Mini 1501: We're On A Boat! (END?! results inside)
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 27, Kazekirimaru wrote:Not sure how to feel about miller claim.
Seen it legit before; seen it used as a scum gambit before.Kazekirimaru is probably scum. Only need two pages to figure that out.
Brian is town. Doesn't feel like a tactic scum would adopt right from the very start. WIFOM all you want but it is just far more logical and probable Brian is telling the truth."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 58, Aeronaut wrote:Hmm.... not much explanation for the vote, this vote was after the claim, so I'd say that's what its for. Seems Legit.
Quite the insightful read! very thorough thought process. Seems legit.
Gives actual reasoning, must be a scumbag, obviously.
So, the question is, what makes me so special?In post 65, Aeronaut wrote:
Yea?In post 60, Brian Skies wrote:@aeronaut: The difference is that notscience made the vote after clearly participating in the discussion. You made your vote upon your entrance.
This is an entrance vote as well. ^In post 57, YYR wrote:The fact that an RVS wagon got formed on Brian before his claim seems entirely too coincidental, and the way he expressed his claim doesn't help alleviate that suspicion. But I like this wagon more:
Vote: Aeronaut
Sorry, didn't mean to rain on your logic, guess I didn't see it there since it doesn't exist.
Aeronaut mainly pointing to others when defending himself.
"They're doing it too.", twice in a row.
Scummy. Instead of explaining his own motivations, he's pointing at others to do it for him."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
HE DID IT ON PURPOSE! HE BORKED IT UP ON PURPOSE!!! THAT DEVIOUS DEVIL!!!! WHAT COULD HE BE UP TO?????In post 83, Kazekirimaru wrote:Lulz. How do you bork up like that on accident?
Such a ridiculous beginning of an argument. Truly.
why u not see? -_-
Why u not ask more question to Rikiscum-san? -_-
Whya you succka da duck?????
(That last one was Italian!)"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
If Kazekirimaru is not scum I'll eat the print-out of this topic!!
A4 size.
Printed back to back (the environment).
Slide show-print, obviously (the environment, you know)
The ammount of slides per page pending on hunger at the time.
LOLLLL!
But I'll do it! I'll eat a piece of paper if Kazekirimaru is not scum!"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I'm not sure I should do the rest of my catch-up under these circumstances. I'll be back later. This is not the place to fluff. Too many pages already, Grim! No use in giving yourself more post to catch-up on. Noooooooooh sirreh.
That last word also counted as an apology (expressed by a retarded child who would pronounce said apologetic word in that peculiar way)"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Y U SO SZERIOUS? LIGHTEN UP MOTHAFCKAAH! This is a game!In post 712, Grimgroove wrote:You guys should re-read the first three pages.
Kazkirimaru is obvscum as far as I can tell. But nobody seems to notice him.
"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
(this is me talking to myself. This is not a hydra-account!! I suddenly envisaged myself in some heavenly prison (being it's in the clouds, other than that there's nothing heavenly about it, let me assure you) after beingt somehow mistaken to be a hydra account and possibly inadvertently having, wait that makes no sense. SOOOWWWY)
Please don't send me to that jail!!! Don't let the pink skies fool you, that prison is HELL!!!! It's so cold"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 710, Grimgroove wrote:Liking fferyllt on page 2.
Smoooth dawg. Real smooth, proud o' ya!"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I love you.In post 720, fferyllt wrote:Hi Grimgroove.
You're coming off a lot less srsbznz than the last time we played.
I must admit I may have taken a less serious stance so far. This is for un-game related reasons.
I'm really not very sure how to embark on this catch-up in a sensible way, it's so difficult. I'm probably talking about ancient history for you guys. A boring old history teacher
So I decided to have some fun first. And then some fun here. I'll be serious again later. Promise!
I'll probably say seuwjie in a very stand-up citizen like way.
(not saying that retarded children cannot be stand-up citizens as well. They MOST CERTAINLY can!)"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Scum #2.In post 727, CrashTextDummie wrote:Can we please feed Grimgroove rope?
Want me to die before I get a word in huh? I'll keep an eye on you.
Thank you for your kind of advice to whoever it was that gave me kind advice. Very kind of you. Kind of. Also a bit mean."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
In post 27, Kazekirimaru wrote:Not sure how to feel about miller claim.
