Mini #717 - Alpha Centauri Smalltown (Game Over!)

Empking · Post Post #53 (isolation #0) » Mon Dec 15, 2008 6:09 am

Vote: MacavityLock

- Roleblocker.

Empking · Post Post #88 (isolation #1) » Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:04 am

I don't want to put the number of votes you have too high, but I wish I could vote for you: Cephrir

Empking · Post Post #136 (isolation #2) » Tue Dec 16, 2008 4:43 am

As Cephrr is only on three.

Unvote

Vote: Cephrir

Reading through last pages argument, I must say that I could see where Occam was coming from completely. I don't think its a useless role though. Just that the best scum hunter should've got it.

Empking · Post Post #171 (isolation #3) » Wed Dec 17, 2008 5:23 am

Cephrir wrote:Obviously BP is not useless. If he plays a good protown game he can't be taken out. Yes, it is probably one of the weaker roles; I still don't get why that would automatically make him a lynch target.

Farside, those 5 reasons are basically the same reason a lot of times. #5 isn't even a reason to vote someone. Occam just voted and then was forced to defend his vote.

Empking wrote:As Cephrr is only on three.

Unvote

Vote: Cephrir

Why?

Your bandwagoning.

Empking · Post Post #210 (isolation #4) » Thu Dec 18, 2008 5:12 am

Oman wrote:
As a town we're letting people like Gremwell and monkeyman get through the net. D

In your own words, what have they done that's scummy.

Empking · Post Post #230 (isolation #5) » Fri Dec 19, 2008 2:50 am

Oman wrote:

Monkeyman
why would you vote someone you thought was stupid over someone you thought was town?.

Is that correct?

Cephrir, I don't buy your defence because it presumes you're an idiot.

Though, Farside does seem scummy but getting in a big, too long argument even when she's wrong does seem like classic town Farside to me.

Empking · Post Post #235 (isolation #6) » Fri Dec 19, 2008 5:45 am

Gremwell wrote:Since they dominated the last few pages, and most people seem to have an opinion one way or the other, how many people think that either one of farside or occam is defiantly scum?

.

I don't.

Empking · Post Post #245 (isolation #7) » Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:52 am

Yeah, this last page of Gremwell's posts have been bad.

FoS: Gremwell

Farside

88, was a sort of FoS. I don't think posting my thoughts on players I think are Pro-Town would be good for the town.

Empking · Post Post #247 (isolation #8) » Fri Dec 19, 2008 8:56 am

Cephrir and Gremwell.

Cephrir: Bandwagoning and then denying it. I don't think his defence was very good either.
Gremwell: The worlds most anti-town plan is mostly why I suspect him.

Empking · Post Post #255 (isolation #9) » Fri Dec 19, 2008 9:26 pm

MonkeyMan576 wrote:So I don't want to take part in Farside and Occum's little argument and it makes me scum? What is it that I'm supposed to take a position on exactly that I haven't done so already?

What gives you the impression that people are saying that?

Empking · Post Post #264 (isolation #10) » Sat Dec 20, 2008 5:38 am

Gremwell wrote:
obviously I didn't actually want a plan like that to go through, I proposed it to get reactions, .

Is that, "I acted scummy do get reactions"? (I'm honestly not sure.)

Empking · Post Post #280 (isolation #11) » Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:12 pm

Cephrir, you don't random vote someone with that amount of votes unless you're an idiot. I don'yt think you're an idiot so I doubt its a random vote. But I'm voting you for one small reason when MM and G are very scummy.

Unvote

Vote; Monkeyman

because of his reaction to been called possible scum.

Empking · Post Post #298 (isolation #12) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 1:14 am

charter wrote:
Occam wrote:Roles aside I think Grem's played scummier. Monkeyman isn't far behind but I really don't think we ought to let the fact that this is an open setup get in the way of lynching scum.
Agreed.

I actually want to know why those voting MM picked him over Gremwell. I can see a possibility (remote though it may be) that MM just blew up over getting called scum as town. It doesn't excuse the rest of his scummy actions, but I think regardless, Gremwell is worse.

Gremwell is bad but I think the overreaction is worse.

Empking · Post Post #314 (isolation #13) » Mon Dec 22, 2008 11:59 pm

charter wrote:Well, if people don't start voting Gremwell soon I'm just going to move on to MM. I still think Gremwell is the scummiest, but MM and farside are right behind.

