HIIIIIIIIIII!
It's a chain!
you're retarded. that's not what I said. Yes it's what he said, but that's not the topic at hand. Don't make subtle subject shifts. For that I keep my vote on you.Yaw wrote:Why would agreeing specifically with TSS be scummy?
He's calling someone a hypocrite when that person isn't a hypocrite. Then he continues.... (see above)GreenLiquid wrote:Doesn't actually contain an argument against Yaw.
I like prodding on and finding reasons when I prod.GreenLiquid wrote:The two main bandwagons going right now (Yaw and Coron) consist completely of crap and have absolutely no meat. If you're going to join either, at least give somegoodreasoning as to why.
teehee.GreenLiquid wrote:In fact, your above post does an excellent job of avoiding my argument against people on Yaw wagon by leaving it, and <snip=doing other stuff>
-_-the silent speaker wrote:MOS. But Fatty Acid would be an acceptable second choice.
Issue? What does an opening spamfest to make sure I'm out, noticed, and ready and waiting to be confronted show?PBuG wrote:I'd prefer Fatty Acid, because Fatty Acid contributed majorly to the spamfest, distracting us from the issue at hand.
*high five*Mastermind of Sin wrote:Ohhh, big words there, Mr. Yaw. I'm just a simpleton, so you'll have to explain this "rank hypocrisy" instead of just hoping people will skip over it and think ur smart without bothering to actuallyYaw wrote:Ok, so you want me to abandon the tells I use and find successful. Duly noted.
The following people have posted three or less times in the game: Aelyn, FoShizzle, GreenLiquid, HezLucky, Machiavellian-Mafia, Primate,
chamber has posted nothing of consequence, except to indicate he's off in his own dream world. Same with STD, ubertimmy...actually, we're carrying alotof dead weight in this game. I know MeMeMeet is going on, but most of these players aren't there. Prods are needed on the worst offenders.
Plus, everyone who's contributed something of consequence (other than TSS, who I find hard to read) has done something scummy. FATty ACid and Coron had the initial argument, which could very well be a distancing tactic. MoS has been attacking me for starting bandwagons...while getting on one of the larger ones himself. PBuG had a few overly chatty moments early that have me worried.
Although I'm coming to agree with TSS that MoS is scummier than Coron. They're both bad, but Coron doesn't quite have the same level of rank hypocrisy.
Unvote: Coron,Vote: Mastermind of Sinverifyany of what you're saying.
As for your other sentence about me, there is a big difference between us. I'm attacking you for trying to create bandwagons on horrible reasoning, which in it self is a good reason, hence the difference between us. As for claiming that I was "getting on one of the larger bandwagons", you know yourself that that's a bunch of crap. Istartedthe bandwagon against you, so in no way shape or form can you twist your logic to make it seem like I'm just getting on big bandwagons. Your attempts at misrepresentation and trying to create scumminess out of nothing are noted.
:goodposting:Mastermind of Sin wrote:I absolutely love how people keep swearing by post 117 like it's the New Bible or something, but they can't explain a single thing about it. Perfect cover for a scum vote, eh?
you know that there's a chance that animals aren't the only thing in this game...Yaw wrote:I'm aware of that. But since I have no idea what animals are in this game, I have no idea which are likely to be scum. Nor do I know that he's telling the complete truth.
Still voting you, yaw.Yaw wrote:Besides which, he's among a certain cabal of followers in this game. Lynching one of them will give us a better impression of who is scum among them.So yes, I'm not unwilling to lynch a pro-town role with an ability that's unlikely to help the town(but likely to help the scum if he's scum) in order to get the alignments of around 5 other people.Especially since that's the worst-case scenario here.
18/2=9. 18 alive = 10 to lynch.Mastermind of Sin wrote:anyone have guesses as to what this means? 18 alive should be 9 to lynch, but we've got this 10 and 11 stuff o.OPetroleum Pie wrote: 18 alive, 10 to lynchyou, 11 to lynch everybody else.
wtf? no. I said he wasn't a hypocrite. You went back to what they were talking about. That had nothing to do with the fact that no, Hez (iirc) was not being a hypocrite, and yet you called him one. Don't try to say I'm the one shifting topics.Yaw wrote:Quite bizarre for an attack. You pointed out how I had misinterpreted a post, so I addressed the misinterpretation. Then you accuseFATty ACid wrote:you're retarded. that's not what I said. Yes it's what he said, but that's not the topic at hand. Don't make subtle subject shifts. For that I keep my vote on you.Yaw wrote:Why would agreeing specifically with TSS be scummy?meof shifting the subject? This looks like transferrence --youare the one shifting the subject. (And I haven't the slightest clue what you think you have shifted it to.)
lol. I also covered the part about those following him being no more likely scum or town. Good job.Yaw wrote:Well, best case scenario would be that MoS is scum, obviously. But I think lynching MoS will give us insight on the peopleFATty ACid wrote:These roles EVOLVE. You said yourself that all the first ones are weak. So why would you be willing to lynch a pro-town role? To get the alignments of 5 other people? Like the ones voting him = scum?followinghim, not the people voting for him. (And I think it will give us insight on those people in both cases of his alignment.)
