And gawd, we have 6 hydras?!
@Nero I like your hydra plan, you can go in my town pile for that.
In post 33, FuDuzn wrote:No, no......it's pronounced....
FUUuuu....DOOOOOOzzz......ZZZEEEEeeeennn
You have to breathe in the O's.
Aw, no unbridled wrath? You leave me disappointed Skull.In post 41, Skullduggery wrote:Harrumph. I can only dispenseunbridledwrath onto one person at a time. If I have to split it up between four people, then it just gets diluted into regular wrath, and really, what's even the point of that?
Save_Us_Skullduggery? Fear not, for I shall break the walls down and save you all.In post 28, FuDuzn wrote:Three votes on me, where is this unbridled wrath that will save me??
UNVOTE:
VOTE: Skullduggery
FuDuzn counterwagon go go go.
Not really, the Monkey wagon doesn't seem very random to me. Squid seemed pretty serious about his vote.In post 72, ferretlover wrote:I think that right now it is still all random votes and shenanigans. Can we all just stop overreacting to everything?
Yes, but it was your vague threat that originally started the Fuduzango wagon in the first place.In post 84, Skullduggery wrote:Well, I saved FuDuzn from being the main wagon, didn't I?In post 65, Ravenpaw wrote:How does self-voting save us?
What's a jib?Why do I care so much about helping FuDuzn, you ask? Becausewe're Scumbuddies, obviouslyI like the cut of his jib, that's all. Also because I'm a Fandango fan.
Whoa! Did Nero accidentally let slip some qt discussion he'd had?In post 100, zachattack wrote:The way it was written sounded like somebody told you I was good. "Zack is supposed to be a pretty good player so he's out". I've certainly never played with you, unless you're an alt.In post 87, Nero Cain wrote:No I saw it, I just didn't think it was important. Do you think its important line of questioning?In post 75, zachattack wrote: Nero, you probably missed it because I didn't use proper quote tags. Where did the idea that I'm a good player come from?
Either I played a game with you and thought you were good or I'm thinking of another user.
Maybe, but Nero did write a lot in his first post, so it might’ve slipped his mind that he’d had that particular discussion in his qt.In post 103, xMALCOLMx wrote:This vote is a bit boring. I don't think that Nero would have a discussion about zach being a good player in his scum QT and then immediately slip that info in his first post of the game. Do you?In post 102, Ravenpaw wrote:Whoa! Did Nero accidentally let slip some qt discussion he'd had?
Hmm...
Yet you vote someone not on the Skull wagon atm?In post 142, RATEDR wrote:Arc is town since she's not playing akwardly
Were out of RVS and all these wagons are lame, especially the skull one which is just dumb so yeah, feels like scum is riding on that wagon atm.
VOTE: Ravenpaw
Doesn’t explicitly saying this make it immediately useless?In post 159, Krab Bucket wrote: We could try some mousetraps manoeuvres to bait them out, and hopefully we'll hit scum if we do it correctly (unless it's town playing poorly)
~Krabs
A little too easy wouldn’t you say?In post 166, RATEDR wrote:Wow that was easy
What’s wrong with being aggressive and interrogative? I like that style.In post 177, RATEDR wrote:I dont know if you realize it but your posts recently are really in your face aggressive interrogation and that is a pain to deal with
Tingle tingle go my Raveny senses.In post 178, ferretlover wrote:I forgot the word "could" between "that" and "alone". Never said that it really is, however. I was just saying that it COULD be.
This post is terribad.In post 181, ferretlover wrote:Look at post #179 for the explanation, thank you very much.
RavenPaw has also only posted 5 times. Are going fast or are they lurking?
This game was as interesting as a Divas match (and for you non-WWE fans this means it was dull). I was after some action and thank gosh I got some.In post 184, ferretlover wrote:Wow o.O.
It feels like about 5 IRL days into this day. Weird.
I'd also like to point out about RavenPaw that she only has 5 posts, 4 of them are vote/unvote, which means to me she is kind of just riding our wagons and changing her vote when we change the wagon.
Explain how that is a deflection please.In post 189, Skullduggery wrote:Ah, so the FuDuzn mini-wagon isIn post 102, Ravenpaw wrote:Yes, but it was your vague threat that originally started the Fuduzango wagon in the first place.In post 84, Skullduggery wrote:Well, I saved FuDuzn from being the main wagon, didn't I?In post 65, Ravenpaw wrote:How does self-voting save us?myfault now, is it? Nice deflection there.
