Anyway, as i only just got here, im entitled to what is essentially a random vote.
theres Battle Mage Logic for ya!
Kison wrote:1) I used random.org
2) Although unusual, how does the "trend" look scummy?
3)FoS : XReyoXfor BattleMage logic.
Kison wrote:1) I used random.org
2) Although unusual, how does the "trend" look scummy?
3)FoS : XReyoXfor BattleMage logic.
Kison wrote:The show is horrid.OverTheUnder wrote:<3 Tom goes to the mayor
Thrilling.XReyoX wrote:Vote : Kisonnow you've got the wagon.
I'd have thought a BattleMage head-to-head with someone would have been more entertaining. He can "find scum" on a bar of soap using an 800 year old invention that he calls "scumdar".DrippingGoofball wrote:I am going tovote:Kisonand put XreyoX head to head with Kison. Let's see how it goes.
Ok, let's hear the first legit scum-theory and get this game rolling.
OverTheUnder wrote:No I'm clearly stating that I don't know if you have prior experience with other sites, and games. Therefore saying I'm not sure if it's newb-ish qualities you're showing or if that's what you are trying to do on purpose. The second part is because I believe that you are showing more newb-ish qualities then experienced so it was the more likely situation that it was just newb-ishness showing than you actually trying to confuse us. In reference to Battle Mage's post you just want on a bandwagon, no actual reason? Just to vote me for the hell of it? Interesting.
OverTheUnder wrote:We were at the random voting stage, if I'm to blame for voting for no reason then so is everyone else because that's what it was, a random vote. If that's the basis for your vote on me then that's sorta weird, and if you're going to say it wasn't then you need to also consider loads of other people to be scum then aswell.
XReyoX wrote:Hold on people!!! Please do NOT give away your role to the scum! Please think about what the scums know that we do not know!!! Think twice before you post.
If you don't understand, view the past 10 posts in the way the scum would.
I'm very very sorry for what I've mistype my sentences and raise this discussion.
The way this discussion is leading to is causing harm to the town side.
Kison wrote:I'm not feeling the Battle Mage wagon at all. My vote stays where it is for now.
Kison wrote:Any time I want to lynch you is because I don't feel we have any other leads to go on. So you're normally next on the list for being near useless, yet still holding the possibility of being scum. So losing you would be no devastating loss of contribution while still holding the possibility that a scum-lynch would be yielded.Battle Mage wrote:wow. This post strikes me as VERY odd. Never before have i seen Kison pass up an opportunity to get me lynched. Either hes finally get the gist of my play, or he is scum trying to suck up to me. For the sole reason that i want to believe it, im going to assume he is the former. My vote also stands.
Kison wrote:I'm not feeling the Battle Mage wagon at all. My vote stays where it is for now.
Since you act like scum 95% of the time, it's impossible to ever really be sure about you. I don't even mean to be harsh, but just look at what you just said right there. Perfect example.
XReyoX wrote:Instructions? Unless you have an IQ of 1000. I guess it would almost beBattle Mage wrote:not to mention the fact that your comments almost sound likeinstructions to your buddy
impossibleto figure out scums who are sending out instructions to each other.
XReyoX wrote:No. I mean it's impossible to tell if a scum is trying to hide an instruction for his buddy to do something.Battle Mage wrote:huh? thats like saying you have to have an IQ of 1000 to work out who got a role pm saying 'Mafia' out of a selection of 12 people. Its not impossible, its just difficult. Nonetheless, the whole point of this game is to try and catch scum. This is what i am doing.
Akbar wrote:This is my 2nd multi-team mafia game played. In my other game, by page 25 we lynched 3 of our own townies, including a power role that fell asleep with a wagon on him. I think we faulted by not considering how quick the mafia teams would support a mislynch. Knowing that, makes we weary of why OTU is not lynched yet. Either, he’s scum and doesn’t have the votes of his team, or the players in this thread are much more calculated in who they vote for. I haven’t voted him because I couldn’t find much scummy about him, with exception to the already mentioned opportunism.
