Mini #1004 - Popularity Mafia (Over)
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
@ Taz: Erm, yeah, that's in rolepm/first post... I'm talking about actual scum hunting stuff, not the fluffed night talking.
On page 5 >.>"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I got to about page 15 before I just started skimming, then eventually just read Llama in ISO.vezokpiraka wrote:Do what I did and skip the next 30 pages.
I'm gonna try to figure out what's going on this day and ignore day 1 for the time being >.> I don't normally do this, y'all should be ashamed."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
1)huggle: Andrius
2)Keeping vote on vezokafter reading day 2, vezok seems like the better lynch... I don't really see any reasons for andrius's lynch besides 'he was on a townie lynch day 1' >.> and most all of vezok's logic has been fail (meta as the reason to lynch someone? Maybe if they're acting out their scum meta/not acting their town meta on day 1 it might be good enough for a VOTE, but not nearly enough for a lynch >.>)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
@ Andrius: I don't replace very often, but when I do I don't normally care that much if people are suspicious of the people before me in the slot. The only thing I can assure you of right now is that rayfrost and friend were just bad townies, not scum, cause sadly, I can't answer for their actions >.<"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
.....vollkan wrote:
Comment on this:vezokpiraka wrote:Volkan is wrong on many accounts.
Scums are Andrius, Volkan and someone else who I am not sure atm.
I Can't comment anything of the case.
The scoring system is broken.Vote: Vezok"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I'm not sure if he's mad and hammered or if he's oblivious and hammered.NicolBolas wrote:Is vollkan angry?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Could have sworn I posted last night... anyway, I bet the distribution is random and that there are 3 mafia as well. If there are NO powerroles... there might just be two, but it's safer to plan for three and be pleasantly surprised when the game ends after lynching two.
From his night talking, Max was for no lynch. (I wasn't at the time but I agree that we shouldn't rush a lynch unless we're sure cause we're probably at LyLo >.>)"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Sando Lynch:Max, Andrius,vollkan, Parama,tazaro,ReaperCharlie,PranaDevil
Vezok Lynch: Twomz,Max, VasudeVa, Nicobolas,Tazaro,vollkan
I'd say at least one of the players in blue is scum. And probably (if there is a third) the other is one of the others on a mislynch who got crafty and decided not to be on both. I dunno if both are scum or not... if they're not then the town is killing itself >.<"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
EBWOP: Meant to preview...
My choices would be either no lynch to narrow the field more... or tazaro/vollkan lynch."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
@ VV: They're people who were on both mislynches (Sorry, I thought it was obvious), I said "at least one", which implies one or two... what 'fiasco' are you talking about, I haven't seen any arguments that would warrant that mark on them."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Ugh. I almost want to vote no lynch just to move the game on to the next day where we're at lylo cause no one's taking any action. But I'm going tovote: TazI'm putting my money where my mouth is."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
[quote=vollkan]"And I'll ask you the same line of questioning I asked Xite [and Parama]: "Explain to me why you think a no lynch would be less beneficial than my lynch. No matter how strongly you suspected [Tazaro], I can't see any reason why you wouldn't want to no lynch. Only scum benefit from us lynching today."[/quote]
I can agree with the no lynch. It's a sound decision to make at this point in the game. But, if we just no lynch without pushing people or trying to figure out who is most likely to be scum anyway we'll just be in the same position tomorrow except we can't no lynch to get out of it and the scum will have that much easier of a time quick lynching a townie. I really think Taz is scum at this point and I'm willing to vote him to show that."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Is that 5 votes for no lynch? Normally I'd say we should be looking for scum more, but the lack of posting except by a few parties makes me doubt it would be worth it."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
unvote, vote: no lynchremember town, ALL of us that survive tomorrow need to vote for a scum to get them lynched, but only one townie is needed to mislynch, be cautious with your vote but you will need to use it."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Parama and Andrius and a asked Xite for one last night.
If we keep no lynching and the scum keep not nighting killing we can force a happily ever after and deny scum the win... sound like a plan to force their hand?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I believe I'm actually out of people I can target, seems like a lot of people are getting in that boat.
vote: no lynchthe mafia obviously was uncomfortable in picking a target, and probably figured they'd be more likely to get a mislynch if they didn't kill anyone. So, let's force their hand, cause it's obvious that they couldn't decide who to kill and it will probably help us decide who to lynch."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Oh snap I still have someone to target! I thought someone below me had died... /shrug. Guess I'm targeting Hind tonight."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Twomz wrote:Parama and Andrius and a asked Xite for one last night.
If we keep no lynching and the scum keep not nighting killing we can force a happily ever after and deny scum the win... sound like a plan to force their hand?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Hind attacking VV makes me think he's scum trying to force a mislynch, so I think we should stick to the 'force scum to NK' play and tomorrow we should be able to hit a scum (hopefully)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Can we get two more no lynch votes? No one is posting... although I don't know if that's cause everyone wants to no lynch or if no one has anything to say >.>"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Since when did fewest posts = lurking? I just try to pace my posts >.<Xite91 wrote:
you were one of the fewest posters.Twomz wrote:Wait, since when was I lurking?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
My top two suspects are Hind and Volk, although I'm thinking that maybe one or more of the people who is refusing to vote no lynch may be scum.