Can you clarify what quote it was that triggered your vote and why?In post 197, FuDuzn wrote: And after that Raven quote that Skullduggery(I also like the cut of your jib, cool name as well) er....quoted, I can do a Raven lynch.
The sky.In post 198, Amethyst Actor wrote:I skimmed through a bit but Raven is not reminding me of Town raven. Sup Girlie?
Why, if you think I'm scum shouldn't more votes be kosher with you? And you never said this when you put Skull at L-3, why is that?In post 200, Nero Cain wrote: nope, that's 6 votes. We should hold off till we hear from her.
Why did you feel the need to share this at this time Fuduzn?In post 202, FuDuzn wrote:I will say, and I preface this as it was only one game, but I have played with scum TAM(daddy) and this is vastly different then he was in that game. And ironically Marangal(mommy) was scum in that game as well.......and I read her well as scum. This is a bit of a 'stream of consciousness' post, but just thought I would share.
This!In post 106, Svenskt Stål wrote: Also could every hydra start to sign thier posts? WIll be helpfull upon rereads to know how reads progressed and not be like "wtf... how did that happen"
Can you lay out what your argument for me as scum is please, as currently it just seems to be "oh Ravenpaw said Nero scum-slipped, obvious scum alert!"In post 235, RATEDR wrote:Not at all, no. The speed of the (pretty small) wagon is more related to the quality of the argument against you than any possible conspiracy theories you might want to pull out of your ass, scum.In post 230, Ravenpaw wrote:[quote="In post 230A little too easy wouldn’t you say?In post 166, RATEDR wrote:Wow that was easy
Aw, I feel loved.In post 239, Svenskt Stål wrote:Actually we could talk about anything, I just want to interact with you.
As I said Esquire is null for me, there's other people giving off more scummier vibes. Top one presently is Nero.In post 241, Svenskt Stål wrote:Allright. Why is (whom ever you´re voting) a better vote than esquire?
My reaction was it was very interesting and actually helped me get a better grip on this game.In post 242, TheEsquire wrote:Hey, it's Raven! I'd like to hear your reactions to all the votes and such thrown at you. What's going on here? I agree that RATEDR's vote on Raven is weird considering he even mentioned how crappy the Skull wagon was. I somehow missed that line. I don't like early bandwagons, the one on you included.In post 230, Ravenpaw wrote:Me likey all this activity. Posts incoming.
So far I lean town on Krab bucket and Monkeyman.In post 250, Svenskt Stål wrote: Hmm... got any townies? I only got one.
All I can really do to help you is to say look at my posts and the reasons for my actions. Do they come across as town or scum motivated?In post 258, Svenskt Stål wrote:Raven, help me read you town. What should I be looking at?
I understand, but scum-Ravenpaw hasn't come into existence (yet) so I cannot honestly say what the difference would be in my play. All my games I've been town.In post 263, Svenskt Stål wrote:You dont get what I am asking. If someone asked me the same question I would answer that as town I am probably more reserved, I have fewer reads, I ask more questions. These are all symptoms of me being unable to approach the game in the same way regardless of alingment. Its a very hard question to asnswer, I know that.In post 260, Ravenpaw wrote:All I can really do to help you is to say look at my posts and the reasons for my actions. Do they come across as town or scum motivated?In post 258, Svenskt Stål wrote:Raven, help me read you town. What should I be looking at?
Also it's helpful to take a look at the people on my wagon and the reasons they have given (if any). Do any votes seem they like they are maliciously motivated?
Or maybe flipping the question would be more helpful- do you see anything scummy about me? If so please ask me about it and I will hopefully be able to clear up whatever it is.
If I read a couple ofyourscum games and a couple ofyourtown games what diffrences would I find, what do you think would be of importance?
No, this is actually very good play imo.In post 287, RATEDR wrote:Other far smaller scum-reads include GoodCopBadCop... and his questioning of very small and worthless things ("Hmm, clicking someone's ISO by accident, how unusual, DON'T YOU THINK?)
