Assassins in the Palace II: Game Over
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Guys, lets not be less retarded. Lynch the obvious scum.
Row Row Row!How about we drop FAKE hints about who the Khalifs are, in an attempt to get the Assassins to slip up? Of course, we would have to masterfully disguise these fake hints, but it is possible.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
I should also try proofreading. Lets not be retarded* or lets be less retarded*. Take your pick.Flameaxe wrote:Guys, lets not be less retarded. Lynch the obvious scum.
Row Row Row!How about we drop FAKE hints about who the Khalifs are, in an attempt to get the Assassins to slip up? Of course, we would have to masterfully disguise these fake hints, but it is possible.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
A) Ongoing games rule...AGAIN. If you plan on playing mafia on this site, please read the site rules. It isn't that hard and is posted at the top of every subforum.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:You know, I am beginning to think these forums are adverse to logic, or something.
I offered logic the last time, and got lynched for it.
I am offering logic this time, and it appears I shall be lynched for it again.
FlameAxe, instead of just saying "OBVIOUS SCUM", as you did in Pikmin, how about you, oh, I dunno, say WHY it makes me "obvious scum"?
You did not last game, and, well, look what I turned out to be that time around.
B) Content finds scum, yes. But in this case, content can also reveal kings. We don't want that for obvious reasons.
C) Your odds make me giggle.
D)
Could you be any stupider? Probably. Only time will tell.How about we drop FAKE hints about who the Khalifs are, in an attempt to get the Assassins to slip up? Of course, we would have to masterfully disguise these fake hints, but it is possible.
E) I suggest reading the AITP game run by Eldarad for Marathon day to figure out this strategy.
F)
Content does no different.And quicklynching could, just as easily, have lost all three. It is pure chance, and, in the end, makes you let hints loose about who the Khalifs are.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
A) The rule is "do not discuss ongoing games" not "do not influence games with other games". Again, read the rules.
B) What makes you think general scumhunting will help us any more than a quicklynch?
D) It's retarded.
E) Read B.
I'll let JD chime in to call you dim.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
B) Yes, and you can just as easily give the assassins a better chance of hitting the kings. Why would you want that, scum? Oh wait, I answered myself with my question. Teehee.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:A) And was that rule not implemented for the sake of people not influencing on-going games?
B) Because you will end up with a better chance of lynching scum than lynching a guard? And the people you are reluctant to quicklynch will be pinpointed as Khalifs by the Assassins?
D) Confusing the Assassins is retarded?
D) How you get there.
A) Rules are rules. If you don't follow them, you shouldn't be able to play. Period.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Row! Row! Row!JDodge wrote:
Except that any Guard who starts a bandwagon would know enough not to start one on a Khalif. One must question why you didn't notice this - the best reason being that you are an assassin. Diescumdie.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:
I already admitted that I could see you logic in the fact that my role in one game does not effect my role in another.JDodge wrote:You're dim. Mostly you're thinking other games have any bearing on your alignment here. Please die.
What I was pointing out is the fact that in any game (And fine, FlameAxe. I shall never mention the Pikmin game again, even though I am already dead in the damn thing.) bandwagoning is no good, because you have far more of a chance of killing a townie than scum. In this game, it also points out who you are reluctant to bandwagon to the Assassins, whom can then presume that those people are the Khalifs.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Your logic is very one-sided. I have attempted to combat it, but you seem to be incapable of looking at it both ways.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:FlameAxe:
I would appreciate it if you at least tried to combat my logic. I notice that you do not do that a lot...
Instead, all you say is: LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGONDefined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Damn...you knew about that? Shit...JDodge wrote:
Not really. Saying that your logic is infallible because one person can't combat it is like saying that a skyscraper is terrorist-proof because someone set off a cherry bomb in one of the toilets.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:
I have new logic out. Please try to combat that, if you would.Flameaxe wrote:
Your logic is very one-sided. I have attempted to combat it, but you seem to be incapable of looking at it both ways.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:FlameAxe:
I would appreciate it if you at least tried to combat my logic. I notice that you do not do that a lot...
Instead, all you say is: LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON
If you do not, all I can say is that you have no argument against it, which means that my logic is infallible, which means that...
Well, I think you get where I am going with this.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Except you said that if I didn't combat it, it was infallible...You said it, right up there. See?ZombieSlayer54 wrote:
Saying my illogical is infallible because nobody can combat it is a different situation.JDodge wrote:
Not really. Saying that your logic is infallible because one person can't combat it is like saying that a skyscraper is terrorist-proof because someone set off a cherry bomb in one of the toilets.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:
I have new logic out. Please try to combat that, if you would.Flameaxe wrote:
Your logic is very one-sided. I have attempted to combat it, but you seem to be incapable of looking at it both ways.ZombieSlayer54 wrote:FlameAxe:
I would appreciate it if you at least tried to combat my logic. I notice that you do not do that a lot...
Instead, all you say is: LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH LYNCH BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON BANDWAGON
If you do not, all I can say is that you have no argument against it, which means that my logic is infallible, which means that...
Well, I think you get where I am going with this.
I invite anyone and everyone to combat my logic. If no one does...Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Lets just hope for that modkill...JDodge wrote:You're an idiot. Vote for yourself before you do more irreparable harm to the town.
This is not your game. This is not in any way suitable for you. You are becoming more of a liability by the moment and you need to die right this instant. You are a horrible player for this sort of game; you think logic reigns supreme in every last situation you see.
Thank you for playing, go away.Defined by who I dislike, not who I like~-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
-
-
Flameaxe Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Comma Police
- Posts: 6642
- Joined: July 9, 2007
- Location: Denver
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.