for actively lurking...
Open 56 - Masons and Monks (GAME OVER) before 542
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
^^Thats as shatery a question as I would expect from a derailing asshat.^^
But seriously, the only thing as derailing as asshatery is complaining or commenting on asshatery, which is also known as ass hater-y.
Shouldn't it be asshattery, with two tease? As asshatery, with one would be the hatred of asses.Mod: Have you prodded Tyler-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
@kabenon007- Too townie is fine for your own personal scumhunting. To convince a town you need something more easy to digest... like voting for yourself and failing to read correctly. These are very well established scumtells with a high degree of accuracy, thus more likely to earn the praise of your fellow townies.-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
...Seriously...
two comments
Oman wrote:This guy seems pretty newbie, and you jump on him for his fallacy rather than explaining it to him.
...this all I can find, (If I am missing something please let me know) mixed in with several attacks on you for your "too townie" remarks. How is it that the idea that he has defended you perpetuates?Oman wrote:Aye, but I felt him voting the way he did was incorrect.-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
thinktank is over defensive in the face of a lack luster and unconvincing accusations. If he had just ignored flameaxe (a seemingly sound and logical response) there would be no wagon on him at all. Besides that, I can only assume that TylerJ has misread the game once again, given that he has failed to justify his vote.-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
Just for giggles, lets review the cases for each of our pet suspects (tyler,
thinktank, Kabenon007, Kuribo) I going with Tyler, so I will say this:
1) Hasn't paid attention to the game. Several examples can be provided if need be.
2) Desperate to find anywhere to land his vote. First it was thinktank because he was sure that Flameaxe was right, and then Flameaxe himself for claiming day cop.
3) Hammers somebody that he obviously had doubts about when we were waiting for a claim, consider:
Farside offers up a reason. And LP's status is elevated to L-1. TylerJ's Contribution?tyler wrote:please explain the votes on LP.
I would love to know what "wasn't right". Of course, whatever it is, he manages to not make a stand one way or another by dismissing it in that same sentence.tyler wrote:holy smokes, somethings not right with this picture, well then again, we are at a deadline.
...but lets continue with the same post:
He "highly doubts" that he will hammer but seems to think that "before I do a hammer" is an appropriate beginning to this sentence. It is as if the exact opposite were true and he knew he would hammer but wanted to make it appear that he was earnestly torn on the subject.tyler wrote:But before I do a hammer (which I highly doubt I will), I will have to reread.
thirty five minutes later...
He is considering it... Somehow we are expected to believe that he posts in real time, unable to remove his, " I am considering it..." and "Arrghh... what the heck" prior to making his post to kill LP. I think it is much more likely that he is making yet another attempt to remind us that his is uncertain. That way, when LP turns up townie, he doesn't look quiet so opportunistic.tyler wrote:For his lame vote on thinktank and his wierd evaluation on himself I am considering it...
Arrghh... what the heck. vote:lutinetpowell-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
I don't understand this interpretation of kuribo's actions. It seems to me that he is voting for you because Jdodge was Nked, not because LP was lynched. What causes you to believe that LP's lynch is the reason he is voting for you?thinktank wrote:You went from Kabennon to me this game day because LP was lynched last gameday?-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
Why FA is voting thinktank:
FA wrote:I am following my esophagus.FA wrote:My posts regarding anatomy explained that vote, but you are too busy to leave them out to make your bullshit attack seem worthwhile.FA wrote:I explained my vote, and you even mentioned it in your post!FA wrote:You asked me to explain my vote, and I already did. What else did you want me to explain about it? Also: post 53.FA wrote:For being a hypocrite.FA wrote:Yes, but the thing is...it's not just you being a hypocrite, its what you are being hypocritical about. I'm gonna give someone else a chance to look over your posts to see if they find it too! It's like a game!FA wrote:I had no reason now? Okay then. Assumptions are cool, and thinktank is scum.FA wrote:I've already stated why in full detail why I'm voting thinktank.
I don't know... make some sort of effort to help the town kill that scum. Just saying "I found scum" does not accomplish this. "Following your esophagus" does not accomplish this. Alienating people and making light of repeated attempts to get a verbose response on this subject does not accomplish this.FA wrote:I found scum, what more do you want?-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
Undecided on both counts. Tyler's play is par for the course, but I refuse to dimiss him as a suspect just because he is always distracting and unsettling. Same thing for Flameaxe.Farside wrote:@pwayne66: Do you still think Tyler is scum. Do you think flameaxe was right to point out thinktank or is he being silly.
The only thing suspicous about Thinktank's play is that he has taken anything flameaxe has said seriously. This causes me to think that he is too sensitive.-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
Just saying his name. It seemed appropriate somehow. I thought that if he got the attention that he is so desperately seeking he might stop the whoring and start playing. I was wrong.Farside wrote:So do you think flameaxe is scum or are you just saying his name?
So why should I not think that your vote is a little OMGUSy?
Either way, I'll have more tomorrow.-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
TT hasn't denied this. How do you justify calling him a liar?farside wrote:Two quote you called him scummie and neither time you voted for him...Please lynch the liar that is trying to save his obvious scum buddy
I don't think so. Please direct me to where this is occurring.kabenon wrote:Well, not much to say, except that Flameaxe still is playing that same game as usual, thinktank I am beginning to get pissed at. It seems to me that he is trying to pass the buck onto me. He is acting like he has given up his life and is instead trying to pin himself to a townie, or even more hopefully, another scum team member, so that the town will think that the patsy is thinktank's scum buddy. It just seems too obvious, doesn't it?
...or it could mean that he misplaced the second vote and was forced to only vote once.farside wrote:You put two people as scum pair and are voting on me which tells me you are trying to save your scum partner.
Why? You list three players that everybody else is suspicious of and then say this. This is not content.tylerj wrote:I'm leaning more on the farside-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
I think it is likely that I consider you a suspect tomorrow if TT turns scum or town. And though I have every reason to believe that TT turns scum, I like your odds of being scum even better.
You called Oman out for the same thing day 1 and it seems that the only beef you have with TT is that he is that he is trying to make you look scummy. This can only be an issue if you believe that he is scummy himself, otherwise he's just a dude that hasn't voted for you yet.
The situation is beginning to look more like this: You are pissed at TT for being too obvious and buckling under light scrutiny from farside and no you are overly anxious to bus him.
That's my take for the time being, I would like a claim from TT.-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66
-
-
pwayne66 Goon
- Goon
- Goon
- Posts: 791
- Joined: April 9, 2007
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-