Seen it legit before; seen it used as a scum gambit before.In post 62, Kazekirimaru wrote:
Idk about HIS miller claim. But miller claims in general are not null. Apples and oranges.In post 57, YYR wrote: You express yourself rather unsure about the miller claim, but yet are so adamant about them not being null tells in your next post. Then surely you have more of an opinion on the miller claim besides 'I dunno,' especially with the potential of the growing wagon.
I'm pretty alright with the aeronaut vote right meow
Unvote
VOTE: Aeronaut
To be honest I'm really not certain how to undertake this catch-up. I'm in it for fun and browsing through 25 pages and taking miticulous notes on everyone simply isn't going to happen. Normally I like to be precise in communication but it would be too tedious to cover all those pages in my usual style.In post 68, Kazekirimaru wrote:Bad excuses are bad and you should feel bad.
We got a live one, here.
Given the pressure that's apparently on my slot, I doubt a summary of reads on people will convince you, but I don't see any other way of doing this. The fact the pressure is coming from fferyllt I'm not automatically assuming this is scumlead given my townread on her, so I guess there are sincere concerns, which will probably will need to be aleviated by yours truly.
Later I'll get into the existing case on my slot, as far as I'll be able to because it's quite difficult to talk for someone else.
The spamming stops now. I was not entirely myself and I'm sorry for having been an annoyance. It all seemed very funny at the time."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I feel a bit silly after yesterday.
But
@mod: I'm repeating my request for a deadline extension, as that was not drugs-induced. Of two days maybe? Don't know if this is alright for others, but I'd like to get my head properly in this game. Tomorrow is looking good for a complete read-through."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Reading up now. I figured out how to do this. I wrote down all of your names on a piece of paper, and will now read through the topic. If I read posts of yours that make me think something about you, I'll write down what it is I think. And then I'll compile those thoughts in a summary of 1 or 2 lines, which will be the output you'll see.
I won't be making any references to specific posts, too tedious and given there will be no extension time is money. But I'll try to put a vote down and you'll get my promise/guarantee it will be a thought-out one.
After that catch-up, consider me in the game and feel free to interact with me directly, based on my reads or with questions that seem pertinent to you."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
So I reached page 6. What I got so far:
Main topics were:
The Miller Claim
First off: I believe it. Post 18 I was almost sold, but then fferyllt's 36 sealed the deal for me. I find a gambit highly unlikely.
When it comes to the reactions to this claim:
I liked: fferyllt, notscience, ChannelDeliBird, Spyrex, CrashTextDummy (even though several people voiced different opinions on the matter, the way they put forward arguments sounded town-intentioned)
I disliked: Aeronaut, Kazekirimaru
Aeronaut's vote on Brian and his tone
I agreed with it being quite scummy, both tone and the vote.
I liked fferyllt's response to it and the way she probed Aeronaut.
I didn't like Kazekirimaru's initial push on the matter, especially because he was focussing on technicalities like Aeronaut making some mistake by quoting the wrong post.
I did not like Smudger's reaction to it.
General notes on players so far:
Liking both SpyreX and fferyllt as obvious town, already after 6 pages. The 133 and 135 really made me sorry I wasn't there at the time. Would love to become part of their town-affair and form some kind of love-triangle. I had the EXACT same thoughts as fferyllt in 133 when reading that discussion, and had the EXACT same feelings as Spyrex in 135. Beautiful.
Which brings me to both Garmr and notscience. both read like town to me. Garms I had written down "well-intentioned newbie". notscience is living up to the town-meta I think I know of him, a bit self-involved but I liked his moderate reaction to Garmr's case.
ChannelDeliBird always looks cranky. At least in the beginning of the game, but also while I was posting high. Somehow, I can't match "crankiness" with scum. You can say it's an emotion that's a null-tell, but I just can't wrap my head around cranky scum. His doubts surrounding the miller-claim seemed very pro-town and the way he talked himself out of policy lynching a miller felt very genuine.
Aeronaut, not liking his opportunistic vote on Brian. During the fallout of that, his defense was focussed on pointing at others ("they're doing the same") and on technicalities. Not feeling good about that slot, saw he replaced out but didn't see anything from SleepyKrew yet.
