That sentence hurts my ears. It makes them bleed...Glork wrote:This is crap.
Zindaras, I demand that, for the good of the town, you unvote Thesp now.FOS: ZINDARAS, CES
P.S. I want in on that vote Thesp today action...
I am able to post once or twice per game per real life day.IH wrote: I demand more nightfall posts.
So you created the belief that you were pro no lynch?.... So? How does that help us? All that did was bring up a huge number of WIFOM issues which truely could go either way.AndrewS wrote:Day 1 lynches are almost always randomish when a game is full of experienced and non-idiot players. I wanted to avoid that.
This will definitely be worth looking at tomorrow. Why are you comming after me so suddenly; someone who actually believes that Andrew is acting scummy, and all the while not addressing the other people who think he's clean?Thesp wrote:This will definitely be worth looking at tomorrow. Why are you deflecting the AndrewS lynch? If you're scum, it would be very nice for you to follow ChannelDelibird's lead and bus your partner.Nightfall wrote:unvote, Vote: Ether for as mentioned a few posts above, she seems a little too attached to Andrew with an aparant view that he cant really do wrong.
Zindaras wrote: Nightfall: Typical Nightfall-lurker.
Nightfall wrote:Hey ***, I check in to everygame I'm in at the least once every two days.
I work during the week so I can only post when I get home. If you check my posts you'll see that they are all from certain blocks of time with each block being almost 24 hours apart. Over the weekend I usually spend time with my girlfriend family and other friends, but I still do my best to make time to come by at least once in the two days to post something. Yes I am in other games with you, **** mafia comes to mind, and if I remember accurately I am 1 of the only 4 people who actually didnt leave that game because of inactivity. I may not make posts 24/7 but I am in the games I play for the long run.
Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Glrok's early vote might've been random, but that doesn't make the bandwagon random. Fritzler called it long before.FoS: IHfor mischaracterising the wagon.
IH wrote:I feel highly dissatisfied with Nightfall this game. I feel himlurklurklurking
nightfall, why are you voting Ether? Who do you think is scum? Can we have some input from you before the deadline, other than some minor humor about the dice?
Ether wrote:Someone who votes for a confirmed innocent is obviously just fucking around; the confirmed innocent lynch would never actually get through. What's wrong?IH wrote:"Can you expain how a vote for a confirmed innocent lynch eqautes to an actual confirmed innocent lynch? Seems harmless"
That's exactly how I see your argument.
I was going to list peoples actions before I got to my points. If you dont care for it though, I'll just go streight to my point the next time...Ether wrote:unvote; vote: NightfallI really don't see any point whatsoever to his new posting style, and I probably still wouldn't if I was at the height of my mental health.
Sorry if I was wanting to put it all in one post so that people could see it easier IH. I was going to writes what I had thought about everyones actions after I had put everything they posted in order. I was in a way trying to show that I was following along with the posts people make.Nightfall wrote: I was planning on doing a summery of everyones posts and explain what I found most scummy.
Mgm wrote:I'm not confused. I may not have paid attention one or two times, but the "not paying attention count" against me is grossly overstated. Everything other than the times I haven't paid attention is simply a disagreement on gameplay.Nightfall wrote:Then were the votes that were made on Mgm because of his confusion seen as "scummy" to you?Thesp wrote: For the record, I think confusion is far more likely to be exhibited by town.
Really? If there are masons in this game, you think Adele would have to be one?Glork wrote:Hm. I take it there's no mason group if Adele's claim holds true.
Unvote, Vote: Thesp
Me calling Patrik pat is cause for alarm? The point of my comment was that at that point Glork was the last one that should be commenting on how Pat (O.o) chooses how to place his vote.Ether wrote:(Day 2, Post 595, Nightfall (on Glork) wrote:-Says that he doesn’t like pats comment that a short time until deadline means that we need to decide which vote leader to lynch.
This coming after he just started a new bandwagon by rolling a pair of dice? Pat’s reasoning to me seemed much more based on reason. On the surface at least.o.OI just realized that he calls Patrick "Pat" at some points, which I hadn't picked up on the first time I tried Find. Nightfall, you never really elaborate on this sentence and I'm not sure what you're insinuating with it.)
Ether wrote: Nightfall, "on the surface at least" is the part that bothers me. Please elaborate.
Thank you.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Nightfall, the town gets 3 non-townie roles. Spectrumvoid filled the first slot, Adele the second. As you need 2 masons to make a masonry, the town doesn't have a mason group.
