Realistic Mafia - Game Over

dahill1 · Post Post #325 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:17 am

Albert B. Rampage wrote:
I'm using my ???? action. I'm going to walk over to BM's house, and strap myself.

aw snap, shit's going down

Albert B. Rampage · Post Post #326 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:18 am

dahill1 wrote:
Albert B. Rampage wrote:
I'm using my ???? action. I'm going to walk over to BM's house, and strap myself.
aw snap, shit's going down

That's RIGHT!!! We're getting GUNS, baby!! LOTS of guns!

Surye · Post Post #327 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:19 am

Haha, my god, what have I done. I've just turned ABR into a Vig

Surye · Post Post #328 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:24 am

If Cyberbob ends up to be SK or Scum, I ask the cop who investigated him to gaurd my house tonight, and treat

ANYONE

approaching as a lethal threat.

Everyone else: Stay the hell away! No one, for any reason, come to my house. Since the jig is up for me, first thing in the morning I will reveal all the investigations.

If they don't agree... well, there's no safe way for you to tell me, so please agree

Natirasha · Post Post #329 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:30 am

Surye wrote:Haha, my god, what have I done. I've just turned ABR into a Vig

Maybe you should go take a weapon to defend yourself, Mr. Mayor?

Surye · Post Post #330 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:31 am

Natirasha wrote:
Surye wrote:Haha, my god, what have I done. I've just turned ABR into a Vig
Maybe you should go take a weapon to defend yourself, Mr. Mayor?

I don't know that BM would give them up willingly, I don't want to be there if a shootout breaks out..

Surye · Post Post #331 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:34 am

Just thought of something, the N0 NK's revealed alignment, why should lynches be any different?

Natirasha · Post Post #332 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:37 am

Surye wrote:
Natirasha wrote:
Surye wrote:Haha, my god, what have I done. I've just turned ABR into a Vig
Maybe you should go take a weapon to defend yourself, Mr. Mayor?
I don't know that BM would give them up willingly, I don't want to be there if a shootout breaks out..

Well, if he truely is town, then he shouldn't be afraid to give them to the pretty-much-confirmed mayor. If he shoots you, then it's obvious he is not working with the town and we'll lynch him.

Although, I agree you should error on the side of caution and wait 'til ABR comes back or dies.

Natirasha · Post Post #333 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:38 am

Surye wrote:Just thought of something, the N0 NK's revealed alignment, why should lynches be any different?

Lynch alignments were revealed in the original.

NabakovNabakov · Post Post #334 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:08 pm

Surye wrote:Just thought of something, the N0 NK's revealed alignment, why should lynches be any different?

Being able to have multiple lynches in a day is pretty rare on this site, and the closest approxmiation we have is Lights out where the town can lynch as many people as it wants, but no allignments are revealed until the town votes for "lights out".

GhostWriter · Post Post #335 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 12:18 pm

Multiple lynches are pointless if we're afraid to lynch someone we think is scummy and then gauge our next lynch on that person and how others reacted to them...

armlx · Post Post #336 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:34 pm

NabakovNabakov wrote:Here's some food for thought.

If BM is indeed a Vig and information comes out that ABR has a truckload of guns, why does BM-Vig immediately assume ABR is a Vig? I'd like a solid claim out of BM.

I simply assumed that given the realistic nature of the game, vigilantes wouldn't have perfect accuracy and multiples would be acceptable and that BM would also figure this.

I also don't think just straight up loading up on weapons is the right choice, however I do feel we need to spread the guns. I suggest Surye, as the pretty much confirmed mayor, holds some. BM, as the owner, holds some. GW and/or Nabakov possibly should get some as their actions last night seem pro-town enough to confirm them with the investigations.

Beyond that, no one should get any until they are some how confirmed. Potentially giving the mafias more guns seems like a bad plan.

dahill1 · Post Post #337 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:37 pm

GW/Nab seem pro-town to me, but there's still the whole thing where the cop reported they were doing "illegal activity"

GhostWriter · Post Post #338 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:44 pm

And there's still the thing where some cops are probably dirty, which would explain them telling the half-truth, and then dirtying it up.

armlx · Post Post #339 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:44 pm

Dahill: This is realistic mafia. You know how many internet things are technically illegal?

GhostWriter · Post Post #340 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:48 pm

Most of the shit I do.

dahill1 · Post Post #341 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:48 pm

armlx wrote:Dahill: This is realistic mafia. You know how many internet things are technically illegal?

haha that's true

dahill1 · Post Post #342 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:50 pm

i'm still waiting on Kscope to tell us what happened with the whole ABR/BM thing

Natirasha · Post Post #343 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:50 pm

[quote=GhostWriter]And there's still the thing where some cops are probably dirty, which would explain them telling the half-truth, and then dirtying it up.[/quote]
There weren't any in the original.

GhostWriter · Post Post #344 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 1:52 pm

Read the first post in THIS ONE. It shows a possibility. I'm have not given the first one a glance. I wouldn't know what that one is like, because I do not want the expectations it gives me to blind me.

Natirasha · Post Post #345 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:21 pm

GhostWriter wrote:Read the first post in THIS ONE. It shows a possibility. I'm have not given the first one a glance. I wouldn't know what that one is like, because I do not want the expectations it gives me to blind me.

Fair enough.

Look, I just have my suspicions. That is the exact same first post as the original, substituting "New York" for another city(I think it was Baltimore or something). And there were none in the original. Now, Scope might've changed it, but I don't know.

dahill1 · Post Post #346 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:25 pm

surye, i just reread the first post and i don't think you should risk having one of the cops protect you..it said the mayor is known to have bodyguards. so unless one of the cops is a bodyguard as well, whoever the bodyguards are (if there are any) should protect you instead

GhostWriter · Post Post #347 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:27 pm

I would hope he knows how to play his role, so I'd just let him play it...

Natirasha · Post Post #348 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 2:52 pm

dahill1 wrote:surye, i just reread the first post and i don't think you should risk having one of the cops protect you..it said the mayor is known to have bodyguards. so unless one of the cops is a bodyguard as well, whoever the bodyguards are (if there are any) should protect you instead

Cops could Bodyguard in the original. I believe the actions they had were
1. Investigate someone
2. Go talk to someone
3. Bodyguard
4. Kill someone

or something like that.

Surye · Post Post #349 (ISO) » Mon Mar 31, 2008 3:58 pm

Yea, cops should be able to protect me as I understand my role, and like I said a CyberBob lynch should tell us if we have a clean or dirty cop. Then I can at least trust him to protect me so I can give out investigations without risking cops. Or have a dirty cop to consider lynching. Either way I see it, CyberBob is a pro-town lynch, almost EVERYTHING we can come up with about him is anti-town, and his death, if we get alignments, will also give us a clean or dirty cop. Or a very clever dirty cop.

And Nat, while I appreciate trying help bringing in the old game, don't you think it's a bit too meta, and not really in the spirit of a closed game?