[phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Undefined array key 5091881 [phpBB Debug] PHP Warning: in file [ROOT]/ext/alfredoramos/seometadata/event/listener.php on line 114: Trying to access array offset on value of type null Micro 201 - Venging Ball - Over - Mafiascum.net
Post
Post #161 (isolation #1) » Sun Jul 14, 2013 6:35 pm
Postby Fifty Ways »
Maki and Guyett and DrPepper are all the scummiest.
I am thinking that Shadi is town because of a few times he turned away from chances to egg on a lynch, esp with maki in 34
the transparency of 34 doesn't suggest factional connection
Guyett is terrible, even when he makes wallposts and earns my vote.
DrPepper is just null-leaning scum for his probably blind endorsement of guyett's case but I'm not too attached to this read
In post 28, SalmonellaDreams wrote:DrPepper, that L-1 vote was awful, especially on page one.
The whole maki shadi thing is interesting, but can we really find associations this early? VOTE: DrPepper
You vote for someone who puts another person at L-1... I don't have much of a problem yet...
however your claim that we can't find any associations yet is lazy at best and anti town at worst.
In post 32, Shadi1337 wrote:Kudos to dr.pepper for trying, even if it's early. His analysis is fair.
Salmo, do you have any other leads you'd like to follow? (You were on Maki's rvs omgus vote before?)
Are you trying to subtly push me onto Maki right here?
The relationship between Maki and Shadi is interesting. It's still to early to learn anything of it, but we'll definitely have to go back to look at it.
Anyways, VOTE: Shadi
I liked the pressure that was on him, and he seemed like he was trying to subtly get me to vote for Maki.
Shadi's play here does seem slightly odd but he does make a good point that you were on to Maki about that RVS OMGUS vote... why not keep pressuring that vote? to paraphrase youreslf;
"how come you didn't push harder on siv? He ignored your question.
What have you noticed about his play?"
In post 54, SalmonellaDreams wrote:greygnarl, how come you didn't push harder on siv? He ignored your question.
What have you noticed about his play? That was a very open ended statement and it seems like you're just hopping on the bandwagon.
VOTE: greygnarl
Again you vote for someone putting another person at L-1, not too concerning yet but part of your reason for voting for Grey kind of contradicts wwith your reasons for going after Shadi...
In post 70, SalmonellaDreams wrote:I'd be uncommitted to pressuring someone if I just let it go when they didn't answer.
Here's the thing: They did answer.
Since Shadi beat around the bush for part of my question, I'll ask again, with additional L-1 pressure. VOTE: Shadi
And now you vote for Shadi and put him at L-1 (apparently)... does that mean you will now vote for yourself?
you admit to doing it to pressure Shadi but that is exactly why DrP and Grey put people at L-1... contradictions and circular reasoning galore!!!
In post 71, SalmonellaDreams wrote:Speaking of that, Maki, don't hammer without a claim, and don't ask for a claim for no reason.
No no don't hammer it'll look bad ect ect ect... hint hint hammer Shadi please Maki winky face
UNVOTE: VOTE: salmon
This makes absolutely no good points. All fluff.
My only reservation about guyett is that he may simply be bad rather than scum. But I think he's both.
Post
Post #192 (isolation #6) » Mon Jul 15, 2013 5:53 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
In post 176, Guyett wrote:No I'm asking why you drag up a post that is a few days old and label it fluff when no one else has labeled it as fluff since then? Sounds like a desperate attempt to make a case for me getting inched. What do you make of Dr.peppers case against salmon?
Well as a guy who has just replaced in I have to comment on every notable post in the thread.
I'm beginning to think you really are just bad. :/
In post 178, Guyett wrote:I assume you mean fifty not thirty. You haven't done anything with him but its the way he has come out attacking me with a flimsy argument against my case on you that indicates he wants me inched to get pressure off you.. That is the protecting i am talking about
You have failed to explain why my case on you is bad.
In post 180, Guyett wrote:He claimed my post was fluff... Like the entire post was dismissed as fluff out of hand.
Well I assume people are able to look at the post and see for themselves. I see you're ignoring the rest of the case. But if you want me to be detailed, there's no problem.
In post 28, SalmonellaDreams wrote:DrPepper, that L-1 vote was awful, especially on page one.
The whole maki shadi thing is interesting, but can we really find associations this early? VOTE: DrPepper
You vote for someone who puts another person at L-1... I don't have much of a problem yet...
however your claim that we can't find any associations yet is lazy at best and anti town at worst.