Why would you change your vote?

Empking · Post Post #319 (isolation #14) » Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:55 am

Code: Select all

[url]https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?t=10062&start=[insert post number here][/url]

Empking · Post Post #343 (isolation #15) » Tue Dec 23, 2008 10:29 pm

charter wrote:
Empking wrote:
charter wrote:Well, if people don't start voting Gremwell soon I'm just going to move on to MM. I still think Gremwell is the scummiest, but MM and farside are right behind.
Why would you change your vote?
I think MM is scum too. MM has more votes and none of the people voting him will vote for Gremwell for who knows what reason. It's kind of sad, but I'm actually kind of waivering on MM, mostly because of the ease at which people will vote him, and the difficulty in getting people to vote Gremwell (who is far scummier).
.

At the time it was three apiece. How did you think their was more ease in voting MM than Gremwell?

Empking · Post Post #368 (isolation #16) » Wed Dec 24, 2008 10:26 pm

MonkeyMan576 wrote:
RagingRabbit wrote:Funny, I just gave a whole lot of reasons why you're scummy. And if your only defense is "NOT!", well, don't expect to sweep anyone of his feet.
So far, the two reasons I have heard that I am scummy is my reaction to being called scum, which was completely reasonable considering a reason for the vote was not given at the time, .

What vote?

Empking · Post Post #386 (isolation #17) » Fri Dec 26, 2008 11:05 pm

Is Undervaluing townie BP scummy? Why?

Empking · Post Post #410 (isolation #18) » Sat Dec 27, 2008 10:50 pm

Maybe we should discuss if we want the redirector to act or not?

I feel that this day is getting to the point of stopping being useful.

Empking · Post Post #412 (isolation #19) » Sat Dec 27, 2008 11:44 pm

No. I really believe that whether or not the redirector should act, should be discussed.

Empking · Post Post #414 (isolation #20) » Sun Dec 28, 2008 12:24 am

Yeah, but there's a difference between saying whether or not you should n or who you should target.

Empking · Post Post #448 (isolation #21) » Mon Dec 29, 2008 4:24 am

Straight Popcorn is better.

Empking · Post Post #497 (isolation #22) » Tue Dec 30, 2008 12:23 am

Unvote

Vote; Gremwell

Though I still think MM is scummy, rereading the thread, I feel that Gremwell's plan, the famous "It wasn't scummy, it was a gambit" and the "I'll wait to see other's options" puts her/him as scummier.

Empking · Post Post #552 (isolation #23) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 5:38 am

Vote: Drunken Piper

Trying to get random claims with a descision from the town to do that clearly not pro-town plan.

As I have no night action.

DrunkenPiper, you can go first.

Empking · Post Post #556 (isolation #24) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:19 am

Drunken Piper wrote:
oh, and we find out who
who doesnt like protown moves..

(sip)

dice claiming is the MOST random and least likely for scum to manipulate. EXPLAIN TO ME HOW wanting random claiming is scummy. and why I am worth a vote even before we have ANY claims..popcorn claiming helps scum craft their claims....

Because Random Voting gives less info than pop corning.

also, before you voted Emp..did you read ANY of the smalltown games that have come before?

Yes. I played Smalltown+ as well. This bit is exceptionally scummy.

No discussion should be had about yesterday's play before the claims are done..

Who was? Not me. Very Scummy

.if you have a problem with this PLEASE READ THE OTHER SMALLTOWN GAMES..you will be enlightened. discussion about yesterday's plays will help scum craft their claim today..claims are how we hunt scum...

Capital text, got a bit angry for just one vote.

if you have a problem with dice claiming..I want an explanation WHY..NOW...

if you think I am scummy for wanting dice claiming..I want an explanation NOW

this is crucial at the beginning part of the Day 2. Only scum will be frightened of random claiming..

Still overly angry. Not only that but he's trying to argue that I'm scum because I think DP is scum.

Ortolan: Don't claim.

Its DP's turn.

Empking · Post Post #560 (isolation #25) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:22 am

CKD & DP; Do you support random lynching?

CKD; When did RR suggest Occam chose who does the first claim?

Empking · Post Post #561 (isolation #26) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:23 am

http://www.mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=8937

DP: Stop trying to back out of it. Claim.

