Open 127 (Lovers Nightless -- GAME OVER) before 761

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #8 (isolation #0) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:12 pm

Way to parrot...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #10 (isolation #1) » Sun Mar 15, 2009 11:17 pm

You are scum for parroting.

Vote: sekinj

Better?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #12 (isolation #2) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 12:02 am

Oh, no! NO MORE NUMBERS ITHURTSMYMIND

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #32 (isolation #3) » Mon Mar 16, 2009 11:11 am

So... we don't care if Empking hammers random people?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #38 (isolation #4) » Tue Mar 17, 2009 11:05 am

I don't like this connection emerging between Mith and Empking, especially since Emp is now being more logical than he's been acting in any of his other games.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #48 (isolation #5) » Wed Mar 18, 2009 11:19 am

Plum, our best lead now is to test this interaction between our two suspects. The question is whether we lynch the founder of MS or the useless VI.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #55 (isolation #6) » Thu Mar 19, 2009 10:25 am

Possible pairings:
Mith/Emp
Plum/Emp
Plum/Ort

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #61 (isolation #7) » Fri Mar 20, 2009 3:36 pm

Unvote

Plum's attempt at taking the heat off Mith is noted.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #72 (isolation #8) » Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:25 pm

Empking: WTF

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #101 (isolation #9) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:59 am

Sekinj, There are more than four people in this game. Therefore, your statistics are fabricated and scummy.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #106 (isolation #10) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:32 am

Your statistics ARE fabricated. You can't claim that there's a fifty fifty chance of someone being scum unless it's a four player game.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #108 (isolation #11) » Mon Mar 23, 2009 10:39 am

Till everyone is gone? Is that a scum signal?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #124 (isolation #12) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 11:46 am

I would vote Mith if the votecount were reset. Instead of responding to my accusations of Plum pairing he asks me why Emp isn't as suspicious. Emp is playing like he does in every game, being largely unhelpful and not really making much sense. Mith, however, has an urge to try to reason and argue with him, which he ALREADY KNOWS is useless to do. I'm not sure if he's trying to prove that he's being objective with him, but if that's the case I find it an uncalled for attempt to look more townish. Sekinj, YES, fabricating percentages is a scummy thing. Plum, I'm curious as to why you want my scum meta so badly. Looking for what to accuse and what not to, eh?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #126 (isolation #13) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 12:11 pm

Yes, I believe she fabricated the percentages.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #128 (isolation #14) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:14 pm

You want to quickly mislynch.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #130 (isolation #15) » Tue Mar 24, 2009 1:21 pm

Your 50/50 numbers suggest that you're more prone to lynch someone off not-so-sound grounds.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #140 (isolation #16) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 11:34 am

I would like a sekinj lynch after mith's. I don't see how he made an about-face as ort pointed out, though.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #143 (isolation #17) » Wed Mar 25, 2009 12:06 pm

zwet, what response did you expect?
Plum shouldn't have done that. I'm not sure what I expected, however, but her response stuck at me like a sore thumb.

I asked you why it didn't apply to Emp because the statement was (at least on the surface) inconsistent with what you had posted previously. You still haven't addressed that, despite my previous requests.
Empking is useless and it is useless to discuss things with him.

Do you think ignoring questions is helpful to the town?
When I'm confused by the question, I'd rather ignore the question than give scum a free pass to point out silly mistakes

Would you post your suspicion/pairing lists, please?
Done.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #175 (isolation #18) » Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:06 am

Emp, have you considered the possibility that people get mad at you because of the way you play?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #180 (isolation #19) » Fri Mar 27, 2009 11:11 am

The game dies for half the day as I'm in school...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #181 (isolation #20) » Sat Mar 28, 2009 12:50 am

Posting for OCD purposes...

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #186 (isolation #21) » Sun Mar 29, 2009 3:16 am

Plum, I'm mentally debating between voting sekinj, mith, or you.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #196 (isolation #22) » Mon Mar 30, 2009 10:53 am

? Doesn't that technically mean that you're going halfandhalf with Emp? I'm getting a Plum/Emp connection, as both are fabricating percentages and numbers.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #205 (isolation #23) » Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:19 am

Oops. Sorry! I meant Sekinj/ Emp pairing for number fabricating.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #217 (isolation #24) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 12:35 pm

Why is sekinj still alive?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #219 (isolation #25) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:54 pm

sekinj wrote:do you think he is your scum partner?

McCarthyism much?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #227 (isolation #26) » Wed Apr 01, 2009 10:59 pm

Unvote; Vote: Plum

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #256 (isolation #27) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:16 am

Sek/emp pairing anyone?

Vote: Emp

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #262 (isolation #28) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 9:40 am

I am almost positive that Empking is scum. Hammer please.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #270 (isolation #29) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:31 am

sek, you just hammered. YAY! I'm positive emp was scum.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #279 (isolation #30) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:31 am

Empking is BY FAR the best lynch choice. Almost all of our possible pairings involve Emp based on the relationships between him and other players.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #281 (isolation #31) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:45 am

I see a Emp/sek pairing.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #283 (isolation #32) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 11:51 am

? Indecisiveness much?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #286 (isolation #33) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:21 pm

Do you enjoy confusing everyone with your shifting opinions on people?

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #290 (isolation #34) » Thu Apr 02, 2009 12:26 pm

AUGH! WIFOM!!

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #333 (isolation #35) » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:15 am

sekinj wrote:Is anyone else playing this game except me and mith?!?!

OH NO YOU DIDN'T

Anyway, ort, READ THE FREAKING PAGE. Every single most likely pairing involves Emp from a slew of good reasons. Chances are high that he's scum with one of these suspicious people.

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #344 (isolation #36) » Fri Apr 03, 2009 11:35 pm

OH YEAH BABY

zwetschenwasser · Post Post #346 (isolation #37) » Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:56 am