In post 32, Shadi1337 wrote:Kudos to dr.pepper for trying, even if it's early. His analysis is fair.
Salmo, do you have any other leads you'd like to follow? (You were on Maki's rvs omgus vote before?)
Are you trying to subtly push me onto Maki right here?
The relationship between Maki and Shadi is interesting. It's still to early to learn anything of it, but we'll definitely have to go back to look at it.
Anyways, VOTE: Shadi
I liked the pressure that was on him, and he seemed like he was trying to subtly get me to vote for Maki.
Shadi's play here does seem slightly odd but he does make a good point that you were on to Maki about that RVS OMGUS vote... why not keep pressuring that vote? to paraphrase youreslf;
"how come you didn't push harder on siv? He ignored your question.
What have you noticed about his play?"
In post 54, SalmonellaDreams wrote:greygnarl, how come you didn't push harder on siv? He ignored your question.
What have you noticed about his play? That was a very open ended statement and it seems like you're just hopping on the bandwagon.
VOTE: greygnarl
Again you vote for someone putting another person at L-1, not too concerning yet but part of your reason for voting for Grey kind of contradicts wwith your reasons for going after Shadi...
In post 70, SalmonellaDreams wrote:I'd be uncommitted to pressuring someone if I just let it go when they didn't answer.
Here's the thing: They did answer.
Since Shadi beat around the bush for part of my question, I'll ask again, with additional L-1 pressure. VOTE: Shadi
And now you vote for Shadi and put him at L-1 (apparently)... does that mean you will now vote for yourself?
you admit to doing it to pressure Shadi but that is exactly why DrP and Grey put people at L-1... contradictions and circular reasoning galore!!!
In post 71, SalmonellaDreams wrote:Speaking of that, Maki, don't hammer without a claim, and don't ask for a claim for no reason.
No no don't hammer it'll look bad ect ect ect... hint hint hammer Shadi please Maki winky face
UNVOTE: VOTE: salmon
This makes absolutely no good points. All fluff.
My only reservation about guyett is that he may simply be bad rather than scum. But I think he's both.
vote guyett
So guyett's post is above. I'm quoting the whole case because people are ignoring the whole case.
First statement is a rehash of what's already been said and no way relates to whether salmon is scum or not.
Second statement is useless rumination of first.
Rehash of shadi's point. Nothing new.
The last statement is just silly.
Isolated, this could be seen as merely a terrible and derivative case. But in light of guyett's posts, it's part of a pattern of fairly substanceless and derivative play.
His interaction with siveure in 36 is incredibly blatant parroting. 31 is the exact same thing.
The most original thing guyett's said the entire game is that I and salmon are scumbuddies, but that was pure OMGUS.
Everyone should calm their tits, no I am not bussing, yes, I was linked to the game & told to go confirm coz I didn't check my PMs to which I was told he voted me (by himself). I proceeded to do an OMGUS for the heck of it.
In post 36, Guyett wrote:It does look a bit odd doesn't it... I Think mak has some explaining to do
I explained higher why I voted him. It's not my problem if your reading skills aren't that good. Anyway, let me tell you again :
1. I get poked to confirm as game is about to start & we got pmed
2. I see my PM, then I get told later on by Shadi that he voted me for the lulz (on another site, it's not that uncommon that I get voted out R1, so think of it as a "joke")
3. I proceed to OMGUS'ing him just for the fun
4. I notice 2 (or was it 3 ? I don't know) people vote him and put him on L-1 when there is NO reason WHATSOEVER to do it
5. I retract, proceed to explaining why I voted him
6. You don't understand, Someone elses votes me
7. & We're here again! ya-hoo
In post 38, Shadi1337 wrote:hey guys, I am going to a trip in Austria from the 8th to the 12th. So v/la or whatever it's called. Will probably post there too but really don't expect me to really follow those few days.
Note : I'm a bit inactive, it's because I'm doing 10 things in one those days, I'll however check atleast once or twice a day if I don't forget! The host can add me on skype @ kolzerreda in case I really forget for awhile, but I doubt I will. Will be checking this thread later today depending on whether I fall asleep or not (didn't sleep at all tonight & it's 7:44AM)
wordy/excited here, too
but not game related content
so maybe an playstyle thing
***
Just because guyett agreed with you doesn't mean it's okay to endorse a scummy wallpost.
Post
Post #196 (isolation #9) » Mon Jul 15, 2013 6:55 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
In post 194, DoctorPepper wrote:Blind endorsement of guyett's case? I have a scum read on Sal. That makes no sense. Btw, you said Maki is scum, without saying why exactly. Now I actually am curious. What do you think of my case on Sal. I think he could scum.
