X-Men: Age of Apocalypse (Game Over)

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #126 (isolation #0) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 7:42 am

Venmar, I don't believe you're scum. Titus is really thick is all. I wouldn't bother continuing to reason with her. Just saying from experience. It'll just make you more frustrated.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #251 (isolation #1) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:11 pm

I will say that tunneling Venmar like Titus is is indicative of town from my experience (which isn't much, but hey), though, admittedly, I am loathe to say so. Also, I was completely unaware of the neighborhood; I just happened to stumble across it because I had accidentally clicked on "Private Topics," so I can confirm that Venmar's confusion/ignorance is legitimate. I guess I thought "The X-Men" link was to Wikipedia or some such thing. Personally, I think he's pretty much confobvtown at this point.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #252 (isolation #2) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:11 pm

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #254 (isolation #3) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:14 pm

?

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #256 (isolation #4) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:15 pm

Fair enough. I stand by it.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #266 (isolation #5) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:30 pm

Rogue wrote:I'm not saying he's scum because of it, I'm saying I want to revisit it if venmar is scum

Because I totally would be eager to point out that my scumbuddy is confobvtown and associate myself with him like that when I don't really need to echo to an extreme people's already-expressed sentiments about Venmar's townness! Just sayin'.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #276 (isolation #6) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 12:34 pm

In post 269, Feu et Vol wrote:
In post 266, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
Rogue wrote:I'm not saying he's scum because of it, I'm saying I want to revisit it if venmar is scum

Because I totally would be eager to point out that my scumbuddy is confobvtown and associate myself with him like that when I don't really need to echo to an extreme people's already-expressed sentiments about Venmar's townness! Just sayin'.

-Cheese

i literally just did that to win a large theme

*shrugs* I believe Venmar is town, so I'm not really worried.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #323 (isolation #7) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:09 pm

Hey guys!

In post 311, borkjerfkin wrote:Anyway, I'd really like to sort this Titus thing out since I see some people's momentum shifting toward her. I don't really like her conspiracy theory reads but I had a decent feeling about her approach to the start of the game in the hood (even if it was different than mine) and some other things that I need to reread to remember.

Titus

might

be scum. Venmar is pretty likely to be town.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #327 (isolation #8) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:11 pm

In post 317, ika wrote:Whoever asked about mass flavor claim, it has its uses. as for my role fishing, yes i am doign it. if you like i can do it out here as well.

i wanted mass roleclaims in out QT, i want mass flavor claim out here.

p-edit: damn ninjas posting before me.

I want to sort titus out as well but she just need to claim her role to me (or public). its easier for me to figure her out that way (as well as anyone else for the most part)

Mass flavor claim could have it's uses. But at this point I suggest doing that in your pt and leaving us out of it. As for mass roleclaim: No.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #336 (isolation #9) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 2:17 pm

For what it's worth. I avidly support deciding on a lynch within the next 12-18 hours.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #453 (isolation #10) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:50 pm

Idea: Whoever we lynch, two whole neighborhoods should vote them, so if they flip scum, two abilities.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #460 (isolation #11) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 3:53 pm

Macaronis has a good idea. It seems like our neighborhood's power sucks in comparison to other neighborhoods' powers, so I'm fine letting others take it. Also, Titus, you really need to be careful with your tunneling of Venmar. You have a tendency to put on your blinders.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #508 (isolation #12) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:12 pm

Titus wrote:
In post 460, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Macaronis has a good idea. It seems like our neighborhood's power sucks in comparison to other neighborhoods' powers, so I'm fine letting others take it. Also, Titus, you really need to be careful with your tunneling of Venmar. You have a tendency to put on your blinders.

-Cheese

I do have a tendancy to put on blinders, but I'm not willing to be anti-town to keep my blinders. Venmar is scum. It's fucking obvious all his posts further a scum objective. No scumhunting. He omgussed me. So yeah, I'll scumread him until he actually does something townie before he's a derping doodoo head which doesn't make sense for Venmar. If you don't want me to keep talking about Venmar, here's an idea, quit asking me about Venmar. I'll tell you if I quit scumreading him and I'll make an effort to highlight a decent post he makes (supposing he ever makes one).

K. Just keep your eyes out for other potential targets. It's comforting, at least, that you're not a vigilante. Thoughts on Clusk92? He was apart of that whole RVS nonsense with Venmar. I suppose I wouldn't mind hearing more thoughts across the board about Clusk. Seems like he should be pinging on people's scumdars to some extent, since he RV'd then peaced.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #512 (isolation #13) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:13 pm

GODDAMN I HAD TO HIT THE SUBMIT BUTTON LIKE FIFTEEN TIMES.

*gains composure* Apologies. Carry on.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #522 (isolation #14) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:15 pm

In post 517, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 508, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:K. Just keep your eyes out for other potential targets. It's comforting, at least, that you're not a vigilante. Thoughts on Clusk92? He was apart of that whole RVS nonsense with Venmar. I suppose I wouldn't mind hearing more thoughts across the board about Clusk. Seems like he should be pinging on people's scumdars to some extent, since he RV'd then peaced.

Clusk isn't on the table today due to which neighborhood he's in.

That's fair. I suppose I want to hear Titus' thoughts, then.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #550 (isolation #15) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:32 pm

BORK - did you post this or something similar in your neighborhood topic? If so, give me the time stamp.

-Cheese

In post 8, borkjerfkin wrote:here is what I was going to post as soon as I could:

If you read nothing else I write here: DO NOT RVS ANYONE

I'm going to attempt to outline some ways we can potentially get some earlier objectives completed so that we can all get closer to our abilities together.

1)
Vote on and correctly predict the day's lynch within 24 hours of the day phase beginning

- this is actually really easy to do if 1) we don't mind possibly
lynching quickly only on D1
and 2) we possess a rudimentary ability to coordinate. I think this is pretty easy to nip in the bud for all 4 hoods, especially since it synergizes well with nearly EVERY other objective.