Right now I’m concerned with PBug and Kison. I had suspicions of Kison on page 8. But, I recently noticed a voting pattern with PBug and Kison.
PBug and Kison combo votes:
Pages 1&2 on XReyoX, after the XReyoX wagon fizzles, page 6&7 hop on Raffles, both attack raffles for his “End of Story” argument on page 7&8. By page 16 both were on OTU, after OTU’s wagon lost momentum, both shifted to Remus 17&18.
That being said, I think either PBug and Kison are extremely aggressive townies, one of them is scum latching onto a townie, or they are on the same team.
Unvote:Vote PBug
Zindaras wrote:Gah, I was just writing my analysis. Here it is, unfinished. I'll attempt to finish it before Phoebus comes in. If not, you'll get it in the morning. I'd like to state that, at the point where I am now, I agree with an OTU lynch.
Yuri's Revenge was such an awesome game.XReyoX wrote:Yea, sure! I'm Yuri from red alert. So don't pick up the phone next time when I call you or you'll be mind-controlled and vote to lynch yourself. ... Wait actually, I'll tell you to lynch your scum-mate and NK yourself. By the way has anyone played the new command and conquer 3 demo. The graphics arereallygood.
The whole XReyoX-wagon at the start of the game seems pretty tangential to me.
Post 42, by al4xz, seems really scummy to me. That's some really bad bandwagon-hopping there. Same goes IH. He should know better.
5 XReyoX (al4xz, IH, Kison, PBuG, Raffles)
Definitely worth remembering.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v469/ ... endyou.jpgRaffles wrote:OMGUS vote: Wizardcat
Dog pwns cats... anyday.
(click the link, I shouldn't spam up threads with big pictures)
IH's 92 is bad. 97-99 is odd, explained in 101. IH's 110 is better. OTU's vote on Reyo looks pretty bad. bird's posting is weak. His post 121 shows he's following the game, but he doesn't weigh in. I really don't know what to make of Fuldu's 124. 149 is horrible. Scarecrow, I know you can do lots better.
She, she. My precious voidybuns is a she!Battle Mage wrote:SV may be lurking a bit, but its also true that he has excused his absence on another game we are both in. I think he will be back full time soon, but a prod wouldnt go amiss.
PBuG is being wagony as hell. 173 jumps out.
You're right about prior knowledge, but Mafia nor Wolves would know the size of both scumgroups.Mr. Flay wrote:Fascinating. And yet you assumed there were three per team, that the teams were equal, and that 3 scum on a team would be enough of a scum group in a game subject to crosskills. That speaks of prior knowledge to me.
Vote stands. I'm not feeling the XReyoX bandwagon at all, it looks like scum jumping on the fat kid.
Al4xz just decides to jump back in in Post 185. Raffles is being silly in 186. 191-192 jump out again, OTU by scumminess and PBuG by pointing it out. Fuldu is again right in 195.
4 OverTheUnder (DrippingGoofball, Fuldu, Mastermind of Sin, Raffles)
6 Raffles (Der Hammer, Kison, Mr Flay, PBuG, Scarecrow, Wizardcat)
(it must be noted that Der Hammer's vote here was a leftover from the random voting phase)
This is also an interesting vote count to remember. BM's 202 is memorable if Kison is scum.
Zindaras wrote:I only started actually reading the thread yesterday.Battle Mage wrote:FOS: Zindy. After OTU has had a big wagon for ages, which stuttered and started more than any other i have seen, you made a conscious decision not to vote. Now the decision has been made without your help, you claim to support it, in the hope that you wont be suspected tomorrow. Its a commendable plan-far more subtle than bussing your scumbuddy, but if OTU comes up scum, i will be keeping a very close eye on you tomorrow.
This bit emphasises the difference between sane and not-sane. in Mafia, of course, this has a slightly different meaning. As far as i know, the only role in which you can be sane or insane, is Cop. This quote would imply that Al3xz could have been an insane cop. This would certainly tie in with him 'having business that is entirely his own'-which suggests he had a power role.Phoebus wrote:Most sane people did this.
There are always those, however, who are not quite completely sane, and who have business which is entirely their own.
