Realistic Mafia - Game Over

Crub · Post Post #350 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:03 pm

Have you thought this through? Just because things at his house suggest he has an agressive nature why does that mean either way if he's scum or town.

I'm happy to vote him if you can explain to me why you can infer that cop's alignment either way.

Surye · Post Post #351 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:13 pm

I guess the mod could be feeding all the cops useless information, but I seriously doubt that. There has so be some purpose in it I think. scum or SK, I think that an aggressive nature in his home must be indicative of something. Perhaps we could check out his house right now and see just what "aggressive" means.

Crub · Post Post #352 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 4:18 pm

Yeah that's more of what I was referring to, why "Agressive" equates to scum, and what that actually indicates.

If he turns up to be a plain vanilla townie, then I suppose you can assume that the cop is dirty, if he turns up to be any sort of other role, town or scum I can't see us being able to 100% clear that cop.

Cyberbob · Post Post #353 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:19 pm

Great, I go to bed and wake up with a 5 page wagon on me.

Unvote

.

I'm finding it difficult to comprehend why I'm the one with the bandwagon as opposed to one of those with the guns - are these people not bigger potential threats to the town?

I... honestly don't know how to defend myself here. It seems as though people are hellbent on my lynch even if it's just to find out the reliability of the cop information - how does one counter that?

Surye · Post Post #354 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:34 pm

Any idea what the cop is talking about?

GhostWriter · Post Post #355 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:38 pm

Yeah... it would be helpful to state what might be seen as aggressive in your house or about your role.

dahill1 · Post Post #356 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:50 pm

bob, i see you're online so you should probably answer this fast or we'll think your making it up

Surye · Post Post #357 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:51 pm

If he had any innocence at all, this should have been easily explained. Or are you claiming the cop is scum?

dahill1 · Post Post #358 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:56 pm

Surye wrote:If he had any innocence at all, this should have been easily explained. Or are you claiming the cop is scum?

no, i'm saying if bob was scum, then he would have to make up some excuse to make it seem like the "agressiveness" is not related to being scum. i saw that he was online, so he should answer or i'll think he's making it up

Cyberbob · Post Post #359 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:57 pm

Christ, ever heard of a little thing called RL? I had to answer the phone. Settle down.

I don't know where this "aggressive nature" information came from - I'm vanilla. Last night I tried to make friends with BM, but he was out so I went home.

Surye · Post Post #360 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:57 pm

dahill1 wrote:
Surye wrote:If he had any innocence at all, this should have been easily explained. Or are you claiming the cop is scum?
no, i'm saying if bob was scum, then he would have to make up some excuse to make it seem like the "agressiveness" is not related to being scum. i saw that he was online, so he should answer or i'll think he's making it up

I was agreeing with you, saying if he wasn't town, he should not need time to answer, it should be easy.

dahill1 · Post Post #361 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 5:59 pm

Cyberbob wrote:Christ, ever heard of a little thing called RL? I had to answer the phone. Settle down.

I don't know where this "aggressive nature" information came from - I'm vanilla. Last night I tried to make friends with BM, but he was out so I went home.

i don't really buy it, but now we have some more information to go on.
BM, where were you last night?

Surye · Post Post #362 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:01 pm

Cyberbob wrote:Christ, ever heard of a little thing called RL? I had to answer the phone. Settle down.

I don't know where this "aggressive nature" information came from - I'm vanilla. Last night I tried to make friends with BM, but he was out so I went home.

Priorities man!

With regard to your vanilla claim, I don't know what to make of it. If this is true, we have a corrupt cop. But I don't have any particular reason to believe it.

dahill1 · Post Post #363 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:06 pm

i don't think there are corrupt cops for 2 reasons:
1) As Natirasha said there were none last game
2) The flavor in the first post said there was corruption

before

in the cops, but then the new mayor was elected, and hired a new force of undercover cops. To me, this implied that the new undercover cops were not part of the corruption.

Surye · Post Post #364 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:08 pm

I'm telling you, as Mayor, I do not trust all of my men, there is a chance.

Cyberbob · Post Post #365 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:10 pm

dahill1 wrote:1) As Natirasha said there were none last game

How in any way does that prevent them from being in this one?

dahill1 wrote:2) The flavor in the first post said there was corruption
before
in the cops, but then the new mayor was elected, and hired a new force of undercover cops. To me, this implied that the new undercover cops were not part of the corruption.

I think it's a little facetious to be putting so much faith in the flavour.

armlx · Post Post #366 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:16 pm

Unimpressed with the claim. I'll wait on the answers to my questions before I vote.

Yes I said questions. First being the lynch alignment reveal.

Second being: Surye, do you know which cop gave you the Cyberbob info? Obviously don't say who it is, just a yes or no.

GhostWriter · Post Post #367 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:16 pm

Unfortunately, Bob, there is a way to find out if there are any. I say unfortunately, because it involves your death.

dahill1 · Post Post #368 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:21 pm

Cyberbob wrote:
dahill1 wrote:1) As Natirasha said there were none last game
How in any way does that prevent them from being in this one?

dahill1 wrote:2) The flavor in the first post said there was corruption
before
in the cops, but then the new mayor was elected, and hired a new force of undercover cops. To me, this implied that the new undercover cops were not part of the corruption.
I think it's a little facetious to be putting so much faith in the flavour.

1) I know that doesn't prevent them from being in this one but i was just mentioning it.
2) It seems to me like the idea that there even are corrupt cops itself came from people interpreting the flavor.

Cyberbob · Post Post #369 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:23 pm

armlx wrote:First being the lynch alignment reveal.

Fantastic. My previous comment about being hellbent is proven.

GhostWriter wrote:Unfortunately, Bob, there is a way to find out if there are any. I say unfortunately, because it involves your death.

Thanks for that, I had no idea.

Will someone please tell me again why I'm being targeted over those who have the guns? People are acting as if they're practically confirmed town, when surely they're far more likely to be scum than I.

dahill1 · Post Post #370 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:24 pm

BM claimed vig

Cyberbob · Post Post #371 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:24 pm

dahill1 wrote:2) It seems to me like the idea that there even are corrupt cops itself came from people interpreting the flavor.

See Surye's last post. It did not come from the flavour alone.

dahill1 · Post Post #372 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:25 pm

well that's just opinion which is baseless

Cyberbob · Post Post #373 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:27 pm

dahill1 wrote:BM claimed vig

Yes, and I like how nobody that voted for ABR voted for him after Surye corrected himself.

Cyberbob · Post Post #374 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 6:27 pm

dahill1 wrote:well that's just opinion which is baseless

He read it in his role PM.