2)
Vote on and correctly predict a night kill

- this is something we can also use to our advantage. If we divide and conquer across the hoods and pick 4 of the towniest looking people in the game and
claim targets in thread
, we can effectively force scum to choose between leaving obvtown alive and advancing the ability counter.

3)
Successfully lynch scum with the whole neighborhood on the wagon

- harder, swingier. We can coordinate this, but we should attempt to do 2 hoods on D1, 2 hoods if we get something that's going to definitely lead to a lynch like a cop guilty, and let people vote normally other days.

4)
Successfully lynch scum with neighborhood members in the first and last positions on the wagon

- can only do one hood at a time, but still completely controllable by us. We can attempt 1 hood every day, just switch the votes on the wagon around.

5)
Successfully navigate an entire day phase without a member of the neighborhood receiving any votes

- Easily manipulable. We can get 3 hoods this one on D1.

If you read nothing else I write here: DO NOT RVS ANYONE

We think we should claim hood abilities.
We have a 1-Shot Sensor (use to discern how many on the lynch wagon the previous day were scum)

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #566 (isolation #16) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:42 pm

borkjerfkin wrote:@Mac & Cheese: Posted several iterations of it, with minor alterations as we came up with the plan.

First instance of this was Thu, July 15 9:09 PM CDT (GMT-5) [I assume this is not against the rules; other people have been posting timestamps]

borkjerfkin wrote:Sorry, July 17. Dunnp where the fuck 15 came from.

Interesting. That is after Speaker for the Dead posted his long-winded post that was similar to yours on July 18th at around 3am EST/EDT. Did other neighborhoods have a similar post to bork's in their neighborhoods?

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #570 (isolation #17) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:43 pm

Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
borkjerfkin wrote:@Mac & Cheese: Posted several iterations of it, with minor alterations as we came up with the plan.

First instance of this was Thu, July 15 9:09 PM CDT (GMT-5) [I assume this is not against the rules; other people have been posting timestamps]
borkjerfkin wrote:Sorry, July 17. Dunnp where the fuck 15 came from.

Interesting. That is after Speaker for the Dead posted his long-winded post that was similar to yours on July 18th at around 3am EST/EDT. Did other neighborhoods have a similar post to bork's in their neighborhoods?

-Cheese

I am just wondering if scum might have copied something like that from another neighborhood to appear town by proposing this strategy that would be posted otherwise on Day 1 in the main thread anyway.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #576 (isolation #18) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 4:46 pm

In post 573, borkjerfkin wrote:@mac n cheese: I want to know how you plan to discern between [communication via scum qt] and [people having similar ideas because they want abilities too]

If they copied my wording that's one thing, but otherwise, meh.

It's worth noting, in my opinion.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #606 (isolation #19) » Sat Jul 19, 2014 5:05 pm

Welp, I fully expect thirty pages to catch up on when I get back from work tomorrow. Oh, boy. Goodnight, gents.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #774 (isolation #20) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:01 am

In post 648, Titus wrote:
- Vote on and correctly predict a night kill
Requires a massive amount of luck

So we've come to the conclusion that basically the NK prediction should be used as a sort of 'doctor'. Just predict the person you do not want to die and force scum to kill elsewhere or give you the ability.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #778 (isolation #21) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:05 am

In post 661, My Milked Eek wrote:I stopped reading at page 20.

Vote: My Milked Eek

You'd better lynch Titus tomorrow.

Nope. The plan is to choose a lynch from my neighborhood and the other neighborhood that hasn't recieved any votes and let the others two reach that objective.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #780 (isolation #22) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:06 am

In post 662, My Milked Eek wrote:There's also a majority of Eek predicts in our neighborhood now, so we'd better push this lynch really fast.
Vol et feu predicted another lynch, while I was at 2. Brian predicted nothing.

I just 'hammered' you as the prediction for out neighborhood.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #782 (isolation #23) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:13 am

In post 675, Desperado wrote:
Vote Count 1.2My Milked Eek (4) - Majiffy, Titus, Rogue, My Milked Eek
Titus (3) - Venmar, Nero Cain, ika
RubikAshtray (1) - Clusk92

Not Voting (12) - Speaker for the Dead, Macaronis and Cheese, Cloud Nine, Ultimate Life Form, Feu et Vol, borkjerfkin, Toogeloo, SnowStorm, RubikAshtray, PeregrineV, Brian Skies, Sharpest-knife-on-tree

PeregrineV is V/LA until 7/22

borkjerfkin, My Milked Eek, RubikAshtray, Cloud Nine, and Titus have received votes today.

The deadline for Day 1 is Monday, July 28th, at 6:00 PM EST. With 20 people alive, it takes 11 to lynch. Deadline in (expired on 2014-07-28 20:00:00).

Can we please coordinate this? I realize it's a policy lynch, but could we at least be prepared for him to flip scum? And Eek, please claim if you haven't already.

Generation Next and the Outcasts should be on the wagon, everyone else should get off of it.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1179 (isolation #24) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 3:22 pm

Ohhhh boy. That was a hoot and a half. Glad I read through all of those pages instead of skimming. Was kind of hard to follow the flow there with all the bouncing from eek to Titus to eek to Titus to Toog... Oof. Anywho...