This section clarifies that Al3xz definitely had a role last night, which he attempted to perform. He targetted or spoke to someone in particular by the looks of things. The bit that strikes me as odd here is the last phrase. 'He could always help himself'. what does that mean? i doubt this game contains an Insane Cop who can protect himself from an NK instead of investigating. its possible, but unlikely. the fact is, he obviously DIDNT help himself, whether he could or not. The mason theory falls flat at this point-as a mason in the typical sense cannot 'help himself'.al4xzwas one of those people and he was out and about in the evening. He knew the risks of what he was doing and the risk was what made him do it. A shiver of excitement ran along his spine as he crossed the village green, on his way to the river. He hoped for a rendezvous there, and if that didn't happen, he could always help himself.
This passage implies that Al3xz was targetted by someone, but not someone unfamiliar to him. The term 'uncle' has alreeady been discussed a little. Kison suggested that it could mean a term of surrender. this is possible, in which case the killer would presumably be someone that he knew and trusted (someone he thought was just playing around). This is similar to Raffles(?) theory, where the killer IS his uncle. However, neither of those are what strike me as the most likely. it makes far more sense to me if you read his repetition of the word 'uncle' as a cry for help!Asal4xzlay down on the soft grass under the willows which grew along the river bank, another one of those people was flitting about in the shadows. Presently, they went up toal4xzand put their hands around his neck.al4xzsmiled a little, until the hands choked further.
"Uncle." saidal4xz
He was replied by silence.
"Uncle!" he said, a little more urgently.
More silence.
"UNCLE!" was his last word.
Followed by more silence.
Broken only by the noises made by the river as it flows past.
A serene silence.
Im not sure about the snarl bit. implies that Al3xz could be a werewolf.Until it is broken by the scream of a girl, out and about for an early dip.
Always on the lookout for trouble in this days, it is not long until one of the village folk come to investigate the source of the trouble.
They findal4xzpaler than the girl who found him, his face twisted in a grisly snarl.
The stuff found in Al3xz house features an assortment of odd items, some of these items for sexual pleasure. i cant think of what else links all of the to be honest, apart from perhaps knitting. lola search is carried out ofal4xz's house. It reveals a disturbing assortment of things like ropes, whips, handcuffs, knives and rolls of linen.
A search of the body reveals a card in it withwritten on it in blood red colour.ESE Member
The discovery is grim.
What will you do about it?[/i]
theopor_COD wrote:First offunvote, vote Battle Mage
Read his posts in isolation, it's tough to find BM as scum because he always tends to act scummy but his last post makes me think we may have scum BM playing this game. He's looked to join a bandwagon again on Raffles whilst trying to throw dirt elsewhere namely at Reyox. I've no real read on DGB but her lack of participation may just be her style of play.
XReyoX wrote: @theopor_COD, Fuldu, DGB: Are all your reasons listed in my list. Was those all the reasons that made you think OTU was the right lynch?XReyoX wrote:I'm not sure how yfineMany. But these are all the reasons I could find. If I've missed any of the, Pls add them back. Just read. If you think OTU was the right one to be lynch, I guess so are many players in this list.
Theopor_COD
#211. OTU's vote is opportunisitc but again I'd be just as wary as the early ppl on Reyox's early wagon. OTU's assesment on Battle Mage is just as scummy. I don't really like the way OTU has unvoted Reyox and then turned his attention on BM for supposed lurking.
#383. still not sure if OTU's the right lynch, will re-read asap.
#494. I'd guess THIS was a lie? Being as four days have passed since. “THIS = OTU saying -ACK! I had my whole post written up and I closed the window on accident. I'll re-write it in a bit I've gotta go for now.”vote
OTU's lack of defence makes me think we had little choice. I'm not sure why he didn't at least claim, however with the deadline I think he was likely to be the only possible lynch and lynching someone gives us more information than a no lynch. Yes I wasn't certain of OTU being scum or town but his lack of defence aside from his post attacking BM amongst others was pretty much all he gave us.