But they learn to avoid predators eventually.Yaw wrote:I also believe I have figured out what MoS's role will evolve into. (Confirmed to a good extent by his elaboration.) So I stand by my evaluation of it being more likely to be a great scum role in the future compared to a middling town role.
The rest of FATty ACid's post iswaytoo flattering of MoS not to be suspicious.
This doesn't sit right with me. Deer aren't all that well known for speed. (Now, if he were a cheetah...) I'd believe it if the mechanic were like Bambi, and he became increasingly too cute to lynch.Mastermind of Sin wrote:no, I evolve by getting faster (you know, deer run fast and all), so I get closer to the normal amount needed to lynch.
The role is easier than normal to lynch. Why would that be 1 at stage three, where they're a normal version of the easier to lynch role? Oh me oh my this post reeks of stupid/not thinking/being mafia lolz.Coron wrote:From the sign up thread:
Mechanic: Evolution Mafia will be a mostly normal game – largely played with standard roles, but with its share of originals. The main twist, though, will be that (almost) every role will have 5 stages to it supported by a base role. Stage 1 will be an underpowered version of that role,Stage 3 will be exactly that role, and Stage 5 will be a stronger version of the role. 2 and 4 will be somewhere in the middle. At the beginning of each day, each player will progress one stage along the way.
I would have thought that 1 would be the third...
FOS: MOS
How the hell are deer supposed to avoid predators, climb trees? No, silly, RUN!Yaw wrote:That's not what MoS said. He said that deer run fast. (Helps when you read the things you're quoting.) Deer may be evasive, but they aren't particularly known for pure speed.FATty ACid wrote:But they learn to avoid predators eventually.
WHAT? DEER, A PRACTICALLY HARMLESS SPECIES COMMONLY THE PREY, EVOLVING TO BETTER AVOID PREDATORS? NO WAI!
How do you not know the intention was a role that is easier to lynch?Yaw wrote:Actually, I noticed Coron's point too, but MoS and he both got their posts in while I was typing mine. It's not an "easier to lynch" role. It's aFATty ACid wrote:The role is easier than normal to lynch. Why would that be 1 at stage three, where they're a normal version of the easier to lynch role? Oh me oh my this post reeks of stupid/not thinking/being mafia lolz.variablelynch role. So it would make sense that level 3 would be normal, while levels 4 and 5 would be harder than normal to lynch. But you're too invested in defending MoS to concede that there's a valid point here.
Yaw wrote:Going back...In post 170, HezLucky accuses me of being scummy for agreeing with TSS (which, again, WTF?). He then promptly votes me, becoming the 5th on the bandwagon. In that he's voting for me, he's inherently agreeing with the people on the wagon. So agreeing with chamber, who has contributed nothing of substance to the game, is good while agreeing with TSS, who has at least presented arguments, is scummy? It's at minimum a double-standard. Then HezLucky says thatFATty ACid wrote:wtf? no. I said he wasn't a hypocrite. You went back to what they were talking about. That had nothing to do with the fact that no, Hez (iirc) was not being a hypocrite, and yet you called him one. Don't try to say I'm the one shifting topics.I'mmaking up things to support my viewpoint, as if his certainty that agreeing with TSS's opinion on one issue must be scummy isn't making something up. Hence, hypocrisy.
scum have to vote for crap reasons? town can't vote for crap reasons? I learn new things EVERY DAY!Yaw wrote:Unlike what you might think, I'm not a simpleton. I look atFATty ACid wrote:lol. I also covered the part about those following him being no more likely scum or town. Good job.howandwhypeople vote, not that they did. That combined with the knowledge of MoS's alignment is what will give us the information.
I was just correcting the part about how he was saying 9. I do not have any knowledge about the 11.Yaw wrote:We all know that part. What about theFATty ACid wrote:18/2=9. 18 alive = 10 to lynch.11?
uhh, good reading, there.MrBuddyLee wrote:plusMastermind of Sin wrote:fine.