So, eek/Venmar/bork are my most-sure town reads for me, with Titus close behind. Toog seems town, but the fact that he screwed up objectives makes me think it's slightly unforgivable in the sense that this could be a scum move to sabotage then sort of back-track - it would seem to me the only feasible way to stall town objectives like that. I'm hesitant to be so bold to call some others town. I have scum suspicions, but I want to talk it over with Macaronis first.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1199 (isolation #25) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:33 pm

Wow. 99.9% chance that Toog is town.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1200 (isolation #26) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:39 pm

So. What we need to do:

Treat this like a double day, take the full amount of time needed and come to a definite conclusion on not only who to lynch today, but tomorrow as well [hint: titus], that way tomorrow, we could get no votes for 3/4 of the hoods and predict the lynch. Also, we should always coordinate wagons right now. Whenever we decide on a lynch, the wagon should consist of two hoods and one other person, even if it's a policy lynch, bc there's always a chance they flip scum.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1202 (isolation #27) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 4:47 pm

In post 1201, Rogue wrote:Yeah, titus isn't getting lynched.

Care to explain why? I just don't see how her play has been beneficial to the town at all.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1211 (isolation #28) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:24 pm

In post 1208, Aronis wrote:
In post 1203, Titus wrote:REally, my play has been totally essential.

Suggest not to policy lynch scumhunt === Protown

Really easy to suggest when you'd be the one getting policy lynched.

Pushing us to lynch scum, even when no one will listen === Protown

You mean blindly tunneling like a raving madman? Yeah. . .

Trying to get my scumreads to produce reads to verify === Protown

It's hard to do when you just keep on tunneling them, ignoring those reads. Well, actually that might be good considering you're so bias- Oh nevermind.

Wanting to know why people townread my scumreads beyond their total dumbasses === Protown

Because they are. . . Town?

Claiming so we could actually get the objective if town was that stupid === Protown

You narrowed the pool of possible PRs for scum. Oh wait, they would never shoot you.

Doing everything in my power to ensure we actually get the objectives even when scum lay traps with illusory options to derail scum wagons that fulfill objectives === Protown

And mislynch tons of people in the process. . .

Now, can you make the same list for Venmar and Eek?

It's not that hard:

Challenged Titus' insane views and tried to correct them=Impossible, but protown.
Acted like obvtown=Protown.
Didn't tunnel blindly=Protown
Didn't create a ton of drama that clutters things and hurts my head=Super protown!

Result=2 'confobvtown'

~Macaronis

In post 1210, Aronis wrote:
In post 1206, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 12, Cloud Nine wrote:Our group is 1-shot global killstop.

bork my group was going to policy lynch SKOT today for day one, but since Venmar is apparently scum/dumb I'm wanting to policy him today. My neighbors(ns/mala and Toog, specifically) are hyper paranoid I'm trying to manipulate them though.

~Nati

silly me

nasty rash DID claim in under five seconds

UNVOTE:

just not his personal role but still

nasty rash hydra is town

Cloud 9 isn't town.
Oh wait, you're their scumbuddy. Carry on.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1218 (isolation #29) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:39 pm

Titus is just annoying, stubborn, and tunnel-y. That's just how she works. It's not indicative of scum with her, really. I mean, I'm down for a PL on Titus, but I don't exactly think she's scum.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1221 (isolation #30) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 5:56 pm

In post 1220, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 1219, pirate mollie wrote:
In post 1210, Aronis wrote:
In post 1206, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 12, Cloud Nine wrote:Our group is 1-shot global killstop.

bork my group was going to policy lynch SKOT today for day one, but since Venmar is apparently scum/dumb I'm wanting to policy him today. My neighbors(ns/mala and Toog, specifically) are hyper paranoid I'm trying to manipulate them though.

~Nati

silly me

nasty rash DID claim in under five seconds

UNVOTE:

just not his personal role but still

nasty rash hydra is town

Cloud 9 isn't town.
Oh wait, you're their scumbuddy. Carry on.

i am so glad you made this post aronis cos it reminds me as to why you are not town..

like when you are town you have decent reads (wicked)

mac and cheese are on the table. it is pretty yum.

VOTE: mac and cheese

Thanks for conf my scum read. It helps tremendously.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1223 (isolation #31) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:00 pm

Reasons aren't enough for you, Titus? Well, you can't exactly complain that people are calling you

unreasonable

, then.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1224 (isolation #32) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:04 pm

In post 1221, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1220, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
i am so glad you made this post aronis cos it reminds me as to why you are not town..

like when you are town you have decent reads (wicked)

mac and cheese are on the table. it is pretty yum.

VOTE: mac and cheese

Thanks for conf my scum read. It helps tremendously.

~Macaronis

Yeah, I mean, this basically seems like OMGUS. I mean, this

reminds

you why we're not town? What? Like, what caused you to think that before, and why didn't you say so?

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1226 (isolation #33) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:06 pm

I've tried that before and it was *quite* fruitless, if you will recall.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1229 (isolation #34) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:12 pm

Titus wrote:No. I just heard people saying he's dumb. Dumb is not a reason to townread someone. Point to me a townie post. That's a reason.

Thinking of something else... Not sure how much I can say.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1246 (isolation #35) » Sun Jul 20, 2014 6:49 pm

To be fair, the fact that you were so anti-hammering Eek seems to indicate a kind of survivalism.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1372 (isolation #36) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 3:57 am

In post 1350, borkjerfkin wrote:lol I put brian twice

And you missed us! Well, I never!

Titus wrote:
In post 327, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 317, ika wrote:Whoever asked about mass flavor claim, it has its uses. as for my role fishing, yes i am doign it. if you like i can do it out here as well.

i wanted mass roleclaims in out QT, i want mass flavor claim out here.

p-edit: damn ninjas posting before me.

I want to sort titus out as well but she just need to claim her role to me (or public). its easier for me to figure her out that way (as well as anyone else for the most part)

Mass flavor claim could have it's uses. But at this point I suggest doing that in your pt and leaving us out of it. As for mass roleclaim: No.

~Macaronis

I find that surpising. Sonic. Did cheese ever say what changed from this?

What about me?

