Hey, watch your f@#$ing language.Lady Lambdadelta wrote:NOT THIS SHIT AGAIN STRANGER.
GOD FUCKING DAMN IT. >.<
VOTE: Lady Lambdadelta
chesskid3 wrote:LLD - E 'la RVS, affrontarla.
Domande per le persone che hanno giocato le prime due partite di questa forma -
Sono ruoli tipicamente rivelato sulla morte e che è stato un qualche tipo di capacità custode, o sono ruoli non rivelato?
Inoltre, circa il modo in bastardo devo aspettare che questo gioco sia?
I'm guessing caretaker = janitor? Yes, I believe that's what happened here (SC didn't say anything about this game being no-reveal).chesskid according to google translate wrote:LLD - It 's the RVS, deal with it.
Questions for people who played the first two games of this form -
Roles are typically found on death and it was some kind of caretaker capacity, or roles are not revealed?
In addition, about the way I expect that this bastard game is?
I'm assuming car=wagon?chesskid according to google wrote:I did not like his answer to the second question about her vote. Honestly I've seen people go up halfway to RVS lynched during the first, and then the car disappears or whether they fit properly and that the pressure stays on.
I'm also using Google translator
I'm not going to lie, this is pretty funny.
chesskid wrote:I do not have a vote, so when I said it's more likely that foam? I said I did not like his answer.
Apologies on the name.
and you just realized this?chesskid wrote:I can see this is going to get frustrating.
lolwat? So you see something you don't like, but you're willing to stick with your crappy RVS vote?chesskid wrote:I did not like his reaction, but it's tiny and worthless vote for her. I like my vote RVS for now.
I don't know who you're trying to call "dense," but I'll let that go.chesskid wrote:Oh, for god's sake. She's pretty dense, is not it.
Not appreciate what he did is not equivalent to thinking is scum because you did it.
I take that as a novice to say, and not a scum tell. My point was to help her.
Even your over-reaction is noted.
I'm assuming city saying=town tell.chesskid through the crappy translator wrote:Why is the city saying. I am noticing the reaction, but I think it's common.
XD That last line is the clearest thing in this post.chesskid wrote:this would be the reaction
There is no appeal to the emotions in this, among other things.
If I had not formed a town attempt to read, on the basis of interaction, I switched my vote to you.
In essence, foam / scum entire city can be found by how they behave - are usually more defensive because they know that the city is the city while the city is sending out probes everywhere to hear people. Overreact to these probes and also for events that occur are a particular favorite of mine.
Come, answer me this, why you feel the need to call my lousy RVS vote?
You see my point?
Probably not, since this will be confused to hell.
@sakshijain:The Stove wrote:Orly.Baby Spice wrote:I don't know about that since it got a reaction.
And what have you learned from the "reaction"?
Nobody Special wrote:Stop telling me what to do, I don't play according to other people's whims.
Also, I fully agree with Espeo -- this is going to be one frakking hard game. (Plus, I feel all fish-out-of-waterish -- I wasn't in SWNIII.)
Reck/dram, am I, really? I'm not trying to be. Sorry.
unvote
Vote: Lady Greekletters
*sigh* I guess it's not that important.Nobody Special wrote:Nope. Which part, exactly, offends you?Antihero wrote:You can see why I'm insulted by you calling the first five pages (which I frequently posted in) a bunch of "dickwaving," right?
Wait...what? This LLD wagon hop is really weird.Blooderection wrote:So wait... you unvote because of a VT claim? nice.
Unvote: Parama
Vote: LLD
No, that's not what I'm saying at all. Your vote relies on Espeonage being scum, which I don't think is the case (given NC's comments on him). Either that, or it relies on the premise of "lynch LLD because she claimed VT," which is a pretty flimsy argument to me.BE wrote:So you're saying we shouldn't lynch a VT claim day 1? That's funny... because usually we don't lynch claimed cops and shit.
gg.
