NY 168: (GAME OVER) The Mod is Dead, Fire and Ice Edition

aptil · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Sat Nov 30, 2013 3:45 am

/confirm

aptil · Post Post #30 (isolation #1) » Mon Dec 02, 2013 4:02 am

VOTE: Desperado I don't think RVS is lame . It is fun .

aptil · Post Post #88 (isolation #2) » Mon Dec 02, 2013 8:31 pm

@garmr: What were you trying to achieve by post#67 ? How can someone give a summary on people who have posted 2-3 posts ?
It is more weird that yuni actually answered that .

aptil · Post Post #110 (isolation #3) » Tue Dec 03, 2013 8:28 am

I don't understand the Bulb wagon . 1 vote is random . 1 vote is a sheep vote . 1 vote was a vote by other player to try and start a counter-wagon to their own wagon .
@mastin : Why do you think yuni is innocent ?

aptil · Post Post #131 (isolation #4) » Tue Dec 03, 2013 5:02 pm

In post 114, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 110, aptil wrote:I don't understand the Bulb wagon . 1 vote is random . 1 vote is a sheep vote . 1 vote was a vote by other player to try and start a counter-wagon to their own wagon .
@mastin : Why do you think yuni is innocent ?
The 3-vote Bulb wagon?

Do you understand the Yuni wagon, because it seems you do by inference. If you do, please explain it.

I have already stated that post#68 is weird .

aptil · Post Post #212 (isolation #5) » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:29 am

@mod v/la till Sunday

aptil · Post Post #296 (isolation #6) » Sun Dec 08, 2013 8:54 pm

Well i am back will read back and post today/tomorrow .

aptil · Post Post #349 (isolation #7) » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:51 pm

Reading this thread now .

aptil · Post Post #370 (isolation #8) » Fri Dec 13, 2013 3:15 am

In post 352, OhGodMyLife wrote:I suck at self motivating right now so I'm just gonna blatantly sheep Mastin until further notice.

Unvote, Vote: Dry-fit

Are you seriously going to do that throughout this game ?

aptil · Post Post #409 (isolation #9) » Sun Dec 15, 2013 11:44 pm

In post 160, Maxous wrote:
In post 131, aptil wrote:
In post 114, PeregrineV wrote: The 3-vote Bulb wagon?

Do you understand the Yuni wagon, because it seems you do by inference. If you do, please explain it.
I have already stated that post#68 is weird .

fos:
you though.
Regarding Bulba you were commenting on the
people on his wagon
and did'nt comment on bulba himself.
PV asks you to explain the Yuni wagon and you comment on
Yuni
herself and not the people voting her.
Why the difference of attitude between the two wagons?

Well the difference is not there . I understood the votes on yuni wagon . So i did not feel necessary to point to every vote and say i got this and got that .
Regarding the people voting Bulba , i found the reasons odd so i was trying to understand the voting pattern there .
So when PV asked if i understood the yuni wagon , i pointed to the post which was one of the main reasons people going that way .

aptil · Post Post #454 (isolation #10) » Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:35 am

VOTE: Dry -Fit

I am pretty sure about this .

aptil · Post Post #504 (isolation #11) » Fri Dec 27, 2013 6:03 am

Here is my reasoning for the vote at that time : Yuni put dry on L-1 in this post .#443 . After that Dry did have his say in #447 . Nothing happened after this for a day . To me it looked like now that we had reached a l-1 the scum were taking it slow and looking to see jump on someone at this point . So it just made him more scummy to me personally . Hence the hammer .
If people on the wagon did not want to get Dry get lynched there was enough time between him going to l-1 and getting lynched to get off that wagon . Do not blame this on site issues as well because most of you came to post very quickly after the wagon was reached .
Obviously i was going to explain these things from my side once the day started but looking at people voting me like that i just think this was decided before and they just wanted town to get on the wagon soon . My guess is most of the scumteam will be found in the people posting after the lynch on day1 and people jumping to vote for me day2 .

aptil · Post Post #507 (isolation #12) » Fri Dec 27, 2013 7:03 am

Toomai wrote:
In post 487, Yiley wrote:We need to go on the attack and not be reflexively defensive.
How is voting for a terrible hammer not going "on the attack"?
In post 484, YuniChikako wrote:VOTE: Aptil, and he better give me a good reason why he's inno if he wants to change my vote
In post 488, YuniChikako wrote:I'll wait until he says something.

Unvote
You wait until he says something before you unvote.

Vote: aptil

This post is the worst of the lot . He not only votes me but also has other people ready to blame at .
VOTE: Toomai .

aptil · Post Post #531 (isolation #13) » Sun Dec 29, 2013 3:00 am

v/la till the 2nd of Jan .

aptil · Post Post #571 (isolation #14) » Thu Jan 02, 2014 3:41 am

In post 558, Desperado wrote:
In post 556, Slandaar wrote:
In post 507, aptil wrote:
Toomai wrote:
In post 487, Yiley wrote:We need to go on the attack and not be reflexively defensive.
How is voting for a terrible hammer not going "on the attack"?
In post 484, YuniChikako wrote:VOTE: Aptil, and he better give me a good reason why he's inno if he wants to change my vote
In post 488, YuniChikako wrote:I'll wait until he says something.

Unvote
You wait until he says something before you unvote.

Vote: aptil
This post is the worst of the lot . He not only votes me but also has other people ready to blame at .
VOTE: Toomai .
I just want to highlight that I really like this post.
Why? You're both misreading it.

Just look he has done what i thought he would do . Vote one of yuni or Yiley after that initial thing . For me to believe him he had to make those findings in seperate posts .

aptil · Post Post #577 (isolation #15) » Thu Jan 02, 2014 4:56 am

In post 475, ElectricSavages wrote:
JKLM [5]
- Bulbazak, Garmr, Toomai, evilpacman18, Maxous

This wagon has at least 3 scum from .
Maxous- confirmed .
Evil ,Toomai - most likely .
Bulbazak- a little less than above two .
Garmr - most unlikely .