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1377 (isolation #37) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:31 am

Did it? I don't recall. That must've been Macaronis. I thought we were always on board for flavor-claiming. He kinda led that; I just kinda agreed.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1379 (isolation #38) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:39 am

In post 1378, Titus wrote:Then why were you saying the opposite in thread????

I thought it would be best to let each neighborhood determine for themselves what they wanted, rather then to get the whole thread to try to claim. Then if every neighborhood did claim, they could just present their list at the time, instead of going one by one.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1382 (isolation #39) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:43 am

In post 1376, Titus wrote:Will reflect.

Mac and Cheese, I want to know why your stance on flavor claiming changed.

We have strong suspicions that Speaker for the Dead is the mafia member implanted within our neighborhood. Firstly, they made a post very similiar to bork's in our neighborhood, nearly one day after he did in yours. Thus it brings up the strong possibility that the person in bork's neighborhood saw the post, told the other mafia and suggested that one of them replicate the idea. Of course he didn't quote it, but most likely just mentioned it. Leaving them to create their own and gain more credibility for it. They also choose not to post it at the start of the day.

Before the game had started, I made a post about flavor: Stating that I thought we were Team X-Calibre and mentioned Nightcrawler. When asked to flavor claim, they claimed Nightcrawler. Which goes to suggest the possibility that they used the info in my post to form a fakeclaim.

Now, only after we have shown reasonable suspicions towards them, they are going after us, wanting to policy lynch us. Which I find to be very OMGUS, considering they didn't even notice us in the first 24 hours and only begin suspecting us, after we suspected them.

I recently claimed within the 'hood, but when they claimed, their claim was two words. Which makes it very difficult for us to discern that they want us to claim. Neither me or my partner recognized it as pointing to us to claim, thus the delay.

The 'X-Men' within this Marvel universe, contain Quicksilver, Storm, Dazzler, Iceman, Banshee, and Exodus.

We're Weapon X. It causes suspicions that they are one of three players outside our 'group' as well.

We're also not very impressed by their posts, despite the wall, which brought this all up in the first place.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1383 (isolation #40) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:44 am

In post 1381, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 1377, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Did it? I don't recall. That must've been Macaronis. I thought we were always on board for flavor-claiming. He kinda led that; I just kinda agreed.

-Cheese

for the record they claimed project x or weapon x or whatever

so they aren't flavour claiming.

can we lynch this shit

WE ARE WEAPON X! What about that do you not understand?

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1386 (isolation #41) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:49 am

In post 1384, Titus wrote:Can someone explain how being Weapon X isn't flavorclaiming...I'm confused again.

I also don't think that scum would need to craft fake claims here. Given the smaller universe of available fake claims (due to neighborhood limitations), why would scum just not be given fakeclaims?

It's simply a possibility. Tbh, despite their 'poor' play, we weren't really ready to accuse them of anything yet. We wanted to get a flavor claim, but other then that, until their most recent posts, we were prepared to leave them alone for today.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1389 (isolation #42) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:52 am

In post 1387, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 1383, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1381, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 1377, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Did it? I don't recall. That must've been Macaronis. I thought we were always on board for flavor-claiming. He kinda led that; I just kinda agreed.

-Cheese

for the record they claimed project x or weapon x or whatever

so they aren't flavour claiming.

can we lynch this shit

WE ARE WEAPON X! What about that do you not understand?

~Macaronis

the part where you are claiming a government research project instead of a character name.

like I don't buy it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternativ ... Apocalypse

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1391 (isolation #43) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:53 am

Perhaps Speaker for the Dead is confused because Weapon X in the normal X-Men series is a government project which produced the likes of Wolverine, Leech, and others, HOWEVER, in the Apocalypse series, James "Logan" Howlett is known as Weapon X NOT Wolverine. So, to be more specific, we're the Age of Apocalypse version of Wolverine.

-Cheese

PEdit: By "perhaps" I guess I mean they are, haha.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1392 (isolation #44) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:53 am

Welp, I guess I took too long.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1393 (isolation #45) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:56 am

I would just like to note, that while Weapon X's and [Venmar's] role in Age of Apocalypse are prominent enough to be mentioned on their regular X-Men wiki pages, Nightcrawler's is not.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1395 (isolation #46) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:58 am

I meant [Majiffy's] not [Venmar's].

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1398 (isolation #47) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:00 am

Wikipedia wrote:The Weapon X codename

In mainstream Marvel, Logan was the first individual known as Weapon X. After Wolverine, Garrison Kane went by the alias of Weapon X as well, before leaving the Canadian Government to work as a mercenary again.

A short time later, a New Zealand terrorist was captured by the Canadian Government and subjected to an experiment which bonded him to a bacteria colony called Thetagen-24. This symbiosis proved dangerous as the union created a deadly energy field which could only be contained by an armored suit that was powered by the energy field.

In the "Age of Apocalypse" alternate universe, Logan was known as Weapon X.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1400 (isolation #48) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:02 am

In post 1397, Titus wrote:
In post 1396, Titus wrote:
In post 1393, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:I would just like to note, that while Weapon X's and [Venmar's] role in Age of Apocalypse are prominent enough to be mentioned on their regular X-Men wiki pages, Nightcrawler's is not.

-Cheese

Can you tell me what Venmar claimed?

Derp...

but this implies you know Venmar's??

I meant Majiffy's. And yes, I do, because he flavor claimed in our 'hood, though I think Venmar's is likely to fall in line with our and Majiffy's flavor claims, given his soft-claim in the 'hood.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1403 (isolation #49) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:05 am

Seems to be productive enough for us.

Also,

VOTE: Speaker for the Dead

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1406 (isolation #50) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:40 am

In post 1404, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
if some1 wants to put forth an argument as to why a project is somehow town when I know that we are a character claim and we are town I am all ears.

