Mini 1397: War is Hell (Game Over)

Xalxe · Post Post #278 (isolation #0) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:13 am

I've been following.

Tierce, explain like I'm five: why should I not be proceeding to beating the snot out of Matt?

Xalxe · Post Post #281 (isolation #1) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:33 am

Boooooring.

But thanks for the heal reminder, didn't realize charter hadn't done so.

HEAL: kdowns
VOTE: MattP

Xalxe · Post Post #283 (isolation #2) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 3:37 am

In post 282, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Tierce, I have zero desire to heal PeregrineV. Like, none. And don't give me that town solidarity lecture youse. >=(

Just for the sake of questioning, why should I heal someone I believe to be scum?

Because (I think) then you won't get the benefit of the accumulation of health from rage? No wait just reread, because then you'll be up one once rage rolls around and unless you're conftown we can't have that.

Xalxe · Post Post #295 (isolation #3) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 12:16 pm

In post 293, MattP wrote:YOU GUYS THINK MY PUSH ON TIERCE WAS A SCUMSLIP? LLD JUST OUTRIGHT LIED, I DIDNT EVEN DO THAT

SHE CLAIMED I DISAPPEARED WHEN I DIDNT

I CALLED HER OUT AND INSTEAD OF SAYING IT WAS A MISTAKE SHE DEFENDED HERSELF BY SAYING BY "DISAPPEARED" SHE MEANT "IGNORED HER CASE ON ME" WHICH ARE INCREDIBLY DIFFERENT

HER CASE ON ME WAS NOTHING THAT I COULD EVEN RESPOND TO OR WASNT RESPONDED TO ALREADY

WHEN I USE CAPS LAWK IT MEANS I'M RIGHT

LOUDER IS BETTER

(pretty pretty please may I hurts it now?)

Xalxe · Post Post #309 (isolation #4) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:04 pm

In post 308, MattP wrote:And before my meta is used against me AGAIN

So hold on.

You'll use meta against me.

But when it comes to you, it's off the table?

Xalxe · Post Post #312 (isolation #5) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 4:22 pm

In post 311, MattP wrote:
In post 309, Xalxe wrote:
In post 308, MattP wrote:And before my meta is used against me AGAIN

So hold on.

You'll use meta against me.

But when it comes to you, it's off the table?

I'm not talking to you right now I'll tell you when it's your turn to speak

My most sincere apologies, sir. I'll just sit here like a good fucking scum, speak only when spoken to and quietly die.

Err, no, wait, hold on, I'll instead fight the case like you're trying to do, because by doing that, both of us will be town, right?

Xalxe · Post Post #322 (isolation #6) » Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:23 pm

In post 321, MattP wrote:This was before Zdenek had referred to me whatsoever. Is it really necessary to literally try to skew everything I say into scum intent without even attempting to fairly read me?

That didn't answer the question. You answered the latter part (is it just because he's defending you). You did not answer the former (can you explain your town read).

Xalxe · Post Post #328 (isolation #7) » Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:07 am

In post 323, MattP wrote:
In post 322, Xalxe wrote:
In post 321, MattP wrote:This was before Zdenek had referred to me whatsoever. Is it really necessary to literally try to skew everything I say into scum intent without even attempting to fairly read me?

That didn't answer the question. You answered the latter part (is it just because he's defending you). You did not answer the former (can you explain your town read).

Why do you care about my justification for my townread on Yos?

Because you're dodging a question. Again. Now answer it.

Xalxe · Post Post #331 (isolation #8) » Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:16 am

In post 329, MattP wrote:
In post 328, Xalxe wrote:Because you're dodging a question. Again. Now answer it.

No, answer my question. I'm not dodging shit. You weren't interested in my read until Yos brought it up. So explain why now.

Okay, fine. I actually don't give a shit about your read on zdnek. I do care about you dodging a question, again. Now answer Yosarian's question.

PEDIT: teehee look at me hiding here, skulking just out of view

Xalxe · Post Post #333 (isolation #9) » Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:22 am

In post 332, MattP wrote:
In post 331, Xalxe wrote:Okay, fine. I actually don't give a shit about your read on zdnek. I do care about you dodging a question, again. Now answer Yosarian's question.

Why are you so interested in my dodging questions?

Why do you continue to do it?

(Two can play at this game mister, and it won't go anywhere)

Xalxe · Post Post #343 (isolation #10) » Thu Nov 29, 2012 9:01 am

Hold on wait did you just call me easy?

Xalxe · Post Post #382 (isolation #11) » Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:33 pm

In post 369, MattP wrote:@Yos: Getting to you now

How goes this?

Xalxe · Post Post #431 (isolation #12) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:46 am

Okay, I've been following but today is apparently "post things" day or something so here's my two cents:

1) I do want LLD's perspective RE: Tierce's Votecounts. I thought Tierce was the one that said that was scummy but rereading, it was her.
2) I want to make it very clear to Matt that from this point on, I will follow every post of his with a quote of every question he hasn't answered yet, starting with Yosarian's, until he answers them. Too many times I've seen scum get away with not answering things until everyone forgets them and I'm not letting him do this.
3) Could someone explain to me why all of a sudden PV is a better choice than Matt? I mean, both are scum, but I feel like more information, if nothing else, is gleaned from Matt's death.

Xalxe · Post Post #435 (isolation #13) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:49 am

In post 432, quadz08 wrote:How is more information taken from Matt's death?

When Matt dies, his alignment (town or scum) sheds light, at the very least, on myself and Tierce offhand. PV death sheds light on his wagon; the only other reads he's given is all relative to theory and is basically useless.

Xalxe · Post Post #437 (isolation #14) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:50 am

Xalxe wrote:
In post 432, quadz08 wrote:How is more information taken from Matt's death?

When Matt dies, his alignment (town or scum) sheds light, at the very least, on myself and Tierce offhand. PV death sheds light on his wagon; the only other reads he's given is all relative to theory and is basically useless.

Oh also Kinetic too.

Xalxe · Post Post #440 (isolation #15) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:52 am

In post 438, Kinetic wrote:At first, yes. But as we've had time to see it, and PV has responded, I feel much more comfortable in it. The 5 came quickly, but they've been building up for a while. And in a way, LLD is 6, so we have 6 players who are ok with hurting our dear scum.

Make it 6.5; the speed makes me balk but as I said, Matt and PV are scum 1 and scum 2.

(this is me not hurting yet until my #3 is addressed)

Xalxe · Post Post #442 (isolation #16) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 8:58 am

It's not speed of the day, it's speed of the votes.

Xalxe · Post Post #460 (isolation #17) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:50 am

PeregrineV: What happened to your read on Kinetic that made you willing to vote him?

Xalxe · Post Post #461 (isolation #18) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 9:50 am

In post 460, Xalxe wrote:PeregrineV: What happened to your read on Kinetic that made you willing to vote him?

*hurt him, not vote him. Stupid Flay games.