Okay, so this is the argument on me right:In post 297, RATEDR wrote:
That post did come across as genuine to me, but it doesn't make up for all the other scum-signals she's put through. I'd love at the very least her response to my argument on her
1. No-one asked me for my case on Nero, they all just jumped to the conclusion that it was that one thing I was voting him for. Notice the “hmm…” in my post? It shows I was thinking about Nero and his previous actions, and coupled with that recent development I thought it was a good vote. And the vote did gather discussion, which is awesome for town.Then, he defends it by going "Oh, come on, I had other reasons to vote him, plus, it has gathered DISCUSSION" (post #230, can't be arsed to quote it) which is an absolute bullshit defense of a bad vote and/or bad logicThe line that sticks out to me as a very weird one is this one:
In post 102, Ravenpaw wrote:Whoa! Did Nero accidentally let slip some qt discussion he'd had?
Hmm...
Unvote
Vote: Nero Cane
Lastly, there's a lot of bullshit in post #231, particularly Ravenpaw passively aggressively asking FuDuzn why he felt like sharing meta he had, why would any Townie do this? It comes across as Mafia trying to look pro-active.
Can you clarify the condescension please?In post 300, Krab Bucket wrote: Raven's #237 seems condescending, which can either be anti-town, or very minor OMGUS.
Agree with this. That wagon needs to get pushed into gear already.In post 325, GoodCopBadCop wrote: However Ferret just seems more scummy. His vote on Raven seems incredibly forced and his reason weak. Voting/unvoting is mostly anti-town, not vote worthy.
...Or maybe a Jebus wagon.In post 331, Jebus wrote:If you look the bottom right under the page numbers, there's a link that says "Activity Overview". Click on that, and then it'll give you a list of players and postcounts. Click on the number of posts and it'll give you all of their posts in iso.
I was clarifying why I had voted.In post 366, Skullduggery wrote:That's the second time you've referenced my "threat." You do realize I was being facetious, right? Why are you so hung up on that?In post 230, Ravenpaw wrote:And to clarifiy my votes: Malcomx was a random, Fud’s was an answer/challenge to Skull’s threat, Skull’s was a slight scum feel coupled with a wagon-a-go-go, and Nero’s was a serious vote.
I do see where you’re coming from, but what I did was not a deflection because the reason I pointed out your threat causing the wagon was to make explicit the logic of the situation. Or do you believe that Fuduzn’s wagon had nothing to do with you?Certainly. You said that my vague (facetious) threat is what started the FuDuzn wagon. In doing so, you're blaming me for starting a wagonIn post 231, Ravenpaw wrote:Explain how that is a deflection please.that I was never onwhile absolving yourself (and the other players that jumped onto it) of any wrongdoing. You see where I'm coming from?
And this is becoming a little pet peeve of mine in mafia games. I asked you a question, yet someone else deemed it necessary to butt in before you could answer. I wanted your explanation because you were inferring a town read on Fudz because you liked the cut of his jib, that's why I wantedFuDuzn answered that question. I didn't see the point of answering it as well when I'd basically just be saying the same thing.In post 231, Ravenpaw wrote:And Skull you missed my jib question, yeah I was making a Simpson reference, but I was still after a proper explanation off you.
No, it’s called keeping an open mind, which is essential for mafia games.Possible fear mongering?In post 240, Ravenpaw wrote:Plus I don't think it's a sure thing to say that Jericho would be town, the current heel/face alignments in WWE land are probably irrelevant to this game.
This reads list is slightly weird because it really feels like you should be voting for me, not Nero. Why the hesitation to get on my wagon Skull?Sure thing.In post 242, TheEsquire wrote:@Skullduggery: Who are your biggest scumspects/why? I'd value your input here since you're in my good graces and, well, I trust you right now
Fuzzyman - Voted for me because of my oh-so-scummy self-vote, which makes me Scum, somehow, I guess. Says he won't move it until I give a better reason for my self-vote (spoiler: it isn't coming, chief), which smells of Scum in cruise control. Also mentions appeals to emotions and lurking in post 190 seemingly out of nowhere. Scum planning ahead, maybe?
Nero - Seems a little too vote-hoppy and opportunistic for my liking. Has been pushing wagons all game, and when people ask him to explain why, he just brushes them off with dismissive answers like "I was just messing around." Could just be flippant Town, sure, but it could be Scum-motivated as well.
Ravenpaw - Deflection of blame, (possible) fear mongering as I just mentioned, unprovoked reassurance that she did in fact receive a Town PM in post 231, and tenuous "QT scumslip" accusations on Nero.