...and who are these "others"?Blooderection wrote:The wagon obviously escalated meaning that some if not several people saw her as scum. A VT claim is not a claim that should derail a would be valid lynch.Antihero wrote:...still waiting on the reason for your vote that doesn't have to do with the VT claim, blooderection.The fact that others do.notwant to lynch her based on that claim in my opinion is scummy
I unvoted, and I don't think we should not lynch LLD because of the VT claim. I don't think we should lynch LLD because a few of her wagoners are really scummy, including you.Blooderection wrote:Whoever unvoted.Antihero wrote:...and who are these "others"?Blooderection wrote:The wagon obviously escalated meaning that some if not several people saw her as scum. A VT claim is not a claim that should derail a would be valid lynch.Antihero wrote:...still waiting on the reason for your vote that doesn't have to do with the VT claim, blooderection.The fact that others do.notwant to lynch her based on that claim in my opinion is scummy
Yep. You, reckamonic, and Nobody special to be more precise.Blooderection wrote:So why exactly did you unvote then? because of people jumping on the wagon? Specifically me?Antihero wrote: I unvoted, and I don't think we should not lynch LLD because of the VT claim. I don't think we should lynch LLD because a few of her wagoners are really scummy, including you.
There's no one who doesn't want to lynch LLD because of the VT claim. Now you're just pulling stuff out of thin air.
VOTE: Blooderection
lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.
You haven't been reading the thread, then.BE wrote:I also don't even know why you got on the wagon.
Blooderection wrote:Lol, so three out of nine players is ridden by scum. niceAntihero wrote:lolwat? Yeah, I tend to not commit to wagons I realize are being ridden by scum.Blooderection wrote:Yo, i mean like... you jumped on and off that wagon like three times. could be perceived as non-committal scum. Just now you actually see that there could be a lynch. I dunno, I'm just saying.
And you do realize this post is hypocritical, right?
yea, you said it was because she OMGUS'd someone. AMIRITE?![/quote]BE wrote:You haven't been reading the thread, then.BE wrote:I also don't even know why you got on the wagon.
This is what I said earlier. The "OMGUS" was referring to LLD attacking parama for his list.AH wrote:I don't see anything except for quasi-OMGUS self defense and active lurking. This is a good wagon.
1) That's an aweful reason to vote.BE wrote:Howso? I'm voting because i don't like the claim.
Here's the entire context. So, how does parama's quote subvert the meaning of the last sentence?Baby Spice wrote:Bhavit was just replaced in a newbie game for not picking up a prod.
Don't know what to think about LLD, but I really don't like the wagon. Don't think there's enough to go on yet.
Seriously?BE wrote:1. its NOT an aweful reason to vote someone.
Oh, yes. Your post was perfectly clear. It was just me making some ridiculous stretch.BE wrote:2. Taking my sarcasm out of context is sweet too. because my posts ARE NOT non-committal. The only way i'm getting off this wagon is if it completely dies, or another scum wagon appears.
What is your idea of OMGUS?BE wrote:I mean, that's cool... you OMGUS'd me.... nice. AntiHero... wanna start a Parama wagon now?
OK, so if you had an idea about the game in general, why didn't you vote ParamaBaby Spice wrote:Parama wrote:Cool kids vote these wagons.StrangerCoug wrote:VOTE COUNT
Blooderection (2): Parama, Antihero
Baby Spice (1): The Stove
So funny. My #1 scumspect calling on the town to joijn #2 and #3 scumspect on voting for best town read I got.
Here's the entire context. So, how does parama's quote subvert the meaning of the last sentence?
Duh, because it was obviously refering to the so called case on LLD, not the game in general which was what Parama was implying. If that's not quoting out of context I don't know what is. Then his excelent reposte of "No I didn't".
Of course you would come to his support Anti-town, since you are his partner.
Tell me, where you glad when someone vigged Nero Cain, because he was really dumping you both in it deep.
