your first mistake.
was.
getting my attention.
nope.In post 101, Fire Assassin wrote:So you think we should be pushing Davsto because he did a weird opening?
irrelephant.fire wrote:Why you not voting them?
Fire Assassin wrote:In post 95, Gorkington wrote:hi everyone.
i decided to.suffer for the sake of my friends
p-edit: lets stop being in rvs now.
fire assassin wagon please.
I think this suggests you got a mafia role card.
you will probably get treated worse if you go down this route.In post 117, androgybee wrote:Fire Assassin you've made me MAD. if you keep saying ew and acting like a cranky 5 year old, I'm going to start treating you like one
he seems like it.In post 122, Fire Assassin wrote:Gorkington, why you think Not Mafia is town lean?
im alright.In post 123, Not_Mafia wrote:Hi Gorkington, I'm good, how are you?
oh and because i dont want you to think im entirely a bad person.In post 149, Ircher wrote:Ans this is relevant because? Also, people can do what they want; if they want to use an alt, so be it; it's not your place to criticize.
did you know that i got a scummy for being on the best town for 2015?In post 164, Maruchan wrote:Glorkington while still being semi-new is playing into these interactions too much.
oh my god im L-5 again. am i supposed to claim now?In post 164, Maruchan wrote:Being paranoid about votes on you when you only have one (and a mis-counted second) vote on you at this stage of the game is super fucking scummy beyond belief. especially with all your earlier bullshit I kept noticing. Sorry bud, youre on my scum list.
do you disagree that smudger's wagon still being a thing is related to his entrance?In post 162, Xkfyu wrote:Most (3 out of 4) of Smudgers votes accumulated before he even made his first post, so why are you connecting his entrance with his wagon?
lack of reaction to the rest of the wagon.xk wrote:Also, why do you believe that he won't react until his wagon's momentum slows down?
yes and maybe.xkfyu wrote:You just gonna scum read me and ignore my questions?
because.xkfyu wrote:And why is M&B "untouchable" today?
i) so youre voting him because "lol a wagon on someone for no reason is fun"?Xkfyu wrote:Yes, I disagree. You're the only one who has really had a problem with his entrance, and you never even voted for him.
Xkfyu wrote:The "rest of the wagon?" You mean Not_Mafia? Perhaps he just hasn't been back online since his last post.
yeah.In post 84, Minsc and Boo wrote:I only know Plotinus usually rolls scum.
so we're probably looking at 6 scum here.
VOTE: Smudger
I also want in!
-Radja
i probably wont be okay with lynching her slot on day one this game for dumb personal reasons. sorry.Xkfyu wrote:Ok, so why is Titus untouchable?
not the first time ive heard that one.In post 201, Ircher wrote:Gorkington still has failed to expand
this is his follow-up to me ignoring his questions.fire wrote:I find this strange you have so many reads this early into the game.
I guess they are mostly 'leans' so, not really strong so its w/e.
this does not look like a genuine reaction to someone hes voting/calling scummy.fire assassin wrote:You realize your hostility isn't going to help anyone read you right? Its all AtE, which can be either alignment. I am willing to have a conversation with you, but if all your going to do is throw emotional posts like this, we can't have a discussion and I will have to ignore you.
the entire mindset of this post just screams to me of scum not knowing how to deal with someone hardpushing them for reasons that they dont understand.In post 188, Fire Assassin wrote:Why does this sound like you are lining up both associations and lynches before we even have a single flip. This is disgusting on so many levels, its more likely to come from bad town than scum though.
its because of all those darn scumtells i dropped.In post 220, Aristophanes wrote:Lol You Noob Gork! XD
Why are people voting you anyway? I don't see/get any cases really.
are you voting me with increasing certainty because of what not mafia is saying?In post 247, Maruchan wrote:Also, if you're implying that the only content we have from gorkington so far is sarcasm, then my vote STILL stands.
oooo did you want me to double down on my cheeky bullshit? because you ignoring me actually giving content in the form of a case to continue this hilarious tirade against me having fun in this game is just amazing and you really are just incentivizing me at this point.maruchan wrote:Gorkington still has failed to respond to any question or request posed to him regarding his reads or changes of his reads, and just continues attempting to make snide humor comments, that fail to provide humor.