See, this is why I keep getting the opinion that you and Fritz were claiming to be masons. That, or you are purposely trying to screw with us >:(Glork wrote: I think I've got a good enough read on him that I can pretty confidently say that if I thought he were scum, I'd be all over him by now. I *would* like to see him contribute a little more, but I do not think we should be going after him for the time being. (That said, I've had only vague passing suspicions of you anyway, so I'm probably not the one who *should* be answering that question.)
I do not understand the significance of this remark.Ether wrote:Okay. It wasn't really saying anything about scumminess or opinion or anything interesting at all, then. Pfeh, I was getting my hopes up.Post 855, Nightfall wrote:I hope that makes more sense now.
An attack from Ether? oh well, it's not like I was expecting anything more...
Ether wrote:Well, I definitely had the chance. I dimly remember staring at his posts two hours before deadline trying to remember why I had offered the hammer. These thoughts were based on how scummy I found him as opposed to the parity issues I'd spoken of when I said I'd hammer, and my Thespscum thoughts have never gone very far.Post 863, Glork wrote:So, um, Ether... why no hammer before you went to bed?
Well thank you for clearing that up yesterday so that someone else could move on it... or wait...that never happend? oh yeah...
Ether wrote:Glork wrote:Sound reminiscent of D2 when she said she'd hammer Thesp? Hmm.
It means your leading us on again. Maybe we'll go for another no lynch?
Glork wrote: Nightfall: What are your thoughts on the non-lynch of Thesp yesterday? Do you think anybody is likely to be scummy for not dropping the hammer? Pro-town?
Although I was not a big fan of a possible Thesp lynch, I'd agree that it appears a little scummy for players who spoke that they were pro Thesp lynch and could have lynched him, yet did not do so. I personally was if I remember correctly was asleep at the deadline.
[quote ="Pat"]
Nightfall: I'm not watching him as closely as some others. Lurks at times. Didn't agree with some stuff he said about Andrew, though he sounds genuine enough. I'd put him at neutral.
Q: If I am unable to check the thread, and for that reason do not post, do you consider that lurking? I'm really just curious.
See, this is why I keep getting the opinion that you and Fritz were claiming to be masons. That, or you are purposely trying to screw with us >:(Glork wrote: I think I've got a good enough read on him that I can pretty confidently say that if I thought he were scum, I'd be all over him by now. I *would* like to see him contribute a little more, but I do not think we should be going after him for the time being. (That said, I've had only vague passing suspicions of you anyway, so I'm probably not the one who *should* be answering that question.)
An attack from Ether? oh well, it's not like I was expecting anything more...Ether wrote:Okay. It wasn't really saying anything about scumminess or opinion or anything interesting at all, then. Pfeh, I was getting my hopes up.Post 855, Nightfall wrote:I hope that makes more sense now.
Well thank you for clearing that up yesterday so that someone else could move on it... or wait...that never happend? oh yeah...Ether wrote:Well, I definitely had the chance. I dimly remember staring at his posts two hours before deadline trying to remember why I had offered the hammer. These thoughts were based on how scummy I found him as opposed to the parity issues I'd spoken of when I said I'd hammer, and my Thespscum thoughts have never gone very far.Post 863, Glork wrote:So, um, Ether... why no hammer before you went to bed?
It means your leading us on again. Maybe we'll go for another no lynch?Ether wrote:I do not understand the significance of this remark.Glork wrote:Sound reminiscent of D2 when she said she'd hammer Thesp? Hmm.
Although I was not a big fan of a possible Thesp lynch, I'd agree that it appears a little scummy for players who spoke that they were pro Thesp lynch and could have lynched him, yet did not do so. I personally was if I remember correctly was asleep at the deadline.Glork wrote: Nightfall: What are your thoughts on the non-lynch of Thesp yesterday? Do you think anybody is likely to be scummy for not dropping the hammer? Pro-town?
Ether wrote:Nightfall wrote:Well thank you for clearing that up yesterday so that someone else could move on it... or wait...that never happend? oh yeah...You said you would lynch him.
You didn't and we went no lynch.
You said after that you changed your mind.
To bad you didnt post that before you went to bed or before the deadline when someone else could have done something about it.
Uh. What?Nightfall wrote:Although I was not a big fan of a possible Thesp lynch,
What? Thesp is not at the top of my possible scum list so I didn't have that strong a desire to see him get lynched... What is so confusing there?