Empking · Post Post #565 (isolation #27) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:28 am

Drunken Piper wrote:EMP READ THE GAEM

Raging Rabbit wrote:I think we're better off with the popcorn method we talked about earlier.
Since Occam basically volunteered his claim, he should choose the next to do so.

And I agree it makes sense to also claim if you know you got targeted by other roles (i.e masonier or inventor).

Still Angry.

(It was probably Semi-Simu BTW)

DP: Its your turn to claim.

Empking · Post Post #567 (isolation #28) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:39 am

Drunken Piper wrote:so I am scummy for wanting the random claiming? WHY IS RANDOM CLAIMING SCUMMY?

As Popcorning is more pro-town.

BUT,. you are not scummy for wanting to control the claim order? ie not fully claiming

I did fully claim.

and wanting me to claim (you do know I am a BP right with no night actions)

That just makes your reluctance to claim even scummier.

also so what if I am angry?..explain that that is revelant (please god say that over reaction and anger was scummy..please)

Over reaction is scummy.

Emp why are you not curious (ie wanting a link) of games that scum have argued random claiming...why are you not curious (wanting a link) of games that scum wanted to control the order of claiming Day 2?

Because there is a search button on this site.

Empking · Post Post #570 (isolation #29) » Mon Jan 05, 2009 6:56 am

Dice Popcorn = No, its not even proper popcorning.

Regular Popcorn - Occam has a role and picked that he went first - Him popcorning - No.

The two night actionless people should go first. That makes sense.

Empking · Post Post #584 (isolation #30) » Thu Jan 08, 2009 5:05 am

Ort you shouldn't have claimed first. DP rolled so he could change his reaction to popcorning once he knew who was going first. We shouldn't have gave that to him.

Almost sure DP is scum.

Empking · Post Post #588 (isolation #31) » Thu Jan 08, 2009 7:41 am

I didn't have a problem with choosing randomly. I had a problem with allowing you to know who would go first.

Empking · Post Post #596 (isolation #32) » Fri Jan 09, 2009 5:25 am

Drunken Piper wrote:
Lying 101,
get your facts straight, son.

(sip)

Empking wrote:I didn't have a problem with choosing randomly. I had a problem with allowing you to know who would go first.

Empking wrote:
Vote: Drunken Piper

Trying to get random claims with a descision from the town to do that clearly not pro-town plan.

As I have no night action.

DrunkenPiper, you can go first.
Empking wrote:
Drunken Piper wrote:so I am scummy for wanting the random claiming? WHY IS RANDOM CLAIMING SCUMMY?
As Popcorning is more pro-town.

backtracking, stretching, and lies...YOU HAD A HUGE PROBLEM WITH RANDOM CLAIMING...

vote empking
(unless something in claims changes this)

You orginally spouted that I must be scum because I wanted random claiming..now you are saying you didnt have a problem with random claiming after I pushed you to explain why. I didnt care who went first...I just wanted it to be random. THAT IS WHY YOU INTIALLY ATTACKED ME.

you lied about not thinking random claiming is scummy (which is why you first started attacking me). Now you are back tracking on that. You are stretching with you "case": Over reaction is scummy...and since I didnt claim (even though I dont have night actions) after you wanted me to..I must me scummy.

I would like to hear EVERYONE's thoughts on this bullshit...

Occam wrote:What do you mean partially claimed?

you havent claimed yet (and I dont think you should until your turn)..if someone targetted you or not last night.

You know What I meant.

Empking · Post Post #602 (isolation #33) » Fri Jan 09, 2009 9:46 pm

I got no sabilities.

DP rolled without asdking the town. He rolled so he could no if the person with the first choice would hurt the scum. Only scum would do that.

DP admitted to having a night action. He is BP. BP does not have a night action. Scum have a night action. Therefore BP is scum.

Empking · Post Post #605 (isolation #34) » Sat Jan 10, 2009 3:19 am

His unwillingness to part claim is as good as admitting it.

Empking · Post Post #609 (isolation #35) » Sat Jan 10, 2009 4:01 am

DP, you have more votes than me. You should answer the questions for you first.

Empking · Post Post #622 (isolation #36) » Sat Jan 10, 2009 10:53 pm

Occam wrote:I have to say, Emp is looking a lot worse that DP in this exchange. Emp, regardless of who has more votes, I believe DP asked you those questions before you asked him. Answering them would be nice.

