probability that Akonas's the one who might be lynched with hasdgfas' vote-to-lynch effort contribution.
Distancing? I understand we now know Akonas was a cop but at the time this was WIFOM.
It didn't feels like an intentional distancing
when I reading
the arguments between them. It's proven now.
Qman wrote:Noticing on a re-read Holy makes a lot if “I suspect this person, but I’m not sure. I’m might change my mind/be convinced otherwise posts.” A lot of waffling and willingness to listen, but she doesn’t really stand firm on her own cases either.
Because I don't have the scum knowledge, duh! On day 1 and day 2, not much I can learn about each player to find out which likely is the scum from their behaviour, certainty without knowledge is foolish.
Qman wrote:Holy wrote: Hm, quite interesting case from farside there. If Opie couldn't answer satisfyingly, I might end-up with voting him today. Farside's right, Opie seems like just following people along so far. With this, if Opie turned out scum, maybe I'm wrong about Shanba, I guess.
Waffle more. More than anything your language use bothers me up to now, you use a lot of fence riding phrases.
Fence riding phrases are MS scumtell, right... I forgot about that. Please forgive this stupid clueless townie ;_;
NO! I JUST
haven't learned much about Opie, I did my re-read before I voted, I've reached my conclusion if Opie-case was so wrong, although my vote history didn't really help me there to convince anybody.
Qman wrote:Then she comes out of the gate with the Open Polls because of a vote move, reasoning it must be MGM, because her vote was moved off him.
Holy wrote:LOL! XD
Allright, I don't need a confession, I'm pretty sure Mgm is scum.
Open Polls
Obviously, yesterday lynch tendency was on Mgm or Opie, and last night my Vote was bought by the Politician, which I believe that a Politician means scum.
We are now 5 townies VS 2 scum, so I need all the townies to co-operate because now I know that the scum can buy a vote. And if anyone thinks that a vote bought to take down Opie and saved Mgm didn't means Mgm is scum, tell me right now of why.
Yes, I noticed that although my vote not bought by the politician, Opie still lynched with 1 vote difference, but it didn't change the fact of yesterday tendency and our clueless result might be.
She then rereads and pulls back on the above, after people explain why the vote mover is almost certainly a pro town role. The long term full game fence sitting bothers me, and there are other moments of WIFOM I didn’t pull. It might just be her playstyle, but if feels to me like Holy straddles the fence for a while, then comes down on one side, the gets back on it, then goes for the other side.
If Akonas didn't clear him, I'm still pretty sure if Mgm is scum. My bad... :p
I prefer to consider all the probabilities, not shutting down any possibilities. I'm still saying my opinions and not staying quiet/being unreadable. I know nothing about a Politician-role in Mafia, a real Politician
in general
usually dirty
(consequences of walking in politic career)
, when I was objected about how wrong it might be (I'm not free from human mistakes
), so, I reconsider my thinking, searched about it and found out if I was wrong with my generalization. Thanks to mscumB.swf from MBF :p