This was already answered, for the record.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1407 (isolation #51) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:41 am

In post 1405, SnowStorm wrote:I don't think judging players by their flavor claims is a valid way to scumhunt.

Certainly there are no past games to see how the moderator chooses characters for roles, nonetheless I think it's valid as a supplemental argument (not a foundational one - I agree there).

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1411 (isolation #52) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:51 am

Well, no, but your flavor claim is certainly the weakest, especially considering Nightcrawler is also a leader of a group that doesn't exist in this game (X-Calibre).

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1412 (isolation #53) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:51 am

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1416 (isolation #54) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:00 am

In post 1414, SnowStorm wrote:
In post 1411, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Well, no, but your flavor claim is certainly the weakest, especially considering Nightcrawler is also a leader of a group that doesn't exist in this game (X-Calibre).

To be fair, with twenty players in the game, we can't all be Jean Greys and Magnetos (Magnetoes?).

Fair enough; it just seems to me that Nightcrawler is the odd man out.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1418 (isolation #55) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:13 am

Macaronis didn't, yeah. I looked into it more.

Or maybe it was a secret trap to get you to claim Nightcrawler the whole time... Mm... *strokes mustache*

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1422 (isolation #56) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:35 am

Can I be honest about something right now, Majiffy? I'm actually a processed, artificially-flavored cheese-product.

I apologize to anyone that felt lied to by my misleading.

-"Real" Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1428 (isolation #57) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:49 am

In post 1413, Titus wrote:Can we just put all of the outed claims in here so that the whole town can see them?

Speaker, cheese is town.
Cheese, speaker is town and unfamiliar with xmen. Most women are.

Macaronis and Cheese: Weapon X
Venmar: Magneto
Speaker for the Dead: Nightcrawler
Snowstorm: Jean Grey
Majiffy: Bishop

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1450 (isolation #58) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 7:32 am

Aronis is Mac-Aronis. Do people not get our triple entendre? That makes me sad.

Also, what exactly is making our case more scummy than Speaker for the Dead's? I'm not following how we went from lean-town to scum on people's reads lists.

borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 1407, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Certainly there are no past games to see how the moderator chooses characters for roles, nonetheless I think it's valid as a supplemental argument (not a foundational one - I agree there).

What is your foundational argument then?

I'm not biting on flavor spec in general and in specific I'm not biting on it here: I skimmed the Earth-295 article for Nightcrawler and he's a member of the X-men and a pretty popular character in general. It's reasonable he's in the game, and I don't see how you can, in good conscience, make any argument that his minor influence in this universe is alignment indicative.

Macaronis and Cheese wrote:We have strong suspicions that Speaker for the Dead is the mafia member implanted within our neighborhood. Firstly, they made a post very similiar to bork's in our neighborhood, nearly one day after he did in yours. Thus it brings up the strong possibility that the person in bork's neighborhood saw the post, told the other mafia and suggested that one of them replicate the idea. Of course he didn't quote it, but most likely just mentioned it. Leaving them to create their own and gain more credibility for it. They also choose not to post it at the start of the day.

Before the game had started, I made a post about flavor: Stating that I thought we were Team X-Calibre and mentioned Nightcrawler. When asked to flavor claim, they claimed Nightcrawler. Which goes to suggest the possibility that they used the info in my post to form a fakeclaim.

Now, only after we have shown reasonable suspicions towards them, they are going after us, wanting to policy lynch us. Which I find to be very OMGUS, considering they didn't even notice us in the first 24 hours and only begin suspecting us, after we suspected them.

I recently claimed within the 'hood, but when they claimed, their claim was two words. Which makes it very difficult for us to discern that they want us to claim. Neither me or my partner recognized it as pointing to us to claim, thus the delay.

The 'X-Men' within this Marvel universe, contain Quicksilver, Storm, Dazzler, Iceman, Banshee, and Exodus.

We're Weapon X. It causes suspicions that they are one of three players outside our 'group' as well.

We're also not very impressed by their posts, despite the wall, which brought this all up in the first place.

~Macaronis

After considering it more, I will admit that given this is likely to be a VT-heavy and Mafia power-heavy game, the likelihood that mafia have been given powerful fake claims seems fairly high.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:44 pm

In post 1564, Speaker for the Dead wrote:policy lynching aronis or anything with aronis in it is always, 100% of the time, protown. the fact his other head is playing just as awfully makes a mac/cheese lynch the most protown move in the history of mafia

Why do you have to be town?

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 21, 2014 12:44 pm

In post 1566, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1564, Speaker for the Dead wrote:policy lynching aronis or anything with aronis in it is always, 100% of the time, protown. the fact his other head is playing just as awfully makes a mac/cheese lynch the most protown move in the history of mafia

Why do you have to be town?

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1603 (isolation #61) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 4:16 pm

UNVOTE:

Gonna reevaluate things.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1649 (isolation #62) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:10 pm

In post 1642, ika wrote:
DAYVIG TITUS

PLEASE TELL ME THIS IS REAL <3

Don't break my heart, babe.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1653 (isolation #63) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:14 pm

In post 1651, Titus wrote:
In post 1649, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1642, ika wrote:
DAYVIG TITUS

PLEASE TELL ME THIS IS REAL <3

Don't break my heart, babe.

-Cheese

Why the hell are you cheering about a vig shot on someone you think is town? Fuck you. You lost town status.

Idk why. I'll go talk to him, we need to get some stuff figured out anyways. Thankfully it's prob not real though.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1660 (isolation #64) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:18 pm

In post 1653, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1651, Titus wrote:
In post 1649, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1642, ika wrote:
DAYVIG TITUS

PLEASE TELL ME THIS IS REAL <3

Don't break my heart, babe.

-Cheese

Why the hell are you cheering about a vig shot on someone you think is town? Fuck you. You lost town status.