Tags Fixed ~JS

aptil · Post Post #592 (isolation #16) » Fri Jan 03, 2014 8:22 am

In post 582, Bulbazak wrote:
In post 577, aptil wrote:
In post 475, ElectricSavages wrote:
JKLM [5]
- Bulbazak, Garmr, Toomai, evilpacman18, Maxous

This wagon has at least 3 scum from .
Maxous- confirmed .
Evil ,Toomai - most likely .
Bulbazak- a little less than above two .
Garmr - most unlikely .

Tags Fixed ~JS
You know it is possible that scum could be voting other scum, right?

Did i say all the people were from 1 faction ? I think both factions are present here .

aptil · Post Post #602 (isolation #17) » Sat Jan 04, 2014 7:35 am

In post 601, NJAC wrote:529, 546, 547... too many lazy players in this game . Not to mention all the lurkers (me included, I know, sorry again), bad thing.

@Matias: I do expect you to answer my questions in 525.

@Mod: Is there some prodding/replacing taking place now?

That is true . Both sides are playing it extremely safe .

aptil · Post Post #632 (isolation #18) » Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:37 am

In post 617, evilpacman18 wrote:
AH HAH.
487 is just the kind of connection between aptil and Yiley I was hoping to run across.

What is the connection there ? What is AH HAH about it ?

aptil · Post Post #663 (isolation #19) » Thu Jan 09, 2014 5:46 am

In post 662, Yiley wrote:How does that matter when the other two may or may not be? Check me all out and if one is not it doesn't matter statement is still true.

What are you talking about ?

aptil · Post Post #670 (isolation #20) » Fri Jan 10, 2014 5:39 am

In post 668, evilpacman18 wrote:
In post 487, Yiley wrote:I agree with T S O April isn't neccesarily mafia just for a hammer. We need to go on the attack and not be reflexively defensive.
aptil, it was just a weird defense that sort of fits into what else I was thinking, given I have scum reads on both of you and don't really see space for either of you Maxous' team. So this isn't something that I would work off specifically for obtaining reads, but it helps reinforce what I was thinking. Also I think someone else said this but that second sentence doesn't actually make any sense and so providing it as an excuse for his defending you makes me think he has other reasons to want to defend you

In post 482, T S O wrote:Opportunism noted.

Aptil probably does this all the time.

This post was also kind of defending me . This came before Yiley's post , why didn't you feel this was weird ?

aptil · Post Post #673 (isolation #21) » Fri Jan 10, 2014 6:22 am

In post 671, PeregrineV wrote:
Vote: Desparado

Sorry you got a scum role this game.

How did you come to that conclusion ?

aptil · Post Post #675 (isolation #22) » Fri Jan 10, 2014 8:07 am

In post 674, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 672, Toomai wrote:
In post 669, Slandaar wrote:You are telling me someone suggesting they don't know it is multiball makes them town. I am saying that actually scum wouldn't come into the game acting like they know it is multiball.
But isn't it a distinct disadvantage for scum to come into a game advertised and titled as multiball and act like it isn't? At best it makes them stand out; at worst it makes it obvious they're only hunting for one opposing group.
In post 671, PeregrineV wrote:
Vote: Desparado

Sorry you got a scum role this game.
This is the first non-RVS Desperado vote all game. Explain it.

In post 673, aptil wrote:
In post 671, PeregrineV wrote:
Vote: Desparado

Sorry you got a scum role this game.
How did you come to that conclusion ?
http://forum.mafiascum.net/search.php?a ... 9&sr=posts

This is a very bad way to answer a question . You are trying to be a smartass here .
What posts made you feel like he is scum ? What contents from a post ? Is it that you feel every word of his was scummy ?

aptil · Post Post #731 (isolation #23) » Wed Jan 15, 2014 3:50 am

How does Bulbazak go from making a case on Mastin and move on to voting someone completely different and only 1 person finds it strange ? UNVOTE:
VOTE: Bulbazak .

aptil · Post Post #775 (isolation #24) » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:47 pm

Got the prod. Going out right now , will post later today .

aptil · Post Post #886 (isolation #25) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:04 pm

I did think EPM was scum , so it feels good to get some correct reads .
VOTE: EPM

aptil · Post Post #889 (isolation #26) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:29 pm

he is at l-1 i believe . You can talk . You are the only 1 whose reads i do not know at all .

aptil · Post Post #890 (isolation #27) » Fri Jan 24, 2014 10:31 pm

This is the second time in 3 days Rachmarie is active only when she thinks a lynch has happened . RM oppurtunistic scum for sure .

aptil · Post Post #915 (isolation #28) » Wed Jan 29, 2014 6:00 am

In post 860, Toomai wrote:Ummmm okay I'm not sure what to make of these shenanigans.

I'm going to consider aptil "not scum" for now, since the only real reason I didn't like him before was that awful hammer; he doesn't really have any other posts I'd call scummy.

In post 839, Bulbazak wrote:[...] but there's another major reveal coming, and I promised to hold off.
Well don't hold off too long.

In post 915, Toomai wrote:
Vote: aptil

Still think he's scum.

From seeing no posts as scummy to still think as scummy . Please explain .

aptil · Post Post #990 (isolation #29) » Sun Feb 02, 2014 1:43 pm

v/la till the 4th

. no time .

aptil · Post Post #1040 (isolation #30) » Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:52 am

@RM: By 3 days: 3 game days not actual days .

aptil · Post Post #1041 (isolation #31) » Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:52 am

Replace me out

. I am sorry for this .