1/2, 2/3, 3/4, 1, 4/3Taken together, imply that on day five it'll take 130% of all available votes to lynch, as opposed to 100% on day four. Not sure that makes sense.FA wrote:18/2=9. 18 alive = 10 to lynch.
Mastermind of Sin wrote:I am a Deer, and it takes half the number of votes to lynch me as anyone else
Okay. Let's look at it that way.Yaw wrote:You're really clumsy when you try to put words in my mouth. I didn't say anything remotely like that.FATty ACid wrote:scum have to vote for crap reasons? town can't vote for crap reasons? I learn new things EVERY DAY!
You'd be surprised.Yaw wrote:Not true. People have tells for any role. It doesn't only come out when voting. More frequently it deals with what's actually being said during discussions to justify voting. Scum and town have different motivations, which comes out. I think you're being deliberately obtuse about this, because if we followed your arguments to their logical conclusion there'd be no way on earth to catch scum.FATty ACid wrote:Scum and town can all vote for any reason at all, good or bad, and do it any way they like.
Uhh... I'm sure if you asked a hunter...Yaw wrote:Quick, get someone to name some fast animals. Deer probably aren't going to come to their minds. (Cheetahs and horses would.) I didn't say that deer were slow, I said that the common perception isn't that they're known for speed.
My role is so much faster than a deer it's not funny. I'm not harder to lynch than normal people. Your point does not hold.Coron wrote:I'll tell you right now that my role is far far far slower than a deer, and I still take normal votes to lynch.
Yeah. It's not hard anymore, given that I now list my AIM...Mastermind of Sin wrote:I know who you are =P(Have I been flattering to MoS? Sure. Thing is, I'm still wondering if he knows who I am in scumchat, and that was just a simple nod at him; I've been doing that ever since I had this new name. I like teasing him. )
I don't forget it when there's something important, you tard. I tend to remember when ICoron wrote:The fact that she "forgets" her role.
Blatant flattery. >.>PBuG wrote::goodposting:Yaw wrote:Is that a bottle of wine I see?Mastermind of Sin wrote:I look forward to seeing you explain why two scum would go so far out of their way to reveal themselves on Day 1 when they could've thrown one another under the bus and not have been suspected for it at all...
What the crap? I never said that. Quit the misrep plz.PBuG wrote:So, FATty ACid, you say that those who are against you or MoS are scum? I doubt that we have a six person scum group.
PBuG wrote:FATty ACid wrote:Ohhh, big words there, Mr. Yaw. I'm just a simpleton, so you'll have to explain this "rank hypocrisy" instead of just hoping people will skip over it and think ur smart without bothering to actuallyYaw wrote:Although I'm coming to agree with TSS that MoS is scummier than Coron. They're both bad, but Coron doesn't quite have the same level of rank hypocrisy.
Unvote: Coron,Vote: Mastermind of Sinverifyany of what you're saying.
Because ya know, if PBuG is somehow town, only mafia would've lynched him for doing that stuff.MrBuddyLee wrote:We're all watching MoS to see if he tries to lynch scum or town.
I'm not scum, you are?PBuG wrote:Why do I have five votes while Jentsu (FA) only has three?
I wouldn't be so sure. Ya know, in a lot of mafias I've heard of, most of the members tend to be human...FoShizzle wrote:I think VisMajor and Machiavellian-Mafia need to give us those posts they promised us.
Btw, I think that all the scum might be wolves. Since another name for "Mafia" is "Wolf". Just my theory.
Stop right there...FoShizzle wrote:MOS- The only contradiction from PBug I see is him pretending to have a decent reason to vote for you near the beginning of the game. It was an OMGUS that he didn't want anyone to see, so he covered it up by pretending to agree with TSS. So yeah, he lied earlier
What the fuck is this? No, I'll go back and quote what I fucking said.VisMaior wrote:FA Jumps on Yaw because TSS said "agreeing with TSS is scummy", not "agreeing with anyone" (This does seem like you buy Hezs reasoning)
See that? I said that Hez wasn't a hypocrite because he didn't say anything about, which Yaw called him a hypocrite for. This is NOT defending anything Hez said, it is punching a hole in Yaw's attack which was not even truthful. Yaw refused to say "lol u r rite, nvm" because he didn't want to admit he was lying to call Hez a hypocrite, or maybe, just maybe, he's just too stupid to realize wtf hypocrite actually means.FATty ACid wrote:No, yaw, he's not a hypocrite. He said agreeing withTSSis scummy.