Xalxe · Post Post #473 (isolation #19) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:01 am

In post 470, PeregrineV wrote:And why are you adding a half-vote from Xalve?

I told him to.

That's OK, you destroyed my town read on you fairly quickly.

How?

Xalxe · Post Post #481 (isolation #20) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:08 am

Can I just go on record that my name does not have a V? Thanks.

Also PV stop ignoring me pls kthx.

Xalxe · Post Post #493 (isolation #21) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:19 am

In post 491, PeregrineV wrote:
In post 481, Xalxe wrote:Can I just go on record that my name does not have a V? Thanks.

Also PV stop ignoring me pls kthx.

I've been answering. Are you looking for 483?

Yes, which you'll notice was

two posts after that post

.

Xalxe · Post Post #516 (isolation #22) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 10:52 am

Xalxe · Post Post #524 (isolation #23) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 11:17 am

In post 520, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:Now, as for Tierce's VC, the meta changes when I call out someone on putting up a VC being scummy. It becomes very WIFOM as to whether scum or town would try and start that back up. Null tell from this point forward, the VC scum tell may only be used once if the subject doesn't know it's there. Good enough Xalxe?

Psssst Matt, this is how to answer questions.

Yes LLD, but it was PV who origin--yes, this is good LLD.

Xalxe · Post Post #548 (isolation #24) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:27 pm

In post 547, Zdenek wrote:How does it work if he flips town?

We know that his intent wasn't to get things off of him, and that he believed what he was saying and can proceed accordingly.

Xalxe · Post Post #551 (isolation #25) » Fri Nov 30, 2012 12:35 pm

In post 549, Zdenek wrote:
In post 548, Xalxe wrote:
In post 547, Zdenek wrote:How does it work if he flips town?

We know that his intent wasn't to get things off of him, and that he believed what he was saying and can proceed accordingly.

Would you say that you usually use lynched townie's reads to inform your own?

No, because I'm a shit player. Do I recognize that it

should

be done? Yes. In fact, if you pop a look at me on D2 of Matt's favorite game of mine to refer to (Newbie 1289), I spend a decent amount of time figuring out fuck-all based on the nightkill and why a random newbie was killed.

Xalxe · Post Post #613 (isolation #26) » Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:07 am

Xalxe summons a book from the ether as it floats before him. He flips through it for a time before arriving at the page he desires.

Muttering under his breath, his hands move quickly as he summons a miasma or some shit, I don't know I'm making this up as I go. Crying out in Ancient Demonic, he hurls the spell at the heavenly one.

HURT: PeregrineV

I may have more words coming later, we'll see, but for now I'm good with this.

Xalxe · Post Post #646 (isolation #27) » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:42 am

Oh yeah Kinetic? Well take this!

HEAL: Kinetic

I think that brings you back up.

Xalxe · Post Post #648 (isolation #28) » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:44 am

Yes I read? Sorry for healing him?

Xalxe · Post Post #650 (isolation #29) » Mon Dec 03, 2012 8:47 am

Yeah but be real here: who would you rather have one down? Hmm?

Xalxe · Post Post #656 (isolation #30) » Mon Dec 03, 2012 1:56 pm

Kinetic, can you keep people's names in quote tags? I assume those are all zdnek quotes.

Xalxe · Post Post #663 (isolation #31) » Mon Dec 03, 2012 4:09 pm

ModDevil: Did my heal on Kinetic count?

Yes, see edited count above.

Xalxe · Post Post #682 (isolation #32) » Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:42 am

In post 680, Tierce wrote:Okay, I think Zdenek Is Town. I'm done reading his posts.
Definitely
not reading the endless wall wars.

Is Kinetic town?

Xalxe · Post Post #701 (isolation #33) » Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:14 pm

In post 699, quadz08 wrote:I approve of drunkscoob's reads

Weirdly enough so do I on most counts.

Xalxe · Post Post #704 (isolation #34) » Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:16 pm

In post 703, scooby wrote:
In post 701, Xalxe wrote:
In post 699, quadz08 wrote:I approve of drunkscoob's reads

Weirdly enough so do I on most counts.

VUT i SAID YTOU WER SCUM??

JUMMM???¿

And I said most counts, didn't I?

Xalxe · Post Post #735 (isolation #35) » Thu Dec 06, 2012 1:02 am

I am going to devote some time tomorrow afternoon to rereading Kinetic v. Zdenek because apparently Kinetic is scum instead now and I don't understand why.

Or we could compromise and beat the shit out of MattP. Just sayin'

Xalxe · Post Post #746 (isolation #36) » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:24 am

In post 739, Kinetic wrote:He has yet to respond to it.

Because I appear to be posting today for some reason:

I made that hurt during what I deemed to be the "second round" of hurts on PV. I wanted to see if the "group" that was hurting would, after getting them back, continue to do so or be willing to talk to PV first. I believed that hurting was the right answer, but wasn't about to go on a one-man destruction campaign; if I was, MattP would be below health right now.

I knew that it would look opportunistic, scummy, whatever, and I'd have to defend it regardless of the flip, but at that point I figured it was the right thing to be doing and committing to. I take a lot more issue with the people who said "yes, PV is a bad guy" and then didn't do shit about it. In this game it is my opinion that votes are not enough.

Xalxe · Post Post #749 (isolation #37) » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:35 am

After checking my posting history, it would appear that my only posts that day were either a) early morning to update my newbie game or b) fuck-around posts. Therefore, I can only assume that I was not in a "seriousposting" mood at that time and wasn't about to read a game thread.

Xalxe · Post Post #751 (isolation #38) » Thu Dec 06, 2012 5:38 am

In post 750, Kinetic wrote:
In post 749, Xalxe wrote:After checking my posting history, it would appear that my only posts that day were either a) early morning to update my newbie game or b) fuck-around posts. Therefore, I can only assume that I was not in a "seriousposting" mood at that time and wasn't about to read a game thread.

In this game, that isn't allowed. Especially if someone is being hurt. You can't "check out".

Is this Xalxe being useless town or feigning it as scum? Does someone have more experience with Xalxe than I do?

I was checking out for what amounts to approx. 12 hours on a weekend. MY BAD I'M SURE

It was a Saturday, and this

is

finals time. I should think it's fairly clear that I have been following this entire time and paying attention. I may not be the most verbose of players, but I am keeping up for once.

Xalxe · Post Post #788 (isolation #39) » Fri Dec 07, 2012 3:58 am

That "rereading the wall fight" will be delayed until later tonight because writing broadcast news pieces is

haaaaaard

.

Xalxe · Post Post #826 (isolation #40) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:26 am

Can I hurts it yet?

(seriously, can I? What's the votecount?)

Xalxe · Post Post #833 (isolation #41) » Sun Dec 09, 2012 6:54 am

In post 832, MattP wrote:why the fuck do you keep on pandering to me?

Weren't you pandering to her earlier?