Idk why. I'll go talk to him, we need to get some stuff figured out anyways. Thankfully it's prob not real though.

~Macaronis

Obviously I'm joking around. While Titus is incredibly frustrating (thus the joke), it's not really worth sacrificing a town slot needlessly.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1661 (isolation #65) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:18 pm

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1668 (isolation #66) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:24 pm

In post 1654, Nero Cain wrote:thank you so much for killing that, IKA

Care to explain? Were you scumreading Titus? If so, Why?

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1686 (isolation #67) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:36 pm

In post 1678, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1668, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1654, Nero Cain wrote:thank you so much for killing that, IKA

Care to explain? Were you scumreading Titus? If so, Why?

nope, titus is town town town and I've been saying as much all day.

In post 1672, Speaker for the Dead wrote:
In post 1658, Nero Cain wrote:He's calling you scum

me specifically or mollie/me as a single slot?

because he can't even tell the difference between mollie's posts, my posts, and me-impersonating-mollie's posts

no, he's calling Titus scum

So the only reason I can see Titus' death being beneficial to you is if you're scum. And why you would want to blatantly reveal that in-thread is beyond me.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1689 (isolation #68) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 5:39 pm

In post 1679, Titus wrote:
3. Macaronis and Cheese (Prof Fridays + Aronis)*, null (bad reaction to dayvig, otherwise town)

Oh, hush. Anyone that makes a marginally negative comment in your general direction comes up scum to you. If our actions thus far have been town, don't let a little joke get to you. I am just utterly exasperated with you.

Then again, I'm not so sure people really care too much about your reads, because you are wayyyy overconfident on some of them (e.g. Venmar, Feu et Vol, Rogue). It is

good

to be

confident

in your reads, but I think it is

more important

to be

open

to changing them. Just because someone goes after you, doesn't mean they're necessarily scum. Town can choose to not believe other town (e.g. if you will recall, you seemed to think us v. Speaker for the Dead was Town v. Town - same deal with you and Venmar, and likely you and eek).

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1709 (isolation #69) » Mon Jul 21, 2014 6:00 pm

In post 1706, Aronis wrote:
In post 1700, Nero Cain wrote:your role is in the pm, I don't see a reason you "need" to talk to a hydra partner unless you are crafting a fakeclaim.

Also, that's why you are Toog are scum. Town shouldn't lie. You two are fucking lying that I'm only talking about you.

Toog is confobvtown, man. And claiming right away isn't always a great idea, especially when there is prob scum in your group.

~Macaronis

Goddammit.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1861 (isolation #70) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:43 am

People should quit claiming. This is ridiculous. And the fake dayvig stuff is getting old.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1936 (isolation #71) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:34 pm

Bork, what's your thoughts about Nero?

Spoiler: And. . .

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1941 (isolation #72) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:39 pm

In post 1938, borkjerfkin wrote:I have lots and lots of experience with muffin. I know exactly how he is.

I'm leaning town on Nero; I understand and sympathsize the desire of wanting to cull players that are doing blatantly anti-town things and calling people out for calling those things towntells, which has kind of been his MO the whole game.

Do you think he's scum?

Sorta. I just don get the best vibes from him and some of his reactions feel fake.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1943 (isolation #73) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:40 pm

Just a min.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1947 (isolation #74) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 4:53 pm

In post 1942, borkjerfkin wrote:Examples?

Sorry, got distracted. The dayvig response didn't give off the greatest vibes imo. His whole set of exchanges with Titus have been really queer. Plus this whole mess involving Toog just doesn't make sense and it feels like hes trying to go after something that isn't there.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1949 (isolation #75) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:00 pm

In post 1948, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 1947, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:His whole set of exchanges with Titus have been really queer.

On a surface level I didn't like this at first either, but I think he feels it would be pro-town to have Titus out of the game even if she flips town and I think the interactions make sense from that viewpoint.

I can see that, but then he was asking us about lynching a town read, so idk.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p6035181

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1951 (isolation #76) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:03 pm

In post 1950, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1945, SnowStorm wrote:at least 4 of those 10 were scum. Toog voting for two hoods adds at least 4 more scum

bullshit. 8 scum in a 20 player game? oh fuck no.

In post 1945, SnowStorm wrote:SO the only way Toog's actions prejudice us is if there are more scum in those two first hoods, which we don't know.

nope, there's only like 4-5 scum in this game. He added ATLEAST 6 more town into the scum mislynch pool. Thanks to his actions they now have atleast 15-16 townies as where with the two hoods they only had anywhere from 6-10.

hey bork, snow flips scum? do we lynch toog or is this scum defending town?

vote:Snowstorm

Okay! Please explain the transformation from having Snowstorm as a strong[?] townread into a scumread.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1956 (isolation #77) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:05 pm

In post 1952, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1949, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1948, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 1947, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:His whole set of exchanges with Titus have been really queer.

On a surface level I didn't like this at first either, but I think he feels it would be pro-town to have Titus out of the game even if she flips town and I think the interactions make sense from that viewpoint.

I can see that, but then he was asking us about lynching a town read, so idk.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p6035181

you really don't understand why I'd be slightly suspicious that you are calling Titus town and then want to lynch them the next day?

Aren't you doing the same thing?

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1957 (isolation #78) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:06 pm

In post 1953, Titus wrote:Can we just lynch Feu? Nero's vote is blantantly survivalistic and I could see voting there too if we won't lynch Venmar.

Why is Feu scum? Lime I just don't see it.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1973 (isolation #79) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:19 pm

Oof, caught up hurr. Just wanted to say I'm a big fan of eek's post from top of page 71: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p6038371

Not too interested in SnowStorm lynch atm; not sold on his being scum as of yet. I'd take Feu et Vol over him.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1976 (isolation #80) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:30 pm

Well, that doesn't really mean I think Feu et Vol is the most scummy; it just means I think he's more scummy than SnowStorm.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1977 (isolation #81) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:32 pm

Also, where is Clusk? I want his butt.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1979 (isolation #82) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:37 pm

Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Also, where is Clusk? I want his butt.

