Micro 365 - ALL YEAR LONG haha see what i did there (over)

[snscompt1]

Post. Goodnight. Oh. NM scum.
VOTE: Not Mafia

[snscompt1]

That last sentence escapes my grasp of understanding it.

[snscompt1]

Right. But who did NM sheep? He said "egopost" and left.

[snscompt1]

I guess I dont follow on what he meant by egopost. I assumed he was referring to himself?

[snscompt1]

Thats what I thought lol. I can easily see how it would be sheeping Naz but didnt really consider that.

[snscompt1]

And honestly I didnt think Tierce(Naz) was saying you had egoposts but rather saying thats what his own post was too due posting from a head account. Makes it easier to keep track of your games as a hydra.

[snscompt1]

Yeah, their egoposts werent referring to you imo but rather themselves.

[snscompt1]

but why would N_M need to egopost? I can see what you are saying about Naz but since N_M said the same thing I figured it was in reference to me dicking around

Because hes VLA due to his laptop charger being blown up. Guessing he didnt read the thread and just made a quick post to confirm or whatever.

I voted him simply because Naz did. Hes in my group so why not. Also, unless someone does particularly scummy, I wont be giving town or scum reads on anyone outside of my group until we merge. There are better odds at finding scum imo but not swaying others reads outside of your group. You could sway someone correctly, but you know none of their alignements unless youre scum.

[snscompt1]

Yup lol.

So Naz. Idk how to really start a conversation when NM isn't here for a bit. Idk. What do you think of Pants thus far? Lots of posts and thought the egopost things were talking about him.

[snscompt1]

WHAT ABOUT ME? INCLUDE ME! TALK TO ME SALA!

[snscompt1]

Hm. Just noticed that two people still haven't posted. AND they're from the same group.

[snscompt1]

Btw. I just understood the title of the game. Herp derp.

[snscompt1]

Hi.

So I'm here but limited access. My egopost was just a replace dodge.

Initial thoughts are that there is almost definitely a scum in Huckleberries. I lile Xayzeck, for the scumbutt I was thinking Pants initially for his seeming paranoia in RVS. Now leaning Maru, hated their opening and their Xayzeck read. Pants and Maru should be cross voting.

Overall liking Naz more than sns right now. We should absolutely be hunting outside of our groups and I am wary of anyone suggesting we shouldn't. If there's something you want to ask of someone and the people in the group aren't asking it you definitely should be. Plus only interacting in our groups allows any d1 scum to completely avoid any relational tells .

VOTE: SNS

You dip. That's what I said. Just don't give reads or try to sway an opinion of someone outside of your group. That's what scum will do. Of course we can't just interact within our group. We've all been interacting with each other already. Ask questions and scum hunt outside of your group but don't state your opinions of others until tomorrow imo. If you don't agree fine, but I'm playing it how it makes sense to me.

I'm definitely fine with my vote on NM now.


PEDIT: Huzzah.

[snscompt1]

I love you Maru. You can be town.

[snscompt1]

I look I gave a read. Whoops.

[snscompt1]

Except that it isn't simply that you have a voting restriction. Two groups have one scum and one group has none. You can't simply treat it like a voting restriction when the setup can't be compared to a normal game. Your opinions are fine but they have the ability to sway others which is no bueno.

You know you're town right? Which means there is most likely scum between me and Naz. But when you look at the other groups. Out of those three people, you know NONE of their alignments. How will you know if you're defending town or scum? How will you know whether you're accusing town or scum? Everyone in their own group knows their alignment, which means they know who they have to accuse. You on the other hand, or any of us for that matter, don't know...unless you're scum. Each person has a better idea about their own group than everyone else, which means hopefully their gut and scum reading is better since they know their alignment.

Swaying others and telling others to vote someone else outside their own group is not good. Give your big reads tomorrow. Focus on today first and focus on your group who has a 2/3 chance of having scum.

[snscompt1]

Oh man. We're getting active.

[snscompt1]

I'm going to agree to disagree with you because I think this is simply "to each their own" scenario. I disagree that this is like a normal game in any sense.

I will drop it but stick with my opinions.

Also, in case there is a misunderstanding, I said it's fine to give reads and such, but simply not to sway anyone's vote. That is a poor decision if you're town.

[snscompt1]

I get what you're saying. Agreed to agree to disagree.

Cool. You might be town.

Naz to get on. Two heads and nothin? Hm hm.

[snscompt1]

Lol. Joking is harder to fake as scum because it can get you in trouble.
Frankie says relax! Go do it! If you wanna go do it!