Krab Bucket - Started off with a lot of "I'm gonna do this now" with no follow-up, which seemed like Scum trying to look busy. Has gotten a little better as of Post 300, but I still can't shake the feeling that he's really going out of his way to look pro-Town, as others have pointed out. It reminds me a lot of the way I played the first time I was ever Scum.
I'd be fine with lynching any of those four today.
What’s your case for him as scum?In post 361, Nero Cain wrote:So anyone wanna kill Goat with me?
There’s a term to describe what Fuzzy has just done to me here but I can’t think of it at the moment, but basically he’s laying out a trap to stop me from voting anyone else. If I do he can immediately jump on me and say “look what I said before! Raven’s doing it! Therefore she’s scum!”.In post 371, Fuzzyman wrote:It wouldn't surprise me if Ravenpaw were to jump fairly quickly onto the next viable wagon that comes around. I'll be watching out for stuff like this.
And? What difference does this have on his alignment? He can be noob and scum y’know.In post 396, Amethyst Actor wrote:Not feeling Ferret, he feels like a noob to me
Krabs pinged as town for me as his vote onto my wagon felt the least scummy. He showed his thought processes for it and I like that, so it gave me a town feel.can someone tell me why Krab Hydra is town/null? He pinged my radar pretty fucking hard
Jebus is not doing anything to help town. He still has his RV activated, he is ignoring questions asked of him (but he took the time to answer a question about the site’s mechanics) and then just left again.I also don't see the case against Jebus so a clarification on that would be nice as well
I found it helpful to focus on those on my wagon and their reasons why. His vote stood out as the least malicious/opportunistic as he gave his thoughts as to why he made the leap, which showed he was considering the case and not just mindlessly sheeping.In post 399, Svenskt Stål wrote:This is a wierd ass reason for calling someone town.In post 398, Ravenpaw wrote:can someone tell me why Krab Hydra is town/null? He pinged my radar pretty fucking hardKrabs pinged as town for me as his vote onto my wagon felt the least scummy. He showed his thought processes for it and I like that, so it gave me a town feel.
Also, you should interact more with me or I might loose faith in my read on you.
I gave my reasons in #398. Basically some of his posts come across as contradictory and fake. He also pushed horrible reasons to vote for me and he's been active lurking. Why do you see him as town?In post 401, xMALCOLMx wrote:I'm actually quite liking ferret for town. What are you seeing that I'm not?In post 234, Ravenpaw wrote:I would also be game for a ferret lynch too.
In post 402, Svenskt Stål wrote: I agree completely about bouncing arround and approaching null reads, but I think that mixing in people that you can bounce ideas with does alot of good. It helps against tunnel vision, as in you might see something one way but someone you trust sees it another way. It also forms cohisiveness and bonding and a good overall work atmosphere.
Jebus is a slight scum. He really needs to start posting more and he’s been active elsewhere so I don’t understand why not here. I also don’t like how he had the time to post about how to iso but completely ignored everything else.Regarding Nero, I am at the point where I feel comfortable calling him town. I dont remember how many that makes but he is like one out of five so far. But that makes like you, AA9, Nero, Krabs, ... I am forgetting people.
People that should be pressured in my mind are Jebus, AA, GOAT and GCBC. What do you think of those four?
So why specifically mention that you'd need to look at my further play to make a conclusion? Why not just say "I'm probably going to analyse their play before I come to a conclusion"?In post 404, Krab Bucket wrote:Regarding my contradiction, I felt I could come to a valid conclusion with my vote by just analysing the posts that I had seen harder. As for your further play, it's been better, but it still gives me a scummy taste.
In post 230, Ravenpaw wrote:Doesn’t explicitly saying this make it immediately useless?In post 159, Krab Bucket wrote: We could try some mousetraps manoeuvres to bait them out, and hopefully we'll hit scum if we do it correctly (unless it's town playing poorly)
~Krabs
In post 393, Ravenpaw wrote:Can you clarify the condescension please?In post 300, Krab Bucket wrote: Raven's #237 seems condescending, which can either be anti-town, or very minor OMGUS.
