![Sad :(](./images/smilies/icon_sad.gif)
Seriously, 22 is completely useless, and worse, it's willfully obstructive.
In post 360, Norman wrote:Vote: Pine
Reason: The way this guy orders his suspects is goddamn suspicious. I mean I know there's probably like one scumbag down at that last near me but there could be one on top.
In post 231, Foxace36 wrote:Pine
In post 231, Foxace36 wrote:I didn't take tabs of people watching the thread. Pine was the only person I occasionally checked for as he was the person I was waiting to question.
In post 607, MaguaofIllusion wrote:In post 602, Pine wrote:Pretty much don't want to play this game anymore. People like Norman just make Mafia un-fun.
I'm a ChaoticGoodBard. I can Detect Law every nightin searchof the LE faction.
Pray tell, how does detecting Law help you search for the LE faction as opposed to simply lawful players in general (ie, half the game)?
In post 327, MaguaofIllusion wrote:Scum
----
Pine - Because I'm bitter over AFFC. Also, #37 sucks. But mostly AFFC.
VOTE: Pine
In post 347, Haze wrote:lol wtf was totally gonna vote pine too until 338. If I voted him it wouldn't really work for me now would it...
In post 387, LimMePls wrote:In post 384, Pine wrote:In post 360, Norman wrote:Vote: Pine
Reason: The way this guy orders his suspects is goddamn suspicious. I mean I know there's probably like one scumbag down at that last near me but there could be one on top.
Are you drunk or just confused?
I haven't even finished catching up (blame midterms), much less put my suspects in any kind of order. This is pure OMGUS masquerading as reasoning.
He was talking about my meter. It looks weird because the quoting got all screwed up.
It is pretty telling though that you're not caught up but you have the time to defend yourself instead of catching up.
In post 422, greenknight wrote:Tammy + Cooldog: You two have been keeping up with the discussion in thread. Why are you not voting?
re. Norman: At this point I get the feeling he could be a Jester type role because he's been going out of his way to antagonize people from the start. I don't trust him but I also have a hard time believing that a regular scum role would play this way.
Haze: why would Pine making a blank "I'll post something later" post sway you away from voting him?
Pine: making two "I'll post something later" posts in a row is scummy.
Tammy re. Zdenek: I was mainly reaction testing him in the previous thread, he didn't respond in a way that I would consider incriminating.
In post 464, MaguaofIllusion wrote:
Pine's still scum.
Shadow1psc is still passive, still don't like.
Wouldn't mind AV or Haze dying.
But Norman's town.
UNVOTE: Norman
VOTE: Pine
In post 483, Shadoweh wrote:Pine's overreactions to being voted are pretty scummy. Kudos for the rant in #461 trying to reason with the misguided idiots as if they aren't scum to you when your vote says otherwise.
In post 485, Zdenek wrote:I like Shadoweh's points against Pine.
In post 486, Haze wrote:
@The person who asked me why I didn't vote Pine:
Like I said, I still think Pine is scummy, but i"ll reserve the vote for when he decides to post, and see if I change my mind. If I vote him before he says anything, then that's extremely hypocritical considering my own position, and at the same time give my own arguments/votes no credibility.
In post 521, brizingre1 wrote:My vote still on Norman, we're not going to get anywhere with him playing, and I could be persuaded to switch my vote to Pine if needed, but at least he's vaguely playing, going to ISO foxace and see how scummy he looks.
In post 536, ManiacalLemon wrote:Alright, here are my current reads:
Scum: MoS, CooLDog, kondi, Pine
Confusing as fuck: MoI, Norman, trekker
Lurkers/Noncontributors: MoS, CooLDog, kondi, riggs
Null: Zdenek, Haze, Fox
Town: Shadoweh, Shadow1psc, Tammy, Mhork
In post 568, CooLDoG wrote:People I would support a lynch for (in no particular order):
Norman
trekker
lemons
-possibly, but I need to be persuaded-
pine
In post 595, trekker wrote:CoolDoG, LynchMePls, Shadoweh. one scum team.
Pine, two others. second scum team.
looking for more connections.
In post 812, MaguaofIllusion wrote:In post 808, Moneybags wrote:Alright. So I read the 30 pages of madness.
I'm going to try something here. I'm a Commoner. I'm town and have no power, just VT. I'm going to keep my alignment to myself though.
Hi. I hate you.
Pine wrote:Okay, I'm sick to fuck of people saying I claimed "for no reason". Imagine you're me, and you're 20 pages behind. You've posted like twice, and are skimming along trying to keep up. And you see this:
Literally do not care. Your claim timing was bad and, etc, but now that it's happened I'd really like to see something other than you defending yourself that the play was somehow good when it wasn't. You can save that for MD after the game is over.
Things I do care about your opinion on:
- Foxace
- Moneybag's claim
- Whether you think CooLDog is town or not
- Whether you think AurorusVox is scum or not
In post 835, CooLDoG wrote:@Pine, before making such a big step as a claim shouldn't you read the whole thread first?
@Pine's 820, One, you had no good reason to claim. Ypur reasdon was that you were to goddamn lazy to read the thread. Is lurking a scum tell for you?
In post 1046, Mastermind of Sin wrote:In post 1025, Foxace36 wrote:Im the only player that has a chance of being lynched before the deadline so why should I even bother trying to convince everyone to lynch someone else at this point? I think it be better that Im lynched so we can avoid a no lynch.
This is not a scum reaction imo. Let's find someone else to lynch today.
In post 1376, CooLDoG wrote:In post 1371, Pine wrote:O noes! You actually followed through with the OMGUS you've been spouting all day
I'm not sure you know what omgus means. I think zde is actually legitimately voting for you. Saying that it is omgus is not a valid defense...
In post 1413, Zdenek wrote:The scum factions both get NK's so I have a hard time swallowing this as a reason to not use your ability to check claims.
In post 1529, Zdenek wrote:Pine has said that he is not going to investigate people to determine if they are telling the truth when they claim.
In post 1540, AurorusVox wrote:greenknight makes a good point against Pine...but gk's strategy only works if everyone ethic claims. Without that, Pine has nothing to go off of.
Remind me, was gk up for a mass ethic claim?
Did CooLDoG and Pine claim the same role but of opposite ethics?
In post 1547, CooLDoG wrote:@AV, what the fuck? I haven't claimed a power role!!! show me where I have claimed a power role. Hell, show me whereI haveclaimed.
@Mos,scum have no reason to lie what soever. Why should they lie? Give me a reason why falsifying your Chaos/law attribute would help the scum. Keep in mind that even if one tam is close to winning the game there still isn't a reason for scum to fake claim because the game will continue after one team has won the game. Ohh, yeah, and even if we could force someone to fake claim it won't help, becausepine has refused to use his power role to check fake claims, which is the only thing that his power role is fucking good for. Also, Scum will not fake claim their C/L attribute because pine has all ready claimed (withonevote on him).
@all, I ask you this: Would town claim a power role with one vote on them? Would town refuse to use their power role optimally even after it has been explained countless times how it is best used? Would town lurk all of day one, only coming out when his name was called?
If you can't answer yes to all of those questions, then you need to vote for pine. Because guess what, he has done every single one of them.
Also, ninja, Empking is another fucking lurker. He has yet to actually post in this game.
In post 1564, Lost Butterfly wrote:Pine what form do you get your results in?
In post 1591, Zdenek wrote:In post 1590, Pine wrote:Point out the cognitive dissonance between thinking you're both probably Lawful and thinking that you might or might not be scum.
That's not what I said.
The cognitive dissonance is between you thinking that I am lawful and thinking that scum wouldn't risk lying about alignment.