1. I dont believe that I ever said I was cool with a no-lynchEther wrote: Then you said you were cool with a no-lynch anyway (and you did place what was only the second vote on me, after deadline announcement, pre-Adele claim). I don't get it.
I've also looked now. I too dont see what MBL is talking about.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Also, MBL, I've looked for it. I've read his posts in isolation and re-read the entire thread. I didn't find anything. I see no reason to search further.
Agreed.Mgm wrote:It's still more powerful than a vanilla townie.Thesp wrote:Agreed.Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:Compared to a cop and a deputy, the roleblocker is weak, even if he's useful an sich.
Pardon?Ether wrote:vote: Nightfall: He's still scum. (I will acknowledge that the kill didn't look like Nightfall's doing at all, nor Channel's. Awesome. We should discuss at some point who wouldn't catch on to Fritzler so they can get town points. (This is where my train of thought fails me; I'm not sure who else wouldn't. It got by me, but I suppose that's not the answer you want to hear.))
3
Thinking they could be Masons I asked Fritz and Glork a few things to see their thoughtsNightfall wrote:I agree with Adele's post 698.
In contrast to my more recent posts, I must say that I am now finding Glork and Fritz less likely to be scum. With that being said, I don't entire agree with their views.
Nightfall wrote: Fritz, if Thesp is not the play today, do you see him as the play for a day soon to come? Or is he more on your pro town list?
Nightfall wrote: One last thing, Glork, how do you stand in regards to CES, Pat, Zind, and Lee?
The truth? I'm a little scared of Glork. I think he's a really good player and if he is scum he would likely over time be able to lead me on and get me thinking a little less for myself and more following his lead. Because I don't really want to risk letting him influence me, I tred very carefully when we speak.Nightfall treats Glork with great caution trying not to give him fuel to counterattack with--apprehension is palpable and they are not likely scum together. He somewhat takes the township of Fritz for granted. He is using instances of Ether's "confusion" to draw suspicion upon her. Did not fuel the Adelewagon. Minimal analysis of CDB's minimalist play. Took a hard look at each of CES's D1 votehops.
It was more of a "If you happen to be town, I hope you take this to heart" type post. CES somewhat said that if I turn up town, my expressed thoughts would not influence his. I find that in itself a little scummy and so I said that if he is town then I hope he and everyone else does take what I said into consideration.Patrick wrote: Nightfall's post 1330 seems to be adressing CES as though he thinks or knows that CES is town, whereas two posts before he said that CES was a grave concern of his.
~And since I posted the above, CES has also expressed that he will care very little what my thoughts are, even if I am telling the truth and am revealed as town through death.Nightfall wrote: ~My concern is that how hard he is pushing for a Thesp lynch even with a believed innocent investigation. Right away he goes for the godfather card, barely giving the thought that he could have been wrong a chance to settle.
~How he acted during the CDB lynch also doesn't sit extremely well with me. He helped to lynch scum but he seemed to want to understate the chances that we could have been lynching a power role.
~Since he was holding off for the hammer it does leave me with a little worried that he might have been trying to give his scum buddy every chance to safe himself before he was hammared.
~As for metegaming, I'm not certain, but I think when CES is protown, even when he is being snarky about it, he is a little bit more willing to discuss things and the possibility that others may be right.
Why don't you perform your "killing"s at night with the rest of your scum buddies.Ether wrote:I'd still be happiest killing Nightfall, as his recent posts have been purely emotional appeals:
When this game first started I was really eager to help out. It was my first invite game. At the start I really thought that Andrew was scummy, and when he turned up town I was truely surprised and I became a little doubtful of my abilities. That paired with a reduced amount of time I had to participate lead to few posts from me. Lately after a long absense herself, Ether once again pounces on me acusing me of being scum. Seeing as how she's been doing it for the whole game it has got a little anoying and bothersome. I have recently come to believe from the way things are going that my time in this game is running short. Therefore I have posted my thoughts on who I believe to be scum and asked those who doubted my sincerity to please once I am gone look back over what I have said. I only ask this so that other town members who outlive me can see what I, a fellow town member had been thinking and where my mind was.MrBuddyLee wrote: Nightfall appeared to be somewhat on the ball early and has given up. Did a PBPA on half the town alphabetically, which is suspect. Upped his posting when he was about to be lynched, then disappeared again. Has asked one question in the past month, and it was about himself.