1. Haha, not with me around matey. I iso the crap out of everyone and constantly re-read. The second part of your sentence is interesting though… are you saying that right now you’re acting like an easy target? And why must it be your wagon that gets pushed to find scum?In post 413, Krab Bucket wrote:First point: Shhh. I wanted to try and let people forget it. Then I could act like an easy target and see who pushed my wagon so much.In post 409, Ravenpaw wrote:So why specifically mention that you'd need to look at my further play to make a conclusion? Why not just say "I'm probably going to analyse their play before I come to a conclusion"?In post 404, Krab Bucket wrote:Regarding my contradiction, I felt I could come to a valid conclusion with my vote by just analysing the posts that I had seen harder. As for your further play, it's been better, but it still gives me a scummy taste.
And my play's been better... but is still scummy? How does that work exactly?
Also Krabs you have now avoided two of my questions directed at you, can you answer them please? Heck I'll quote them right here so you don't even have to go iso'ing:In post 230, Ravenpaw wrote:Doesn’t explicitly saying this make it immediately useless?In post 159, Krab Bucket wrote: We could try some mousetraps manoeuvres to bait them out, and hopefully we'll hit scum if we do it correctly (unless it's town playing poorly)
~KrabsIn post 393, Ravenpaw wrote:Can you clarify the condescension please?In post 300, Krab Bucket wrote: Raven's #237 seems condescending, which can either be anti-town, or very minor OMGUS.
Second point: You treated his vote as if it was worthless, and you also seemed quite startled.
~Krabs
I still feel iffy about ferret but I’m willing to let him slide today because I like Malcolm’s post about his newbie confidence. I’m cool with pressuring Jebus.In post 421, Svenskt Stål wrote:Nero and raven
I agree on goat... but he falls in the same folder as Jebus. The absolute best read anyone can have on Jebus is null.
I sudgest that we focus our efforts on the same target, lets start with Jebus?
This is a good observation, and I appreciate the psychological approach taken with it.In post 427, xMALCOLMx wrote:I think ferret is town. The way the he holds such conviction in such ridiculous things seems to be coming from an independent thought process. He's pretty fearless for a newbie, which is pretty hard to mimic as scum without prior experience.In post 164, ferretlover wrote:oh lol
I just derped around and accidentally clicked RavenPaw's ISO button, and she has vote/unvote FOUR TIMES. I think that alone is enough of a reason to vote for her.
UNVOTE
VOTE: RAVENPAW
In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:@Raven:
1: The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post. Also, I would be acting like an easy target, if you didn't constantly bring it up!
So now you’re saying that being condescending is only something scum would do?2: I didn't really view it as condescending at the time because RatedR was a town read of mine.
Ok, and how does this affect your current read on me?Second Point: It's turning more into a mixed bag of play, instead of pure-scum play.
*Looks above* I don’t the reasons, Krabs, can you outline them for me please?In post 450, Krab Bucket wrote:Personally, my 4 targets of the day would be Ravenpaw (reasons listed above), Doctor whatever (pathetic contributions, from a hydra that's disgraceful), Amethyst (hasn't been scumhunting, and then calls me opportunistic without expanding on it at all), and Nero Cain (The meta comment from Monkey was really interesting, and Nero's reasoning for jumping on the Skull wagon was poor)
~Krabs
You missed my question about who your 3 scumspects were but seeing as you’ve now said no-one I guess it doesn’t matter. Also you don’t care to respond to my case on you?In post 474, ferretlover wrote:Well, I just C+F'd ('cause I have a life and can't read through all of the posts right now) the last 10 pages, and didn't see any questions pertaining to me. Could someone just have some questions that you want me to answer?
Scum can be active and not be a***holes too ftr.In post 477, ferretlover wrote:I don't understand what Krabs is doing wrong. He's not lurking, being an arsehole, or any of that crap. He seems to be legitimately trying to help.
Yes, however the reasons you had listed it felt like your justification was stronger to vote for me, especially when you’d question your Nero tell by saying that town can also do that. Plus you haven’t been talking with Nero much at all, but you still have your vote on him, so why aren’t you pushing his wagon?In post 490, Skullduggery wrote:I don't know if "hesitation" is the right word. I only have one vote, so I can't very well vote for all four of you at once, can I?In post 394, Ravenpaw wrote:This reads list is slightly weird because it really feels like you should be voting for me, not Nero. Why the hesitation to get on my wagon Skull?
What do you think of AA, ferret?In post 496, ferretlover wrote:I don't really have any scumreads for now, so I will make a vote in my next post for the person with the post longest ago.
