![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol2.gif)
I can't tell who he is....
Incognito wrote:To contextualize:
- In the camn-link, I'm showing a past game where the idea of a mass name claim was floated around and a camn town was strongly opposed to it. In our current game, she now seems to be pro-mass name claim. I'm trying to figure out why there's a difference.
- In the Haylen-link, I'm showing a past game where I actually voted someone without listing reasons and a Haylen town (IN HER VERY NEXT POST) quickly followed my vote and placed a vote on the same guy I reasonless voted for. In this game she's claiming that she both a) finds reasonless votes scummy and b) wouldn't follow my vote if I didn't provide a reason for it. It makes me think she's not being sincere.
Not to crazy about it. It's not like the random vote that Trip did eventually place after becoming unbusy could have been all that time-consuming; it wasn't exactly groundbreaking or anything along those lines.Green Crayons wrote:- How do you feel about Trip's explanation? Does it fit into your "one reservation?"
My "reservation" was me thinking that maybe the "Who's Online" list wasn't being accurate, but Trip's admitting that he did get the PM but chose not to post anyway, which tosses that out the window.
Green Crayons wrote:
---
I actually think Incog's "meta case" on Haylen is weak. Relative to the camn case, I think it's the weaker of the two. I'm willing to explain why (I don't think it's necessary at this point, especially before Haylen has said anything on the matter), but I'm curious about why you think the exact opposite. Why do you think that it's one of the most well presented meta cases you've seen in some time?PeregrineV wrote:Most well-presented meta case based on other games I've seen in a while.
Unvote.
Vote:Haylen
Magua wrote:PeregrineV wrote:@Magua- Before I answer that, I'm curious as to why your so insistent on it.
My insistence on getting an answer is directly related to your insistence on you not giving me an answer.
Magua wrote:PeregrineV wrote:Well, as I said to Green, [Pine]'s a null alignment wise.
PeregrineV wrote:As for scumreads...let's say Magua, Pine and MehPlusRawr for now.
PeregrineV in Post 184 wrote:@bvoigt- last two posts mainly. Although will continue to expect more.As for scumreads...let's say Magua, Pine and MehPlusRawr for now.
@Battle- Welcome to town, were we don't know and have to guess/figure it out, and are in the dark until the mod makes the deathpost. Is it different for you?![]()
P-edit: See, now Magua posted something. I'll post first then read it.
PeregrineV in Post 225 wrote:Magua wrote:PeregrineV wrote:@Magua- Before I answer that, I'm curious as to why your so insistent on it.
My insistence on getting an answer is directly related to your insistence on you not giving me an answer.
Well, as I said to Green, he's a null alignment wise.
PeregrineV in Post 215 wrote:@Green- Pine is a hyper aggressive tunneling player who takes offense easily. While that has no bearing on his alignment, it does affect how he plays. Since I am somewhat put off by that playstyle, he usually trips scummy for me from the start. But, rationally and logically, no bearing on alignment. So, right now he's a straight null read alignment wise.
Camn I've only played one game with. So I base anything now on her actions. She's active, she's coherent, she's not belligerent. I like the playstyle. However, no bearing on alignment..etc. So, instead of thinking town like I want to, I have her as a null also.
And the interactions between the two of them haven't changed my opinions above, it's mostly how I arrived at them.
PeregrineV in Post 226 wrote:@Battle- I'll be happy to read any links to recent (past 2 months) normal type games where scumbussed on purpose, esp. day 1.
Battle Mage wrote:
Let's turn up the HEEEEAAAAT!
BM
Incognito wrote: Let's turn up the heat.
Battle Mage wrote:
Peregrin wrote:
And can all my fans please post the link to their "cases", or present them concisely, if they want a response.
If you don't want a response, or don't have a case, then why are you voting me again?
I don't particularly want a response, and the only reason im not voting you, is because im not done with the day yet. But why would i want a response? You are essentially already dead.
PeregrineV wrote:@Battle- I'll be happy to read any links to recent (past 2 months) normal type games where scum bussed on purpose, esp. day 1.
bvoigt wrote:PeregrineV wrote:Relevant posts from the link you posted that shows it was noton purpose.
camn wrote:Mine is: You are quibbling the semantics of "ON PURPOSE"?
I cartainly didn't but our partnerby accidentin that game!
bvoigt wrote:PeregrineV wrote:@Camn- Yes, that is the purpose of words. That's why I said "on purpose". That's why I didn't say "on accident".
Magua wrote:PeregrineV wrote:@Magua- You got my read at each point in time. Do you want to discuss why you agree/disagree? It would seem to make sense. Otherwise, reads change. A lot.
And you know it.
For the last motherfucking time, the question I've been asking you iswhy did your read change.
I mean, goddamn, at least four times now I've asked that question: #188, #190, #193, #204.
At this point, I don't really expect you to answer the question, and so you can go die.
Yosarian2 wrote:So, you actually going to respond to the reasons I suspect you, PeV, or are you going to just dismiss me as "agreeing with Haylen" and therefore somehow irrelevent?
Yes, I agree with specific points in Haylen's case. how about, rather then dismissing me, you respond to those points? If I am wrong and you are town, it's your job to convince me of that, ASAP.
PeregrineV wrote:Gotta go to lunch, more fun when I get back.
If I'm hammered before then, I'm
Luigi Largo, Vanilla Townie
the smartest and toughest![]()
If not, brief preview:
Incognito- not great vote
Yosarian- Suspicious from one post to my vote post
Battle- "Got no reason, but scum don't need no reason."
@Haylen- I don't mind agreeing to disagree. I think players may kill teammates on purpose, but voting doesn't kill, so voting doesn't count as purposeful bussing. And I have yet to see a mafia team strategy that says "Hey, bus me for town points. Here is how we'll do it...."
InflatablePie wrote:D1 VC #7 (Final D1 VC) - The Thankless Job Votecount
PeregrineV (7): Magua, bvoigt, camn, Incognito, Yosarian2, Battle Mage, Pine
Incognito (1): TripMyWire
Battle Mage (1): Green Crayons
Green Crayons (1): Medicated Lain
Magua (1): PeregrineV
Not Voting (3): Fugitive, Haylen
That's a lynch!
-----
Determined to find the scum that have invaded the Opera, the group finally decided on their first suspect. The man was shocked that he was being accused of being one of these people, protesting that he was the smartest and toughest of them all. When he went to pull out his knife, however, the group restrained him and hanged him right there, on the stage. Turns out he wasn't dangerous after all - he just had a little anger problem.
PeregrineV - Luigi Largo, Vanilla Townie, has been lynched.
It is now Night 1. Any and all QTs are now open. If you have a night action, send it in. Day 2 will begin in about 72 hours, or after about 48 hours if all night actions are submitted before then.
InflatablePie wrote:The group of 12 had come back after a brief intermission following the death of Luigi Largo.
Well, I should probably say group of 10.
They found two bodies in the center of the stage - one male, one female. The male was none other than the founder of GeneCo - Rotti Largo. The other was his daughter, Carmella Largo, also known as the pop star Amber Sweet. The surprise came when they searched the bodies. Looks like daddy's little girl wasn't so innocent after all...
Magua -Rotti Largo, Bodyguard- has been shot.
Battle Mage -Amber Sweet, Goon- has had her "anatomy" removed.
It is now Day 2. With 10 alive, it takes 6 to lynch. Day 2 ends in three weeks - July 16th at 11pm Eastern.