Dice Vote GO!
Vote: Dice #
Because she was the first to mention that Dice votes were bad. No particular reason other than that.aioqwe wrote:I'm feeling kind of partial to food's attitude, why specifically mention Darla?
My dice vote wasn't helpful at all other than making people accuse me. If I started an interaction with that, I'd probably be the person to get lynched, I'm not good at pulling stuff out of air.aioqwe wrote:food, you dice vote to get interaction from others, why limit yourself from this interaction?
I find this strange, he didn't vote on you directly. He pointed out that the other players who voted on me had weak justifications. Not you.charter wrote:If you're already going to assume that one of four people is scum, I'll just go ahead and assume you're scum.
I have misinterpreted what I have read.sthar8 wrote:Oman, post 32 wrote:Dice tags are wrong and evil, and you should be killed.DarlaBlueEyes, post 33 wrote:I agree Dice tags = Bad.What?Because she was the first to mention that Dice votes were bad. No particular reason other than that.
Food and Kiwi are high on my list, but so are windkirby and strife220.
Oman, would you care to elaborate on your thoughts about strife?
I made a mistake on reading which person accused me first on my dice vote.sthar8 wrote:Food, I was giving you the chance to recognize your mistake and answer the question based on the correct information, since the answer you gave us was either invalid or incomplete. If you'd rather that I vote you over something so small...
Also, please restate "so what if I pointed out that she said a certain person? What will that lead to?" as I'm not sure what you mean by this.
I missed this, sorry.charter wrote: That was a joke, notice the "Serious now"
I can see your point, you think it might be too soon for me to start labeling people.charter wrote: Also, it's not that the people had poor reasons for voting for you, I agree, but you already labeled at least one of them as scum, which I don't neccessarily agree with at this point.
Pun intended?Oman wrote: I have a realbeefwith melikefood's actions here, it seems panicy and really asking for what the town thinks.
Wind Kirby's claim is right after 219, Kirby was at the top of my list before he claimed.charter wrote: @food,melikefood in 219 wrote:Kiwi I don't find suspicious, just defensive trying to bat off accusations from him.
Charter I'm not suspicious of either, his vote was before my dicing and was random.What's this "other's stuff" that prompted this 180 degree turn?melikefood in 268 wrote:Based on other's stuff I'm finding Charter the most suspicious.
I don't find Aiwoqe very suspicious. Only a teeny tiny bit.
If either of these end up being true, then we either Controlled the Mafia's kill or Kept the mafia from attacking.ClockworkRuse wrote:The mafia would claim that he lied to us and is mafia. Get it? Basically, we can't know if he's conformable or not if the mafia no kill. D=melikefood wrote:Clockwork Ruse wrote: The next day, mafia puts blame onto vig saying he faked claimed to try to get rid of the NK immune vig.
I'm lost here, how would the Vig's claim lose credibility if the mafia makes no kill?
Emphasis mine.Oman wrote:I'm an admirer of Creamy Chicken (which I also crumbed early). If Creamy chicken "Finds" me (I) I get a power, or become part of their group (if masonry) or we become lovers, or I become unNKable or something. The role PM effectively says thatthinknow, that means "creams me"there is no way to predict what will happen, who knows?
I read over this thinking that CR might be the doc, but then Charter claimed doc, so I'm wondering if it means anything.ClockworkRuse wrote:Second upon my plate: (I'm emphasising this because I think it's funny, because he's saying plate and he's quoting me FOOD, that's funny.)Am I the only one who feels this is Food throwing out his line and trying to catch the doctor, if there is one?Food, post 232 wrote:I'm forgetful.
I'm aware we're not supposed to lynch him.
Are we sure there's a Doc?