Anyways, scum tend to be more serious. I have a distinct scum vs town personality that I cant seem to shake.

Pants is town in my books. Mostly.

[snscompt1]

Hey, feelsgoodman.jpeg
Playing with your balls or having someone play with them for you ain't nothin' to be ashamed of.

Pedit. I wasnt referring to you. I dont care why pants scum reads you. If you wanna see a difference in playstyle for joking vs seriousness, check out my games. Two scum ones, very serious, the rest are town basically. Since thats what I do, I lean town on Pants.

[snscompt1]

Well pick one and vote them lol.

Pants, youre making me doubt my read on you. Stahp.

[snscompt1]

Sala, join our group. We wont lynch you today.

Pedit. Stuff. Im tired. Time for bed.

[snscompt1]

Hm. Liking NM more and more.
Lets see where this goes. At work. Catch up later.

[snscompt1]

I agree with pants though. Espresso, that post was ridiculously scummy lol. But then again townies make the scummiest posts.

[snscompt1]

Wait, so are we just waiting on Maru?

[snscompt1]

Well yeah, but youre sucking pretty hard as scum.

[snscompt1]

Lol i luv u anyways

[snscompt1]

Cant explain right now. As long as someone gives intent to hammer, I will explain then. For now, NM dies. Just trust me for a bit. I will explain before the day ends.

[snscompt1]

LOL he just claimed the other guy in your group is town! Or am i misreading?

[snscompt1]

Lolz. Okay. Why is it a mistake? There is guaranteed to be at least one dead townie tomorrow. Why cant your entire group be town?

Lol, you SAID ac was town by saying to lynch Sala the day after

[snscompt1]

Lolz. This is awesome. Anyways, I will check back tomorrow. Im gonna go gamble....at bingo.

[snscompt1]

I swear to fucking god I'm not town.

Wut.

[snscompt1]

Naz...how did I insult you exactly?

And I voted NM because Ive played with him before, your very few posts seemed fine, and no lynch was gonna happen immediately.

Espresso? How does that change your read on me exactly?

[snscompt1]

Lolz. Who are you?

[snscompt1]

Oops! Sorry Tier. Mah bad.

Espresso, what did he elaborate on lol?

Also, I know he was in your group, it was a joke.

[snscompt1]

Second thing. Read da setup brah.

[snscompt1]

Hes allowed to have town reads on both. Its silly as of right now but hes allowed to :/

[snscompt1]

Or who is most likely to be partners with your scum reads.

[snscompt1]

@Naz

He might be town because he didn't push a huge confrontation against me. He had two votes against him and imo should've been more concerned about being lynched than he was. He was voting me and could easily try making a case, but instead he drops all possible reasons to solidify a case against me. I can't see scum doing that when they already have two votes.

I said I was liking him more and more for the post right before I posted that statement. He was thinking along the same lines as me and between Xay, Pants and Maru, I really don't see there not being scum.

I did not call him scum for awkwardly phrased opinions. Please quote where I did. I believe I disagreed with his setup spec etc. but I did not call him scum for that. I called him scum originally for post 185. That vote was bad. His statement before the vote was even worse. We have many days left(I think?) and yet he gives up and votes AC. A replacement would've been found before then. Didn't like it. He was then scummy for making TWO scum slips. Town could make mistakes and do that, but two of them is kinda hard to overlook regardless of how much AtE is going on.

[snscompt1]

I don't think scum would really vote like the, they'd be more concerned not to look like sheeping. Do you think otherwise?
I only see the 'not town' scumslip which is meh. What's the other?

Why are you still voting notmaf? You said you'd explain.

Notmaf, why do you think our group is all town and then why are you voting sns?

But no one had a vote on me. So any potential arguements against me wouldn't be sheeping. I might be misunderstanding what you're asking.

Espresso said "not town" and he also said that after today's lynch(which in his group would be AC), he said that tomorrow we would lynch Sal. Who is also in his group. Which means he is saying AC is town.

Oh and there were no poorly phrased opinions that you commented on that was just my memory of it sorry.

Pedit. Correct. The reason I hated the post was not because of who he said scum was, but rather the cross voting thing. If you reread the context of those pages, you can see how the cross voting and not influencing anyone outside your group was the main focus. So I agree with the first part of his statement, disagree with the second.
No worries, it happens.

[snscompt1]

EBWOF" The "No worries, it happens." was in respons to the apology.