Xalxe · Post Post #934 (isolation #42) » Tue Dec 11, 2012 4:28 pm

hi hello yes I'm alive

by "alive" I mean "despite not having finals I'm actually p. busy this week somehow"

Will try to make time to reread some things tomorrow, namely Kinetic v. Zednek and The Mysterious Case of Why Nobody is Voting for MattP Anymore.

Xalxe · Post Post #955 (isolation #43) » Wed Dec 12, 2012 1:28 pm

I figured votes stayed in place. VOTE: MattP

Xalxe · Post Post #1080 (isolation #44) » Sat Dec 15, 2012 1:37 pm

wheeeee proddoge

somebody make me post tomorrow because I suck

Xalxe · Post Post #1316 (isolation #45) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:16 pm

This is a post.

This post should inform you that as of right this moment (promise!) I'm reading starting at #788. That's like 20 pages. Will have words at the end, but will at the very least have something tonight.

Also yes I suck etc etc

Xalxe · Post Post #1337 (isolation #46) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:32 pm

Scooby 806 is holyfuckbad.

MattP 810 wrote:2) Kanye is town. Kanye is calling me town. We just completed a game together where we hydrad as town (Marketplace Mafia). We know each other's townplay intimately. You should never even CONSIDER lynching one of us should the other flip town

This would be bad if kanye was in danger, but as it is I just don't like the sentiment behind it.

MattP wagon due to ABR interactions was a good one and I think we should all take a look back at that. Also followed nicely by fantastic AtE; someone explain why this is town now?

I don't think…ugh…but kanye…ugh. I need a read on him honestly, his vehement defense of Matt--oh. Hm. There's a thought. Interesting.

…and yet, Matt's case on ABR isn't bad all things considered.

Okay I've had a thought real quick here.

Matt

: You continually fall back on "I hydraed with kanye in Marketplace, I know his town game." That's well and good and I don't have an issue with that, but tell me this: what differentiates his town play from his scum play? What is it here that you're seeing that makes it different? Feel free to cite specific examples if it helps you out, but just saying "it's the same" won't fly.

VM 912 wrote:Also, it's kinda stupid to ask for a case when Matt already said he would get to it, so.

You clearly haven't been paying attention to Matt.

I'm posting this now (I'm on 912) because holy fuck the postcount seems to be escalating from what I see. What the hell guys, come on. If it's just a bunch of one-liners I'm going to be super pissed.

Xalxe · Post Post #1355 (isolation #47) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:44 pm

Okay so from what I'm seeing the solution to the Mysterious Case of Why Nobody is Voting for MattP is because he came off better in the ABR argument. Problem is…that's actually accurate and I agree with it.

Pretty sure I'm suffering from mental illness here because my #1 scumread might not be, somebody help me here.

quads' suggestion of lynching ABR for anti-town actions is not scummy, alright? Anti-town people might, at some point, need the rope. Plus, having a dead ABR gives info on MattP for sure.

Fuck that MattP unvote…ugh. I need a serious headshift.

Yeah I should've been behind this scooby lynch (please be aware I have not yet seen his flip yet--at least I assume he died because it's Epoch III and I don't know who else you'd have killed cause it wasn't me)

I am having the heebies about Tierce and I don't like it because I suspect she may have done something that I'll need to go back and look for.

At post #1016, short break, carry on without me as I know you're already doing.

Xalxe · Post Post #1370 (isolation #48) » Mon Dec 17, 2012 4:51 pm

scooby's replace request is super fucking scummy.

Okay I'm at 1080 which is the point where I stopped reading the game. I'm going to write down a scum/town list for myself then I'm going to do the rest of the game tomorrow because it's all new stuff. Try not to add another 10 pages before the morning, k?

Xalxe · Post Post #1601 (isolation #49) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 3:53 pm

#reading

I've decided that Matt will probably have to sit at null for forever on my end because quite honestly I just hate your playstyle and there isn't a whole lot that can change that.

Xalxe · Post Post #1603 (isolation #50) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:10 pm

Fuck's sake can I skip the last eight pages? It looks to be quickly devolving, quite honestly.

Got a couple responses to make to Tierce, but quite honestly, either she's gotten shit at reading me (possible) or is scum. I'd just like to say now that I endorse Kinetic's plan.

Xalxe · Post Post #1604 (isolation #51) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:19 pm

Okay so LLD is confscum can I kill it yet?

Anyway: I have 4/4 rage. I have not ragedumped because I haven't been following. I'm willing to prove this by ragedumping on LLD, or anyone else for that matter, just say the word and don't be named Matt because I don't like the way you're leading town around by the nose.

My vote for who goes next falls into the group of Tierce/MattP/ABR in no particular order, and before I make a decision I'mma need to look at a few things.

Gonna go grab a couple Tierce posts to respond to 'cause she talked directly at me. Fully caught up.

Xalxe · Post Post #1605 (isolation #52) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:22 pm

In post 1347, Tierce wrote:
In post 1337, Xalxe wrote:
VM 912 wrote:Also, it's kinda stupid to ask for a case when Matt already said he would get to it, so.
You clearly haven't been paying attention to Matt.
This is fucking forced considering he actually had to write VM's username in that quote. The thread title says Epoch III and the first thing you should do is look at the first post as Town or know what you did as scum. Making this post looks like he's trying to play dumb and unaware for Townpoints.

HE'S NOT GOING TO ANSWER YOU BECAUSE HE'S DEAD

See, here's the thing: I never do that on rereads because I want to look at things from a clean perspective. I saw Epoch III begins and I assumed scooby's replacement died. Never did I imagine that another person was dead.

As for the "forced," that's bullshit and you know it. I wrote it in because I was writing the post in TextEdit and I was just copying lines into it. I did the same thing with Matt's quote right above that too.

In post 1376, Tierce wrote:Xalxe, if you're Town, look at my (as of this post) 172 posts and realize I'm posting at 4 am in an airport after 12 hours of being here. Does this match lurker-scum Tierce?

NOPE.

...
God Xalxe's posts are SO FREAKING FAKE.

I never said you were lurkerscum. I'd also point out that, in fact, you

were

lurkering and have admitted, multiple times, to not reading the thread while still paying attention. You can't have it both ways.

Also they're not fake if I was faking it I think I'd be doing it better but :wine:

Xalxe · Post Post #1606 (isolation #53) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:25 pm

In post 1604, Xalxe wrote:My vote for who goes next falls into the group of Tierce/MattP/ABR in no particular order, and before I make a decision I'mma need to look at a few things.

This list should also include kanye but I'm DUMB and forgot him.

K done spamming the thread for now, the rest of you can go back to doing it like normal.

Xalxe · Post Post #1610 (isolation #54) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:21 pm

In post 1609, kanyeknowsbest wrote:xalxe i really love that for all your effort in showing that youre actually reading the thread you still pretend to have no idea what is happening.

In what way precisely?