CrashTextDummie read very opportunistic to me at first, both by asking for more rope for me while I was how I was, and by taking such a strong stance on "lynch all millers". But after reading his explanation on why he thought millers should be lynched, I ciould see town motivations shine through it. I like how he found the inconsistency between the Wiki and what Brian was saying. It's something you'd only be looking for as town thinking you can catch scum.
Smudger (now Lolwagons) is my biggest scumread so far. His posts are off the beaten track, but without really leading us anywhere.
On top of that he stalls ongoing debates by questioning what normally should not be questioned from a Town PoV, namely their (the ongoing discussions') use. Not constructive at all.
Plum wasn't participating in the game yet by page 6.
Maestro was neither, I was genuinely surprised when I saw his "waaaaat"-post. Felt like a post of some out-of-game-observer.
Brian Skies: I believe his claim and I said why. Not much to add to that.
Kazekirimaru (Peabody): Not as sold on him being scum anymore. While I did not like his reaction to the miller claim (contradictory) and to Aeronaut's vote (opportunistic), the top of page 5 was a game-changer for me. There he really took clear stances for clear reasons, looking all the better for it. Maybe I should get ready putting that A4-paper in some blender.
More later. But already quite some townreads to show for only 6 pages"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
My lynchpool for this daystage will be, partially based on PoE, in order of current preference:
Lolwagons, SleepyKrew (apart from what was mentioned above about thier predecessors, not liking their interaction (Lolwagons still being Smudger at the time) at the second half of page 7/page 8, maybe it's confbias talking but this reads like a play between two scum, where one can play "Mr. Why U Townread Me?", which always scores with the ladies, and the other one can come out unscathed because his fluffy interrogator allows him to)
Plum (bad gut feeling after his big entry-post)
Empire (still no read at this point, so he still is an option)
And I'm extremely surprised only one of them currently has a vote on him.
Still reading-up, but I feel strongly enough about it to already express my intentions in this regard."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Hmmm.In post 203, pitoli wrote:In post 202, SleepyKrew wrote:@mod
Can we see sample Miller, Mafia Goon and Serial Killer Role PMs?
No clue if that's actually allowedNice try, but no lol
Not sure if I should do this, but this does read like a mod-town-interaction.
Hrm. But the request itself by sleepyKrew is scummy. There was simply no way of getting those samples from the mod. Asking it feels like it's more for show than for result.
Continuing catch-up."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Suddenly, I'm starting to wonder about Brian Skies.
While fferyllt made a good point about a newer player not enetering a game with a gambit like that, I suddenly wonder: Is he a newer player?
Remember the inconsistency between the Wiki-page on Miller-claims and Brian's explanation of why he did it and what he was thinking when doing it.
He said he read the wiki-page, but CarshTextDummie gave reasons to believe he didn't: the thing Brian was referring to was not formulated in the Wiki in the way Brian formulated.
If Brian was speaking out of experience, rather than out of wiki-reading, it means he's not a new player at all, but faking to be one.
The reason I ask this is because I had a painful experience with someone faking to be a newbie and coasting through the entire game with it. (http://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=29135, SunnyDays pretended to be a newbie but wasn't)
I want reassurance that Brian Skies is effectively a newbie. I'm putting my strong townread on him on hold until that time.
Regardless of these reservations I don't think Brian Skies should be lynched today. The way I understand it once a Miller-claim has occured, there's a form of natural selection that transpires, sparing us from having to do heavy-thinking."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Don't have much time left and won't be online anymore, but to already address one point: you're putting my townread on CrashTextDummy into question, right?
I don't think it's something scum would do, no, going to look at a Wiki-page to find an inconsistency.
Why? Because scum wouldn't expect even in the slightest to find one. So why bother?
That's where my townread on CTD differs with CDB's reason for townreading notscience: CTD showed genuine town-motivated activity.
notscience did not show activity, only the motivation.
That being said, I also think notscience is town.
You seem awfully preoccupied with questioning townreads, SleepyKrew? Getting too cramped for you?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I don't judge based on meta. You act like town here and that's all that I manage to take into account.In post 842, fferyllt wrote:grimgroove, your read of me is so different in this game from our one prior. I'd expect a course correction of sorts, but 1) my play in this game is quite different and 2) it's a really huge course correction."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I don't know who CTD specifically is, but I don't see why anyone would check a wiki-page without being able to expect to find something like a contradiction. Scum would not expect to find anything, so would not go looking. CTD went looking so isn't scum. It's really not that difficult and has got nothing to do with the person CTD.In post 837, SleepyKrew wrote: You're addressing the wrong part. Do you think checking the wiki is something specificallyCTDhasn't doesn't wouldn't do as scum?
