VP Baltar wrote:
Jack replaces flinter effective immediately. Welcome him!
Zachrulez wrote:I'm pretty much convinced beyond any doubt that Flinter's slot is scum now given the way she just replaced out.
That doesn't sound like an obvious scum strategy to me.Zachrulez wrote:Mainly because linking us together is pretty much what Flinter did, and you replace in and cast suspicion on me and Sotty before really delving into the game.Jack wrote:Why aren't you surprised?
In fact, why was there such a pressing need to react to me?
Why is that funny? I assume three scum, you are 4th, the list is in order. You do sit on one person as scum, and that is what you are doing now, this is correct?Zachrulez wrote:Funny how you don't commit to calling me scum and actually call me neutral.Jack wrote:
zach got called out for vote hopping early, and said that as scum he sticks to his vote. Which is EXACTLY what he's done for the rest of the day.
Even more interesting how Sotty ended up town after you said you didn't like both of us earlier.
Also looks like you're fine with your vote right where it is too. It's great how things like that work out.
So why aren't you all over his case this game?xRECKONERx wrote:Oh my god Jack's post is so so so wrong
Jacky boy. 1) I'm not scum. 2) I'm usually the one who is ALWAYS all over kyle's case and trying to get him lynched. It's this hate-hate relationship we share in every single game we play together. You can meta that if you want.
No.Vi wrote: You want hohum lynched for crude language?
Sotty of all people winds up jumping from scummy to Townie?
What?You moved your vote someplace where it's neither helpful nor credible?
What did he do back on page 1 or 2 that was townie?xReck wrote:...pretty much the whole game.
It's looking like I'll vote xRecks, but the fact that I'm not voting anyone is irrelevant. That "by not voting your not helping" line has always been bs.I didn't like you because you both wanted to lynch me out of hand. That wasn't about suspicions; I hadn't read the thread yet.
The only thing he's done this game is defend himself a couple times and defend xReck a couple times. His vote post for flinter is scummy, but mostly it's the link to xReck (and vice versa). So lynching xReck has a certain "lynch one scum get the second one free" appeal.ortolan wrote:It's just so hard to choose between hohum and Jack
Can someone summarise the things kyle has done which are actively scummy please?
ortolan wrote:didn't want to prejudice his responses, br0. Of course now you're going to need to meta his replacement anyway.Vi wrote:I would like to see your response to Vi's 284 and 287.ortolan 288 wrote:I just isoed kyle, the only scummy thing I noticed is
Which is kind of a weird thing to say. I would like to see kyle's response to Vi's 284 though.kyle ISO 6 (to ekiM) wrote:You make some decent points on me,
Unvotefor what looks like tactical replacement.
Vote: kyle
Only page 10 at the time. I look for a pairing, which is inherently suspicious. However, I'm not big on the xreck-kyle combo right now. It wouldn't have changed my hohum read either way, since it's both possible that xreck is innocent and that hohum is bussing.Jahudo wrote:Do you mean you had only read up to page 10, or only page 10 at that time?
@Jack: How much do you look for scumbuddies before a single scum flips?
You pair kyle and reck together but also think hohum is scummy, who has been voting reck pretty hard. Does hohum change your reck read at all? And what are your reasons for thinking reck is scummy?
About 4 going by ekiM's list, compared to about 7 for hohum, who I like a bit better. And deadline is in like 12 hours. You're voting for no lynch right now. Not that I object since you'll change your vote before hand, but that's what you get for lecturing me earlierVi wrote:You're basically wrong, and this argument is stupid.Jack 410 wrote:-Your vote is doing jack, VI~Vi wrote:Your vote wasn't on anyone. Mine's on scum. tyvmJack 408 wrote:And you were lecturing me about my vote being somewhere that wasn't "helpful".
You're nothelpinganyone and it's lending nocredenceto your dedication.-
Why don't you want to lynch ortolan? There are plenty of people who have voiced interest in lynching him.
ekiM wrote:
Goodies
ortolan- mostly gut. Reads as genuine. Would like more posting.