Xalxe · Post Post #1611 (isolation #55) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:26 pm

In post 1610, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1609, kanyeknowsbest wrote:xalxe i really love that for all your effort in showing that youre actually reading the thread you still pretend to have no idea what is happening.

In what way precisely?

If you'll excuse me I'm a stupid fucker. KANYE IS TOWN AND I AM REALLY STUPID

OKAY CARRY ON

No idea how I did that, but I just happened to see your name on my notes from last night and went "oh yeah why isn't he on my scum list again?"

Xalxe · Post Post #1613 (isolation #56) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:45 pm

In post 1612, Quilford wrote:hi ladies and gents!

reading up a bit.

Most important thing: LLD is confscum and I'm not sure why we're not hurting yet.

Xalxe · Post Post #1615 (isolation #57) » Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:58 pm

In post 1614, quadz08 wrote:we are hurting

Nobody's hurt her yet. Yos tried but was already dead.

Xalxe · Post Post #1649 (isolation #58) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 4:31 am

In post 1648, MattP wrote:Kinetic is obvie townziebears and quadz is scummy but I haven't read kinetics theory yet but by this point I assume anything in kinetics theory is wrong anyway

If he's town, why would his theories be wrong?

Xalxe · Post Post #1653 (isolation #59) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 8:52 am

In post 1652, MattP wrote:
In post 1649, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1648, MattP wrote:Kinetic is obvie townziebears and quadz is scummy but I haven't read kinetics theory yet but by this point I assume anything in kinetics theory is wrong anyway

If he's town, why would his theories be wrong?

I am not even saying this to be rude, but I'm seriously unsure if you're trying to seem stupid for town cred

On further reflection, that post was worded poorly. Maybe try this: if you believe he's town, why aren't you willing to consider his theory? Is it just because it names you as scum?

Xalxe · Wed Dec 19, 2012 11:25 am

In post 1658, MattP wrote:It seems like xalxe has literally NOTHING worth discussing and that he has NO scumreads as of this point

Isn't ignoring my posts

fun

?

Xalxe · Post Post #1665 (isolation #61) » Wed Dec 19, 2012 6:43 pm

In post 1662, Mr. Flay wrote:Xalxe is at 1 HP below normal maximum.

Does anyone know why this is? I don't, and it didn't say that a minute ago.

Xalxe · Post Post #1685 (isolation #62) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:21 am

In post 1684, MattP wrote:
In post 1677, kanyeknowsbest wrote:wish you would use your fuckin head some times kinetic.

People in this round don't understand the concept of prolonging the answering of a question to scumhunt. I got attacked for this earlier on even though I use it as a strategy in games all the time, especially town games.

Woah.

Woah woah woah what if no?

There is a difference between prolonging and not answering. You do the latter.

In addition, that's some fucking fantastic buddying on the conftown there Matt, well done.

Confirm vote: MattP

I'd demand proof of the "I do it in town games" but I really don't care at this stage.

Xalxe · Post Post #1689 (isolation #63) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:57 am

Three examples of Matt not answering questions

In post 102, PeregrineV wrote:

Matt(29)- How do you not get rage? It's rule C, it's in the sample PM, and it should have a big section in your PM.

This was followed up in your next post a page later by "still waiting on charter." No followup since.

In post 324, Yosarian2 wrote:
In post 321, MattP wrote:

In post 320, Yosarian2 wrote:
In post 294, MattP wrote:
All of the scum are in these 7. Kanye, Quadz, Tierce, Kinetic and Zdenek are town. If you don't mislynch them we win.

Can you explain why you think Zdenek is town? Is it just that he keeps defending you?

In post 161, MattP wrote:Just for the record, Zdenek is town

Oh look I have a read on him

This was before Zdenek had referred to me whatsoever. Is it really necessary to literally try to skew everything I say into scum intent without even attempting to fairly read me?

I am trying to get a read on you, Matt. That's why I'm asking you questions about your reads.

So can you explain why you think Zdenek is town?

Followed by:

In post 327, MattP wrote:
Hold on Xalxe is about to tell me something

No followup.

In post 1337, Xalxe wrote:

Matt
: You continually fall back on "I hydraed with kanye in Marketplace, I know his town game." That's well and good and I don't have an issue with that, but tell me this: what differentiates his town play from his scum play? What is it here that you're seeing that makes it different? Feel free to cite specific examples if it helps you out, but just saying "it's the same" won't fly.

Followed by:

In post 1338, MattP wrote:If this is a gambit and I actually thought of it this quickly I seriously deserve a fucking medal

Which has nothing to do with what was being discussed.

Xalxe · Post Post #1690 (isolation #64) » Thu Dec 20, 2012 7:59 am

In post 1687, MattP wrote:Also, you do realize you're going to be killed before me AND that you trying to push this lynch on me is going to be your downfall? I just want to introduce these cost-benefit things in case you think that what you're doing is beneficial to your scumteam. You have some good other options to try scumhunting on! I know I'm the only person you've pushed the entire game and your scumhunting is obviously very organic and towny but maybe you just wanna try yknow like adding that extra little inch of town SPUNK

When I've caught scum I don't feel the need to focus on more.

And sure, maybe I go down before you. I don't think I will, but we'll see. Even if I do, then I flip town and the smart people say "well, he was town, his reads were genuine, maybe we should kill the fuck out of Matt nao because he's led several town lynches?"

In post 1688, MattP wrote:
In post 1672, Kinetic wrote:
In post 1660, MattP wrote:When xalxe and LLD are both flipped scum PLEASE keep calling me scum, I dare you kinetic

And when Xalxe is town? Like I'm pretty sure he is?

ITT you call me/Yos/Xalxe/LLD a 3/4 probable scumteam with Xalxe being conditionally scum only with me (otherwise it's Tierce and quadz as the remaining two I think you said but I'm not going to go through the effort of checking) and Yos landing town meaning that it MUST be a me/Xalxe/LLD scumteam, then call me scum and Xalxe town EVEN THOUGH you think Xalxe is scum with me and LLD

OK BUDDYBOI

When was the last time he advocated that specific set of scumteams? I ask because I'm genuinely curious and I suspect it was a while ago.

Xalxe · Post Post #1707 (isolation #65) » Sat Dec 22, 2012 5:32 am

*poke*

Did we all die?

Xalxe · Post Post #1724 (isolation #66) » Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:03 pm

In post 1723, Tierce wrote:I am terrible at this. Still not going to be todayish.

Xalxe · Post Post #1728 (isolation #67) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:01 am

In post 1725, Tierce wrote:And yet, you have not addressed my previous post. Yeah, you're sure paying attention to the person you're scumreading.

I considered it a non-entity at the time, but seeing as how you're harping on it, I went back through our games together because I was

so sure

you were good at reading me.

Our only game together where you were town was Reverse Mafia. Statistics say I should lynch you here as a result.