I also don't understand how not claiming is the same as admitting to being scum. Especially since he's BP - the only logical conclusion to draw from his unwillingness to claim is that he was waiting to reveal whether or not he was targeted. How you can draw the conclusion that he's scum from that, I'm not sure.

I don't think either side of this claiming order debate is any more or less right or scummy than the other. It really doesn't matter whether the person who starts is randomly chosen by dice or if someone just starts. To me the order of night actions method made most sense, but regardless, I also don't understand Emp's insistence that rolling dice was scummy. How? It's still random and DP still can't control it.

For pressing this bizarre, weak case to no logical end,
vote: Empking

When did he ask the first qquestion? (That I didn't answer.)

DP is dodging the question and in order to disguise that he's asking more questions. That's what scum would do.

Empking · Post Post #624 (isolation #37) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:44 am

Empking wrote:CKD & DP; Do you support random lynching?

Empking · Post Post #627 (isolation #38) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:01 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:Oh c'mon. What do you think the answer is? How is this stopping you from answering the not rhethorical questions directed at you?

Are you saying that my question (which I expected an answer for) was rhetorical?

Letting DP get away with dodging questions is not a good thing.

Empking · Post Post #630 (isolation #39) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 2:11 am

Stop answering for him.

Empking · Post Post #635 (isolation #40) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 4:03 am

Why is it getting ridiculous?

Empking · Post Post #638 (isolation #41) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:28 am

acutally emp, I dont have a fucking clue what you are saying..did you or did you not intially attack me for wanting random claiming? AND why are you ignoring questions?

Empking, partially claimed, no night action.

Emp were you targetted last night with anything or are you going to not answer that question either?

************8

Yes.

This was the first quote with a question I didn't answer and its already talking about ignoring questions. Smells like scum to me.

Repeating me not answering questions but apparantly this is the first dodge. DP is scum.

*******************

backtracking, stretching, and lies...YOU HAD A HUGE PROBLEM WITH RANDOM CLAIMING...

vote empking (unless something in claims changes this)

You orginally spouted that I must be scum because I wanted random claiming..now you are saying you didnt have a problem with random claiming after I pushed you to explain why. I didnt care who went first...I just wanted it to be random. THAT IS WHY YOU INTIALLY ATTACKED ME.

you lied about not thinking random claiming is scummy (which is why you first started attacking me). Now you are back tracking on that. You are stretching with you "case": Over reaction is scummy...and since I didnt claim (even though I dont have night actions) after you wanted me to..I must me scummy.

***********************

Er, where is the question?

************************8

Speaking of scum, why do you GET to decide you popcorned first?

*****************************

Because its better than your idea.

*************************

I "Ignored" questions because you wouldn't answer mine.

Over reaction is scummy because scum do it more often than town.

I haven't produuced a "case" because people presume I'm wrong whatever I do.

******************

New question, exactly the same as the old question. He's just repeating himself so I either have to repeat myself or "ignore" a question. Clearly a scum trick.

********************

I asked the question as I can't understand why town would want random claims but not random lynch.

How old I am does not impact my role. This is a scum tactic to ask that.

I don't think about games after I'm lynched.

***********************

DP: Why did you ignore my question? Do you find ignoring questions scummy?

Empking · Post Post #639 (isolation #42) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:29 am

Drunken Piper wrote:
One other point...
up in this joint.

(sip)

Emp, the more I think about your play(this is our second game together), the more I am disgusted. If at this end of this game. You are indeed town and not some variant of scum (SK, mafia)..I will never join another game with you. I keep going back and forth on if you are scum or just a really horrible player. My meta on you is that you are just a horrible player.

Ad hom.

Why do you use Ad Hom?

Empking · Post Post #641 (isolation #43) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:31 am

DP, I asked you questions. (This is more to maske sure he notices them)

Empking · Post Post #643 (isolation #44) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:34 am

Drunken Piper wrote:
Empking wrote:
Drunken Piper wrote:
One other point...
up in this joint.

(sip)

Emp, the more I think about your play(this is our second game together), the more I am disgusted. If at this end of this game. You are indeed town and not some variant of scum (SK, mafia)..I will never join another game with you. I keep going back and forth on if you are scum or just a really horrible player. My meta on you is that you are just a horrible player.
Ad hom.

