BM, why change your vote every other post?
Crackers! Mafia -- Game Over. See page 50
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
OMGUSKorts wrote:
avatar changeGuardian wrote:
What does this mean?Kison wrote:Clearly I need to get rid of the cat.
rofl, your questions don't have much point to them. Why are you interested in hearing who DGB/vollkan think aretown, when it's scum you're supposed to be looking for?unvote vote: KortsDo not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Zazier -- answering questions posed at others is not a reliable scum tell. It is unhelpful, but not scummy, because lots of people naturally do this. I used to think it was a scum tell because most unhelpful things are scummy and vice versa, but this one seems to not be.. Defending others surreptitiously by answering tough questions posed to them is scummy however, if you think any of the instances you brought up fall into that let me know.
I am very unconvinced by the case on CKD, and mention this because I think it is mostly wasting our time :(. Is the case anything more than him having a strong gut read early in the game, and saying so? If it is please enlighten me. If not, please move on.
BM, why do you think DGB will be unreadable? Why are you continuing to promote this meta of vote hopping if it is a scummy meta? Scummy things are generally scummy because they are unhelpful to town -- if you acknowledge that constantly moving your votes is scummy, e.g. unhelpful, why continue to do so?
Self voting is scummy -- it robs town of information. I am disappointed in vollkan especially for this -- I've always looked at his play as logical and very helpful to town. I find his choice to self vote and rob the town of information suspicious and out of character, especially considering I think that others self-voting probably impacted his decision to do so.
DGB, you seem to have said that at least half the players are either obviously town or obviously scum. Please list all the players with your current thoughts on them, and a short explanation of why you think this way.
This is supposed to be such a stellar cast -- we seem to have largely spam'd/noise'd our way to page 8 in two days. Short page lengths are better for towns -- in reality, people are not going to re-read 40 page day ones as well as they read 15 page day ones.
Please cut out the garbage -- it is unhelpful and suspcious. Posting a lot of nothing can make you look like you are scum hunting, being active, thinking about the game, etc. when you aren't.
I am especially annoyed with BM and rofl for this, off the top of my head. BM you need to re-read the thread and come up with something logical, and stop the knee-jerk voting reactions that seem to come three times a page.
rofl, when asked a question that you see that you are being asked, either refuse to answer it and move on (worse option), or answer it immediately (better option). Don't draw it out over a dozen posts where you get into a debate with others where you explain why you are refusing when you could just answer (worst option, one that you chose).Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Reading over the thread again, there are two quick things I'd like to say.
If, after considering whether you truly think the case on CKD is good, you still think it is, keep going for it. I do not want us to waste time, but I just remembered the plethora of reasons I refuse to defend people -- I am not going to defend him by saying why I think the points against him are weak, that is up to him.
I think destructor is townish, but I have been wrong and been burned too many times to say "obviously town." I already decided I am going to keep my eyes on him today, and not let my initial read blind me. I suggest everyone does the same with all players.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Please explain why you think this is so, as per each paragraph in the post.DrippingGoofball in 207 wrote:Guardian is more scum now than he was last time I declared him to be scum.
Pretty much all of his post #195 is a scum agenda
Also, please:Guardian in 195 wrote:DGB, you seem to have said that at least half the players are either obviously town or obviously scum. Please list all the players with your current thoughts on them, and a short explanation of why you think this way.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Dammit. I hate it when good players get convinced to play badly :(. Adel & JDodge are generally very good, but self voting is bad for a couple of reasons :(.vollkan in 217 wrote:
I'm disappointed that you would think I had fallen into the trap of stupid play :sob:Guardian wrote: Self voting is scummy -- it robs town of information. I am disappointed in vollkan especially for this -- I've always looked at his play as logical and very helpful to town. I find his choice to self vote and rob the town of information suspicious and out of character, especially considering I think that others self-voting probably impacted his decision to do so.
I actually did some thinking a while back (and I acknowledge my debt to Adel and JDodge for opening my eyes on this: see Open 59) and decided self-voting can, logically, be protown in the early game.