(that was a joke)

Xalxe · Post Post #1730 (isolation #68) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:37 am

In post 1729, Tierce wrote:Newbie 1289.

Yes, you'd already mentioned that, as has Matt.

Xalxe · Post Post #1732 (isolation #69) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:42 am

In post 1731, Tierce wrote:My point is that I misread you there, so I don't know where this assessment that I can read you comes from.

Either way, off to bed.

It came from my addled brain, which has since admitted that I was wrong.

Xalxe · Post Post #1734 (isolation #70) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 2:45 am

In post 1733, Tierce wrote:Then why do you keep harping on my play? Have you even thought to look at my overall activity these days?

Fuck's

sake

I'm not harping, don't misrepresent that.

Xalxe · Post Post #1737 (isolation #71) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:36 am

In post 1736, quadz08 wrote:So I went and looked at his ISO. He talks about LLD twice: once in a very brief discussion about her opinion of people doing votecounts, and then to say he would ragedump on her after she was confscum.

She was

lurking

. I was absent for most of that period where she started doing things again.

Tierce got the eyeroll because I'm BoPing her. She was lurking prior to the Christmas lurkfest.

Xalxe · Post Post #1739 (isolation #72) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:38 am

In post 1738, quadz08 wrote:So was I.

And you didn't post and say "I'll get to this later" at a point when I was online. Plus, I don't have experience playing with you.

Xalxe · Post Post #1742 (isolation #73) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 5:47 am

In post 1740, quadz08 wrote:Lol. So the thing that makes it especially bad and deserving of mention is the fact that you were online when she said it?

95% of the time when I post, it involves being online and reacting to the most recent post. I don't do huge-ass walls, I don't do quote strips referring to everything that's posted since my last post, I just comment as I see it. Sometimes I'm off base. It's a spur-of-the-moment thing.

In that moment, I found another LOL POST LATER post to be absurd and irritating. Did I say ERMAHGERD TERCE SCERM? No. No I didn't. Did I say it was something everyone should look at? No. You're blowing a 0-thought post into something huge now.

Xalxe · Post Post #1746 (isolation #74) » Thu Dec 27, 2012 6:38 am

In post 1743, Tierce wrote:...I have been pretty obviously busy since BEFORE Christmas. Did you even read my posts about being in transit on the 17-18th and being on holidays in the US since then? I have three weeks with my loved ones and MS is quite low on the priority list.

(Did I post about it here or was it just obvious in 62 and not here?)

No, actually, I didn't know you were in the States now. All I knew was that you were flying at one point, which I figured was to go back home.

Tierce wrote:(Also the way you claim you play is bad and you should feel bad for it. Spur of the moment is shit re: actual analysis. But etc.)

Never claimed it wasn't.

quadz08 wrote:I mean, spur of the moment is great and all, but that shouldn't mean "I only comment on what happens while I'm here." It should be "I comment on what happens since I was LAST HERE."

Basically I think you're bullshitting.

I DO, but I'm far more likely to comment on something if I AM here versus when I'm not. Had I not seen Tierce post that, it wouldn't have gotten a second look.

Xalxe · Post Post #1756 (isolation #75) » Sat Dec 29, 2012 8:31 am

Prods on Quilford and Zdnek please, ModDevil?

Xalxe · Post Post #1765 (isolation #76) » Tue Jan 01, 2013 8:48 am

Vote Count

MattP - Kinetic, Xalxe
Xalxe - Zednek, quadz
quadz - kanye

Let's play a fun game. It's called "if you're not voting, explain why please."

Xalxe · Post Post #1775 (isolation #77) » Thu Jan 03, 2013 6:18 pm

K WHO DRAINED MY RAGE

BECAUSE I DO NOT APPRECIATE IT

Xalxe · Post Post #1812 (isolation #78) » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:11 am

In post 1804, Quilford wrote:because they probably contain the scum? i thought tierce was scum because her continuous focus on mattp was silly and unreasonable,

Why?

In post 1804, Quilford wrote:and i thought xalxe was scum because his post by post catchup was bad (especially the stream-of-consciousness) and bad post by post catchups come from scum.

Why?

Xalxe · Post Post #1825 (isolation #79) » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:06 pm

In post 1823, quadz08 wrote:no comments on anything else :party:

Concur.

How many votes on Quil is that?

Xalxe · Post Post #1827 (isolation #80) » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:13 pm

In post 1826, Tierce wrote:He keeps expecting me to treat him with kid gloved when I see no reason I should respect this destructive playstyle and accept it.

Do you think that comes from scum, or town?

Xalxe · Post Post #1830 (isolation #81) » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:24 pm

In post 1828, Tierce wrote:I just said that IIRC I had ABR as a Townread. I'm asking for content from him so I can analyze him further. This is... pretty obvious in my posts? Why aren't people actually bothering to read me?

...I was talking about Quilford. Were you talking about ABR?

Xalxe · Post Post #1832 (isolation #82) » Sun Jan 06, 2013 5:28 pm

In post 1831, Tierce wrote:ABR = Quilford. Same slot.

Right. Forgot that, sorry.

Xalxe · Post Post #1923 (isolation #83) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 6:43 am

In post 1922, Zdenek wrote:Honestly, I don't care at this point.

what

Xalxe · Post Post #1931 (isolation #84) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 7:00 am

In post 1922, Zdenek wrote:Honestly, I don't care at this point. I can't get anyone to think that Kinetic is scum and it's driving me crazy because it's so obvious to me. After him, Quadz is a good bet for scum as far as I am concerned, so I'm happy voting him.

what

(better?)

Xalxe · Post Post #1938 (isolation #85) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:20 am

In post 1937, MattP wrote:*OBSCURE PRE-KNOWLEDGE ABOUT KNOWING HOW A VOTE WILL BE CONSTRUED THAT A TOWNIE WOULD NEVER HAVE EVEN CONSIDERED*

Um, no.

Xalxe · Post Post #1940 (isolation #86) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:29 am

In post 1939, MattP wrote:
In post 1938, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1937, MattP wrote:*OBSCURE PRE-KNOWLEDGE ABOUT KNOWING HOW A VOTE WILL BE CONSTRUED THAT A TOWNIE WOULD NEVER HAVE EVEN CONSIDERED*

Um, no.

Does it hurt your feelings that you and/or Quadz are caught scum? Pls answer this seriously

Oh, woe is me! My heart pines for the days when we could scum together in the fields without a care in the world! Why must our days of happy murderering end thusly, at the hands of the Great and Glorious MattP? Alas and alack!

Xalxe · Post Post #1947 (isolation #87) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:10 am

Tierce: why would you advocate lynching MattP and then me if we're clearly in opposition? Are we cross-bussing?

Xalxe · Post Post #1949 (isolation #88) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:16 am

In post 1948, Tierce wrote:...

What is it with the stupid questions lately? Yes, I think you are cross-bussing.

Why do you think we are? What do we have to gain from this?

