Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Hello, I'm here.

Town, break a leg (figuratively). Mafia, break a leg (literally).

All in all let's have some fun.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

I guess we're all just randomly voting now, aren't we.
Hrm... I think I myself will wait a little bit longer before I vote, seeing as I don't know any of you that well.
(Though I am leaning towards randomly voting the person with the signature of quotes saying she's a troll...)

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Meh, random votes for the win.

Vote: BlondeSoWut

Just because I don't like trolls.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Wow, three people with 2 votes each. I'm assuming 5 are needed on one person before they are lynched?

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Yes, 5 are indeed needed.
But can you explain the first part of your last post, DCJ? I want to know what the reason was why you posted this:

Wow, three people with 2 votes each.

I'm surprised you couldn't bother yourself to figure it out.
Obviously I'm referring to the vote tally. I thought it was kinda funny, to be honest.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Ah, I think I see the confusion now. I meant three people have 2 votes on them, each. Not three people with 2 votes voting for someone.
Sorry.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

Sens is right. I was asking you why you felt the need to point it out that there are three players with two votes each. I also was wondering which emotion you had with it. If you were happy, surprised or sad about this. But I didn't think of funny. It's also not the impression I get when I read your post that you saw it as funny.


I haven't played with Zwet before, so I don't know what you guys are talking about. But I have seen Sens behaving like this before. So Zwet, you can better not keep this in your mind as it won't work:

I would be if you would stop trying to find fault in everything I'm saying and actually play the game instead of randomly insulting me.

Wow, people on MafiaScum are ten times more serious then the people I'm used to playing with.

I find odd things like three players with 2 votes each on them funny. My post pointing it out? I felt no need to point it out. In fact, it was just a random post. I have a very odd sense of humor, and I often voice out my thoughts. The "emotion" I felt with that post was nothing more than me being calm and noticing something I found odd, yet funny.
I wasn't really paying attention to everyone else's vote patterns until the tally, basically.
That is all it was. Nothing more.

I thought this was kinda ironic since I random voted BlodeSoWut and then Darkcoffeejazz voted her after I did which put her at 2 votes and

is then surprised when there are players with 2 votes this early in the game.

I did say I was leaning towards voting them anyway, but I was gonna wait on it. Also, yer wrong about the bolded part. I was never surprised, and even if I was, it was not about players having two votes on them early in the game. It was that three players at the same time had 2 votes before the first vote tally.

Also, I'm finding I agree that Zwet's posts aren't actually contributing at all, but I don't think he's voteworthy. Heck, I don't find anyone all that suspicious yet, unless Militant and Zazier count for pointing out a post that proved highly irrelevant in the end. But I'm reserving judgement on that one because they don't know how I play.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

I think everyone but Seamus has voted.

We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll

Unvote, Vote: Zwet

.

After all, we have to lynch someone.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

You're majorly pissing me off, Sens. Stop. KMD, no it isn't, and I'd like to hear a response from Dark about his contradiction.

It's quite simple, really. There is no contradiction.
I can say I don't think yer voteworthy, but I also don't wanna listen to you arguing and such. Besides, we learn nothing if we lynch no one. If you are not mafia, then, from my point of view, it might be the ones who are abso-posi-lutely pushing for your lynch. As in, those who started the bandwagon to begin with.

Not to mention, you two are pissing me off with yer childish arguing. You are not contributing at all when yer arguing like this.
Also, the fact you haven't contributed at all that I can see is still anti-town. Though I may not like voting for you, I'm doing it so we're not stuck on Day 1 forever, like the other game I'm in.

(seriously, MafiaScum should look into shorter days, like only a 48 hour time limit like I'm used to).

Also, Zazier, jumping the gun a bit, methinks. I don't see any real reason to vote me, to be honest. Seeing as there's no "contradiction" I can see with what I've said so far.
It's called a "random" vote for a reason.

[Darkcoffeejazz]

And DCJ, my vote wasn't due to the contradiction (and there was definitly one, and if there wasn't one, it's only worse), but for your reason for your vote against Zwet.

Voting just for a lynch (with the only exception at deadline) is very scummy.

Not where I'm from. Where I'm from, we have 48 hour days, 24 hour nights, and if you don't vote at all, or vote the wrong person, yer scummy.
So I always vote. Even if it's a random vote Day 1. After all, if you don't lynch anyone, you learn nothing.
If Zwet is truly town, and is what he claims, I think we have a new target.

But seeing as he's claimed, for now I'll

Unvote

.

Even if it was really stupid.

And Emp, I have no idea what you are talking about. Did you really ask me a question?