Percy- Again what he's saying feels honest.
sotty7- Gut...
Zach- And again. Yeah I guess I can't explain these reads yet.
ekiM wrote: hohum, ortolan, DDD. These guys trouble me. They've all been less involved than I expected. They've all been chasing the easy targets (hypocrisy, I know).
ortolan again with the lurking and chasing xRx/flint. I like his interactions with kyle though. Inscrutable man.
I will support a hohum or DDD lynch today.
ekiM wrote:Scum are hohum, Locke, and one other. DDD? Sotty? Hrm.
ekiM wrote:No reason ort can't be scum, but it's less likely to be with hohum when he named his two lynch preferences for today as Jack/flint and hohum. I'm pretty sold on hohum being scum.
ISO 18 you talk about most of the people in the game but skip orto.ekiM wrote:Looking again at ortolan, his lurking and going after the VIs a lot still look bad. His meltdown towards Vi is still baffling. I don't know what more there is to say.
************Vi wrote:The whole conspiracy about hohum "waiting" before accusing xRx is utter dreck. In case you missed it, hohum was multiposting, catching up to each response as he saw it. This should be obvious by how hohum finally got to flinter's post "don't lynch xRx" long after she actually made it and hohum had already responded to earlier posts twice.
In (207) hohum responds to (206) with a lengthy post and about 8 linksOrtolan-206 wrote:what's with the ultimatums from people who are nowhere close to being lynched?
hohum I would like to know the totality of reasons for your vote on Percy at this point in time.
It could be. That's not really something I weigh real heavily.Amished wrote:@Jack: Fine, look at hohum attacking Ortolan. Does that look like scum attacking a buddy?
hohum wrote:If you're not going to rectify your lurking problem
hohum wrote:So you think calling out lurkers in a game with tight deadline is scummy? We should continue to allow people to lurk?
Jahudo starts today going after ekiM.Jahudo wrote:Locke wagon is looking weak. I don't see how he's been wishy-washy or lurky. I had one tell on him that I still like, but it was also kinda early in the day and now I'm feeling meh.
*puts locke/Amished at L-1*Jahudo wrote:Looking back at Locke's early opinion of the ortolan wagon, I can see where he was trying to keep it from gaining momentum. There was the threat of a no lynch occurring if the various wagons didn't compromise into a lynch wagon, but I don't see how that's something you counter-act with preventing new wagon suggestions. That should actually help the compromise process, and further analysis down the line.
There's also the idea that he was against orto-wagon talk because he had a town read on orto. But if he was town I don't know how he'd then see Vi's vote as being suspicious.
Vote: Amished
I could have sworn I requested that 2 posts ago, but I guess I got distracted somehowAmished wrote:Also, I ask that somebody unvotes me until I at least have my say and a chance to defend my position. Continuing on, I'll try not to get as picky to cut down on stuff that I picked up on.
But you dropped Locke as I quoted you to show.Jahudo wrote:And Locke was one of my suspects day 1, whereas I have a town read on hohum.
That's nonsense, Vi was pushing a tiny wagon with 12 hours left, not a good play, and I wanted hohum lynched.Percy wrote:Jack - I think his initial reaction to the ortolan wagon is one of the worst. He tried to actively derail Vi's wagon in this post,
Mostly. kyle was my top suspect in my initial list iirc.Percy wrote:I'd like to ask,
@Jack: To what extent is your suspicion on Jahudo based on your suspicion of kyle99?
Not necessarily. "a bit" Town get frustrated too of course.Vi wrote:Why scum, necessarily?Jack 755 wrote:Percy sounds a bit like scum that's pissed that at people like hohum and xReck not drawing the fire he thinks they should.
Vi. I didn't accidentally post my "lynch one townie today and the other tomorrow" plan in the thread.Vi wrote:Which of them (none, one, the other, or both) is scum?Jack 811 wrote:I can see the town deciding for some reason not to lynch Jahudo tomorrow if he isn't lynched today. But I think hohum is lurking so badly etc that there'll always be some support.