Xalxe · Post Post #1952 (isolation #89) » Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:35 am

In post 1911, Tierce wrote:Problem is--I'm running out of people who can be scum. quadz isn't scum. Quilford isn't scum. Zdenek and Kinetic are not scum, and I don't think kanye is scum unless he bussed unnecessarily (I have to look at LLD and check).

I'm assuming we're talking about these townreads, in which case I would point out that Zdenek is probably scum. Matt, however, is also probably scum.

Xalxe · Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:30 pm

In post 1964, MattP wrote:
In post 1961, kanyeknowsbest wrote:
vote matt

Fuck you explain the fucking mechanic

Why is it important?

Xalxe · Mon Jan 07, 2013 12:34 pm

In post 1970, MattP wrote:VOTE: Kanye

Xalxe literally shut up for the next 6 hours

And you get on me for not answering questions.

Xalxe · Post Post #2005 (isolation #92) » Wed Jan 09, 2013 1:46 am

In post 2000, Zdenek wrote:
In post 1952, Xalxe wrote:
In post 1911, Tierce wrote:Problem is--I'm running out of people who can be scum. quadz isn't scum. Quilford isn't scum. Zdenek and Kinetic are not scum, and I don't think kanye is scum unless he bussed unnecessarily (I have to look at LLD and check).

I'm assuming we're talking about these townreads, in which case I would point out that Zdenek is probably scum. Matt, however, is also probably scum.

Why do you think that I'm scum?

You're playing in a very anti-town, tunnel-visioned way and attacking someone (Kinetic) I believe to be town, coupled with some bad vote switches throughout the game.

Xalxe · Post Post #2033 (isolation #93) » Fri Jan 11, 2013 2:20 am

In post 1960, MattP wrote:kanyeknowsbest -
has demonstrated prior interest in a quadz vote

Kinetic -wont vote quadz
MattP -
voting quadz

quadz08 -obv wont vote quadz
Quilford -
voting quadz

Tierce -wont vote quadz
Xalxe -wont vote quadz
Zdenek -
voting quadz

If KKB vote's quadz that's 50% of the living players and I'm going to start an attack on him. IDGAF if half the game feels otherwise. However, nothing is happening until KKB explains his role.

Question to kanye and Zdenek: do you plan on hurting quadz here?

Xalxe · Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:36 pm

In post 2049, Zdenek wrote:And check out Tierce defending her scum read Xalxe by calling him a weak player.

It's precedented.

Matt, shut up.

Xalxe · Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:39 pm

In post 2055, MattP wrote:
In post 2054, Xalxe wrote:Matt, shut up.

I'm town as a dick

Take that to the presses

I'm going to assume that was supposed to say that you were a dick as town as it makes no sense otherwise.

Xalxe · Post Post #2096 (isolation #96) » Sun Jan 13, 2013 2:15 pm

I don't think there's been a VC in a while.

Oh, and HEAL: quadz08. Come at me Matt.

Xalxe · Post Post #2099 (isolation #97) » Sun Jan 13, 2013 3:23 pm

If quadz is scum, feel free to come hurt me tomorrow.

If he's town, you'll still come after me who am I kidding, but just rethink the choices you made tomorrow when we all get to hurt you.

PEDIT: Actually, I don't much care.

Xalxe · Post Post #2117 (isolation #98) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 5:53 am

Actually Kinetic's argument makes the most sense and I agree with it.

Also I'm p. sure I am voting for Matt, Zed.

Xalxe · Post Post #2128 (isolation #99) » Mon Jan 14, 2013 8:02 am

Kinetic, when Matt flips scum we can deal with Zed.

Xalxe · Mon Jan 14, 2013 11:39 am

Yep that's not anti-town nope.

Xalxe · Wed Jan 16, 2013 12:54 am

In post 2171, MattP wrote:Tierce, in a hypothetical world where I flipped town, what's the first thing you'd say

"Flay, you sure?"

Xalxe · Thu Jan 17, 2013 1:01 pm

In post 2188, MattP wrote:
In post 2187, Tierce wrote:Scum. But damned if I'm lynching Xalxe before MattP.

KKB what do you think of this?

For some reason, I imagine he was already going to respond to that. It could be that he asked the original question, but I am a young boy who knows nothing of war.

Xalxe · Sat Jan 19, 2013 2:42 am

In post 2193, Kinetic wrote:Over 24 hours and no one else has posted. What the fuck?

I have a fun game.

Let's start hurting Matt.

Xalxe · Sat Jan 19, 2013 12:01 pm

My turn?

My turn.

Marquis Naberius, fallen Cherub. 9 HP, 4 rage max which I'm at right now.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 20, 2013 2:56 am

My favorite part about this game is that we're basically split into two equal groups and there's no way that should be happening at all and I'm not even remotely close to figuring out how on earth that makes sense.

Kanye, have you been tracking people this whole time?

Xalxe · Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:33 am

In post 2261, Zdenek wrote:MattP, Xalxe why did you claim your HP?

Because Matt did.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 20, 2013 6:55 am

No, I'm avoiding the inevitable "OMG Matt claimed HP but Xalxe didn't he's hiding info SCUM SCUM SCUM KILL IT" that would follow.

Plus, I don't see the info mattering much.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 20, 2013 4:47 pm

With respect, I'm not going to heal until someone else heals me. I'd really not like to be within Matt's rage range.

Xalxe · Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:29 pm

Tierce, your countdown magically went from 24 hours to another 36 and that's just too long for me. You wanna wait, that's fine, but he'll probably be dead by then.

HURT: MattP

die scum die

Xalxe · Tue Jan 22, 2013 12:59 pm

In post 2273, Kinetic wrote:(4) Matt (Tierce, Xalxe, Kinetic, Quadz)
(3) Xalxe (Matt, Qui, KKB)
(1) Kinetic (Zd)

No Zed. Since this was posted, none of the Matt votes have moved.

Xalxe · Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:07 pm

No it didn't.

Xalxe · Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:09 pm

But this is the part where I point out that I wouldn't care if it did or not because this game is stagnating so hard and I'll be damned if I'm going to let scum lead town by its nose any further.

Xalxe · Wed Jan 23, 2013 2:52 am

I'm sorry, wasn't I clear enough that I ragedumped on him? Well fine, I raged on Matt.

Anyway likely only post from me today because fuck life.

Xalxe · Thu Jan 24, 2013 12:35 pm

What.

No. What the fuck was that bullshit readflip for self preservation? No.

Hirt MattP

Xalxe · Sat Jan 26, 2013 3:33 am

Here's what I think needs to happen:

kanye needs to inform us of any relevant information he has
Massclaim, not that I expect it'll do much

I think it's two scum left, and I think they don't have a huge ragepool somehow or else I'd probably be dead right now and I can't figure out why I'm not. I also can't believe we have NO other power roles other than Kanye, and in fact that makes me question kanye to some degree.