Yes this one vote on me with no support from anyone else makes me really nervous
I'm def not questioning townreads that I think have been explained with questionable reasons
That's too high level for me
Not my vote on you is maknig you nervous, it's the amount of townreads going on inhere. You try to discredit them in hopes of opening up the lynchpool, keeping your options to mislynch open. Is that too high-level thinking for you?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
And about my style being obnoxious I only have one thing to say: fuck you.
I'll approach this game as I damn well please. You think it's scummy? Vote me for it. You think it's obnoxious: shut the fuck up and put yourself in my shoes.
You didn't have opinions after ten pages? You were in a vacuum of thoughts, simply thrudging along until you reached page 20?
Of course I have opinions and ideas after reading through 10 pages, so did all of you. And I see no reason at all why opinions obtained after 10 pages are worth less. I'm taking the same course you all did and I'm jotting down the thoughts that go with it.
So yes CTD, you can swallow your advice, get off your high-horse and take my reads seriously. Actually READ what I have to say about people, instead of just dismissing everything just because it somehow doesn't fit your way of "catching up". I cannot do one big read-through and summarize conclusions. It is tedious and boring. Taking this thing page by page and commenting on it in such a way feels much more participatory for me.
If I want to read 35 pafges and write a summary about it I'll go back to highschool and ask for a reading assignment.
Plum has a booboo cuz I don't townread him apparently Funny how you would say I'm appeasing when that's the exact thing I didn't do with you."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
That's reassuring enough.In post 839, fferyllt wrote:
I asked Brian about his mafia experience in the first game I played with him. His answer is here.In post 830, Grimgroove wrote:While fferyllt made a good point about a newer player not enetering a game with a gambit like that, I suddenly wonder: Is he a newer player?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Single posts can be game-changers, yes. Remember that my obvscum-read on Kaze came into existence under circumstances of overestimation of my skills. What Kaze has shown on the top of page 5 completely conflicted with what I thought of him, and was a game-changer. Sorry to hear you don't like it. And even more sorry to hear your reads apparently don't change. Sounds like I'm in a pickle!In post 840, CrashTextDummie wrote:
A single post by Kaze was "game-changing" enough for you to reverse an "obvscum" read. 4 pages later, you're confident enough to narrow the scum down to 4 people. I'm finding it very hard to take your reads seriously.
My thought process has already been clarified, but I'll humour you:
You were "almost sold" by his ISO #3 and Fferyllt doubting whether a new player would make such a gambit "sealed the deal". You are now questioning whether he's a new player, which I can see "unsealing the deal", but I don't see how it affects the basis of your alleged read. Please explain your thought process.In post 830, Grimgroove wrote:Suddenly, I'm starting to wonder about Brian Skies.
1. Brian Skies claims Miller : I'm not sure what to think.
2. Brian Skies explains why he claimes Miller: I see his point and thus an argument in favor of believing him.
3. fferyllt says the odds of a new player starting with a gambit like that are very low: I agree with this and thus secure my townread, without putting into question that Brian is indeed a newer player.
Some time passes.
I don't know why, I don't know how, but suddenly I am reminded of the game I linked you to earlier, where someone pretended to be a newbie, made an idiotic claim when he replaced into the game which was either A. a retarded scumclaim, B. an understandable mistake to make for a newbie. Given his newbishness and the general sense he was portraying, we went for option B and never questioned it. He won as scum, and admitted to having played the part of a stupid newbie in order to get out of that pickle.
This dark memory had a certain parallel, where someone being new was read as town, with a big part due to his newbishness. Hence my wonderment.
1. I am not a machine.
What about this game is giving you trouble exactly? This is not a particularly strenuous game to replace into, there's more than plenty of one- and two-line posts to balance out the modest walls.In post 735, Grimgroove wrote:To be honest I'm really not certain how to undertake this catch-up. I'm in it for fun and browsing through 25 pages and taking miticulous notes on everyone simply isn't going to happen. Normally I like to be precise in communication but it would be too tedious to cover all those pages in my usual style.
