![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_smile.gif)
PS: I love Darkstalkers, love it love it!! <3 <3 <3 <3!!!!
I have no problem with his post because I don't see how a post like his could benefit scum. And lurking is annoying but it doesn't automatically means scum.Drunken Piper wrote:he says he does not like random votes and day 1 posting is a shame,springlullaby wrote:Through the question is not addressed to me, and I'm certainly interested in Sir Tornado's answer, I think your meta is drivel (what a nice word).
Change of gaming style is a null tell, and I don't see how that particular little speech would benefit a scum anyhow. However, what I find more interesting is your bringing up your 'meta' at every turn. Your meta here looks to me as a fine way to appears to be doing your homework, while in fact what you evidenced is inconsequential at the very best.
Unvote, vote: Drunken Piper
I think that the discussion on random voting is drivel also. Bias behind random votes are too hard to divine and too easy to disguise whether from town or scum to be important. What matters is the throwing of accusations, bandwagons etc. That said I also can understand that it's a nice place to start a discussion.
but posts like mad day 1 and random votes in another game?
this does not bother you!
this does not bother you?
he basically says he will not chat (much) this day.
but you feel like his lurker attitude is A ok?
so I have your vote for actually be Hands On and trying to scum hunt.
but you have no problem with his lurking stunt?
Interesting to me,
noting this link, I be.
I am not faking a PR,
check out my other games and you will find them on par.
My case is simple, I think Ross has not said anything of import and have yet to state a clear opinion.Alabaska wrote:I don't understand your case against Ross. You don't mention him at all in the rest of the post and I agree with RogueBen on this one; he seems solid to me. In addition to you comment about lurking, which doesn't make the least bit of sense unless you are defending your partner, IGMEOY: springlullaby.
It is a question you can ask, and I certainly won't answer in his place.Rogueben wrote: The meta is a very valid argument. Why is it that Ranger has decided for this game to make a stance when in many other games he has done nothing of the sort?
Are you kidding me? "Lost in the pages behind"? You asked these questions in the last page only. My last post date from the last page too, and not everyone have yet posted in the meantime, Ranger's replacement has certainly not yet answered to your own prompt yet. So why are you voting me again?DP wrote:reposted them to make it easy to find.
dont want them lost in the pages behind.
In my first post addressing you:Drunken Piper wrote:
Please explain what was crap about my "case"?
I fact checked his first post and found it off base.
Seems to me that if you were of thetown persuasion,.
you might do some Foot work to see if my findings, rose to the occasion
In clear, though I'm not overly fond of meta used as an argument, I did check RotN since you brought it up. The result was that while it is true there is only one prior occurrence of him not placing a random vote (he was town, in a game with nightstart), he has also random voted both as town and mafia: my conclusion is that him choosing not to random vote in this game is a null tell.spring wrote:Through the question is not addressed to me, and I'm certainly interested in Sir Tornado's answer,I think your meta is drivel(what a nice word).
Change of gaming style is a null tell, and I don't see how that particular little speech would benefit a scum anyhow. However, what I find more interesting is your bringing up your 'meta' at every turn. Your meta here looks to me as a fine way to appears to be doing your homework, while in factwhat you evidenced is inconsequential at the very best.
I'll assume these are rhetorical, nevertheless I don't feel like I came to RotN's defense. Though, I'd like you to tell me what should have I done toward finding scum that I didn't do.wrote:Also what have you done toward finding scum?
Thats right, you prefer defending lurkers, right chum?
A slip of what? As far as I can tell, everyone got a rank. Are you saying that scums do not have ranks? How should you know?Mod wrote:What are ranks?
Ranks represent different levels of power among darkstalkers. Some abilities may not work against higher class characters (explained in the role pm).
Ranks in the game are B-Class (lower), A-Class and S-Class (higher). Only darkstalkers have ranks.
GW, link please.GW" wrote: Who can mess with that? I was hoping for a slip involving him saying the lower rank of his "true" role (assuming he was lying) , which I would have jumped on with a link to a site telling you that Morrigan is an S-class character.
armlx, I wasn't implying anything, I stated it quite clearly.armlx wrote: Claus: I think he was insinuating my asking for his rank was me fishing to see if I could use a hypothetical power on him.
I also agree freely talking about ranks is bad, but this scenario was hardly talking freely. In retrospect if I had not specifically asked about the thing his claim was missing (rank) he would have been more likely to slip up, but at the time I was much more worried about him trying to slip back out of a slip up by claiming he had never been asked about it.
Tell me, what other informations need I know 'about those actions'?Mod wrote:What are ranks?
Ranks represent different levels of power among darkstalkers.Some abilities may not work against higher class characters (explained in the role pm).
Ranks in the game are B-Class (lower), A-Class and S-Class (higher). Only darkstalkers have ranks.
This was in response to:armlx wrote:Also, is there any reason you care to dig for role information here?spring wrote:Tell me, what other informations need I know 'about those actions'?Mod wrote:What are ranks?
Ranks represent different levels of power among darkstalkers. Some abilities may not work against higher class characters (explained in the role pm).
Ranks in the game are B-Class (lower), A-Class and S-Class (higher). Only darkstalkers have ranks.
So yeah, pot, kettle.armlx wrote:Also, I think your argument about the information being used to inform decisions against him is pretty bad.That is, unless you have information about those actions that would say otherwise...
I have FoSed them, I didn't vote them. However I did vote DP before.gorckat wrote:Most recently, you had FoSed GW and armlx- why DP over GW?spring wrote:I don't want an Alabaska lynch. I'd prefer a duel at the very least.
No, I know Jedah is cult since the beginning; it means that I was not expecting others enemies than Jedah so I didn't think about expressly breadcrumbing the type of the menace.Claus wrote:springlullaby wrote: Though, I did not have the foresight to precise Jedah was cult as I did not anticipate a mafia.
SL, what does this mean? You were not certain that Jedah was the cult leader?
Can you only find out Jedah? or his culties as well?
What does your flavor tells you about Jedah?
What with the past tense?armlx wrote: Also, when I died all my recruits unconverted, though they didn't know that.