Btw, Maki is really anti town. He says he posts because he doesnt want to be replaced, yet he posts no actual content. Like, dafuck man.
Hi notscience, you stalker. Tell me why it was bad to state those things that potentially help us find scum?
My read on Sal is null and you case doesn't really affect it.
Everyone should calm their tits, no I am not bussing, yes, I was linked to the game & told to go confirm coz I didn't check my PMs to which I was told he voted me (by himself). I proceeded to do an OMGUS for the heck of it.
In post 36, Guyett wrote:It does look a bit odd doesn't it... I Think mak has some explaining to do
I explained higher why I voted him. It's not my problem if your reading skills aren't that good. Anyway, let me tell you again :
1. I get poked to confirm as game is about to start & we got pmed
2. I see my PM, then I get told later on by Shadi that he voted me for the lulz (on another site, it's not that uncommon that I get voted out R1, so think of it as a "joke")
3. I proceed to OMGUS'ing him just for the fun
4. I notice 2 (or was it 3 ? I don't know) people vote him and put him on L-1 when there is NO reason WHATSOEVER to do it
5. I retract, proceed to explaining why I voted him
6. You don't understand, Someone elses votes me
7. & We're here again! ya-hoo
In post 38, Shadi1337 wrote:hey guys, I am going to a trip in Austria from the 8th to the 12th. So v/la or whatever it's called. Will probably post there too but really don't expect me to really follow those few days.
Note : I'm a bit inactive, it's because I'm doing 10 things in one those days, I'll however check atleast once or twice a day if I don't forget! The host can add me on skype @ kolzerreda in case I really forget for awhile, but I doubt I will. Will be checking this thread later today depending on whether I fall asleep or not (didn't sleep at all tonight & it's 7:44AM)
wordy/excited here, too
but not game related content
so maybe an playstyle thing
***
Just because guyett agreed with you doesn't mean it's okay to endorse a scummy wallpost.
First point : People put Shadi on L-1 and then immediately thought we were bussing because I was told to read the topic & saw his post & OMGUS'd. So I explained it.
Second point : People didn't understand easily what I meant apparently, there are some times where it seemed the users lost their brain
Third point : I'm inactive for now, it's true, I focus on ton of things, so I just notified people, note that I did the same on another game @ http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=83&t=29887 where I am not posting game content currently. (well aside from my vote on a retard, but let's not mention that)
I think I may have simply had a problem with your style of posting, maki.
Last edited by Cheery Dog on Mon Jul 15, 2013 1:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post
Post #235 (isolation #19) » Tue Jul 16, 2013 11:24 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
Guys, the game is stalling. If you want to help the game stop stalling, just say something. If you're voting for someone, advocate that guy's lynch. If you're not, hurry up. If you disagree with someone's ideas speak up. Say something. It'll help a lot.
Post
Post #265 (isolation #23) » Thu Jul 18, 2013 8:15 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
In post 258, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:Well, I don't have an amazing scumread on guyett, but what I do have is still a strong lynch. If you'd care to present a better person to lynch besides guyett, sure, I'll vote them, but guyett seems the best lynch atm.
Eh, given how useless maki is we could lynch him... wait he'll have a vengekill if he's town. Yeah let's not do that.
Hmm, not 100% sure on guyett either.
could you at least elaborate on the basis on your guyett read at the time you voted him and/or the time you said he was probably scum
Everyone should calm their tits, no I am not bussing, yes, I was linked to the game & told to go confirm coz I didn't check my PMs to which I was told he voted me (by himself). I proceeded to do an OMGUS for the heck of it.
In post 36, Guyett wrote:It does look a bit odd doesn't it... I Think mak has some explaining to do
I explained higher why I voted him. It's not my problem if your reading skills aren't that good. Anyway, let me tell you again :
1. I get poked to confirm as game is about to start & we got pmed
2. I see my PM, then I get told later on by Shadi that he voted me for the lulz (on another site, it's not that uncommon that I get voted out R1, so think of it as a "joke")
3. I proceed to OMGUS'ing him just for the fun
4. I notice 2 (or was it 3 ? I don't know) people vote him and put him on L-1 when there is NO reason WHATSOEVER to do it
5. I retract, proceed to explaining why I voted him
6. You don't understand, Someone elses votes me
7. & We're here again! ya-hoo
In post 38, Shadi1337 wrote:hey guys, I am going to a trip in Austria from the 8th to the 12th. So v/la or whatever it's called. Will probably post there too but really don't expect me to really follow those few days.