Suspicion of MOS was random, he's not done anything overly obvious to worry me further at present, mind he's a good player so who knows. "Post some waffle" - just means posting rubbish, i.e totally irrelevant, guess it was in relation to WizardCat.Akbar wrote:Theopor_COD
Post 211 he defends BM some which could indicate partnering.(But, in post 414 he points out BM's scumminess for fishing in 260) He FOS's OTU & Scarecrow and then declares a hunch that MoS is scum. Now that a month is passed, do you still have that hunch and if so, could you elaborate on it? Also, what does the phrase "post some waffle" mean?
Post 414 & 417 He declares Remus to be more scummy than OTU.
By post 494 he's moved back to OTU. Was this from lack of support for the Remus wagon, or did you change your mind?
Post 546, voting DGB(which I agree with), and no mention of Remus.(which XreyoX pointed out) Care to elaborate?
I found OTU relatively scummy whilst doing my re-read he was the leading wagon, so with two scums in the game chances are some pushed his wagon, remus jumped out at the time as being scum suspect number one to me. I'd need to re-read his latest posts to confirm if I still feel like that, but at the time he jumped out at me.
XReyoX wrote:@BM: 1)you obviously didn't read the original deathscene. The sane-insane thingy wasn't there originally. Oh c'mon. rope and knife as sex tools for an insane cop called erotic secual enterprise written in red text? I guess you are the one who is insane. (Or the mod is if this is true). I've said that whether alex is a wolf/scum doesn't matter. He is still a scum in one of the groups.
quote BM "do you have ANY other reason to think i am scummy?"
2) Yes. your opportunistic vote on OTU which didn't provide any useful reasons.
3) Stop quoting a large chunk of text.
QFTMastermind of Sin wrote:Actually, a stalling wagon is usually the sign of a scumbuddy that their partners don't want to throw under the bus, so assuming that lack of lynch = town was either bad reasoning on your part, or a bad attempt to deceive us by making shit up to cover your tracks.
XReyoX wrote:I'm going to repeat again.
Al4 being a cult =/= 2 failed NK.
Assuming there are 3 mafia and 3 wolves (like the other game).
both scum group targetted alex has a probability of 14/(17^2)= 4.8%
1 group targetted alex and the other got protected = (17 x 2) /(17 x 19) = 10.4%
*no blocker / immune role included. chance would be higher than 10.4% if these are include.
@BM: use some logic.
if there were 2 missed NK and alx died because he tried to recruit a scum. The chance is
(6/19)(17/(17x19))^2= 8.7 x 10^-2 %.
Its like saying "i wouldn't be suprised if i win the lottery even tho it has one in a billionth chance of happening, because someone win it everyday"
XReyoX wrote:Are you backing off because you couldn't answer my question?Battle Mage wrote:i agree that Raffles story concernijng yesterday doesnt exactly add up, but he seems like an easy lynch really. MoS does look a little panicky though, and the Xreyox vote isnt going anywhere.Unvote, Vote: MoS
>>"why do you think I know more than a pro-town player?" and " what kind of info you think I know which a pro-town player shouldn't?"
what do you mean by " xreyos vote isn't going anywhere"
if raffles story is concerning why don't you vote for him?
you think he is scum but he is an easy lynch so you dun want to vote him?
hidden message in your post: "my not a scum so I don't go for easy lynch"
is this what you what us to believe?
XReyoX wrote:This is my first game. I've said it before. You can take a look at my other game but I'm not dead yet so I can't proove that I'm town with it. Its better to leave that game alone anyway.Battle Mage wrote:question for those who have played with Xreyox before:
Is he this aggressive as scum or town usually?
I appologise if i appear too aggressive to you and is making this game unpleasent for you. I understand that being interrogated isn't a fun thing. However, I do not want vote/unvote go easy either. This would just benefit the scums and allow them to fester around. If you are town, no matter how hard I push, you won't have anything to panick about.
Shanba wrote:Aright. My thoughts and stuff on various people/stuff that has caught my eye.
Reyo's town. I'm almost certain of that. Looks very town to me. The early day 1 wagon on him was tosh, but then it was mostly a random wagon. Still, Kison has picked up scummy points for his reaction to it.
