SpyreX, at this point I see you accusing just about everyone. It hard to take what you say seriously anymore. I have said a few times why I voted Wall-E. The case was obvious so I would not expect people to post reasons why they change their vote. What I want you to answer is why are you jumping from one person to the next so fast? You just pick a person and try and force a lynch. This may net you scum but you will most likely take out a few townies in the process. I like the aggressiveness but I think the cost is too much in a game like this. Granted the deadline I am sure plays a part but right now all scum had to was sit back and let you do their work. Its hard to say but if you keep up the way you do I hope at some point you find your target.
Porkens, I jumped from your bandwagon because I thought Wall-E was caught in a trap and I thought it was legit. I thought I voted you at the start of today but guess not
Vote Porkens
. Same reasons as before and to add I find you plus:
I ultimately thought that the case against Wall-E was moderate at best
The bandwagon on Wall-E went fast as I am sure anyone who logged in and read would have voted him. Even you who thought his case was moderate voted him. Your FOS's for an unpopular Cambria wagon is just crap. In a game this size I dont think 2 votes is a bandwagon. Porken's is in SpyreX pocket though. Not sure if that means anything but something that is odd to me.
If you thought the case was weak why did you vote?