If someone held a Hurt to my head, I'd go for Zed right now, but I really want my two points to happen first. Alternatively, the claim can be read as "Hey, if you're a power role/something special, claim right the fuck now."

Xalxe · Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:04 am

In post 2509, Kinetic wrote:You have been calling Xalxe scum all fucking game, and in the eleventh hour, suddenly when you realize that Xalxe might be your key to winning the game, Xalxe is town in your book. I don't buy it.

(psst I think Quil kinda did the same thing)

(though it's difficult to say as he never gave any reads ever)

Xalxe · Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:44 am

In post 2513, Tierce wrote:Xalxe, go.

Seriously?

Zdenek.

Xalxe · Sat Jan 26, 2013 5:55 am

Tierce is town.

Has nothing to do with the post above me and everything to do with the meta I just did on her (on actual Tierce games, not Hydra games, TYVM).

PEDIT: Why didn't you use all your rage, Zed?

Xalxe · Sat Jan 26, 2013 6:17 am

So you had 3 left after you killed Quadz, yes?

Xalxe · Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:26 am

In post 2535, Kinetic wrote:doubt its 11:2. 10:3 seems right.

This is what I've been thinking too, but with only one PR...I dunno, it gives me pause. Again, going back to "I'm not dead yet," two scum with semi-full rage SHOULD be able to end me.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:43 am

In post 52, kanyeknowsbest wrote:are you trying to set up scum/town versions of a role in a 1v1? whats to stop scum from just not claiming it an instead getting all of our prs big rage targets on their backs?

In post 53, Kinetic wrote:
In post 52, kanyeknowsbest wrote:are you trying to set up scum/town versions of a role in a 1v1? whats to stop scum from just not claiming it an instead getting all of our prs big rage targets on their backs?

There is something... but I don't want to reveal it right now. In fact, I'd have to wait until after such a claim to reveal my main idea, because revealing it before the claim would stop the scum from "messing up", but that's why I want you to THINK about it. Think about the bad ideas for this plan because I'm not sure where they are yet. And if enough concerns are brought up, I'll think about what I think might help and whether it would be worth going through with such an idea and whether I want to push to try to convince others.

Doing a kanye reread. Kinetic, what was your plan/does it work now?

In post 935, kanyeknowsbest wrote:quadz whos scum? what do you think of tierce and lld?

IIRC, LLD was not under suspicion at this point.

In post 1496, Lady Lambdadelta wrote:I'll claim then, since Kanye is a stupid fuck.

I'm ALSO an Ophan. I can watch once every 12 hours, and have been constantly watching Matt for the first while of the game, until I decided that the more quiet people are those I should watch. No results on Matt.

I was in the process of watching VOIDED when he died. Also no results from him.

So let me guess: Kanye saw me do something to Voided and now thinks he has a guilty.

And he's a fucktard. Again.

You wanna test this? Kanye can watch me again. I'll submit a watch on him right now.

LLD HAPPENS to claim the same as Kanye? Hmm...

kanye needs a fullclaim, I agree.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 27, 2013 8:17 am

Okay yeah I actually TOTALLY missed that.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 27, 2013 10:05 am

In post 2564, Kinetic wrote:It couldn't possibly be that Tierce and LLD were scum buddies and KKB was solo scum all along... could it?

But while this could maybe be a thing (I don't think it is), why go for Tierce first?

Xalxe · Sun Jan 27, 2013 1:11 pm

In post 2573, kanyeknowsbest wrote:in the completely missed that camp.

also still want kinetic dead as hell and no im not pinning my claim down exactly. there is zero benefit for town to know how much hp i have and there is all the benefit in the world for scum to know it.

You're not listening.

we don't care about your HP. PROTIP: If scum wanted you dead, you'd prob. be dead, but whatever. We want to know how you work. What's your ability, when can you use it, when does it take effect, etc etc etc.

Claim literally everything except your HP.

Xalxe · Sun Jan 27, 2013 5:01 pm

In post 2579, Kinetic wrote:Ok... the person I wanted to comment on my vote didn't, instead the two people who I didn't want to, did...
unvote

Thinking...

Oh good.

I'd just like to remind you that I meta'd Tierce on my own using my own links, not the ones she gave us, and decided this is Town!Tierce. They are, in fact, different.

Xalxe · Mon Jan 28, 2013 3:41 am

I have words but I'm in class now so yeah. the tl;dr is that if we do this right we should have it won (and if Kinetic gets off Tierce's ass).

Xalxe · Wed Jan 30, 2013 12:56 am

Post within 12 hours. Promise.

Xalxe · Wed Jan 30, 2013 7:44 am

I believe that currently, the game stands at one of two options:
a) there is one scum left, LLD's partner. Likely this is a vanilla "goon."
b) there are two scum left: LLD's partner and a "third party." LLD's partner is probably vanilla, the third party probably has an ability.

Currently, there is the question (I think) of Kinetic's random non-damage. This is probably the result of scum protecting him in some way. Why did they do this? Fuck if I know. It's also possible that scum was blocking VM from hurting or something, I can't be sure, but either way a town power role would've claimed by now.

From my point of view, Kinetic is town and Tierce is town. I'm also town. From this, there are three candidates left: Quilford, Zdenek, and kanyeknowsbest. I'm going to advocate the following:

it doesn't matter who we kill, we have this won provided Tierce, Kinetic & I are town.

I'm comfortable literally staking the game on my Tierce read and my Kinetic read.

Here's the scenario:

If there's one scum left, even if they're the last of the three we kill, it's still 3town v. 1scum. Scum doesn't win unless they can magically nuke us.

If there's two scum left, they're not working together. We get one wrong, it's 3town v. scum v. scum. We get two wrong...well, that's impossible. If we kill a scum and it isn't GG, then kill the other.

Even if somehow scum isn't in {Quilford, Zdenek, kanye}, if we whittle it down to Kinetic/Tierce/me, that's at best 2town v. 1 scum, and at worst town v. scum v. scum which

town can still win.

tl;dr: no fuck you read my damn post I don't post like this ever

Xalxe · Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:00 am

In post 2645, Kinetic wrote:If there are two scum AND they are working together

But I don't think there

are

.

Smart

coordinated scum would have taken the opportunity when people were low to nail them. It goes back to the "I'm not dead yet" logic.

Either that, or I suppose I'm scum.

Xalxe · Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:05 am

In post 2647, Kinetic wrote:PEdit: ... If that was a scum claim I'm going to slap you in end game...

Yes, I'm going to claim scum here.

('twas a joke)

Xalxe · Wed Jan 30, 2013 8:11 am

In post 2649, Tierce wrote:Goddammit Xalxe stop looking Town. What do.

Seriously, the fuck is this game

doing?

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:05 am

Hey, me too!

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:51 am

In post 2677, Zdenek wrote:Yoo hoo Xalxe, explain your meta read on Tierce.