We have 8 alive and there have been, what, 4 posts in the past 2 days? Where is everyone?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
This is true pretty much regardless of game. I don't think we've ever been on the same side. No lynch is still the way to go today, and I still hold Hind as my top suspect (but Andrius has moved into my top 3 after his vote on me when we should be no lynching.Charlie wrote:If Andrius is mafia then Twomz is town
If Andrius is town then Twomz is mafia"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
THEN THE PRECEDENT HAS BEEN BROKEN!!!!Andrius wrote:
Actually, we bothTwomz wrote:
This is true pretty much regardless of game. I don't think we've ever been on the same side. No lynch is still the way to go today, and I still hold Hind as my top suspect (but Andrius has moved into my top 3 after his vote on me when we should be no lynching.Charlie wrote:If Andrius is mafia then Twomz is town
If Andrius is town then Twomz is mafiastartedComedy of Whims on the same side.
LET THE DANCE OF A THOUSAND MONKEYS BEGIN!!!!"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
So, my thoughts on scumteam is Hind (been saying it for a while)/Parama (don't like his reactions to Charlie's posts)/and a split between Vollkan and VV. I don't see charlie, Xite or andrius being scum (all joking aside) and I know I'm not scum, so yeah. That's that.
I'd still rather no lynch... I'd say let's take a vote on it, but w/e."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
It's not as simple as 'you should be willing to lynch any of your top suspects'. You lynch based on who you think is scum AND who you think you CAN get lynched, the fact that votes have been been put on you and taken off of you today makes you a better lynch candidate than vollkan.
unvote, vote: ParamaI HATE the whole 'oh woe is me, replace me' thing that people do, at that point I would vote you even if I thought you were town. If you don't want to play the game, don't sign up for it."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
unvote, vote: No Lynch
BAM my brilliant plan to get someone else to switch to no lynch so I could hammer it was a success!
See y'all tomorrow."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
VasudeVa (1): Parama
Andrius (1): Charlie
Hinduragi (2): Vollkan, Twomz
Charlie (2): Vollkan, Parama
vollkan (2): Charlie, Hind
Twomz (4): Andrius, VV, Parama, Hind
Parama (5): Andrius, Charlie, VV, Twomz, Hind
I PROPOSE AN ANDRIUS/VV/HIND MAFIA GROUP, TARGETTING MYSELF AND PARAMA AS MISLYNCHES
Agree/Disagree?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
EBWOP: @ Parama: Cause so much was happening that a random no lynch would be thrown in there? I had to change the status quo in a way where someone would be more likely to put a vote on no lynch so I could end the day (as was agreed at the beginning of the day), a looming lynch would pressure the people who actually wanted no lynch to put a vote there to put weight back towards not lynching... thus allowing me to throw down the no lynch hammer... how is that hard to follow?"It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Town, don't go throwing votes around like they're candy. THINK before you vote.Twomz wrote:unvote, vote: no lynchremember town, ALL of us that survive tomorrow need to vote for a scum to get them lynched, but only one townie is needed to mislynch, be cautious with your vote but you will need to use it.
@ Andrius: You're right, we aren't the same alignment, except this isn't a SC game, so that means YOU'RE scum and I'M town .
@ Parama: Hind probably is the best bet for first lynch, but we need to hear from the rest of the town before we actually start up anything."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Xite said the same thing to me about watching out for vollkan/charlie if they neighborize someone who died.
Was it ever asked/answered if scum could neighborize and talk in the same night? Cause if they can't we can go back over and see if there's a hole.
Sorry I was V/LA camping this weekend with no notice, I'll try to post more this next week.
Also, I'm ashamed of all the votes flying around at this point, scum can and will try to force a mislynch at this point (unless there's only two... but we haven't really been considering that this game)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
I'm waiting for Andrius and VV to switch onto Parama with Charlie and let Hind hammer, it would be hilarious. But, they'd all have to be on and Charlie would have to not be on for it to work. If it does happen I'll try not to say 'I told you so' too loud.
The reason that I don't want people voting for each other right now is because of the four people who have votes on them, only at most three can be scum. And of the people voting, at least one has to be scum (unless there's only two, if me and vollkan are the scum team then no scum are voting)."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith-
-
Twomz Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Cliqued On
- Posts: 2981
- Joined: November 21, 2005
- Location: Texas
Hind isn't scum but Charlie is? What the balls?
GJ scum, I might have pointed out VV a couple of times, but I never suspected charlie... damn you! Nothing of note happened in any of my QTs."It's not a logical inconsistency. B can't be correct because then C would be, but it doesn't go the other way - there's nothing wrong with C being correct. Aside from Twomz saying otherwise." --Mith
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.