Battle Mage feels off to me. Most games I've seen him in (as pro-town) he's got an idea in his head and run with it bullheaded through any walls like common sense or proof that he's wrong that might stand in his way. This game he's much more opportunistic and widening his horizons, which is something I want to watch.
DGB is scummy and needs to contribute.
MoS is not scummy, and DGB's case is rubbish, frankly. Raffles is scummy, but I have a horrible gut feeling he's town.
Scarecrow is so scummy it's not funny. Seriously, look at his posts in isolation, he's not just lurking but casually agreeing with people while trying to avoid garnering any sort of attention. I can't wait to grill his replacement (though Remus wasn't much better, to be honest XD)
Akbar is pretty scummy. Needs to be watched, as is flying under the radar somewhat.
I also don't get how after his long post the conclusion he came to was a DGB vote. He presented in my opinion interesting cases on a couple of the others yet failed to even FoS them for it and also when discussing Scarecrow he provides little analysis but calls him a serial Killer then fails to follow through with a vote or a FoS. Note also early fishing for Reyo's role.
Fuldu has struck me as fairly pro-town, yet there is a connection between him and Reyo which is slightly worrying. If I'm wrong about one of them and they are scum I want to take a good look at the other too.
We need cattle prods of various people, namely wizardcat and ~N9V~, just to pick a couple of severe offenders off the top of my head.
To summarise:
Vote: Scarecrow, Heavy FoS: Akbar, FoS: DGB, IGMEOY: BM
Phew. Also I would note that I don't believe any of this night scene speculation is particularly helpful, and in fact distracting to the oal at hand, namely lynching scum.
Anything else you think I should look at/give my thoughts about/address then let me know.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Because DGB is trying to stir up suspicion against the person that is most proactively attacking Raffles. If Raffles is scum, this makes DGB look pretty bad tomorrow.XReyoX wrote:@MoS. How does raffles being a scum makes DGB oneas well?
Kison wrote:*gives MoS a ritalin* I tire of reading your sporadic condescending posts. I've yet to see another player get so worked up over thesegames.
Back on topic, I accept DGB's answer about MoS hounding XReyoX, although I disagree.
I hate this kind of logic from the Battle Mage. It really irks me because of how WIFOM it is(he tried pulling this on me in another game). There's a profound difference between what MoS is doing, and what DGB was suspected of doing. If Raffles came up scum, there'd be no proof that MoS was scum BUSing his partner. He could very well be scum, however, in DGB's case, there's plenty of proof that heBattle Mage wrote:OR, in light of this comment, it makes you look bad, for blatantly bussing your buddy.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Because DGB is trying to stir up suspicion against the person that is most proactively attacking Raffles. If Raffles is scum, this makes DGB look pretty bad tomorrow.XReyoX wrote:@MoS. How does raffles being a scum makes DGB oneas well?didattempt to sidetrack the Raffles wagon, although we would still be unsure of why, that is where the concern of his reasoning comes in.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:a) Raffles didn't say which game, so he's more than allowed to make a comment like thisBattle Mage wrote:Kison i suggest you dont use other games that are still being played. i think i know which one you are talking about, but it really means very little when neither of our affiliations are known...
b) Raffles comment had nothing to do with alignment. It's bad logic regardless of your alignment. He was just pointing out that you have a history of bad logic, since you've done it to him before.
Kison wrote:BM, if you bothered to read, MoS meant Kison when he said Raffles.
Raffles wrote:I think you mean Kison...?Mastermind of Sin wrote:Err, yea. Sorry.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Yea, Kison's got you on this one. You can't put this on him.
you not paying attention? i bolded it for you.Battle Mage wrote:too late, i already did. 2 wrongs dont make a right.try and stay on-topic from now on
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Yea, Kison's got you on this one. You can't put this on him.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Actually, I think I'm right on topic. Your constant attempts at craplogic and trying to bulldoze error and responsbility off of yourself and onto other people is starting to get really counterproductive. You're not helping the town at all, so why should we keep you around?