It's a totally different tone to her posts.

Also, you keep bringing up Author Mafia. That's bad, don't do that. Instead, do something she wasn't playing a character in.

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:14 pm

In post 2680, Zdenek wrote:
In post 2679, Xalxe wrote:
In post 2677, Zdenek wrote:Yoo hoo Xalxe, explain your meta read on Tierce.

It's a totally different tone to her posts.

Also, you keep bringing up Author Mafia. That's bad, don't do that. Instead, do something she wasn't playing a character in.

What games did you look at, what were the similarities and what were the differences?

Yeah, because I remember that. Go READ for yourself, you've shown it's clear my words won't sway you so why ask?

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:50 pm

In post 2683, Zdenek wrote:This is from Sunday.

In post 2580, Xalxe wrote:I'd just like to remind you that I meta'd Tierce on my own using my own links, not the ones she gave us, and decided this is Town!Tierce. They are, in fact, different.

And? I grabbed the last few from her wiki that weren't a hydra/Author Mafia. Mayyybe I grabbed the Tyene Sand one, I dunno.

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 12:59 pm

I don't remember

.

Why?

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:01 pm

Well, sorry, but I honestly can't recall.

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:05 pm

Maybe when I'm not in class.

Or you could assume you're right and do your own analysis because

it really doesn't matter

.

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:15 pm

Zdenek wrote:The thing is that there is absolutely no town reason for you to be so cagey about this. On the other hand, as scum you'd want to avoid being called out on a fake read, and failing to provide the basis for your read prevents that.

Alternatively, I don't remember what games I looked at from FOUR DAYS AGO.

In post 2691, Kinetic wrote:I think you're misunderstanding what Zed is doing Xalxe.

You see, he has two motives. First, he knows he's so close to winning the game, but he needs to pull at least one more vote on me before he can kill me and wash his hands of it when I flip town. Second, he realizes that you're the key person holding the noose around his neck right now. Your plan is the one that will lose him the game if it goes through. The crux of all of that is both Tierce and your read on Tierce. If Tierce supports your plan, that's three people and Zed is dead no matter if he ends up killing me or not. If he can either shake Tierce off of it, or shake your faith in Tierce (by, perhaps, shaking your read on Tierce by looking at the specific examples you've found and disputing them), then his plan works.

It doesn't matter what
Zed
feels about Tierce at all here. Zed is trying to trick
you
into following his lead.

(You think I don't know this, I'm kind of offended)

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:19 pm

In post 2694, Zdenek wrote:Xalxe, Kinetic is obviously scum and you should ignore him.

WHY?

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:24 pm

In post 2697, Tierce wrote:I'm about to ask Xalxe to elope with me

k let's move the cult to Portugal/Nevada/wherever the fuck you are now, I forget

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:31 pm

In post 2700, Tierce wrote:
In post 2698, Xalxe wrote:
In post 2697, Tierce wrote:I'm about to ask Xalxe to elope with me
k let's move the cult to Portugal/Nevada/wherever the fuck you are now, I forget
Portugal. Here for about another month and a half, then Nevada. I do have an updated location field, y'know.

So many don't these days.

Now go unpack so you can reread the game because I do actually want your opinions.

Xalxe · Thu Jan 31, 2013 1:43 pm

In post 2703, Tierce wrote:Frankly Quilford looks like a good option. Extreme doormat mode does not impress me.

While I totally get your hatred of doormat mode, of my scum pool he's #3. Still not averse to his death though, I just wouldn't bet money on a scum flip.

Xalxe · Sun Feb 03, 2013 2:55 am

I've seen about all I need to.

VOTE: Zdenek

Every other action revolves on this flip, in my mind.

Xalxe · Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:01 am

Who dies next among the pool.

Xalxe · Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:11 am

You flip scum, Kanye's next and Kinetic's even more conftown than he is now.

You flip town, then it's a toss-up between Kanye and Quilford.

Xalxe · Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:13 am

a) you're scum
b) he's trying to win it for town

Xalxe · Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:16 am

So noted. I'll give them more consideration if you flip town.

For now, die please.

Xalxe · Sun Feb 03, 2013 6:01 pm

In post 2766, Tierce wrote:stuck for having a dog, stuck for not having one

Damned if you do, damned if you don't is how we say it.

Xalxe · Mon Feb 04, 2013 12:06 am

In post 2778, Quilford wrote:Apart from your little axis of evil over there nobody thinks both you and Xalxe are Town.

So...half the game, then.

Xalxe · Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:52 pm

What interactions?

Xalxe · Wed Feb 06, 2013 1:15 am

Yippee.

HURT: Zdenek

And here I was thinking we could be friends.

Xalxe · Wed Feb 06, 2013 2:47 am

Kinetic, did you use rage on Zed?

Xalxe · Thu Feb 07, 2013 2:21 am

Temporary internet issues; please allow 24 hours to be fully functional.

--Xalxe

But I do have enough to do this:

Hurt: Zdenek

You are still on cooldown.

I also sent in rage on him last night so yeah.

Xalxe · Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:43 am

In post 2901, Zdenek wrote:Xalxe was never conf-town. He forgot that you'd not been hurt when Peregrine attacked you. Maybe scum knows why that happened. He would if it was a scum role block rather than a protection, for instance. Perhaps there is something going on that we don't know.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You clearly haven't been paying attention to the fact that I'm an

idiot

who can't remember what happened five PAGES ago, let alone five eons.

Xalxe · Thu Feb 07, 2013 4:51 am

In post 2903, Zdenek wrote:Well ok.

Xalxe, when I flip town, who will you think the scum are?

You won't, but in fairyland, the next one is kanye, and Quilford dies afterwards.

Xalxe · Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:01 am

Well, kanye has refused to take a stand on either me OR you, and Quilford is attacking me, so at this point, no.

Xalxe · Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:08 am

In post 2911, Zdenek wrote:
In post 2908, Xalxe wrote:Well, kanye has refused to take a stand on either me OR you, and Quilford is attacking me, so at this point, no.

Why is attacking you scummy?

The sensation of knives slicing into my flesh, while somewhat pleasurable at first, quickly wore thin.

Also, I'm losing a lot of blood here and it's doing some funny things to my mental processes.

Xalxe · Thu Feb 07, 2013 5:13 am

In post 2918, Zdenek wrote:
In post 2915, Xalxe wrote:
In post 2911, Zdenek wrote:
In post 2908, Xalxe wrote:Well, kanye has refused to take a stand on either me OR you, and Quilford is attacking me, so at this point, no.

Why is attacking you scummy?

The sensation of knives slicing into my flesh, while somewhat pleasurable at first, quickly wore thin.

Also, I'm losing a lot of blood here and it's doing some funny things to my mental processes.

Xalxe, your reasoning is fucked.

Swords

hurt

.

Xalxe · Fri Feb 08, 2013 1:30 am

HURT: Zdenek

phone brackets are hard