[snscompt1]

Yeah but the way he worded it was weird. It was like a fake attempt at grudgingly giving up and being forced to vote him. The fact that there is only two people he can vote for does not make me think that sheeping is out of the question. Unless both team members are voting him, he has to sheep someone, so since AC wasn't here, why not go ahead before he has a chance to post?

Sala gives me the shivers too tbh. But letting TWO slips go just to go for lynch on someone else is imo pretty risky. This has to be addressed. If espresso flips scum, depending on the NK, etc. sala should definitely be looked at, but right now espresso, like you said, has to die.

And my vote on NotMafia stays a secret until someone declares intent to hammer. I will elaborate then, if I don't, feel free to lynch me. I have my reasons. It will be explained in due time, but in order for me to explain, our group can't be the one declaring intent to hammer. This probably confused the fuck out of everyone but I have my reasons.

[snscompt1]

Lolz. I slipped too. We're all scum. Maybe it really was just writing mistakes on Espresso's part. Hm.

I get the shivers from sala because he's being to "clean" about everything. I get a townread on him because I don't find that he's saying anything wrong. But that's what makes me more suspicious. I suck at scumhunting. I never know what's real and what's not.

My plan is by no means ingenious. It has plenty of WIFOM but I think it MIGHT be suitable enough to work.

And yes, you have to be voting. It can be me or NM, it doesn't matter that much. NM preferred of course.

[snscompt1]

So you think he's town?

[snscompt1]

"SAYING he is town"

Bro. That is an incomplete sentence. That's why I'm confused. Who is saying who is town? You or scum?

[snscompt1]

Right, but do you town read him? That was my question.

[snscompt1]

lolz. Naz keeps ninjaing me.

[snscompt1]

Hm. Well that's unfortunate. I'm going out for a bit but will be back later to elaborate Naz.
I fear that your arguments against me, while wrong, are valid in the sense that there is nothing I can say to disprove anything you've said. I have my own reasons and can explain what I meant, which I will, but I don't really think that will change your mind.

As a quick note. There is no point in me explaining my plan if I am the one about to be lynched. No big deal though, it probably wouldn't have worked.

[snscompt1]

Mmm yeah i should. When someone declares intent to hammer i will

[snscompt1]

Lol. Luv u Naz.

[snscompt1]

Along with explanations for your reads please.

[snscompt1]

Hey, sorry. Been meaning to post but just been busy busy. Will post shit in 6 hours.

[snscompt1]

@Naz

Here are my explanations for each of your concerns/reasons for voting me.

Spoiler: Longish Explanation

130

This seems like pushing for a mislynch outside of the group while covering his butt when espresso flips town. This is especially true given sns' vacillation concerning espresso in the rest of the game.

I totally agree that it can be taken in that context and never really considered it as such. I think espresso is the towniest out of their group atm. I wasn't trying to push for a mislynch, I simply did not like his vote on AC at all, as I've explained. It was imo scummy. Yet, why did I say that the scummiest players are typically town? To voice my thoughts and hesitation as to whether espresso was really scum. I do typically find that the towniest players are scum. Yet his vote was scummy. Maybe now it's clear as to why I was flip flopping all the time. I stand firmly now that he's town given the fact that I too made a slip. It was quite easy to do and I didn't even notice it until you pointed it out. Besides his vote and slips, he's been calm and been resigned to a lynch on himself. I can't really see scum doing that. I feel like they would at least

try

to put the lynch on someone esle, even if it was subtle. Scum wouldn't resign.

194

Compare to 299, where espresso's posts may now come from town, conveniently after my other Head provided pushed against the hasty espresso scumslip scumreads (298).

Pretty much the same as above. Upon slipping myself I realized how easy it was to do and that it was hardly alignment indicative considering I'm town. So I was questioning what argument I really had for Espresso scum. There really isn't one.

198

What possible reason is there to delay an explanation? I always find playing coy scummy, especially when it does not involve a roleclaim. Plus, this feels like a bad justification for voteparking, given that the justification was clearly present at the beginning of the day but we will obviously not hear about it until the day is going to end imminently.

Still won't explain. My vote is on NM. Both of yours is on me. It hardly matters to what my plan is until the time comes. The reason to delay an explanation is because....well, when I explain it will be clear as day. If not, then continue with your lynch on me. That is all I will say on the matter.

If someone intends to hammer, please state it first.

199

[snscompt1]

Sounds good. Let me know when someone wants to hammer.

[snscompt1]

Prod acknowledged. My bad. Will catch up in a moment. I kinda figured the day was ending already.