Really? I think it's pretty cool actually.In post 24, kanyeknowsbest wrote:thats dumb.
Is this vote serious or random?
I think he's scum.
Really? I think it's pretty cool actually.In post 24, kanyeknowsbest wrote:thats dumb.
Is this vote serious or random?
Why? He gets better later on, but I don't get having a townread on him at this point.In post 31, kanyeknowsbest wrote:fyi matias is town.
I'll say more after Dolittle next posts, but that was the best thing I could think of to attack from Page 1. If it was a random vote, then I wouldn't have considered it scummy, but if it was serious then him not saying it was serious/not providing any reasoning just makes it do nothing at all. If he had provided reasoning in his next few posts, then I would have been more ok with it, but with him obviously very much liking a Sakura vote combined with talk of white-knighting Sakura, the lack of any content behind his Sakura scumread strengthens my scumread on Dolittle.In post 109, talah wrote:Wow. So. Right.In post 101, DeasVail wrote:Why I think DrDolittle is scum:
66 strongly suggests that he has a scumread on Sakura/is pretty invested in the wagon, and that his vote in 19 was serious. What I'm wondering though is why he didn't share his reasoning for Sakura being scum. If town are making a serious vote during what is still semi-RVS, they want to show everyone how smart they are and share their reasoning! Despite the resistance to Sakura-scum, he doesn't get very involved in trying to read her or gathering support (Matias and kanye's play around Sakura appears a lot more genuine by comparison). While I do have doubts, I don't think his play is particularly unlikely to come from scum so far either so I'm pretty happy with my vote here.
Are you saying you somehow reverse-telegraphed your scumread on dolittle, which you first mentioned when his only post was a naked vote?
Didn't I do exactly the same thing as him, in naked voting and then reaffirming that he was a choice vote?
What do you think of mastin?
I'm not sure what this would involve, but ok! Mastin is still kind of ehhhh for me and I feel like it's excluding other people that are pretty town, but otherwise I'm fine with it. Maybe we can have code names! (Although I don't know what to think of Deaznuts )In post 135, waynegg wrote:Ok so Kanye, Deaznuts, Mastin, Nat town. You guys wanna work together?
It doesn't have to be strong at all, but no one has anything that makes me excited at all about pressuring them and it's become a concerning trend for me lately.In post 146, Matias wrote:You look extremely skittish.In post 126, DeasVail wrote:Ok yeah, I don't feel comfortable with this anymore. His play here is really weird compared to previous games, but in a way that's a towntell and I feel like I'm just forcing the scumread at this point.
Unvote: DrDolittle
I don't have anyone in mind as a scumread right now, and I'm going to be out for a fair bit of the day, so I'll see if anything pops out at me when I get back.
Do you feel like you're supposed to have a super strong scum read right now? I certainly don't have anything major (other than Sakura, and that's on the coattails of my RVS phase) and I'm not fretting about it.
Oh, I misunderstood, but yeah, I'm usually the same, but essentially he's diverting from both his town and scum meta so much here that I'm more inclined to think town (because scum often try to replicate previous town meta rather than change their play).In post 177, talah wrote:Anger it up, angrykanye.
I don't "do" meta unless it's shoved in my face and haven't played with Doolittle before.
That sounds fine to me. I definitely prefer Majiffy of those three though.In post 244, talah wrote:Actually, I'm looking to abandon this vote on waynegg and I was thinking of asking Nati if he would be willing to discuss/vote together for a bit to get a read on him. I'm wondering now if you'd be interested in playing like that for a bit too.
I was going to suggest a couple of options - Beli, mastin, and Majiffy.
I'm pretty sure I gave my reason in a recent post.In post 258, leviathan93 wrote:would like to know reasons for a majiffy vote other than the fact that he hasn't posted, but I agree with people that he should actually join the game because his 3 posts are lame and say nothing of the game themselves.
votes probably will get him to step it up. as of this point even if we do lynch him its not like he helped any. UNVOTE:
VOTE: majiffy
Ok, here's what I don't understand. It was obvious from your post that you hate RVS, yes, but it's pretty easy to work out whether we're in RVS or not by just reading the posts (and there were pretty real reasons for most of the votes at the time so I'm pretty sure it was clear that we were), so it makes more sense to me that it was being used for some kind of purpose rather than asking a question that you could easily answer yourself, or a random comment that was only relevant several pages before.In post 336, Majiffy wrote:You know what they say about assuming...In post 334, DeasVail wrote:-I'm pretty sure not posting because of RVS was the implication though? Not posting at all, and then asking 'have we left RVS yet?' before proceeding to complain about it pretty strongly suggests that you couldn't really be bothered with RVS so are waiting until it's over.