2. I want to have fun. (an important rule in the game, if I recall correctly)
The manner in which you've elected to structure your analysis strikes me as dubious. You're moving through the game at a snail's pace, all the while insisting on a deadline extension. I get portioning a read-through upon replacing in, but not in a game of this size. Meticulously giving reads after having read 6 pages of a 30 page game is completely over the top. It screams "look at how comprehensive my thought process is!".There is very little pro-town benefit to most of what you've contributed so far, because you've demonstrated twice now that even your most strongly worded reads are far from solid.The only real benefit to your manner of posting is that it tends to garner town reads, providing strong scum motivation to do so. I've used similar tactics as scum in the past and it works remarkably well (and is easy to pull off to boot).
If you are town, you need to stop what you're doing, spend an hour and a half reading the full game andthengive your reads.
I resent the first part of that which is bolded. My entrance was not up to certain standards, but what I offered was definitely pro-town. If not the reads, then at least the arguments I provided for them. Instead of putting over a blanket over them by this general criticism based on how YOU would play as scum, I would have appreciated a more detailed response that what it was I said.
And the second part you're not being very fair here. The Kaze-read should not be taken into account as you know full-well what the circumstances of that read were, and the doubts I had surrounding Brian never involved a sudden review, just an on-hold for reasons I believe are pretty understandable.
You've got your big head into a tunnel and I fear it's too big to get out of it again. I'll try to find some lubricant but no promises."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
*sigh*In post 232, SleepyKrew wrote: Okay quick look at his ISO (lol) and yeah you're right. Didn't think about it that way. Carry on.
Maybe read his ISO before critisizing people who voted him?
This post exemplifies what I think of SleepyKrew's entrance: he critisizes, questions everything, but what does he do? Is there any factual backing to his criticism? And when questioned himself always chooses for the "attack is the best defense"-adagio. He never allows the discussion to revolve around his behavior. He's busy kicking the sand under his feet, all around him, until we can't see him anymore."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Meaning he could have been lying about his newbishness there, as well as here?In post 867, fferyllt wrote:FYI he was scum in that game.
Anyway, like has been said before, it will sort itself out. I think there's people who are scummy enough in order to warrant a normal lynch, instead of having to resort to policy-lynching a miller now. That stuff will sort itself out eventually."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
It's the second time I see you mention that, as you already used it against me.In post 263, Plum wrote:Is anyone even voting him currently that he's still inundated with minutinae of defense and clearing up stuff?
What is your problem with minutinae? Why is it scummy to approach the game in such a way? You realize we're talking playstyle here, right?"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Why?In post 878, Peabody wrote:As I reviewed his iso, I wanted to lynch him,
If it helps, I withdraw my assertion that I will eat paper. This wasn't meant to have any effect on the game (if I recall correctly these things are even against the rules, real-life wagers and stuff like that).
There is no way I will be eating any paper."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Yes, your criticism of the other Maestro votes was bad too, as they were based on the same posts you find in that eye-opening ISO.In post 881, SleepyKrew wrote:
What the hell is that first lineIn post 869, Grimgroove wrote:
*sigh*In post 232, SleepyKrew wrote: Okay quick look at his ISO (lol) and yeah you're right. Didn't think about it that way. Carry on.
Maybe read his ISO before critisizing people who voted him?
This post exemplifies what I think of SleepyKrew's entrance: he critisizes, questions everything, but what does he do? Is there any factual backing to his criticism? And when questioned himself always chooses for the "attack is the best defense"-adagio. He never allows the discussion to revolve around his behavior. He's busy kicking the sand under his feet, all around him, until we can't see him anymore.
That is bullshit condescending "advice" because you're pretending all the Maestro votes were as thought out as ffery's when clearly they weren't. Yeah my criticism of her vote was bad, that's why I dropped it. Do you think my criticism of the other Maestro votes was bad too? How come I didn't drop that?
Please show me multiple examples of me being questioned and replying as you described
How am I stopping discussion about myself? Examples?
It's not bullshit condescending advice. It's me calling you scum for not having even checked what MAestro had said but instead decided to go around showing everyone how "critical" you are. Always there with the "why's" but you haven't even bothered figuring out the "what's". Because you don't need to. you know what's what because you're scum.
And it's a thing that's difficult to get through examples. People should do as I did (and as notscience is doing) and simply re-read the topic. Somehow it gives you a certain perspective and a certain feel of things. I'm quite positive everyone re-reading the thread will end up voting you.
