And Max claimed third party? Yeehaw
UncertainKitten 2
Minineko 3
Ellibereth 4
Jahudo 5
SpyreX 1
Max 12
farside22 7
HackerHuck 8
Super Awesome Mega Pimp! 9
Cobalt 10
pwnman 11
Grimmy 6
So you had NO win condition and opted to leap to "serial killer" / "another third party" instead of just asking where your win condition was?I just spent a great deal of time trying to find out my wincon then in the rules it cleared it up when I read that there are no serial killers. Unless I'm another third party role.
Not bad != good. It is just the same as a random, no more, no less.farside wrote:I don't know why people think random shoving is a good idea at all. FOS: spreyx and Super Awesome Mega Pimp for thinking it is.
And, really, this is different than most games how?farside wrote:All people have to do is be active to keep from going to the bottom and being lynched today.
Nah I don't ever read. Come on now.farside wrote:Seriously?
Dude unless you are not reading this game it is the person with the lowest average that will be lynched today. Not the person with the most votes so if the scum team is an active bunch that has nothing to do better in their lives but to keep themselves from having their average at the bottom the likelyhood of getting scum to the buttom is going to be hard.
I'll leave Jah's quick response to that part but, again:First off, I'm not entirely sure that you're correct so it's not helpful to keep random shoving in case it is an overall average. Secondly, a whole bunch of useless shoving does harm the town because we don't get a good idea of who is scummy. You're arguing that random shoving doesn't put anyone in any danger. Random voting kind of works because it can start wagons. Without that kind of a mechanic, random shoving just fills the thread with noise and we're not really going anywhere with it. That's a pretty crappy way to find scum.
Jahudo wrote:Is it just me or did pwnman mostly parrot what I said?
Jahudo wrote:SpyreX 6 - Plenty of mechanics talk, some of it necessary to get everyone on same page and off subject, but not much scumhunting.pwnman wrote:SpyreX- Plenty of mechanics talk, some of it necessary to get everyone on same page and off subject, but not much scumhunting.Jahudo wrote:Minineko 9 - Lurker is anti-town. Lurkers needs to post more.Pwnman, what's up with the word-for-word repeats of my opinion of Spyrex and Minineko?pwnman wrote:Minineko- Lurker is anti-town. Lurkers needs to post more.
Jahudo wrote:Super Awesome Mega Pimp! 3 - Lurker and non-shover pressure looks okay for now. But I expect something both super and awesome.The first sentence is exactly the same for this read too.pwnman wrote:SAMP- Lurker and non-shover pressure looks okay for now. Is freaking out at Cobalt though so I left him mid-line.
Jahudo wrote:UncertainKitten7 - Has given a little bit of reads, but most posts are questions about mechanic.These two look very similar, so why didn't you just copy me word for word here (if you'll admit to copying me)?pwnman wrote:UncertainKitten- Giving a few reads, but not much scum-hunting although not very scummy
While I like people agreeing with me, this looks suspicious. Some kind of buddying or inability to make his own reads is going on here.
The setup is too easy. Much like pwn being scum was.What do you mean by too easy? Too easy to find fault in his read, or the current suspicion on him has been flowing too easily?
You're missing the step that bothers me.SAMP wrote:If I randomly said one plus one is three, that's not an alignment tell, it's just demonstrably stupid. The same is true of pwn's lie. I say pwn copying Jah was a little scummy only because of the possibility that it was an attempt at buddying.
In any event, I'm not saying there were no protown reasons to be attacking pwn or Hacker, or me for that matter. I'm saying Cobalt and Elli never gave any such reasons, and pushed townie lynches on rhetoric. And that is scummier than the Great Lakes.