Such as, I think RVS is dumb and generally useless to the gamestate yet people continue to insist on it every fucking game?In post 334, DeasVail wrote:For some reason I did think that you had specifically said it though, so I'll admit that it's possible that you were just asking for some other reason.
That might be a reason. Hey, whatdyaknow.
You're still not reading my posts.In post 334, DeasVail wrote: -The justification was that when you posted the post mentioned above, it was still RVS, and I think it pretty obviously wasn't.
It's aboutIn post 334, DeasVail wrote: -I like buddying/saying what I think when it's something nice to say, and I'm not going to stop just because some people seem to think it's a scumtell.howyou say it.
Are you admitting to scum buddying then?In post 334, DeasVail wrote:More strange is the fact that you haven't complained about my buddying to Talah. I think that's much more pronounced than what is in 27?
1) No, I think that the 'at least for me' shows that I wasn't.In post 345, AGar wrote:1) You're trying to project your reasoning onto the rest of the Majiffy wagon.In post 334, DeasVail wrote:AGar, if you think I'm wrong, please at least say why.
1A) Half the wagon didn't have a god damned reason to vote Majiffy
1B) I don't feel Majiffy ever "made anything up" to avoid posting instead of saying busy.
2) I don't think you actually believe that Majiffy "made up a reason" for not posting content. He was pretty straightforward in that he felt that we weren't at a point worth putting in the effort, and he's backed that up since. Whether that's a smart play or not is up for debate, whether that's what actually happened or not isn't. You're grasping for straws to try and stretch out a wagon that, quite frankly, is shit and should be dead by now.
I don't think I can say more about Sakura than I already have. Nothing outright scummy, but her posting just falls flat for me. She seemed much more town where I saw her previously.In post 460, talah wrote:Explain Sakura please.
If the answer is null, explain kayne if you would.
I have misgivings over the way you drummed on and on about Majiffy RVS tell. I'm thinkin you soft-attacked him.
It's mostly already been explained, but talah because she is doing cool things to update her reads and figure people out, and I think it's much more effort to go to than scum would be bothered doing. I also agree with what others are saying about new scum likely to be more cautious than claiming 1-shot tracker and all that. Overall, her posting seems pretty genuine.
I don't really think this is a thing though? I think there's a difference between claiming on Day 3, and claiming on Day 1 too.In post 478, waynegg wrote:And then to claim it D1 with like no provocation? Over eager scum, much?
I know he only had 10 posts, but how he's going about things while he is there is just completely different from here. And I'm defending him because I think he's town...In post 484, pieguyn wrote:that's a really weak argument, he only had 10 posts that game and he replaced out. = = I can see he was acting different, but how can you be sure it was based off alignment and not inactivity?
also why are you defending him? = =
You either think I'm scum or are scum. Either is pretty saddening.In post 486, Pyrotechnics wrote:Why are you giving me a frownie face when you have me in your leftover pile?In post 459, DeasVail wrote: PEdit: No tammy.
I've already explained Beli and Dolittle. (Beli probably doesn't care what people think of him and Dolittle is not playing how he usually does either as town or scum, so is more likely town but I don't know)In post 487, Pyrotechnics wrote:Oh wait forgot. Can you explain these of your town reads?In post 459, DeasVail wrote: Townreads:
Belisarius
AGar
leviathan93
Town with reservations:
DrDolittle
PeregrineV
NachoKoopa
It's more the difference between the style of his posts (I don't feel the kind of scum player in La-La goes all capsrage as scum in another game).In post 494, pieguyn wrote:yeah that's what I meant, how can you be sure that's based off alignment and not inactivity?In post 485, DeasVail wrote:I know he only had 10 posts, but how he's going about things while he is there is just completely different from here.
what are you hoping to accomplish by doing this?In post 485, DeasVail wrote:And I'm defending him because I think he's town...
also Pyrotechnics reads town for me. he's pointing a lot of things with wayne's logic similar to what I noticed w
It's partly your lack of involvement (which I acknowledge could very well be due to RL reasons and that's fair enough), but the post about not having much to say unless there are questions asked of you is something I can relate to as scum (as scum you're primary focus is what others think of you, so you're priority will be with responding to comments about you/answering questions addressed to you), but not really at all as town, where I know that at least for me the priority is updating reads and convincing others of them, and I imagine it would be similar for others too. Your play this game has also not been as town as I'd have hoped from you (although this is in itself is not a huge deal) and I think 12 is slightly scummy, but that's quite weak too.In post 571, Matias wrote:Hey Deas, why am I concerning to you? Feelings mutual but I want your take.