Why do you use Ad Hom?
Not ad hom...it is a truth...this is not a attack on what role/alignment you have in this game...this is attack on your general play across the board...If you are town...I WILL never join another game with you..to go into more detail at this point will break rules and just result in insults.

going to address your bigger post...when I have time.

CKD: Does that make sense to you?

"Its not Ad Hom, its an attack on you the player not the role."

Empking · Post Post #645 (isolation #45) » Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:39 am

I know it was, that's why I wasn't calling you scum for it.

I just know that when I "cross post" I often don't look at the posts above mine.

acutally emp, I dont have a fucking clue what you are saying..did you or did you not intially attack me for wanting random claiming? AND why are you ignoring questions?

Empking, partially claimed, no night action.

Emp were you targetted last night with anything or are you going to not answer that question either?

************8

Yes.

This was the first quote with a question I didn't answer and its already talking about ignoring questions. Smells like scum to me.

Repeating me not answering questions but apparantly this is the first dodge. DP is scum.

*******************

backtracking, stretching, and lies...YOU HAD A HUGE PROBLEM WITH RANDOM CLAIMING...

vote empking (unless something in claims changes this)

You orginally spouted that I must be scum because I wanted random claiming..now you are saying you didnt have a problem with random claiming after I pushed you to explain why. I didnt care who went first...I just wanted it to be random. THAT IS WHY YOU INTIALLY ATTACKED ME.

you lied about not thinking random claiming is scummy (which is why you first started attacking me). Now you are back tracking on that. You are stretching with you "case": Over reaction is scummy...and since I didnt claim (even though I dont have night actions) after you wanted me to..I must me scummy.

***********************

Er, where is the question?

************************8

Speaking of scum, why do you GET to decide you popcorned first?

*****************************

Because its better than your idea.

*************************

I "Ignored" questions because you wouldn't answer mine.

Over reaction is scummy because scum do it more often than town.

I haven't produuced a "case" because people presume I'm wrong whatever I do.

******************

New question, exactly the same as the old question. He's just repeating himself so I either have to repeat myself or "ignore" a question. Clearly a scum trick.

********************

I asked the question as I can't understand why town would want random claims but not random lynch.

How old I am does not impact my role. This is a scum tactic to ask that.

I don't think about games after I'm lynched.

***********************

DP: Why did you ignore my question? Do you find ignoring questions scummy?

Empking · Post Post #659 (isolation #46) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 6:39 am

RR; I picked RB because it was the most anti-town role.

I didn't want to let DP dodge questions.

Empking · Post Post #663 (isolation #47) » Mon Jan 12, 2009 7:56 am

charter wrote:[
659- Lets not start arguing now about roles being anti town. That was fine in the beginning, but now it's just going to cause headaches.

You dshould be claming RR for asking about it.

Empking · Post Post #674 (isolation #48) » Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:25 am

Cephrir's recent posts are wierd and don't seem to follow the same thought. Slightly more scummy and he's still one of my big perople I'd vote for.

Empking · Post Post #687 (isolation #49) » Wed Jan 14, 2009 5:30 am

Drunken Piper wrote:
very little time,
for rhyme.

vote charter

reason to come....but mostly from play yesterday versus his night kill.

also a retort to Emp "answers" or lack thereof when I get a second...

RL is super busy..trying not to replace out of games.

Not going to answer my questions though?

Empking · Post Post #691 (isolation #50) » Thu Jan 15, 2009 6:26 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:emp, you're going beyond ridiculous. How is the answer to "do you support random lynching?" anything but completely obvious?

.

I'd say so but the fact that he dodged the question is what's important.

DP: Has been ages, that's what's ridiculous.

Empking · Post Post #698 (isolation #51) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:43 am

Raging Rabbit wrote:If you saw a guy walk down the street and another guy comes up to him and asks if he by any chance supports the AIDS virus, and the guy gives him a funny look and keeps going without bothering to answer, who would you think acted odd?

We're not voting for who acts odd. We're looking for who ascts scum. In your case its definately the first guy. (doesn't want to commit to a view point.)

Empking · Post Post #701 (isolation #52) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:53 am

ortolan wrote:You serious? Why?

Right now I'm all for making Cephrir place the lynching vote on Empking

Er, shouldn't we trying to lynch scum (DP) instead of town.