So far so good.vollkan in 217 wrote:Non-self random votes have two main benefits: discussion springboards and as later-game tools for scum linkages
The former need not necessarily arise only from a non-self vote
The latter has (speaking from my experiences) never been useful
:(. This is why self voting is BAD. It can at best only generate debate about self-voting. It gets people sidetracked from discussing who is scummy into talking about whether somethingvollkan in 217 wrote:Self-voting is a controversial action. That means that any self-vote will be likely to generate some degree, potentially a significant one, of debate.
Such debate will likely revolve around the scumminess or otherwise of self-voting. Thus, despite the debate being "manufactured", in a sense, there are good prospects of people making actual accusations against me - which, I believe and have seen in practice, that my argument is reasonable enough to overcome.that will never come up again in the gameis suspicious. It wastes time and space and thought and energy. Also, if the conclusion is that self voting is scummy, it guarantees that it brings the focus on to you! And that is never good if you are town -- you want the focus on the scum, not on you having to defend yourself because of your self-vote that sidetracked the town. Please stop this. It is making me cry.
First of all, as I just explained, it carries huge risk. If you are the only self voter and towns determine that self voting is suspicious and anti-town (which it IS!) then it brings focus to you. Also, since when did low-risk mean good town play?vollkan in 217 wrote:Since early game self-voting carries little risk and can generate at least as much useful information as non-self random voting, I believe it is a justified course of action for town.
This conditional is true but the premises are always going to be false.vollkan in 217 wrote:I also believe it can be acceptable at other points of time as a "stir the pot" sort of device, provided the risks are sufficiently minimal that a risk v reward analysis would hold it reasonable.
Never self vote ever again. This goes for all of you, and Adel.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
in my preceding post, 217 should be 215.
I want to point out that, at least for me, the issue isn't polarizing. I think rofl (appeared to) was making a good effort, but ultimately I find it unconvincing.destructor in 216 wrote:I think the polarised ckd-rofl thing is a distraction. A case on either rofl or ckd that revolves around each other is based on isolated scummy play. This is going to be less effective and informative than making cases based on interaction with at least one other suspicious player. I say this player is Korts.
I also note that a number of players have backed ckd up but only DGB and I have swayed on the side of rofl. So, ckd, Kison and anyone else who thinks rofl is scum - who's distancing from him?
I also want to point out that discussion on who and what is scummy is usually never a bad thing. I find the case on ckd unconvincing, and I find it a waste of space, but nevertheless it could lead to good things. I was wrong to say to stop it earlier.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Or pointing out that people naturally want to comment on what other players say. We should all try to not do this, but in the end it is not a reliable scum tell, unless someone keeps doing it when asked not to, or a pattern forms. Why do you think your explanation is better?DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
here Guardian is opening the door for his buddies to answer questions posed at others with cheeky impunity.Guardian wrote:Zazier -- answering questions posed at others is not a reliable scum tell. It is unhelpful, but not scummy, because lots of people naturally do this. I used to think it was a scum tell because most unhelpful things are scummy and vice versa, but this one seems to not be.. Defending others surreptitiously by answering tough questions posed to them is scummy however, if you think any of the instances you brought up fall into that let me know.
So you are trying to imply a tenuous causal link between CKD's alignment and mine, because I find the case on him unconvincing?DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
Only scum would be unmoved by CKD's screaming scumminess. My own scumdar, which is finely calibrated, first pinged, then sounded full alarm... another CKD post, and it started shooting sparks, caught fire and blew up in a mushroom cloud.Guardian wrote:I am very unconvinced by the case on CKD, and mention this because I think it is mostly wasting our time :(. Is the case anything more than him having a strong gut read early in the game, and saying so? If it is please enlighten me. If not, please move on.
This assumes that mafia cannot daytalk, which I guess is possible but would be pretty odd since this game has no nights. And sorry DGB, but I don't think BM/anyone is particularly alarmed by your keen eye for scum-catching as opposed to, say, Yos2's or vollkan's...DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
This is a weak prodding of your buddy to stop vote-hopping, which he is doing on purpose, alarmed by my presence in the player roster and fully aware of my keen eye for Day 1 bus'ing.Guardian wrote:BM, why do you think DGB will be unreadable? Why are you continuing to promote this meta of vote hopping if it is a scummy meta? Scummy things are generally scummy because they are unhelpful to town -- if you acknowledge that constantly moving your votes is scummy, e.g. unhelpful, why continue to do so?