In a previous game I played with Matias, he was town and probably the most obviously town player in the game, but players are bound to have games where they appear less town even as the same alignment (it's happened to me a few times), so I'm not going to call him scum for that alone (unless I don't find anything town about him, which is not true in Matias' case).In post 581, Kalimar wrote:Why is this not a big deal to you?
Who apart from Nacho thinks I'm town?In post 627, Majiffy wrote:Because the active cunts in the game all have it in their weak little minds that you're somehow town, which is not only beside me but also fucking retarded.
I still think he's likely to be town here, but I'll keep it in mind.In post 622, Pyrotechnics wrote:Well it was his first game and his first scum game so of course it will be different. What I mean is that he has the capability of Looking. Like lost newb town when he's not.
He does this all the time!!!!In post 633, NachoKoopa wrote:Brushing me off again. What is your current read of me?In post 627, Majiffy wrote:I am towning the towniest I can town, you just have your head up your ass.
In post 637, NachoKoopa wrote:Oh no I meant he does this all the time this game.In post 635, DeasVail wrote:He does this all the time!!!!In post 633, NachoKoopa wrote:Brushing me off again. What is your current read of me?In post 627, Majiffy wrote:I am towning the towniest I can town, you just have your head up your ass.
Not as town.
You're the best!In post 638, waynegg wrote:@Nacho Unless you're idiot savant...
@Deaz Thanks! I'd hold off til the 8th to hammer you if the votes swung that way.
I meant he's doing it all the time this game.In post 637, NachoKoopa wrote:Not as town.In post 635, DeasVail wrote:He does this all the time!!!!In post 633, NachoKoopa wrote:Brushing me off again. What is your current read of me?In post 627, Majiffy wrote:I am towning the towniest I can town, you just have your head up your ass.
You haven't answered my question, so I still don't think you care.In post 652, Majiffy wrote:Go find my reads list and poke around the posts near there. I had people questioning my read on you and no one supporting me.
I'm thinking about my other reads and considering other options, but if tunneling just means trying to lynch your strongest scumread, then I don't really mind if I am?In post 680, talah wrote:Deas - I have a slight scumread on Majerky right now but the risk/reward of him actually being town makes him not a fantastic D1 lynch. ADDITIONALLY I wish you'd stop tunnelling him and you know, scumhunt.
Of course it was completely wrong. I know it was completely wrong. You know it's completely wrong. I'm not that deluded.In post 627, Majiffy wrote:Because the active cunts in the game all have it in their weak little minds that you're somehow town, which is not only beside me but also fucking retarded.
-Look at my postsIn post 780, Majiffy wrote:Go on...In post 763, DeasVail wrote:but I think there are other scummy things about [Majiffy] too.
When you challenge arguments for someone being scum, that shows a town-lean, if not a town-read.In post 766, DeasVail wrote:when I challenge Majiffy about this in 628, he responds with something that doesn't actually indicate people thinking I'm town 652
When you don't support arguments for someone being scum, that shows the lack of a scum-lean or a scum read.
This isn't hard.
No that's not why I think you're scum but if that makes you feel better then sure?In post 783, Majiffy wrote:Your posts have all been "Wah! Majiffy won't answer my really self-evident questions! What a scumbag!"
So I'm asking you to further your case with reasons you've already stated exist. So go on, then. Lets see whatcha got.
They asked me to explain in a tone that implied they disagreed with the read. And certainly no one supported the scumread. Ergo, I'm right, you're wrong. Again. Twist it how you want, I'll still be right.
I understand where you're coming from, but if I thought Nacho was scum as I do Majiffy, I'd be all for lynching him too. I don't think the fact that someone's experienced should stop us from lynching them.In post 876, talah wrote:Let me put it this way. What if we lynched Nacho today and he flipped town?
Imperfect analogy but people's thoughts evolve as more information comes to light and D1 isn't the best time to be lynching experienced players I have only a mild scum-lean on. I want to see what he does tomorrow, if he's still alive.
Is there anyone else you feel is a good lynch for today?
This is where you should start thinking that we're probably not partners.In post 940, Majiffy wrote:Jesus Christ if you guys flip partners you are without a doubt the worst scum team ever.In post 933, DeasVail wrote:I completely agree with Pie about Majiffy.
I'll say more about this later, but regardless, pie shouldn't be lynched today.In post 1067, waynegg wrote:How about SK?In post 1065, Majiffy wrote:Breadcrumb was ridiculously bad. Plus he's a little scumbutt.
I've never encountered a scum vig before, seems kind of weird considering scumalready have a night kill.