Took away the color tags, so everyone can see the bull. Hope that's OK, strangercoug.Baby Spice wrote:Tell me, where you glad when someone vigged Nero Cain, because he was really dumping you both in it deep.
I'm not sure what you're getting at with the first line.BE wrote:who here has played mafia before?
Umm.... him voting me after calling him scum.
XDchesskid according to googlefail wrote:I'm back, sorry for the ambush. I had 2 sets to 4:00 because of the problem today, and then after that I slept for 11 hours.
I've got my vote as a vote of LLD on the pressure. I was not convinced I wanted to lynch her, but I wanted to help the car to see who would join. This does not mean that I would be desperate if she died, but was not all smoking guns for a lynching LLD.
I would also, however, that Black Cain throwing scum should lift up my Townie was a bit ', but I always forget bussing. fuck.
However, I prefer a wagon Baby Spice to be a wagon, because the child is doing does not make sense at the time quite clearly pro-town calling people scum d1. Of course you are not completely understood, but they get passed soon. NC was the scumlist Parama, turned scum. was scummy as fuck.
BC head of BE could be just be the village idiot we all know and love.
In addition, Antihero is pushing for a strong enough probable misslynch
LOLBaby Spice wrote:Oh, as for Antihero. "@NC: Could you please specifically point out the chesskid hypocrisy? Also, what do you think about Baby Spice and Tasky's first posts?"
N C, known scum, specifically quotes Anti-hero, who then directs a specific question at NC, who then answers it back, again with Antihero quoted. That is enough linkage in N C's two posts to make me seriously look at Antihero
Umm.... I was actively supporting NC? Where did this occur?Baby Spice wrote:quote from The Stove. "Tasky and Baby Spice are scummy". (8 posts before N C was vigged you must note) Hmm, this is an echo of Antihero's question to NC, you know our only flipped scum. Why would we have two people actively suypporting/seeking the opinion of our only scum flip.
Oh, when you said that I thought you were saying you thought NC'sThe Stove wrote:The Stove wrote:Espeonage - holding an RVS vote
Antihero - okay
Baby Spice - one of the worst votes I've seen on MS
Nero Cain - hypocrisy, thy name is Nero Cain
sakshijain - ahahahah
sakshijain needs to eat a bullet, any vigs in attendence plz fix this problem TIA.
VOTE: Baby Spice
A Nero Cain is ok too.
Antihero wrote:@Stove: I disagree with your assessment of NC's vote, but I'll wait for his response.
Espy wrote:They are something for later should you actually start acting scummy.
Remarkably similar ... reasons? For what?Baby Spice wrote:When players seperately express remarkably similar reasons out of the blue it is usually because there is a communications link between them. Especially when there is so little to go on. Since one of those players has been revealed as a non-neighbour scum, then there is only one possibility for that communications link. The link is the specification by Antihero and The Stove reguarding myself and Tasky. (Which could be neighbourisation normally) Directing it to, and involving, N C is what drags the scummy in and rules out neighbours.
baby spice post 80 wrote:Oh, if you didn't notice, yes I have a post restriction, but you can hardly notice it. Not.
At least it's not a language one.
Vote Chesskid3
Out of the blue? Checksakshijain post 86 wrote:VOTE: chessaah i just can't read his postsso i vote him.
hmmm...Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Antihero, can we please lynch BS before BE? She's so much scummier than he is.
Why would NC pretend to think that Baby Spice was faking her post restriction? And the post restriction was fairly obvious, I don't know why he's pooh-poohing Baby Spice just saying what it is. I suspect he intended to possibly use this as a justification for a possible Baby Spice wagon.NC wrote:RE Baby Spice: 79 sucks. 80 isn't much better. I saw no point in claiming the PR (not that I really believe it) and she gives no reason for voting Chess so its pretty scummy.
Antihero wrote:I also have yet to hear why BE is a "probable mislynch" and why he selectively called me out for being on the blooderection wagon.