Too bad there's only a day left, guess your free lynch is served and it's called "Brian à la façon du Scum"."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
OMG U WINIn post 884, SleepyKrew wrote:
No they weren'tIn post 883, Grimgroove wrote:Yes, your criticism of the other Maestro votes was bad too, as they were based on the same posts you find in that eye-opening ISO.
They were lolpressure look at us we're useful
Clearly not the same as ffery's
Oh no proof okay thenIn post 883, Grimgroove wrote:And it's a thing that's difficult to get through examples. People should do as I did (and as notscience is doing) and simply re-read the topic. Somehow it gives you a certain perspective and a certain feel of things. I'm quite positive everyone re-reading the thread will end up voting you.
I'll just sit back and see how this Day plays out. I'm not in a position to change a course that's been taken during a period of 35 pages, and I don't feel like bothering right now anyway. Possibly toMorrow. No reason to believe both of us won't be there to see that happen.
For now I'm hoping the question marks I've raised around you will move other people to try and see what I see. It's not that difficult to see it, really. Sometimes it's better to let posts and iso's speak for themselves. Right now I see more merit in pointing people where to look.
Town just has to be able to do better than a policy lynch on a miller claim of someone who appears to be MiA after all this time. My hopes are vested on this idea."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Lolwagons reads much more town than his predecessor.
I don't understand why none of you contemplate a SleepyKrew-lynch. I seriously don't.
I'll read up on Empire specifically now. Spyrex and fferyllt pulling it gives me faith.
Spyrex and fferyllt: What are your views on SleepyKrew?
@ferryllt: my lynchpool is SleepyKrew - Plum - Empire and given his behavior from last night, well, I can't say I'm liking Brian all that much anymore. But SleepyKrew is on his wagon, which gives me enormous pause, and somehow I would understand that a miller is demotivated at a stage like this."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I've just ISO'd Empire and I have to say: it's difficult not to be impressed.
I don't see what you mean by him not scumhunting or townhunting. 423 blew me off my socks in that regard. The level of analysis shown there is just how I would like to have done it.
And in 411 he provided a perspective on the miller claim I hadn't even considered before: pre-game scum QT-talk. It's true, scum could have devided this plan, and who better to perform it than Brian Skies, the newbie nobody will suspect of having thought of such a thing?
I can't see Empire-scum. I'm looking at Lolwagons' and Spyrex' ISO now to see what case he's got against him, but from what I've seen Empire did attack Spyrex, making the latter's vote suddenyl look quite opportunistic. This could be a blitzwagon, with a lack of town-consensus, that Spyrex is trying to force through on character rather than on argument.
It appears I inadvertently entered the Champions League by joining in this game. Slowly starting to feel this is all going over my head.
That said: I prefer a Brian-lynch over an Empire-lynch right now. 411 is an eye-opener and Brian's latest behavior fits that scenario perfectly."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Yeah!
Let's do this.
VOTE: Sleepy Krew
Every reads list you guys post sways me again. Brian Skies isn't scum. Look at his read on Sleepy Krew, it's so wonderfully correct and just like how I foresaw: if you re-read the topic you can see SleepyKrew is scum. It's not something that can be seen from one post, it's something that you feel, through his interactions with everything, on a whole."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
So, I started a little game that I thought would be fun, but it got tedious after 5 minutes. I did manage to get something out of it, I think.
ISO SleepyKrew.
What is the first thing you notice?
QUESTIONS!
Questions everywhere. His entire ISO reads like a barrage of questions, it's a vulcan gun set on topspeed firing questions in every direction.
sleepyKrew has more than 180 posts in this topic so going too far with this exercise wouldn't be good, but these are the questions from just his first 39 posts (so not even half of his activity).
Spoiler: Question-Time
Observation number 1:
Most of these questions have two things in common: 1. Tedious to answer. 2. Pointless.
1. is what scum wants because it makes everyone who doesn't answer in full look bad.
2. Pointless as there is no clear track of follow-up that I can discern. SleepyKrew ending up on the miller-wagon is an indication of this.
What is the possible follow-up of all these "why"-questions? You think scum can't come up with "reasons"? It's the easiest thing to do.
"What are your thoughts", same.
