i appreciate the killa seven vigging.
the random vote stage is unnecessary as we will be lynching strife today.
this is scummy. i'll tell you why when you're older.armlx wrote:Why?iron man is obviously town. obviously.
ok armlx, you're older now.armlx wrote:roflcopter wrote:this is scummy. i'll tell you why when you're older.armlx wrote:Why?iron man is obviously town. obviously.
You realize that with no reason stating X is town on page 1 with no logic is actually an EXTREMELY anti-town move as there are 3 possible scenarios regarding it.
A) You are a cop claiming on page one. I currently doubt anyone would be dumb enough to do this.
B) You are scum trying to set up an "I told you so" or protect a scum partner with no reasoning. For this exact reason what you did gains you know town points under any circumstances.
C) You are a townie, and you have just looked like Group B.
forbiddanlight wrote:FoS STrangerCoug. I rather dislike how reluctant you were to get off the mason claimants, and then still trying to make it look like they could be scum. It's been beaten to death, but let's reiterate again. D1 mason claims would be pretty stupid for scum to do. I'm not ready to vote you yet, but should a wagon appear on you, I will sure as hell join it.
that part. it basically says "when its obvious i can safely join the crowd without drawing much attention to myself, i'll help lynch the townie."forbiddanlight wrote:I'm not ready to vote you yet, but should a wagon appear on you, I will sure as hell join it.
armlx, you just aren't going to admit that making legitimate points against you like rolefishing and poisoning the well make this obviously not omgus, are you?armlx wrote:Rofl, you just aren't going to stop OMGUSing me for starting the wagon that lead to your claim, are you?
easy bandwagon, as there were several people already on me at this point, and you'll notice he doesn't actually give any real reasons for believing me to be scum. this vote was extremely opportunistic.BlakAdder wrote:vote:roflcopter. Just seems like everything he's said so far is kinda pointing towards scum.
translation: pssst. hey scumbuddies, remember there might be a second doctor.BlakAdder wrote:That's not necessarily true. There could be another doctor.armlx wrote: Why would we want potential masons to claim now, especially with no doc.
translation: no i was not warning my scumbuddies to be careful with our nightkills.BlakAdder wrote:True. I guess I was being a little reckless there.
if everyone played mafia by making assumptions and voting without giving the slightest bit of reasoning it would be a very easy game for scum like you.BlakAdder wrote:That was before he claimed mason, and I just thought that his behavior was kind of suspicious. Making assumptions is part of a game of mafia, after all.-TinVision- wrote:Wow. I get caught up in work for a day and come back to claims on Page 3.
...
Anyway, anyone suggesting roflcopter for today's lynch, under the circumstances and given his claim, should be hit in the head with a baseball bat.
Would you care to elaborate on your thought process behind this post, please, BlakAdder? Cause, frankly, it's textbook bandwagoning.BlakAdder wrote:vote:roflcopter. Just seems like everything he's said so far is kinda pointing towards scum.
unvote
translation: i don't think i need to justify my intuition because my intuition said i was getting on the easy townie bandwagon before i looked scummy doing so, but my intuition was clearly wrong.BlakAdder wrote:Pretty simple, really. If everyone waited until they were totally sure that someone was scum, deadline would roll around before we reached a majority. Also, my assumption was voting for roflcopter, obviously.-TinVision- wrote: Could you elaborate on what you mean when you say "making assumptions" is part of the game of mafia and what exactly you were making assumptions about?
Also, I don't think I need to justify my intuition, but whatever.
more excuse making for voting without providing reasons.BlakAdder wrote:Okay, good point. Guess I just kinda get used to going by my gut and I forget that not everyone thinks like that.armlx wrote:But you do. Intuition is not valid reasoning.BlakAdder wrote: Also, I don't think I need to justify my intuition, but whatever.
- Edited to fix tags. Mod.
agreeing with someone else's case =/= providing reasoning, and FOS-then-voting onto the most popular wagon doesn't make it any less opportunistic or scummy.BlakAdder wrote:I agree with Bystand. I want to vote Vamp, but I'll give him a chance to give some particular defensive evidence against himself first. But for now,FOS: Vamp
further evidence that armlx should not live to see dawn tomorrow.korts wrote:@armlx: you are trying to prepare multiple lynches. Not good. Real bad.
this is an interesting point. please elucidate further.forb wrote:username: I don't like how he questions. He seems to set up questions so that no matter what you say is wrong and it will lead to you being scummy.
<3 <3 <3!The Fonz wrote:Some people appear to be quite blind to what seems quite obviously a protown attempt to get the game moving by rofl with the arm/strife thing.
</3The Fonz wrote:Rofl 62: WTF? No reason whatsoever to claim like that.
sure thing pal, here goesMuerrto wrote:Can you list his actions? I thought he was scummy because he HAD NO actions. That doesn't quite apply to me.
this is scummyVamparific wrote:argh i dont want to be on rofl's sideunvote
this is scummyVamparific wrote:vote:forbidden lighti agree with the others points
this is scummyVamparific wrote:lol i keep screwing myself overIron Man wrote:
I also get the whole deal with Vamp. Seems really opprotunistic given his poting history.FoS Vamp.
More later.
this is so scummy.Muerrto wrote:I like the Vig directing actually but I'd like it on IM because:
A. He's lurking as bad as Vamp and not contributing anything.
B. I wanna test the masons.
this is especially scummy, since instead of accidentally hitting a power role you'd like the vig to purposefully hit a power roleMuerrto wrote:One dead mason instead of the Vig possibly accidently hitting a power role randomly is a good trade
except, you know, not shooting a masonMuerrto wrote:It's a good a use of the Vig as any
and this new one against your plan...rofl wrote:scum claiming masons wouldn't be so dumb if there weren't a serial killer in this open setup.
no, but it does make me awesome.ting wrote:That they're coming from a pro-town person doesn't make them right.
translation: waaa i'm gonna get lynched even though i think i'm playing a great gameMuerrto wrote:So did anyone have a case onmeand not Vamp?