-Cheese

And while you're at it, get me RubikAshtray's tookus and SKOT's bee-hind.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1986 (isolation #83) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 5:54 pm

In post 1960, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1951, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Okay! Please explain the transformation from having Snowstorm as a strong[?] townread into a scumread.

It would REALLY help if you started reading my posts instead just randomly asking questions. Snow is being really really dense about Toogs actions. So to me it looks like either scumbuddy defense or scum defending for the town cred.

In post 1953, Titus wrote:Nero's vote is blantantly survivalistic

lololololololololololololol

In post 1956, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1952, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1949, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 1948, borkjerfkin wrote:
In post 1947, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:His whole set of exchanges with Titus have been really queer.

On a surface level I didn't like this at first either, but I think he feels it would be pro-town to have Titus out of the game even if she flips town and I think the interactions make sense from that viewpoint.

I can see that, but then he was asking us about lynching a town read, so idk.
http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 1#p6035181

you really don't understand why I'd be slightly suspicious that you are calling Titus town and then want to lynch them the next day?

Aren't you doing the same thing?

~Macaronis

lawl no. This goes with the whole reading my posts thing. I've been calling Titus scummy all day, when you asked if I was scumreading Titus I said no 'cause its crystal fucking clear that I was so I decided I'd just fuck with you.

Maybe I didn't get that impression or don't have time to dig for the damn posts. If you want to lie, deal with the consequences.

And could you respond to this: http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.ph ... 3#p6041063

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1990 (isolation #84) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:05 pm

In post 1988, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 1986, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Maybe I didn't get that impression or don't have time to dig for the damn posts. If you want to lie, deal with the consequences.

And could you respond to this: viewtopic.php?p=6041063#p6041063

silly me, expecting players to be able to read the game.

also my response to why I switched to snow is in the post you just quoted....

Sorry about that.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1996 (isolation #85) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:08 pm

In post 1980, Titus wrote:
In post 1976, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Well, that doesn't really mean I think Feu et Vol is the most scummy; it just means I think he's more scummy than SnowStorm.

-Cheese

Who do you think is the most scummy? Why?

Still needs some fleshing out (obviously there's a lot of null), but...

Strong Town

Venmar
borkjerfkin
Toogeloo
Titus

Lean Town

Majiffy
My milked eek
ika
Ultimate Life Form

Null

Brian Skies
SnowStorm
Speaker for the Dead

Null due to inactivity

RubikAshtray
PeregrineV
Blusk92
SKOT

Disagreement

Rogue (Macaronis = lean town, Cheese = lean scum)

Lean Scum

Feu et Vol
Nero Cain
Cloud Nine

------------------------ (want to make sure that y'all don't think "-Cheese" is Lean Scum) ------------------------

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #1998 (isolation #86) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:11 pm

Titus, you should assume Venmar is town and see where that gets you.

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2001 (isolation #87) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:14 pm

VOTE: Feu et vol

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2003 (isolation #88) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:15 pm

In post 2000, Nero Cain wrote:Cheese, please stop being an idiot.

After you, my dear Nero.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2005 (isolation #89) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:16 pm

Titus wrote:
In post 1998, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Titus, you should assume Venmar is town and see where that gets you.

I will do that for an exercise but my reads are Venmar independent as he hasn't done anything.

<3

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2007 (isolation #90) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:24 pm

Also,

DAYVIG

HAPPY BIRTHDAY MASTIN!

Sincerely,
-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2009 (isolation #91) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:26 pm

In post 2008, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 2003, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 2000, Nero Cain wrote:Cheese, please stop being an idiot.

After you, my dear Nero.

~Macaronis

In post 2004, Nero Cain wrote:Didn't know I was misreading you unless you are claiming scum...

well ok then, if you want me to scum read you then I will

I'm OK with that under this condition. You write a 1000 word essay explaining why we are scum.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2010 (isolation #92) » Tue Jul 22, 2014 6:31 pm

In post 2008, Nero Cain wrote:
In post 2003, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 2000, Nero Cain wrote:Cheese, please stop being an idiot.

After you, my dear Nero.

~Macaronis

In post 2004, Nero Cain wrote:Didn't know I was misreading you unless you are claiming scum...

well ok then, if you want me to scum read you then I will

I daresay that seems an awful lot like an OMGUS scum-read...

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2102 (isolation #93) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:35 am

Metal Sonic, post on yo' damn hydra account, son.

Love,
-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2106 (isolation #94) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 3:42 am

Love ya, babe <3

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2373 (isolation #95) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 9:38 am

Haha, I think I like SnowStorm as town now.

Tbqh, I'm starting to think that most of the lurkers are scum, just by PoE.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2473 (isolation #96) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:00 pm

In post 2471, Speaker for the Dead wrote:btw nati, i am around for most of today and i am planning on doing stuff here. i want to talk to you

Can you get mollie to post in the neighborhood? Thanks.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2474 (isolation #97) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:01 pm

In post 2472, Rogue wrote:Pretty sure you should save those discussions for the scum qt

Can you make a short, but informative and detailed, post on why they[SftD] are mafia?

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2498 (isolation #98) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:25 pm

VOTE: Clusk

Let's do this!!

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Post Post #2499 (isolation #99) » Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:26 pm

(I may be re-stating this; I forget) I'm (we're) becoming more and more convinced of people's being town, so by PoE, I'm just tempted to go with a "Lynch All Lurkers" philosophy and see where that gets us. At the very least, it should hail Beetlegeuse, eh?

