Policy lynching is, in and of itself, scummy.
Same reason.
I agree about policy vigging, but personal experience tells me that policy lynches help scum more than town, so the suggestion of one is a scumtell to me.LlamaFluff wrote:Policy lynching/vigging is actually really townieKairyuu wrote:vote: Parama
Policy lynching is, in and of itself, scummy.
FoS: RayFrost
Same reason.
First of all, to oppose it in an attempt to look pro-town would be an in game reason. I fully acknowledge the fact that there is no in game reason for my opposition of the specific proposed policy lynches. I am opposed to policy lynches AS A GENERAL RULE. I don't like them. I've given my reasons why, and I'll not be repeating them. If you consider my arguments wrong, then fine, argue that. Don't tell me that because I have a stance that spans multiple games (I'm pretty sure I pointed out in the endgame of BM's game that I was surprised I hadn't been called out for supporting a policy lynch) that I'm scummy. The info is there. At least read it before you continue to push a null tell.Fishythefish wrote:Kairyuu wrote:@Fishy: The problem being that there is no difference between what you say and what I say. By acknowledging that my stance is considered to be pro-town you are also acknowledging that by arguing it I appear pro-town.Absolutely not. I think that policy lynches are generally considered antitown, and opposing them protown. However, here, it doesn't feel like you are opposing the idea for in-game reasons, but just for the sake of looking protown. Thus I think you are scum trying (and failing) to look protown.
You really don't seem to be understanding what you're saying. If someone is going out of their way to avoid dropping scumtells, then guess what they're NOT DROPPING. That's right, by avoiding dropping scumtells on purpose, the person in question is NOT DROPPING SCUMTELLS. There is no way, therefore, to tell the difference between someone who is not dropping scumtells by way of being pro-town, or if they are not dropping scumtells by way of deliberately avoiding dropping scumtells.Fishy wrote:Kairyuu wrote:The Too Townie fallacy covers cases where a person is suspected because their arguments are supposedly contrived with the purpose of appearing pro-town, which is another way of saying that the person in question is acting pro-town so they must be scum.I don't know if this is true in the common usage, but it's flat out wrong. If someone doesn't drop any scumtells, that makes them more likely protown. But if I know that someone is deliberately going out of their way to avoid dropping scumtells, I think they are probably more likely scum.
I don't think your arguments are contrived to look protown because they look so protown; they look contrived. The TT fallacy is a red herring here.
I don't insist. I know that the site meta has everyone being a bunch of pansies who are fine with voting on a wagon unless it's a hammer. If it's the hammer it's suddenly taboo. RBT blatantly refuses to claim. Therefore, death. Since I highly doubt anyone else is willing to do it without badgering endlessly FOR the claim, I will.RayFrost wrote:why do you insist on being the hammer?Kairyuu wrote:Bleh. I can't count.
unvote
One of the pansies that's afraid to hammer should vote. As soon as I see it I will drop the hammer.
Wrong. It's outguessing the mod. Putting a daykilling SK in the game and giving it multiple shots/day is essentially giving it a win. The correct play would be to kill constantly until you lost the power in that case. Broken in half. ani is town.RayFrost wrote:w i f o mKairyuu wrote:Which is why he wouldn't do it again.
CSL: CLAIM NOW
Please explain. Is this role related, or do you just want to hammer.RichardGHP wrote:Yesh pleashe!dramonic wrote:I think we should have Richard hammer CSL.
L-3, amirite?
1. Bullshit. Any doc not on ani would have to be a complete idiot.YAY WIFOM
1. Maf may have thought a doc might have been on me
2. Maf may want to keep me alive to see if they can get me lynched
Anyways this is total WIFOM and I won't have any of it.
Don't be an idiot. SpyreX dies and you follow immediately. There is no possible reason that anyone should support a SpyreX lynch right now.animorpherv1 wrote:If I get some agreeals, I would vig DN, and we'd all lynch SpyreX.FeFiFoFum wrote:oh I thought you mentioned something about power role. my bad. So what should we do? I say we take care to Spryex. But the DN case still looks open