So does it indicate nothing or does it indicate that he is SK?DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
This is just silly. Self-voting is indicative of nothing at all, and vollkan did it to bus himself, as he is the SKGuardian wrote:Self voting is scummy -- it robs town of information. I am disappointed in vollkan especially for this -- I've always looked at his play as logical and very helpful to town. I find his choice to self vote and rob the town of information suspicious and out of character, especially considering I think that others self-voting probably impacted his decision to do so.
I disagree. Mafia has an implicit social contract where we all put our thoughts about other people to be analyzed. When you don't self vote, you don't do that. It is like lurking. It robs the town of discussion and moves the discussion in a bad direction. At worst it can bring suspicion to yourself -- because it IS unhelpful to the town.DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:But more seriously, Day 1 self-voting is not even worthy of comment, unless you're looking for an easy point to make to fake scum hunting.
Why refuse to state who you are suspicious of and why? Why refuse to list the players and make comments? I want a firm stand from you on the players because right now you are my first (second if you count me misreading Korts) real suspect. I will explain further after you procure such a list or again explicitly refuse to.DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
I've done it for you and for vollkan. For the players that I have declared to be town, I must decline to comment as it should remain a secret formula. Otherwise there is a strong risk of it being exploited by you and your buddies.Guardian wrote:DGB, you seem to have said that at least half the players are either obviously town or obviously scum. Please list all the players with your current thoughts on them, and a short explanation of why you think this way.
unvote: vote: DrippingGoofball
Again, you presenting the information you claim to have gathered in a concise manner will help me and others to analyze the truth of this statement.DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
I disagree, these 15 pages are shockfull of information and I've already pegged half the players correctly. Especially vollkan.Guardian wrote:This is supposed to be such a stellar cast -- we seem to have largely spam'd/noise'd our way to page 8 in two days. Short page lengths are better for towns -- in reality, people are not going to re-read 40 page day ones as well as they read 15 page day ones.
I highly dispute that this is so, especially as compared to BM's vote-an-hour and rofl's back and forth with numerous people about why he refused to answer a question.DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
HEY! That's what you just did.Guardian wrote:Please cut out the garbage -- it is unhelpful and suspcious. Posting a lot of nothing can make you look like you are scum hunting, being active, thinking about the game, etc. when you aren't.
I expect a good faith effort at pro-town play from everyone. I think that BM'sDrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
BM I understand, though I promise you will be disappointed if you expect logic from him, as you would if you expected sanity from me.Guardian wrote:I am especially annoyed with BM and rofl for this, off the top of my head. BM you need to re-read the thread and come up with something logical, and stop the knee-jerk voting reactions that seem to come three times a page.spamposting was lacking in that, was unhelpful/suspicious, and that he can amend his play to be more on that track if he is town.
Do you think roflcopter going back and forth for a dozen posts about why he didn't want to answer a particular question at a particular time was at all useful? Do you think that was the most pro-town he could be?DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:But rolfcopter? Come on. Please do not try to silence the townies.
How is this trying to 'trip' him? This is me telling him that something he did was unhelpful, and yes, suspicious.DrippingGoofball in 212 wrote:
Stop trying to trip rolfcopter. It's scummy.Guardian wrote:rofl, when asked a question that you see that you are being asked, either refuse to answer it and move on (worse option), or answer it immediately (better option). Don't draw it out over a dozen posts where you get into a debate with others where you explain why you are refusing when you could just answer (worst option, one that you chose).Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Guys, I realized that I did something that was not pro-town, and admitted it and corrected my stance. I am a bit perplexed as to why this is being used as the basis for votes, and why it is being termed fence-sitting.
I am not fence sitting -- I have not yet wavered from saying that I find the case on CKD lacking. But if people want to continue discussing it I should not stop that, for many, many reasons. For example, CKD could react in a scummy way and the initially unconvincing case could lead to CKD-scum catching. Or I could become convinced. Or if someone keeps pressing a bad case they could look suspicious. Etc.