Ah okay, thanks for clearing that up for me.In post 524, Svenskt Stål wrote:I think it refers to game setups where there are other factions then just town/scum. Like SK, neutrals, seperate scum factions.
Why is posting a lot a bad thing? His posts have been helpful.In post 544, GoodCopBadCop wrote:Also, Sven stop posting so much. You're responsible for more than 1/5 of all the posts.
I agree with all of this.In post 562, GoodCopBadCop wrote:This is super scummy. You don't even know what's going on. You just saw an opportunity to vote me and did it.In post 551, Krab Bucket wrote:Claiming neutral, then demanding that a Vigi goes on one of the most pro-town players in the game at this moment in time?
Not to mention your flip-flopping makes me think Mitt Romney is part of your hydra.
I don't bye your claim one bit, and even if you are a neutral, why would you actively say you want a Vigi to kill what many players believe to be one of the most pro-town players at this point. Neutral or not,it seems you may be detrimental to our success.
UNVOTE: Ravenpaw
VOTE: GCBC
~Krabs
I didn't ask a vig to kill anyone. I just "did it" myself.
The bolded is terrible. It's like you know i'm town and you're justifying a policy lynch.
VOTE: Krab
In post 566, ferretlover wrote:@Ravenpaw what have I ignored? Just quote/say it again and I'll probably be happy to answer.
In post 504, Ravenpaw wrote: You missed my question about who your 3 scumspects were but seeing as you’ve now said no-one I guess it doesn’t matter. Also you don’t care to respond to my case on you?
There's other stuff I said to you but answering these will do for now.What do you think of AA, ferret?
Yes and it was in a response to you:In post 580, Amethyst Actor wrote: Raven, did you answer why you thought Ferret is scum? I don't see an answer to how anything they are doing can be deemed as scummy
But with that said, this is old stuff. New info has come to light (and I have said why Ferret dings my radar a bit less now), so I'm not currently feeling his lynch right now. Why don't you ask the people that are actually voting for him why they think he's scum?In post 398, Ravenpaw wrote:And? What difference does this have on his alignment? He can be noob and scum y’know.In post 396, Amethyst Actor wrote:Not feeling Ferret, he feels like a noob to me
Reasons for why ferret is giving me scum vibes:
1. He says in post 72 that the votes are all still random, yet in 162 he would say his vote on Skull from post 49 was (still) legitimate.
2. Post 178, his backtracking in his words that he meant to write “could” as well read as so very fake. (And actually if the word 'could' is added the sentence doesn't read correctly anymore).
3. His making an issue out of my activity and voting was terribad, and held no water whatsoever. It felt like he just wanted to show that he wasn’t just sheeping Rated R.
4. He has time to ask what is IIOA which shows he’s reading the thread, yet doesn’t respond to anything in the actual game?
Yep, thanks for clarifying.In post 595, GoodCopBadCop wrote:In post 590, Svenskt Stål wrote:Right so I have to iso ferret, then skull then AA... might do AA before skull..
Will happen this evening,
Scum, run scared.@Raven - You get what I mean...In post 591, Svenskt Stål wrote:but first a movie.
I agree, he only has 6 votes, yet he's already giving up? And if he really had an important role he wouldn't be worried about a wagon on himself building up because he would know that his claim would save him. But he is worried.In post 629, Amethyst Actor wrote:I'm calling a bluff on Krab's part
He does scum AtE when his wagon builds up on him and he makes us think that he's has some kind of important role by soft-claiming before his wagon gets to L-2
In post 504, Ravenpaw wrote:In post 430, Krab Bucket wrote:@Raven:
1: The point of me keeping it quiet is so I can bait people pushing for an easy lynch. Then I can spring the trap by quoting that post. Also, I would be acting like an easy target, if you didn't constantly bring it up!
Ok, I’m not following your thought processes at all here Krabs. So you are saying that you are acting like an easy target? And can you clarify why it must be your wagon pushed to find scum? Also, I mentioned the words easy target once and that was in a response to your use of it…so how is that constantly?
So now you’re saying that being condescending is only something scum would do?2: I didn't really view it as condescending at the time because RatedR was a town read of mine.
Ok, and how does this affect your current read on me?Second Point: It's turning more into a mixed bag of play, instead of pure-scum play.
