Excellent slip on a QT partner. Im done no lynching. Parama, you can suck it if you don't want to lynch in MyLo. First this guy mentions lynching lurkers at LyLo to Xite, then he defends Andrius to the brink of warfare, and now he gets his night targets messed up. I originally wanted to wait yesterday, and even today. Now I'm done waiting. I know who I think is most likely to flip scum and my opinion won't be changing much.VasudeVa wrote:Actually it's, Andy, Xite, NicolBolas. Screwed that up.
Note to self: Don't post while you're doing something else.
No. The actual question is: how do we know there are lurker scum? I see no reason to go for lurkers when they could flip scum or town. I'd rather go for active scum first and make connections to the buddies later. This is MyLo. You don't decide it's time to lynch lurkers and lose us the game.VV wrote:Okay, Hindu. When DO we lynch lurker scum? How can we win if we don't lynch lurker scum? Hmm? D1? Oh dear, it's not D1 is it?
Because Twomz/Nicol are the only ones lurking? In that case, who was the lurker you were looking at. I have a QT with Nicol and he talked to me during the night so I can answer some questions that I asked him overnight.VV wrote:Oh right, and how sure are you that the non-lurkers are scum too at MyLo?
So you defended him...but you weren't sure if he was town or scum?VV wrote:I didn't actually say Andrius was confirmed Town, I said he was probably Town based on his actions/our conversation in the QT.
I hadn't read the Twomz part that you mentioned later. As for your scum being a lurker, why go for Twomz instead of one of your more active suspicions? At least you can verify your read on him then?VV wrote: thought you knew that I was suspicious of Twomz? Why are you suddenly asking me about who I'm suspicious of?
>_>VV wrote:Evidence? Quotes? This is a baseless accusation. Yes, I could do that as scum but unless you have evidence that I AM actually doing it, you're just hypothesizing and not proving anything.
It's a 50 page game. Chances are the slot will not be replaced into anytime soon. I want to wait for it.Xite91 wrote:Uhm, considering that we're all null on him and another player would just bring in another perspective and probably help us find scum? They totally could hammer the guy getting replaced. Why would it be likely for scum to not nk him?Hinduragi wrote:...you seriously think scum will NK the guy getting replaced? Dude, you're out of your mind. This is exactly why NL shouldn't be hammered.
Actually, a modkill of the slot would be good as long as it didn't result in us losing the rest of the day.
Parama, he already said why he's going for you.Charlie wrote:Hinduragi's #1260 is a good because we know where he stands on things, and we get fresh content to boot. The last comment was comedy gold. Okay, his case on why vollkan is town seems logical, but my gut says he isn't town. I can agree to hold off on his lynch for Today, but vollkan being vollkan being impossible to read is a threat. Definitely a worthy lynch, but we might not have any to spare... final decision to follow at the end of my read.
That's because I think I have 3/4 of the townies found and we may have been right all along. Working on the last one now.Parama wrote:Hindu's suspicions are basically what the town as a whole had been saying the day before... aka generic and thoughtless.
Xite, Andrius, VV, and Charlie told me they would lynch him if they could in my QT. Xite is town, I'm town, and I think there is 1/3 town in those three so I'm pretty sure it's not a scum mislynch.Parama wrote:But something is saying that having him at the top spot in 4 lists either makes him scum to every town or a popular scum mislynch. Seeing as how he wasn't under any pressure prior to today, I'm leaning towards the latter.
It's the same thing you said yesterday when they were voting you.Parama wrote:This isn't convincing at all.
That's the entire reason you switched your vote.Parama wrote:I didn't even mention voting analysis.
Parama wrote:This is the Twomz post I keep referring to. I thought he was doing something else with his vote on me :/
That's the one I'm referring to.Parama wrote:Hmm, maybe Twomz did nail it!
Yes, my reads are that bad. I know it sounds like a scummy excuse to have my vote but if Xite said lynch him fast, then I'm confident he had good reason to do so, given how much analysis and input he had on the game.vollkan wrote:So, at LYLO, you are casting your vote based on something that Xite said which, by your own admission, you don't actually understand?
You may not realize it yet, but since I've entered the game, instead of getting scum reads, I've been looking for town reads(Because not having good reads after a 50 page reread is pretty bad), and I've been doing it by making irrational, weird, or slightly stupid calls in order to get conversation rolling. This let me get my town reads. Here's what I've gotten since I joined the game:Parama wrote:Hindu: You are either stupid or scum if you're going to lynch based on one silly thing Xite said.
...Oh, I misread votes. >_>Parama wrote:Nobody's at L-1?
) No. I took this listVV wrote:@Hindu: Am I reading it right that, again, you are using other people's cases?
where he called a Hind/VV/Andrius scumteam and made my own conclusion of the NK and who I thought would be scum based on that NK off of that. In our QT, I told Andy you/me/him all had even chances of being the NK. Parama, I thought I was L-1 too, but I'm not. I'm L-2. Anyways, whoever's town, we should start putting all these reads together. I know some people's reads have changed since yesterday, given the NK, so let's offer them up.Twomz wrote:VasudeVa (1): Parama
Andrius (1): Charlie
Hinduragi (2): Vollkan, Twomz
Charlie (2): Vollkan, Parama
vollkan (2): Charlie, Hind
Twomz (4): Andrius, VV, Parama, Hind
Parama (5): Andrius, Charlie, VV, Twomz, Hind