---
destructor, I don't think rofl's question-avoidance was very scummy, especially in the context of the whole thread, but it was unhelpful and something that I think should be avoided.
BM, I fundamentally disagree that your vote hopping is helpful. By over-voting your rob your votes of any meaning. They do not express who you are most suspicious of, they do not intimidate those who you are voting, etc. When you just voted me, I thought to myself "oh well, but he will probably change that in a few pages." It took exactly one post :\. Your votes are meaningless if you continue in this fashion.
As for "we cannot take anything DGB says seriously..." I fundamentally disagree with that as well. Contrary to popular opinion, I think DGB is always serious. She just uses apparent humor to get things done her way. I was converted to this line of thinking after playing with her in mith's California game #2 and mod-ing her in iPick. She's fun -- but we can look at her play and see motive, logic, etc. there.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
Uncommitted? My stance on the CKD case has not wavered, why are you saying it has??Korts wrote:After trying to discredit CKD case, and a reply from rofl, he quickly retreats and basically allows rofl to follow the lead on CKD. I think he's trying too hard to stay uncommitted to any particular side.
How is this fence sitting -- I am doing the exact same thing DGB is doing -- refusing to explain why I find a player townish.Korts wrote:
More on the fence.Guardian wrote:I also want to point out that discussion on who and what is scummy is usually never a bad thing. I find the case on ckd unconvincing, and I find it a waste of space, but nevertheless it could lead to good things. I was wrong to say to stop it earlier.
I don't know whether you generally believe we cannot analyze DGB because she is "joking" or whether you are spewing a line of bullshit. "DESPERATE" attempt to defend myself? Because DGB is attacking me for not posting content when I have posted content, and I have one vote?? And this makes me DESPERATE? I was trying to illustrate how bad DGB's attack was -- and now I find you agreeing with it :|.Korts wrote:I don't know if Guardian genuinely doesn't realize that DGB is joking or he's really intent on refuting every single paragraph of DGB's post in a desperate attempt to defend himself.
I fundamentally agree that self-voting is not scummy, as I spent a whole post explaining. NotKorts wrote:One way it is helpful is that it outs the opportunistic players who are all too eager to jump on an anti-town thell saying it's a scumtell. Remember, kids, anti-town=/=scummy. There may be overlaps, but it's a false conclusion to painteveryanti-town action as scummy. And self-voting isn't scummy.everyanti-town action is scummy, but it is pretty damn close. I made this pic to help you understand:
That's exactly the thing -- she hasKorts wrote:Whoa, misrep! DGB is refusing to list those players she sees astown. She made it pretty clear who she thinks is scum, with added comments.notmade it pretty clear who she thinks is scum; she's said at least 5 players I can recall are definitely scum. I want to hear her actual stance on everyone with reasons. If she doesn't want to give reasons for who is town, fine, but everyone she thinks is scummy I want reasons for.
We can analyze her motivations for lying, if she is lying. If she refuses to play honestly I am up for lynching her. One of my greatest pet-peeves is saying players are unlynchable because they have a scummy meta. I personally do not know of anyone who has such a meta. But if you believe that someone does, I support policy lynching them in every single game I am in with them until the meta changes. If in this game, the town as a whole refuses to acknowledge that a player is readable AND then refuses to lynch them (whether this player is DGB, or anyone), then I am going to replace out. No one should get a free pass in mafia. Giving it is idiotic. Especially not DGB, she is perfectly readable.BM wrote:Right. So you're saying DGB genuinely believes that the people she has named as scum are scum, and those she has named as town are town? I think not. She lies constantly, and unless she starts playing the game honestly, she is completely unreadable, because we cant use interactions or lies as scumtells, because they are all tongue in cheek. You cannot apply normal scumtells to DGB.
I do not think she hasn't been playing honestly -- if she hasn't I would like her to explicitly state that this is the case, and explain what was honest and what wasn't.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
fyi:
I'm sad that Adel didn't answer my questions in the thread like she did with the last ones .Adel wrote:
-mafia are allowed to talk via quicktopic -- see PM.Guardian wrote:Adel, are the mafia allowed to talk one on one via PM (or in some other generally unobserved area) regularly during the day? It is not clear from the front post (to me).