In post 203, Gorkington wrote:so heres fire assassin in a nutshell and why you should vote for him.
i) opening vote is on me.
starts as RVS.
he then tries to weirdly justify it with easy reasoning.
not a big deal, but it gave me gutfeels that he felt nervous about sitting on an unexplained vote, which feels scummy in my heart.
ii) transition onto nahdia/beeboy hydra is wonky and easy. he abandons the vote on me for what amounts to "these posts look weird" which is meh. what bothers me is that it feels like hes registered that im not an easy push at this point. specifics here being:
this is his follow-up to me ignoring his questions.fire wrote:I find this strange you have so many reads this early into the game.
I guess they are mostly 'leans' so, not really strong so its w/e.
where other people are prickled by me doing this, he backs off, hedges and waffles. it just doesnt seem like a real genuine "im trying to figure out who scum is"-reaction and instead just kind of looks to me like "how do i push someone and not get flack for it here/how do i explain what ive done so far in a way that wont get me in trouble?"
this does not look like a genuine reaction to someone hes voting/calling scummy.fire assassin wrote:You realize your hostility isn't going to help anyone read you right? Its all AtE, which can be either alignment. I am willing to have a conversation with you, but if all your going to do is throw emotional posts like this, we can't have a discussion and I will have to ignore you.
the entire mindset of this post just screams to me of scum not knowing how to deal with someone hardpushing them for reasons that they dont understand.In post 188, Fire Assassin wrote:Why does this sound like you are lining up both associations and lynches before we even have a single flip. This is disgusting on so many levels, its more likely to come from bad town than scum though.
im struggling a little trying to articulate exactly why this post is bothering me so much. i think its mostly that i cant see the town incentive in simultaneously hedging on calling me scummy/calling me bad town to discredit me without committing to pushing me. im kind of hoping if i draw attention to it, someone smarter than me will look at it and see what im seeing and put it into real words.
part of what also bugs me about this, is that he says "time to find scum!", calls me bad town, and then goes on to basically ask me a bunch of questions. does not feel like genuine scumhunting methinks.
there you go. having all of that time to make up these reasons really helped. thanks for letting me stall ircher.
heres his rebuttal too.In post 241, Fire Assassin wrote:Finally going to address this. Not breaking up quote just going in numbers...hope that won't confuse.
1) So you are just calling me weird. That isn't news to me. Meh
2) You are not a easy push? I didn't realize this as all. Call me arrogant, but I think I can push whoever if I was scum. With different levels of success but still I could push you if I wanted to, but I was thinking I had good portion of you that I didn't need to look more at you. Your responses as of late have registered you as one my strongest town reads. Which I find funny.
3) I usually don't pressure people to answer my questions. If I do, I am interested if not I am genuinely just trying to create discussion or legitimately don't care. Glad you picked up on the last part, but me not trying to solve the game is different.
4) How does it not look legitimate? They threw AtE at me, I still have them at null for it. The reaction was pretty over the top for them, but I could see it from either alignment. I want to go away from reading people by emotions, which is kind of my strong suit, going to try see reason based or some people call mechanical reads.
5) So you don't know how to put what you saw into words. Great. Don't know how this makes me scum, but again another great town tell.
If this is all there is on me, I pray for the towns future.
dats cute.In post 270, Minsc and Boo wrote:@Gork, OK but if you don't scumhunt me soon. We're going to have problems.
this is probably the first and last time i will address a point wall, especially when it appears that youre more interested in attacking semantics over the nice juicy details of what i was talking about here.In post 241, Fire Assassin wrote:1) So you are just calling me weird. That isn't news to me. Meh
2) You are not a easy push? I didn't realize this as all. Call me arrogant, but I think I can push whoever if I was scum. With different levels of success but still I could push you if I wanted to, but I was thinking I had good portion of you that I didn't need to look more at you. Your responses as of late have registered you as one my strongest town reads. Which I find funny.
3) I usually don't pressure people to answer my questions. If I do, I am interested if not I am genuinely just trying to create discussion or legitimately don't care. Glad you picked up on the last part, but me not trying to solve the game is different.
4) How does it not look legitimate? They threw AtE at me, I still have them at null for it. The reaction was pretty over the top for them, but I could see it from either alignment. I want to go away from reading people by emotions, which is kind of my strong suit, going to try see reason based or some people call mechanical reads.
5) So you don't know how to put what you saw into words. Great. Don't know how this makes me scum, but again another great town tell.
what happens if fire assassin flips scum?In post 290, Ircher wrote:Reads should be 85% objective and 15% subjective imo.
has it ever occurred to you that maybe youre just really bad?In post 299, Ircher wrote:Then dont post a case that is 100% null indicative.