VOTE: Clusk

-Cheese

PEdit: DAMMIT MACARONIS *shakes fist*

Macaronis and Cheese · Wed Jul 23, 2014 5:27 pm

ALSO,

2500th post hollaaaaaaa!

-Cheese

PEdit: TITUS NOOOOOO

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:36 am

I freaking love your wall, Muffin. A lot of them were pretty in-line with our reads, though you managed to sway me on a couple-few.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 7:14 am

In post 2600, Feu et Vol wrote:muffin can you just say one last time clearly why you feel it is so necessary to impersonate mollie

fyi i'm in the neighborhood right now talkin about you behind your back

Obvconfscum

VOTE: Feu et Vol

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:16 am

In post 2607, Rogue wrote:I'm going to be very upset if I've got mollie and jiffy backwards.

Mollie's prob town. Jiffy- Not so much.

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 8:41 am

In post 2610, Titus wrote:
In post 2608, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:
In post 2607, Rogue wrote:I'm going to be very upset if I've got mollie and jiffy backwards.

Mollie's prob town. Jiffy- Not so much.

How are you townreading Mollie after the horrific weapon X push plus insistance that she knew the lore?

I put it off as idiot but I began second guessing after the chainsaws.

Her posts in the 'hood has seemed pretty town, recently.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 9:23 am

Snowstorm, check the neighborhood.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 10:21 am

If this is about how my logic sucks[maybe it does]. The whole slips is not the only reason for voting him. I've had him as a scumread for a decent amount of time now.

~Macaronis☆★☆

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:23 pm

In post 2829, Prof Fridays wrote:
In post 2824, Rogue wrote:Beast, I'm in a really shitty mood right now and that made me laugh.

Thanks.

Whenever people are feeling down, I usually just tell them to think of me, because I'll be damned if you're not better than me at probably everything.

XOXO,
-Prof

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:30 pm

In post 2832, Prof Fridays wrote:
In post 2830, Sharpest-knife-on-tree wrote:and I get called for lurking...lol do you have anything to say about the game PF, any thoughts on the state of affairs?

I'll let my buddy Cheese handle this one.

Thanks, Prof. You know, you're such an intelligent, beautiful, handsome, strong, half-human, half-walrus creature!

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Thu Jul 24, 2014 5:32 pm

In post 2836, Titus wrote:I think SKOT thought lurker cuz new AV.

Guys can we all get on Storm to get the objective? I am near universal vig choice. This will put the town in an obvious better position.

Not a new avatar, Titus xD

You should know, you've seen the same one every day over in our Open lol.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:25 am

SnowStorm, is your Empathy ability triggered when you are

killed

or only when you're

lynched

?

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:26 am

Hold on, answer that in our neighborhood, please, not here.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:28 am

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Fri Jul 25, 2014 5:36 am

K.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Fri Jul 25, 2014 7:37 pm

We didn't get post 3000. Grrr.

And of course I'm behind in this thing. There's always tomorrow.

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:01 am

Policy lynching and policy vig'ing is stupid. Do not vig SnowStorm.

I've been thinking on it more, and everything about SnowStorm's claim makes more and more sense to me. It makes sense flavor-wise, and it makes sense when you consider the presence of a Governor ability. Additionally, Beloved Princess is never a wise fake-claim-move on scum's part. Have you ever heard of a scum fake-claiming Beloved Princess? I mean, especially when there is like a 95% chance that a vigilante is definitely in this game, I mean, good Lord. And you can't call that WIFOM, because the probabilities here are not 50/50. Nothing has led me to believe SnowStorm is scum since the game started, so I don't plan to change that now.

I will say, while I'm generally against policy lynching, the Titus lynch is *really* enticing...

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:24 am

Rogue wrote:
In post 3091, Rogue wrote:
Ignore the above post, any potential vigilante's.

If Snowstorm is lying we're lynching noodles and moldy dairy products.

That is literally so stupid. People stick so rigidly to policies that

they forget why the policy was created in the first place

. Policy lynches became a thing because they frequently caught scum, but if you don't have good reason to believe a person is scum, why kill them just for the sake of sticking to policy? That's not conducive to catching scum. SnowStorm is town, and even if his role isn't a PR, he still brings valuable reads and contributions to the day discussion - just like any good VT.

I actually kind of think at this point that you can't call a Titus lynch a policy lynch, because her behavior and posting is inherently anti-town, because it impedes productive discussion by the town, which is a scum-tell.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:29 am

Scum-play is like bacteria, and many policies are like penicillin. The penicillin worked for a time, but the bacteria have adapted to be resistant to penicillin, so you have to use other medicines/techniques.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Sat Jul 26, 2014 8:30 am

In post 3098, ika wrote:
In post 3096, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:just like any good VT.

he didnt claim VT.....

No shit. I didn't say he was a VT, I was

comparing

him to a good VT.

-Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:33 am

Bork, who's your preferred lynch?

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:34 am

In post 3178, Macaronis and Cheese wrote:Bork, who's your preferred lynch?

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:36 am

In post 3181, borkjerfkin wrote:The person I am voting

Titus. . . Would you consider voting Feu?

~Macaronis

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:39 am

In post 3184, borkjerfkin wrote:No.

Why not?

~Macaronis and Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 28, 2014 3:40 am

VOTE: Titus

Bc deadline.

~Macaronis and Cheese

Macaronis and Cheese · Mon Jul 28, 2014 4:14 pm

In post 3188, borkjerfkin wrote:Also Mac and Cheese wtf happened in the ~1950 post range (where one of your heads is saying "I don't think Feu is scummy" and your other is saying "he's scummier than snowstorm I guess" to the reads list you guys posted that made Feu your scummiest read.

Because that whole progression seems really suspect to me.

Cheese was scumreading them fairly strongly. I had them more as null, but we talked it over, etc. And I agreed to push them.

~Macaronis