Or does the Mayor step down, get impeached, etc? I'm confused. :/
Anyway, I wouldn't mind being elected Mayor. If you need to see credentials on my skill with an arbitrarily given perk, go read Kingmaker Mafia.
Hurrah!
...but some of them....Mariyta wrote:I don't think I want to see most of these people naked.....lordy wrote:Vote Lordy For Mayor!
I will legalise public nudity!
Dont beat around the bush, show Bush your bush!
Mastermind of Sin wrote:The town of Indecision has decided to elect amayor, with a term of one day, until they get rid of this threat. The mayor cannot be lynched or targetted at night, nor can they make any night actions of their own. They will have 2 votes during the day.
LIES! THERE SHALL BE NO SUCH SACRIFICES FOR GLORKSCUM IN THIS GAME!! I GO FOR THE FLAWLESS VICTORY!! >=[petroleumjelly wrote:Heh, you're just fine, Mudbuck. The mods will be sending out roles soon, we have a Mayor all set up and ready (and trust me, Glork being mayor should be helpful, since he'll sacrifice scummates for us if he is scum ), and now you won't be replaced since you've posted. Just be sure to be active once the game starts!
Yosarian, Max *CLAIMS* to have targeted Pooky. He also claims to have the potential to "blow up" things or people, and now he's not elaborating on what the hell he's talking about. An innocent was blown up last night.Yosarian2 wrote:Except Max hasnotadmittend to any nightkills. He targeted someone, not knowing what the effect it would have, and that person died. Now we know that that person died because a vig killed him.
QFFT.Yosarian2 wrote:Like I said, we should be able to avoid that by having all the vigs target the same person every night. That way, there should only be one extra death a night, and we'll be able to pick who it is. I'd rather have one extra kill a night that then waste multiple days lynching pro-town people.Yaw wrote: You're telling me that having 6+ kills a night isn't a problem?
...
But you're talking about there being three extra random kills. That going to hurt.
I'd thought about this. I'm pretty sure they have to target somebody else.Yosarian2 wrote:Hmmm...I just looked back at thue rules, and it specfically said the mayor can't be "targeted". Mod, what would happen if a vig tried to target the mayor?
Raj, you should know me better than that. I know this is complete 100% WIFOM, but I'm not blatant enough to FoS two of my scumbuddies while attacking the same player(s) as them.rajrhcpfreak wrote:thats not what i ment.Glork wrote:My "Mari for Mayor" bit was not intended to be serious. Hence the ":P" face. Raj is misrepresenting me by saying I FoS'd Mari then supported her for mayor.FoS: Rajfor that and his support of Yaw and his plan.... neither of which I am particularly fond.
you try to distance yourself by fosing mari and pj by fosing them
but then you 3 start attacking yaw and me together.
Oh, because you NEVER make a joke in a game.Raj wrote:if the mayor wasnt ment to be serious then why didnt you say it sooner and tell people that making the vig the mayor wont work? if its not serious then dont start saying crap like that.
Read this role.Yaw wrote:1 -- Mariyta admitted to killing last night (which ought to be enough as it is, unless we're talking about IS).
2 -- Mariyta stated she must kill each night.
That's the definition of a scum role! It's clearly anti-town!
And who is pushing the Mari lynch most fervently?al_kohaulec wrote:Hehehe, I remember that game all too well Glork . That forced vig gave us mafia an easy lynch.
Which means it could happen again.
Max wrote:FA here's an idea how often do you see mafia inventors apart from in games that I host IRL
how often do you see someoneclaimthey killed someone yet still say someone else did
and how often after 2 claims doscumtry and get an easy lynch on a townie in bandwagonEVERY TIME
vote: FATty ACid
Glork wrote:Dear Everybody Trying to Discredit the "Max is Scum" case by saying that Max did not Kill Pooky: PART OF THE ARGUMENT IS THAT MAX LIED ABOUT WHO HE TARGETED. THE ARGUMENT THAT FATTY IS TRYING TO MAKE IS THAT MAX BLEW UP COLONEL KURTZ. HE DID NOT SHOOT POOKY.
Thank you, that is all.
Hmm, I'd forgotten about that. I've been careless...Yosarian2 wrote:Well, I don't know if he's scum or not, but I can tell you one thing. Max did not target Kurtz last night.
You've been following me around singing "let's test Glork, let's test Glork!" I said before and I'll say it again: I get the distinct feeling that you're the one who wants to push off a mislynch against me (or to claim, "Look I was right too!" if things turn up right). I should clarify that I think Bogre should be vigged if MC actually turns up pro-town. I think that the two deaths plus his Glork-following record (follows me on Max, Yaw, and MC) can shed a lot of light on other players' alignments.Bogre wrote:Out of curiousity, why would you want me vigged? It looks like you are just trying to throw off suspicion to me incase the Masterchief lynch turns out to be wrong, Glork, because I've been voting the same way as you.
Wait, what?slaking_master wrote:ok, that confirms my theory.
it is my belief that the members of mafia comitee(s)DO NOTknow the identities of the other mafia members. if this was well-known, then i guess im slow, because it just dawned on me, and i figured i should post it.
Care to contribute anything more than that?Blackberry wrote:Unvote, Vote: Coron