SleepyKrew doesn't mind long posts so my question to him: Pick five questions out of that list and tell me what you learned from them.
Observation 2:
SleepyKrew asks more than he answers. He's taking this game to anything that's not about him, even when talking about him. When you talk about him, he turns it around and makes it about you, too lazy to find examples, to useless in his votes, too this or too that. This is the sandstorm I've been talking about, and SleepyKrew created it with his tempest of ?????????"What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
So conflicted
Not liking this bit AT ALL
What does that have to do with luck? You're sounding like the "world is against me"-type of person here. AtE...In post 937, Brian Skies wrote:With my luck, I might not even be around in time for the deadline hammer, but who knows.
What does it even matter if you're around for the hammer or not? You look like you just said all you wanted to say.
I wish SleepyKrew-Brian Skies in a scumteam would make more sense, life would be easier."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Where are you guys?
I'll be back tomorrow in around 14 hours, so I'll be here during the last hour of deadline. If the SleepyKrew-train didn't gain any traction I'm aleady now claiming willingness to hop on Brian's choochoo.
Empire, no, not feeling it, sorry, you'll have to look elsewhere for support for that one."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Agreed wholeheartedly.In post 1038, Peabody wrote:Garmr's post looks like a 'congratulating the doctor' tell.
SK's attack on the Maestro wagon was weird to begin with as was pointed out before. The coaching. The chainsaw defense of the Maestro slot.
VOTE: SleepyKrew
I'm fairly confident NS is town. His meta matches exactly with a previous game I've had with him as town. Exactly. And while this made me suspicious at first, I decided that plus NS's vote on Maestro early makes him town.
VOTE: SleepyKrew[/post]
I don't have much else to add at this point, apart from the fact that Plum's effort in 1031 rings town to me, though I'd like to hear more about her pre-selection process when lifiting out those three. Empire had me fooled, there's no denying it, and the vig really did town a huge favor because I don't think he was going to get lynched very easily. Other reads remain unchanged, though ChannelDeliBird's grumpiness is becoming less of a decisive factor in my townread on him, which is wavering fiercely given I don't remember seeing him around ever since I sobered up here."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Not a lot of time right now, but I'm suddenly being townread by quite a few people and I'm not sure that's sitting very well with me.
Especially ChannelDeliBird suddenly considering me his strongest townread seems quite out there. MAybe afte rthe Empire-debacle scum thinks me to be easily swooned and manipulated, but free townreads like that just feel like buddying. No matter how much enthousiasm I show and how much heart I put into it ("sheer volume and heart"), those are not clear-cut towntells and I find it odd you use these as your arguments to call me your top townread."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
I can't say I like CDB's case on fferyllt. First it was such a bold thing to do to scrutinize someone who's considered obvtown by most, bold as in townish. But looking at the case, I don't actually see much of a case. The little he presents also comes with such an apologetic tone he seems to realize himself his arguments don't hold much water. I like Garmr's 1066.
Let's get this wagon rolling.
VOTE: ChannelDeliBird
But let's not forget about SleepyKrew. The man can't be allowed to prod his way out of our attention field."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
You asking this question points to possible scum motivation.In post 1072, ChannelDelibird wrote:On my phone so can't post much but, Grimgroove, ffery, what do you think was the scum motivation for presenting my thoughts on ffery as I did?
Like I said, at first I thought you were tiown for swimming against the stream by picking on fferyllt, an obvscum read for many. And I think this is the reaction you wanted to go for, because in essence there is indeed no scum motivation for doing so. But that in itself is scum motivation enough. The fact you're confident we can't find any scum motivation ehind your push (which is evident since you asked the question) further points in this direction.
The nature of the push doesn't sound sincere, and combined with this question, I think you only did it to instill the reaction that you clearly wanted: us thinking you're town for doing something that has no discernable scum motivation behind it."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013
Same here. I think the only way to approach this reasonably is to go for interactions. My scumreads on SleepyKrew and CDB feel pretty solid though, I don't see what I could add more to the fferyllt-CDB discussion other than say CDB hasn't convinced me. SleepyKrew is in prod-mode and still hasn't addressed anything I said about/to him making further participation from my side difficult at this point."What truffles are to pigs so are these charlatans and pettifoggers to my mental acuity." - Frasier-
-
Grimgroove Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Mafia Scum
- Posts: 3538
- Joined: March 27, 2013