Besides, all that between MOS etc sounded more like a misunderstanding (and it is; either they misunderstood, or i'm not getting what happened). So I don't really see a reason for voting TSS on that, but calling hez a hypocrite for doing something he... didn't say anything about! Not a hypocrite there.
Vote: Yaw
Oh yeah, that's because I'm not at all showing how they apply to other things.VisMaior wrote:FA: its not that Agreeing with TSS is scummy, but I voted for calling him a hypocrite while he isnt.Greenliquid is scum. (>????)
<other stuff>
FA rejects points against her by stating "theehee" and "-_- fail TSS". HighFives MOS for defending her. Questions peoples views on 117.
I'm noting the irony in GL saying that I'm just avoiding the argument and doing other stuff, while I just pointed out how Yaw was avoiding what I was saying about him, shifting the topic to asking how agreeing with TSS was scummy.FATty ACid wrote:teehee.GreenLiquid wrote:In fact, your above post does an excellent job of avoiding my argument against people on Yaw wagon by leaving it, and <snip=doing other stuff>
You are saying that confirming 5 people as either scum or as town is worse than lynching one scum? That's just stupid! The case, however, doesn't really involve confirming five people. He just said it would. Had it confirmed people, it would've been amazing, but it's actually the worst-case scenario, like he said. So either way, he was using bad reasoning.VisMaior wrote:What? What do you mean "this is the scenario where you want to lynch scum"? And what do you mean "I'd say the confirming 5 people one way or the other is a greater scenario than finding one scum"? No it isnt, Yaw is right, that IS trhe worst case scenario!So you're saying that the worst case scenario is confirming 5 people lynching town (which isn't really the case; see above), as opposed to lynching scum and not getting anyone else's alignment? I'd say the confirming 5 people one way or the other is a greater scenario than finding one scum
However, that's really not the case anyways. This is where you wanna lynch scum and not town. Seriously.
I never said he pushed! People pushing things needn't be the case to find scum trying to paint people things! Also, I never said I fucking agreed with anyone!VisMaior wrote:3. FA bad reasoning, jumping on Yaw because he said hypocrite. There is so much wrong with this. 1 it makes it seem that she agrees with Hezs reasoning (wich is nonexistent). yaws comment was just a comment, he never pushed for Hez based on THAT!!! He pushed because Yaws reasoning is stupid!
GOOD FUCKING JOB PUTTING THAT VOTE IN CONTEXT!MrBuddyLee wrote:Fourth scummiest post of the day, when followed up by:.FA, the next day, 1:15 PM wrote:Vote: Yaw
What the fuck does that even mean?VisMaior wrote:267 by MOS defends FA instead of FA->scumtell
Oh, I dunno, maybe he wants to get more info to the town of connections and distances?VisMaior wrote:Coron doesnt want to finish the day with lynching the scummiest player in 288, whats up with that???
Because I obviously haven't been giving reasoning EVERY FUCKING TIME I FUCKING SAY ANYTHING ABOUT HIM! GOOD GOD, WHY THE FUCK WOULD I DO THAT?!?!VisMaior wrote:Reasoning is techPBuG is prolly scum, btw. Or just a really meh player at best...
...Or maybe I'm attacking false logic?VisMaior wrote:380 by FAdefending MOS again! AND it was uncalled for to boot!Because ya know, if PBuG is somehow town, only mafia would've lynched him for doing that stuff.
No shit? I thought he was scum. I've said a billion time why.VisMaior wrote:She also pushes for PBug hard.
It's still letting that guy decide, it's just giving them a better reason to potentially save the cop.VisMaior wrote:Coron asksThat seems like a sensible thing to ask, as it could clear PBug. Nevertheless, its fishing again. If someone has, let that guy decide wether he sticks his neck out for PBug or not.DOES ANYONE ELSE HAVE A ROLE THAT COVERS SUCH A WIDE RANGE OF CRITTERS?
Conclusion: You make it sound like I defend people instead of attacking shitty logic.VisMaior wrote:Conclusions later.
And you know what info would come from lynching me? That I'm town, that I haven't lied once, and that your attacks are not only horrendous, but that they were so strongly attacking town.VisMaior wrote:I really think the most information would come from a MOS or FA lynch. My second best bet would be Hez, i think. MBL is also high on my list.
vote FattyAcid
No, not really. I'm not kidding. Either he just wouldn't admit to it, or he really doesn't know what hypocrite means, because hez was not saying saying anything hypocritical.VisMaior wrote:Ad hominem here.
You fail again. Confirming 5 people as town is amazingly good. Confirming 5 people as scum is even better. Lynching one scum but having 5 people not get confirmed? Not as good.VisMaior wrote:Yes.You are saying that confirming 5 people as either scum or as town is worse than lynching one scum?