Meh, I'm doubting BE is bussing.Twomz wrote:@ Antihero: BE's vote could be seen as self preservation... or bussing (which counts as self preservation). But NC trying to get a wagon started is a valid point... I still think a BS lynch would be a good place to start day 1 >.> everyone can't be vigbait, we don't even know if we have a vig.
EBWOP:Antihero wrote:When did I say neither of you were scum? Scum can't be on scum wagons.
So, I can't accuse more than 1 person of being scum at a time?
Antihero wrote:When did I say neither of you were scum? Scum can't be on scum wagons?
So, I can't accuse more than 1 person of being scum at a time?
I will consider the existance of two scum teams... never.chesskid3 wrote:Prenderò in considerazione due scumteams la prima volta che vedo più di una morte, per non parlare forse due morti dei non-scumLady Lambdadelta wrote:Chesskid, there is the chance of a town roleblocker.
Note: In SWNIII, Dramonic was town roleblocker.
I don't know, why was BS the best lynch for yesterday?Blooderection wrote:Yo... so why am i still the best lynch for today?
Yo... might I add YOU WERE ON THE WAGON!Yo... might I add that if we had lynched the claimed VT.... WE WOULDN'T HAVE LYNCHED THE COP!
You can drop the act now. You're fooling no one.Vote: Tasky
-gives off major scum vibes to me.
First off, he got Baby Spice's gender wrong, so I'm willing to bet he didn't look at her posts very closely.manho [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2575395#p2575395]Post 353[/url] wrote:why is Baby Spice still alive. he's the most obvscum i've seen.
BE's vote on LLD is not a scum tell to me, as i always thought that lynching a claimed VT is standard procedure.
LLD is town for the reaction to the his own lynch.
Tasky is scum for unwilling to read and scumhunt.
M=W is scum for doing nothing but pushing the well-established wagon on LLD and BS.
someone do an ISO on Twomz will find that if you remove the PR-first liner, he has no content at all. so he's scum also.
parama is town. and i will think the stove is town if not agar did the great job in the original SWNIII as scum.
other is a no read or no time to read for now.
VOTE: Baby Spice
Well, your book is a lot different from my book.The fact that BE was for the LL lynch after her VT claim is a town tell in my book.
Well, there's an easy way to find out.manho wrote:1. PR are randomly assigned.
You missed Twomz.manho wrote:3. there are only me and chesskid being the alive PRs.
What was that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of the OMGUS!chesskid3 wrote:Non a caso, fanculo la matematica.
Questo non è scumhunt dalla PRS, questo è scumhunt da chi è schiumosa. Se siamo un problema reale in seguito è possibile avviare vigging noi uno per uno. Politica linciaggio 3 PR perché hanno PRS è l'ultimo in comportamenti anti-città.
Antieroe è stato semi-tunneling su di me tutta la partita, nessun altro notato?
Io non sono "attivi in agguato matematica" Sto cazzo di distacco in italiano.
In realtà il fatto che lo fa mentre sta votando per BE mi fa pensare che sta cercando di impostare un altro misslynch sul ragazzo che parla italiano.
Vote: Antihero
Blooderection [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=2569885#p2569885]Post 272[/url] wrote:Unvote:
Vote: Baby Spice
It's not OMGUS? And I saw the phrase "he is voting for me" in the translation, I don't see much room for "misrep" as I don't know italian.chesskid wrote:So Lynch is one of PR, which city flip.
The next day, the argument goes OMG two PR have flipped the last two cities must contain a foam. Lynch And you another, etc. etc.
Retarded plane is delayed.
It is also not omgus why did not you vote, you missrep what I said because xvart is translating all my posts on things that have not clearly said.
First off, "semi-tunneling"? What is that? And how have I been doing that?chesskid wrote:Antihero was semi-tunneling on me the whole game, no one else noticed?
I am not "active lurking math" I'm fucking posting in Italian.
In reality, the fact that he does while he is voting for me to believe that BE is trying to set up another misslynch the guy who speaks Italian.