Empking · Post Post #703 (isolation #53) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 6:59 am

charter wrote:Emp's last post has just gone to the realm of beyond ridiculous.

You don't find not wanting to make a stand scummy? Or is it that you think we should be looking for odd people instead of scum?

I think I already said about Ceph.

Empking · Post Post #707 (isolation #54) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 7:18 am

Empking wrote:Cephrir's recent posts are wierd and don't seem to follow the same thought. Slightly more scummy and he's still one of my big perople I'd vote for.

Charter I asked you a question. It was about you saying that my post in regards to RR's "story" was ridiculous?

Empking · Post Post #716 (isolation #55) » Fri Jan 16, 2009 11:03 pm

charter wrote:
Empking wrote:
Empking wrote:Cephrir's recent posts are wierd and don't seem to follow the same thought. Slightly more scummy and he's still one of my big perople I'd vote for.
Charter I asked you a question. It was about you saying that my post in regards to RR's "story" was ridiculous?
RR's post was to show you that you're being ridiculous. The fact that you gave a serious answer is just taking it too far.

But that quote defines RR's reasons for voting me. Not that I'm acting scummy but that I'm acting odd.

Empking · Post Post #718 (isolation #56) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:03 am

How am I avoiding my own interrogation?

Also, does your silence mean that you are voting me because you think my play is "odd" than scummy.

Empking · Post Post #720 (isolation #57) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:19 am

1. You mean a completely reasonable and pro-town thing?

2. But you wouldn't respond to the fact that your example was a person acting "odd".

Empking · Post Post #722 (isolation #58) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:30 am

Then what do you mean?

Then what's the point of bringing it up?

Empking · Post Post #724 (isolation #59) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:35 am

How did I try to paint the other guy black by really contrived measures?

But if it lacks relevance to this game, what's the point in bringing it up?

Empking · Post Post #726 (isolation #60) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:46 am

So the reason he didn't answer the question was because it was ridiculous?

What has acting odd have to do with finding scum?

Empking · Post Post #728 (isolation #61) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:49 am

What's your excuse for the other questions?

"One thing conceived as representing another;" - So you think acting odd represents acting scummy?

Empking · Post Post #730 (isolation #62) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 2:55 am

The questions I asked him after I answered his.

Why should DP be allowed to ignore questions?

Empking · Post Post #732 (isolation #63) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:08 am

You don't think he was ignoring the questions? Do you think he acknowledged the question? How long did it take you to write 727?

I knew he was ignoring my questions. He knows he was ignoring my question. It isn't a loaded question.

Empking · Post Post #733 (isolation #64) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:08 am

Why do you ask loaded questions?

Empking · Post Post #735 (isolation #65) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:22 am

Why do you keep asking loaded questions?

That's not a loaded question?

So you're saying that DP had enough time to say he didn't have time but not "10 seconds". Did I get that right?

Empking · Post Post #737 (isolation #66) » Sat Jan 17, 2009 3:55 am

Its very loaded. No less loaded than anything I did.

It didn't require reading a big post. It required answering two short questions.

Empking · Post Post #753 (isolation #67) » Mon Jan 19, 2009 5:04 am

Claus wrote:Hey! I'm replacing
CKD
Drunken Piper!

Aren't you happy you won't have to hear rhyming posts anymore?

So, what is the plan?

The plan is for you to explain DPs actions as best you can.

I think DP's overreaction is scummy. Do you agree?

Empking · Post Post #788 (isolation #68) » Wed Jan 21, 2009 5:30 am

Occam wrote:It looks to me like charter was just wrong, not necessarily scum, because of his misunderstanding. Being wrong doesn't make you scum.

Emp still thinks DP's "reluctance" is scummy, so I'm still leaving my vote on him.

What reluctance. Hisreluctance to answer any questions?

Empking · Post Post #806 (isolation #69) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 5:07 am

I haven't had ascum read on Charter.

Vote: Cephrir

Empking · Post Post #818 (isolation #70) » Fri Jan 23, 2009 10:10 pm

charter wrote:LYNCH CEPHRIR

Cmon people. I MUCH prefer just lynching Ceph over trying to force him to hammer Emp.

Empking wrote:I haven't had ascum read on Charter.

Vote: Cephrir
That's nice. Why is the choice only between myself and Ceph? With no one having more than two votes you don't need to throw an unjustified vote around.

Its almost DeadLine.