Note : I'm a bit inactive, it's because I'm doing 10 things in one those days, I'll however check atleast once or twice a day if I don't forget! The host can add me on skype @ kolzerreda in case I really forget for awhile, but I doubt I will. Will be checking this thread later today depending on whether I fall asleep or not (didn't sleep at all tonight & it's 7:44AM)
wordy/excited here, too
but not game related content
so maybe an playstyle thing
***
Just because guyett agreed with you doesn't mean it's okay to endorse a scummy wallpost.
The scummiest thing about maki is her unnatural posting style.
Everyone should calm their tits, no I am not bussing, yes, I was linked to the game & told to go confirm coz I didn't check my PMs to which I was told he voted me (by himself). I proceeded to do an OMGUS for the heck of it.
In post 36, Guyett wrote:It does look a bit odd doesn't it... I Think mak has some explaining to do
I explained higher why I voted him. It's not my problem if your reading skills aren't that good. Anyway, let me tell you again :
1. I get poked to confirm as game is about to start & we got pmed
2. I see my PM, then I get told later on by Shadi that he voted me for the lulz (on another site, it's not that uncommon that I get voted out R1, so think of it as a "joke")
3. I proceed to OMGUS'ing him just for the fun
4. I notice 2 (or was it 3 ? I don't know) people vote him and put him on L-1 when there is NO reason WHATSOEVER to do it
5. I retract, proceed to explaining why I voted him
6. You don't understand, Someone elses votes me
7. & We're here again! ya-hoo
In post 38, Shadi1337 wrote:hey guys, I am going to a trip in Austria from the 8th to the 12th. So v/la or whatever it's called. Will probably post there too but really don't expect me to really follow those few days.
Note : I'm a bit inactive, it's because I'm doing 10 things in one those days, I'll however check atleast once or twice a day if I don't forget! The host can add me on skype @ kolzerreda in case I really forget for awhile, but I doubt I will. Will be checking this thread later today depending on whether I fall asleep or not (didn't sleep at all tonight & it's 7:44AM)
wordy/excited here, too
but not game related content
so maybe an playstyle thing
***
Just because guyett agreed with you doesn't mean it's okay to endorse a scummy wallpost.
please allow me to quote the post ive quoted two times already after making it shadi
Post
Post #295 (isolation #29) » Fri Jul 19, 2013 6:19 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
In post 289, DoctorPepper wrote:NS hasnt been contributing and has been his usual troll ns. So why does it make him scum Fifty, he plays like this all the time.
Scumtrolling vs Towntrolling
The difference is the gut read I have
You've pretty much expressed suspicion of everyone this game.
You say that like it's a bad thing.
pedit: "chainsaw" is soo never a legit accusation but I do think the recurring template of a lot of questioning without any bite is starting to seem artificial
Post
Post #318 (isolation #32) » Sat Jul 20, 2013 8:42 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
Guys, maka townslipped earlier when he selfvoted. It was a clear show of 'newb thinks getting a vengeshot is worth being lynched'. There is no other valid interpretation and this lynch is terrible.
In post 343, Fifty Ways wrote:I'm pretty mad at NS for not moving his vote to someone who was not basically-surely-town. I wonder if he's buds with guyott.
vote guyott
Lmfao, look at who I voted and what they flipped.
sigh
NS, you let an obviously innocent townie get killed, you asshole. It's only Maka's insight, not yours, that gives us anything to work with today. Nothing you've done in this game so far has been meritorious. All you've done is sit on a gutread (that you somehow could only justify after-the-fact) and allow an obvious mislynch.
And you are playing differently this game because you are scummm.
Post
Post #452 (isolation #42) » Tue Jul 23, 2013 3:43 pm
Postby Fifty Ways »
I don't see why guyett's lynch needs to wait for anyone to develop their reads on people who are not guyett. Don't you think you'll be in a better position to do that tomorrow?
Post
Post #460 (isolation #43) » Wed Jul 24, 2013 5:48 am
Postby Fifty Ways »
In post 454, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:If somehow guyett is town, and he venges town, we're in lylo, needing to lynch 3 scum in a specific order. I'd like to have reads on everyone beforehand in case that happens.
Post
Post #524 (isolation #55) » Fri Jul 26, 2013 5:15 pm
Postby Fifty Ways »
In post 520, Siveure DtTrikyp wrote:All I did was get off the wagon to extend the day to get reads. I didn't try to go anywhere else. I was ALWAYS lynching guyett, I just wasn't lynching him straight away. Slightly confused why you'd deflect onto me though.