Eh?VisMaior wrote:True, you even said later that you disagree with him. And, instead of asking him to clarify his points, you attack his opposition based on some wording.Also, I never said I fucking agreed with anyone!
...stfu about that. Seriously. you piss me off.VisMaior wrote:Could you say that in all caps? I cant quiet make out what you intended to say.I said that Yaw called hez a hypocrite, which he did. HEZ IS NOT A FUCKING HYPOCRITE FROM WHAT WAS TOLD ABOUT HIM! Yaw called Hez a hypocrite when he didn't say a damn thing that was hypocritical. If you can point out what Hez said that was so goddamn hypocritical, really, that's fucking fine, BUT HE DIDN'T! THAT IS WHY I STARTED VOTING YAW IN THE FIRST PLACE! Do NOT try to make it sound like I was defending SHIT that ANYONE FUCKING ELSE SAID UNLESS I FUCKING DEFENDED IT! I did NOT! All I did was tell Yaw to stfu calling Hez a hypocrite when he DID. NOT. SAY. ANYTHING. HYPOCRITICAL.
You shouldn't be doing stupid shit like that, either.VisMaior wrote:I dont "make it seem like you said something". Instead, you "make it seem like you agrreed, but you actually didnt". I just point that out.STOP MAKING IT SOUND LIKE I SAID SHIT I DIDN'T FUCKING SAY!
Okay. But I don't know why that would happen here, as IT. DOES. NOT. MAKE. A. FUCKING. DIFFERENCE. TO. HIM. BECAUSE. I. AM. NOT. EVEN. SCUM.VisMaior wrote:That means questions were aimed at you, and MOS answered them for you. That is tipical if someone thinks you may screw up your own defense(and people always think they could do better than the other guy).267 by MOS defends FA instead of FA->scumtell
He's not defending me. He answered for himself, and guess what? It's not all that much off from what I do. I don't really know why he said it, but I really don't care. I still gave my answer, which was really the common sense answer for fucking everyone anyways, which coron just couldn't get his brain around.Mastermind of Sin wrote:I can't speak for FA, but as far as I go, I generally forget everything about my role EXCEPT when I am cop, in which case I tend to remember that someone is innocent. When I am scum, I always forget who my scumbuddies are and have to go look it up from time to time >_<.Coron wrote:So you don't really forget your role.
If you remember anything you're going to give tells.
Because when I say you're retarded, I'm saying that if you are doing these things as town, you're retarded, and if not, you're mafia, and you're still retarded. Wanna know why? BECAUSE YOU'RE FUCKING RETARDED. Your attacks DO. NOT. MAKE. SENSE. None. Not a bit. Nothing. As town, you're retarded. As scum, you're not even trying hard enough to make an attack that makes sense. Because you're retarded.VisMaior wrote:Maybe. Or maybe not. I really dont understand these kind of comments. If you think Im mafia, why are you surprised? If you dont think I am. why do you say I am?I swear, you really are retarded.
I just pointed out the reason for this: it's because you're retarded. Tell me what I didn't give reason for. Quote or at least give post numbers. For that matter, give post numbers anyways, scum.VisMaior wrote:I didnt had that impression.Because I obviously haven't been giving reasoning EVERY FUCKING TIME I FUCKING SAY ANYTHING ABOUT HIM! GOOD GOD, WHY THE FUCK WOULD I DO THAT?!?!
Examples?VisMaior wrote:No. People often call "false logic" when they mean "false conclusions". I am not looking at your reasoning, instead I look at the metareasoning here. Again, questions asked MOS, and you answered instead. Its simply a situation where I expected MOSs name on top of the post, but it was yours instead....Or maybe I'm attacking false logic?
VisMaior wrote:What? No more secks?I've had it with you.
too bad I've done nothing wrong, then, eh?VisMaior wrote:No I dont know that yet. If you come up clean, that would at least clear MOS and some other people in my eyes a bit. (not completely tough.) If you come up scum tough, I would have a second day target.And you know what info would come from lynching me? That I'm town, that I haven't lied once, and that your attacks are not only horrendous, but that they were so strongly attacking town.
Ya rly.VisMaior wrote:O. .R.L.Y.?.You. Fail. At. Mafia.
I'd love to do that. Just seriously do not make jokes like that, kthx. ^_^VisMaior wrote:the rules wrote:2. THOU SHALT NOT SUCK. It's just a game. Play your hardest and enjoy yourself. Don't take anything anyone else says too seriously. In the end, it's all in good fun.