FoS: Battle Mage
Mastermind of Sin wrote:I took responsbility for my error and apologized. You continually try to shift responsibility off yourself to make it look like someone else is at fault.Battle Mage wrote:you criticise me for error, yet it was your errors that started the whole conversation.
you criticise me for crap logic, yet you are the one who professes lynching a player based on their ability, not their affiliation.
The irony is killing me!
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Actually, I think I'm right on topic. Your constant attempts at craplogic and trying to bulldoze error and responsbility off of yourself and onto other people is starting to get really counterproductive. You're not helping the town at all, so why should we keep you around?
FoS: Battle Mage
To be honest, regardless of alignment, you are being detrimental to the town. We're getting nothing done because we have to deal with your idiotic comments. Evenifyou are protown, we have a better chance of winning the game if you're dead. The scum can take advantage of you and use you as a distraction to hide from the town and keep us from lynching correctly. We're better of lynching you now instead of leaving you alive to lose the game for us later. And that's onlyifyou are protown, which I'm starting to doubt. I find it hard to believe that a person can be this illogical without having some sort of agenda.
Mr. Flay wrote:Trust me on this, MoS: Battle Mage can be that annoying in any game situation, it may have nothing to do with a hidden agenda. Ask Stoofer after the game is over.
That said, BM's craplogic doesn't help us today, but I still prefer Raffles for today's lynch. Where is everyone else?
Kison wrote:This debate is still going on?
*smack Battle Mage*
your avatar seems to imply differently...Akbar wrote: I don't kick puppies.
theopor_COD wrote:BM pretty sure you were voting PBug not MoS, getting mixed up are we?
DrippingGoofball wrote:You're right. Not much of a reason, I agree. Is that some slick attempt of yours to try to derail my attempts to find scum? If the other two candidates are weak, perhaps you would be an interesting alternative. Thanks for showing up and signalling your interest for the job.Kison wrote:I don't see much of a reason to go for the other two of your candidates.
See Raffles? We already have an interesting reaction from Kison. Let's shake before we bake.
unvote, vote: Kison
in general you dont need any help to do this...Mastermind of Sin wrote:Nice try at making me look bad, DGB, but I already said it.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:Only to you and your army of clowns.Battle Mage wrote:in general you dont need any help to do this...Mastermind of Sin wrote:Nice try at making me look bad, DGB, but I already said it.
Shanba wrote:hrm... I've been more satisfied with DGB's recent posts, and I get the feeling she's getting into the game. I'm willing to move back to my original suspect now.unvote Vote Albert B. Rampage
I have to agree with this. i'd find it infinitely better if you commented on OTHER players, and, rather than apologising for lack of contributions, make an effort to right the situation.Shanba wrote:I don't think it's a particularly helpful exercise though.
i dont like this post atall. Not because it mentions me, but moreso because of the lack of recognition of its significance for DGB herself. IF Mneme comes up town, that reflects VERY badly on you, who, despite being called very scummy, has yet to recieve a vote.DrippingGoofball wrote: His "mixed feelings" about BM aren't to BM's credit, if mneme turns up scum.
vote: mneme
DrippingGoofball wrote: When a scum points to 3 people they find scummy, I like to look for the "exception" in the lot. I am "très scummy" and raffles is "obvious scum" but he has mere "mixed feelings" for you, BM. This being said, I don't find this to be compelling evidence that you may be scum, at all. Just a tiny tickmark next to your name.
If Mneme's post contained some INSIGHT I would not look for these little details. It looks like he read nothing, and just tossed these little accusations that he thought would not stand out. I bet he's pretty shocked that I jumped on him so quickly, since his post was carefully designed not to offend.
How much work did Mneme really put in to conclude that Raffles, BM and myself are scum? None whatsoever. And if he didn't put any effort into it, and hasn't read the thread with looking for scum in mind, I have to wonder why BM gets a "mixed feelings" break. Since Mneme is out to deceive us, what is his purpose? Distancing - but not downright bussing? But he could also be wanting to cast suspicions on all 3 of us, and simply used different wording to give a fake appearance of variety.