Also, can they (and other roles) prearrange events? Can they PM you ("kill Player 1 at 1:00 AM")? Can they PM you ("kill Player 1 right before the day ends")? Also, what happens if you have not resolved a mafia kill and someone is lynched in the meantime?
-no
-no
-no
- they don't kill anyone
As much as I think I have something on DGB, I want to put this out for consideration -- she implied I was trying to lead BM away from being scummy, inasmuch as he could be my scum partner and I couldn't talk to him during the day. Mafia can talk via quicktopic. Does it make sense to take it as an indicator of DGB-townness that she was arguing that I had to communicate to BM in this thread? That could be faked, I dunno.. I just thought of it and am not sure what to think so I wanted to throw that out there.
PS: An interesting consequence of the rules as Adel responded to me is that if we quick-lynch someone before Adel has resolved a mafia kill, the mafia kill will not go through. So we might want to try that as a strategy at some point, and in fact we might want to be more liberal about hammering on a whim or some such if the mafia have not killed yet. Sure, mafia could get away with BS quick hammers, but then they would be killing scummy people instead of whomever they chose.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
DGB, do this, promise to do it, or refuse to in your next three posts, or I will take it as you refusing to do so.I wrote:Why refuse to state who you are suspicious of and why? Why refuse to list the players and make comments? I want a firm stand from you on the players because right now you are my first (second if you count me misreading Korts) real suspect. I will explain further after you procure such a list or again explicitly refuse to.
I got busy Saturday-Tuesday with a paper, I will read up and comment when I get free time.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
ps: people unvote ckd, otherwise it seems that the scum could kill someone and change it from 8 to lynch to 7 to lynch. we don't want ckd lynched unless we want ckd lynched and have him hammered; if he is town and is at 7 votes, the scum can kill someone and get an instant lynch on ckd.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
if ckd is town, lynch -1 basically means lynch, because mafia can kill someone, then there are 13 people alive, then it is 7 to lynch when it is now 8 to lynch.
so, realize that if you vote CKD now, and put him at lynch -1, you are effectively hammering him.
if you all are comfortable with that... then I'll find you suspicious for it.
CKD is under such suspicion and likely lynch that I would like to say some things in his defense, and I have a hell of a lot more I want to say today before ckd gets hammered. I prefer short days, but I prefer that we end days when we choose to, not because we didn't realize scum could kill someone and reduce the requirements to lynch.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
I've been reading along...
Game was balanced, maf got unlucky and then made poor kill choices.
Yosarian2 was obviously, obviously scum. Yosarian2, I've got your number. I PM'd Adel this, and explained why you were scum. I wish I'd gotten the chance to explain why.
I was pretty obviously killed because of my comment that we shouldn't put people at lynch -1, imo... Korts, was that it, or did you really think that killing me would look like scum hunting??
If Korts was really a vig I'd have been very annoyed, I keep dying night 1 due to vigs who are the only ones who suspect me...
I think the town wasted a lot of time and lynches, just the mafia got so unlucky/unskillful that it didn't matter. Days 1 and 2 lynches made absolutely no sense to me. Waiting to lynch Korts made no sense either, to me. RagingRabit was notably good as town.
Cheers all, I look forward to playing with you again.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
-
-
Guardian Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 4703
- Joined: March 28, 2007
- Location: Warning: Always looks scummy. Is town.
reading a game thread someone has played in makes it harder for them to win in the future. people need to get over themselves. I don't give a crap about meta-ing them, I want to read it because it interests me... based on your logic, we should make all the games readable only by those in them, because meta-ing people makes it harder for them to win in the future.Adel wrote:
no, you didn't miss it, I didn't post it. If the scum team wants to share it they may, but someone pointed out (before this game) that sharing a scum-qt thread may make it harder for those players to win as scum in the future.roflcopter wrote:did i miss a link to the scum qt somewhere? i wanna see it.Do not lynch me.
[wiki]Great Nibbler Takeover of 2008[/wiki]
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.