*Looks above* I don’t [see] the reasons, Krabs, can you outline them for me please?In post 450, Krab Bucket wrote:Personally, my 4 targets of the day would be Ravenpaw (reasons listed above), Doctor whatever (pathetic contributions, from a hydra that's disgraceful), Amethyst (hasn't been scumhunting, and then calls me opportunistic without expanding on it at all), and Nero Cain (The meta comment from Monkey was really interesting, and Nero's reasoning for jumping on the Skull wagon was poor)
~Krabs
And beyond Nero’s skull vote, what do you think of his other play?
Yeah Fuzzy's been bothering me too. It's also annoying that he was absent for 2 days and now comes back only to go on a VLA.In post 623, Skullduggery wrote: There's something that has been bothering me about Fuzzyman. I wanted to chat about it some more before bringing it up, but now the rascal has gone VLA and I don't feel like waiting any longer.
Fuzzyman thinks I'm Scum because I self-voted at the beginning of the game. According to him, I shouldn't have done that since I'm putting a Town player (myself) in danger, which is "nearly as bad as being Scum."In post 371, Fuzzyman wrote:You're pretty determined to avoid explaining how your actions have been pro-town, eh? Skull, when you self-vote, you are either scum or you are voting for someone you know to be town, which is nearly as bad as being scum. You claim that you did it to "create discussion", but what that really means is that you created something for people to call you out on, so that you could lash back at them, painting them as scummy for questioning you. Not good play at all.
Putting yourself in danger as Town is scummy? Then why hasn't he saidanythingabout Krab Bucket's alleged plan to make himself an easy target and attract suspicion? According to Fuzzyman's logic, Krab Bucket and I are doing essentially the same thing -- putting ourselves in danger. When I do it, I'm scummy and I deserve his vote. When Krab Bucket does it, it gets completely ignored. Now isn'tthatpeculiar.
Because there's scummier people, and there's no-one on that wagon and we're running out of time. He can be pressured tomorrow.In post 648, Nero Cain wrote:Why not Goat?
What don’t you like about my defense specifically?In post 650, RATEDR wrote: -I don't like Raven's defense to my attacks, if anything it just made me feel even more that he's scum.
Why do you disagree with it?For reference, its post #393. In that same post he defends GoodCop's abrasive playstyle on every small worthless thing as "good play", which let's just say I strongly disagree with.
All his posts since then have come across as illogical
My read of Krabs has changed! Did you even read all my posts??? I’ve been pressuring him like heck ever since I found an inconsistency in him, and have him as one of my strongest scum reads.and just the complete opposite of my reads, including his defense of Krab,
Who’s being illogical now darling?his defense of GoodCop and his scum-read on Ferret (who I've had as null to Town this whole time). Having different opinions than me does not make one Mafia, but its a good point to add on top of all the others.
I’m against it because I have a strong town read on them. There play has been very critical, and I’ve found their analyses very helpful.In post 678, Svenskt Stål wrote: Hey raven, can you tell me why you are against a GCBC lynch? What do you see that I dont?
The scummiest things he’s done imo:Also could you sum up what you think Krabs most scummy actions are?
Actually I take back the firetruck, let's make it a "what the funk?"In post 728, Ravenpaw wrote:What. The. Firetruck.
Goat's a null for me, his reaction to Cops’ test did bother me but not so much as Krabs. He's done some scummy things but he aslo has a few townie things that he’s done imo.In post 703, Nero Cain wrote:I agree with this. What does this make you think of Goat?In post 700, Ravenpaw wrote:I’m against it because I have a strong town read on them. There play has been very critical, and I’ve found their analyses very helpful.In post 678, Svenskt Stål wrote: Hey raven, can you tell me why you are against a GCBC lynch? What do you see that I dont?
And I really don’t see scum doing that vig test that they pulled earlier.
Despie's reaction seemed pretty darn legit to me. Why didn't you like it?Yet so did Goat. Desperado's reaction is the one that I like least.The scummiest things he’s done imo:Also could you sum up what you think Krabs most scummy actions are?
1. His reaction to the vig test, he didn’t even understand what Cops had written yet took the opportunity to switch to that wagon when he saw some ‘peculiar’ play.
Ah ok, I missed that.In post 732, Nero Cain wrote:In post 730, Ravenpaw wrote:Despie's reaction seemed pretty darn legit to me. Why didn't you like it?In post 711, Nero Cain wrote:Your "woah"-"full claim" seems kinda cautious and then jumping onto the Krabs wagon seemed a bit opportunistic.In post 705, Desperado wrote:@ Nero can you go into more detail about that? A couple other players have said they had the opposite reaction.
