d3sisted wrote:Wait a second, you're 3 and I'm 4 on the list. How does that work?
If you rolled a 4, would you still have voted for me? If that's the case, I am twice as likely as anyone else to get selected on your die.
11 alive, and I have a policy against voting to kill myself
. So I rolled a 10-sided die with the intention of skipping over my own name. If I rolled a 4, I would've voted for whoever's after you on the list.
This whole discussion about the night kill doesn't really sit well with me. It's all very WIFOM. Reading through some of the previous posts, though, post 20, from Hang 'em High, is bothering me:
Hang 'em High wrote:d3sisted was in 1 completed game with =Confused=; they were both townies and d3sisted posted some complimentary things about =Confused=, so it's fair to say he was impressed with =Confused='s game and might consider him a threat.
Feels like a
really
weak attempt at drawing suspicion to d3sisted. I don't think the killing of =Confused= was a matter of removing a threatening player.
Not
killing a more recognized player may have been a strategic move but that gets into the messy WIFOM territory.
Hang 'em High wrote:I thought Battle Mage might be the target tonight, since he appears to be the most experiened player here. The fact that he survived night 0 makes me a little suspicious.
This sort of point bothers me. Maybe Battle Mage is alive because he's scum. Maybe he's alive because the scum think he's good enough at getting himself lynched, anyway. Or maybe he's alive because the scum want to be able to make this sort of argument about how he might be scum because he's still alive.
unvote
vote: Hang 'em High
It's not much, right now, but it's better than a dice roll.