Post 494 sounded pretty genuine- he's not afraid to acknowledge how his day 1 play can be unhelpful. He's also not afraid to post while drunk which as someone said before seems more something that a townie would do then scum. He could definitely be more helpful but he has started giving reads which is something.What townie things has Goat done, Raven?
Even worse is that there are two people in that slot. Where is TAM at?In post 733, Svenskt Stål wrote:In post 727, Amethyst Actor wrote:Don't have time, I'll be back Tuesday and maybe Wednesday for some of you guys. When did Peta get in this game?
-Mom
This is a slot that has problem commenting on the game.
This slot is very likely scum.
It does, and I'm still working on my playstyle so I embrace any and all advice so thank you.In post 748, Svenskt Stål wrote:raven, to get your questions answered people has to feel like they have to... even townies. Most are just polite and answers anyway but with some there has to be an incentive. The best incetive is that when your voice carries weight and you are a consencous townie.
So, some tips, be as open as you can and speak your mind, if you are town thats how others will get the same idea.
When formulating questions in which you have suspicion you should make that known, say that you didnt like a post with reasoning and you decide to ask "why did you think that". Instead, first explain that you find it scummy, explain why, and then ask the questions in sucha a way as for you to get insight into his decisions.
Dont know if that helps or if its just shit.
In post 778, Svenskt Stål wrote:Answer my fucking questions ferret
Definitely what was on my mind too, it feels like scum just giving up.In post 878, Skullduggery wrote:Keeping my vote where it is for now. If Krab Bucket really is a PR like he soft-claimed in 624, I want to say that he'd have fought a little harder to diffuse the wagon on him. I just have a hard time believing that a PR would wuss out like this at the first sign of danger. The soft-claim is a lie.
^ This felt like a soft-claim to me.In post 624, Krab Bucket wrote: Might as well claim soon.
In post 788, Desperado wrote: @ Darthe why is ferret in your town and scum lists?
I echo this sentiment, but it's more then a gut read for me. He avoids answering my questions and throws silly accusations at me that make no sense.In post 890, GoodCopBadCop wrote:@MalcomAgreed. I got a gut scum read on Rated.Malcom wrote:If you post something better than "LURKER LURKER LURKER LURKER" you might be able to get something done, but not until then. I'm not opposed to a rated wagon after Krabs is lynched though.
What is the point of this vote at this stage of the day? Desp is not going to gather 10 more votes in a day.
Why do you think he's town?In post 992, MonkeyMan576 wrote:I would, if I thought he was scum.In post 990, Ravenpaw wrote:What is the point of this vote at this stage of the day? Desp is not going to gather 10 more votes in a day.
Do something helpful and vote for Krabs.
Have you even looked at Krab's posts and the interactions he had?In post 1002, MonkeyMan576 wrote: Mostly the people on his wagon.
What? That is not how it works! You don't just get to throw out a whole bunch of accusations and then just blatantly ignore the response. If you truly believe I am scum then you should have no problem responding to my questions here:In post 1046, RATEDR wrote:Also, Ravenpaw, I'm not answering to you because you're not bringing up any point or question worthy of discussion. You keep acting as fake and forced as you did 38 or so pages ago. Although there are bigger fish to fry now.
-Grazie
In post 672, Ravenpaw wrote:Your read on me Rated R is terribad, why do you do this, are you not reading the thread properly or are you scum?
What don’t you like about my defense specifically?In post 650, RATEDR wrote: -I don't like Raven's defense to my attacks, if anything it just made me feel even more that he's scum.Why do you disagree with it?For reference, its post #393. In that same post he defends GoodCop's abrasive playstyle on every small worthless thing as "good play", which let's just say I strongly disagree with.All his posts since then have come across as illogical
Show me where I have been illogical?My read of Krabs has changed! Did you even read all my posts??? I’ve been pressuring him like heck ever since I found an inconsistency in him, and have him as one of my strongest scum reads.and just the complete opposite of my reads, including his defense of Krab,Who’s being illogical now darling?his defense of GoodCop and his scum-read on Ferret (who I've had as null to Town this whole time). Having different opinions than me does not make one Mafia, but its a good point to add on top of all the others.