Seriously KMD, stop those OMGUS votes for once
Open 121: Two of Four (b9) - Over! before 752
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Agatha Christy's 'And then there were none'. I just love Agatha Christy, but this one of her books I haven't read yetTen little Soldier boys went out to dine;
One choked his little self and then there were nine.
Nine little Soldier boys sat up very late;
One overslept himself and then there were eight.
Eight little Soldier boys traveling in Devon;
One said he'd stay there and then there were seven.
Seven little Soldier boys chopping up sticks;
One chopped himself in halves and then there were six.
Six little Soldier boys playing with a hive;
A bumblebee stung one and then there were five.
Five little Soldier boys going in for law;
One got into Chancery and then there were four.
Four little Soldier boys going out to sea;
A red herring swallowed one and then there were three.
Three little Soldier boys walking in the zoo;
A big bear hugged one and then there were two.
Two Little Soldier boys sitting in the sun;
One got frizzled up and then there was one.
One little Soldier boy left all alone;
He went out and hanged himself and then there were none.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I don't think so, but this is what was written. And you might want to look again at the OP. Veerus has used a part of it.
I thought it would be interesting to see what the next scene will be . For example, I don't want to chop myself with an axe I hope you will sacrifice yourself for me if I get chopped, as we're friends. Right, KMD ?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Sens is right. I was asking you why you felt the need to point it out that there are three players with two votes each. I also was wondering which emotion you had with it. If you were happy, surprised or sad about this. But I didn't think of funny. It's also not the impression I get when I read your post that you saw it as funny.
I haven't played with Zwet before, so I don't know what you guys are talking about. But I have seen Sens behaving like this before. So Zwet, you can better not keep this in your mind as it won't work:Zwet wrote:I would be if you would stop trying to find fault in everything I'm saying and actually play the game instead of randomly insulting me.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I'm not always serious... I can name three (four if one hadn't left this site) players who can support this statement. It just depends on the situation.
I don't see how it was odd as it happens all the time. And that's why it's strange that you pointed it out. As I have never seen anyone do that. This is my reason for questioning your intention of it.
But anyway, what's the meaning behind this:DCJ wrote:Also, I'm finding I agree that Zwet's posts aren't actually contributing at all, but I don't think he's voteworthy.
Why the switch?DCJ wrote:We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll Unvote, Vote: Zwet.
And the best part of your last post, voting for a lynch just to get things moving.DCJ wrote:We'll get nowhere the way the votes are, so I suppose I'll Unvote, Vote: Zwet.
After all, we have to lynch someone.
Unvote Vote DarkcoffeejazzIgnore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Yes, I agree. Zwet's posts haven't been useful. However, I don't think he has gotten the chance so far. Almost at the start of the game, players were already calling him useless. And since then, every time he responded to one post where he was accused as useless, the next post already came in which he was called useless (a bit overreacted from my part). This only results in an endless circle. So, Zwet, I'm a huge supporter of more votes against DCJ. As he's the most discussed player after you, what's your opinion of him?
And DCJ, my vote wasn't due to the contradiction (and there was definitly one, and if there wasn't one, it's only worse), but for your reason for your vote against Zwet. Voting just for a lynch (with the only exception at deadline) is very scummy.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Sens, you've played one game with me before, although I wasn't very active back then.
Anyway, I don't agree with you on post 142. Normally it would be the case, but not this time. He has already seen in a different game, that we have much time to discuss things. His excuse in this game is just weak.
Also, have you seen his reason to unvote? In case you haven't:
He's unvoted, because Zwet has claimed, not because of what Zwet claimed!DCJ wrote:But seeing as he's claimed, for now I'll Unvote.
@DCJ
What's your reason for suspecting me?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I actually disagree with the case against hewitt. I don't see why scum would post upset after their partner is lynched. And I've been also a few times sure that someone was town, while everyone else saw that player as scum (see NG 684).
I'm actually more interested in Sens as that hammer is questionable, and BSW as her disappearance was rather 'convenient'.
So I'm waiting to hear from Sens if he actually thought that DCJ was scummy with reasons, and to hear some content from BSW.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I don't think that Sens has to show any examples of players who agree with policy lynches. There are players who are not appreciated due to their playstyle. And apparently Zwets is one of them (Don't shoot the messenger as I don't agree with policy lynches. I'm just bringing the message across).
And no, I don't find that ridiculous. I can remember the way Sens posted during our first game, so I'm not surprised. Just get used to this if you're gonna play with him again.
Anyway, I'm in favor of hearing something from BSW.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
@Empking
For me, they are: BSW, Militant and Sens.
Sens due to his hammer and not providing the reasons why he saw DCJ as scummy.
Militant for his last two posts. First he points Sens action regarding Zwet out as peculiar, but when I ask his opinion about it, he's chosing both sides. Also, his post number 4 doesn't sit right with me.
I'm waiting with my vote, till I hear something from BSW's replacement.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
@Sekinj
I just want to hear your opinion of DCJ in general. However, so far you've only talked about one part of his posts. There were other things DCJ has said or done as well. You don't have to respond to a specific post of his as long as you give a general opinion that isn't based upon only one part.
@Primate
Because I'd like to know everyone's opinion of DCJ. Especially as BSW (the one you replaced) never gave her opinion, I'd like to see what you have to say about him.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
You've got nothing to say about his contradiction? Or his reason for the unvote? And you might want to look again at his defence, to see why his defence was bad.
You can also look at the reasons Sens had given. What do you think of those?
Also, if you wouldn't have voted DCJ, who would you have voted day 1?Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
Because what he has done today doesn't strike me as scummy. Nothing that Hewitt has said so far screamed scum to me.
As for Zwet's play, I have given my comments about it. Zwet wasn't scummy, he wasn't helping due to all those attacks at the start of the game. So in my opinion, he wasn't scummy. But if you want to know why Hewitt saw Zwet as town, you should ask him, not me. And if I'm correct, he already said why.
Anyway, the day that there won't be any townie that uses AtE, I'll say how awesome you are. But right now, there are still townies who use AtE, and I think that hewitt is one of them.
Vote Sekinj
The willingness to hammer, but still not doing it.
The impression I get that she hasn't read the game so far.
Using an attack against Hewitt he can't give a defence against as she's not giving the games she's gotten the meta from.
DCJ ignoring Militant's questions.
Militant's last two posts.
And meta reasons.
Oh, and as for your question:Zazie wrote:@Empking
For me, they are: BSW, Militant and Sens.
Sens due to his hammer and not providing the reasons why he saw DCJ as scummy.
Militant for his last two posts. First he points Sens action regarding Zwet out as peculiar, but when I ask his opinion about it, he's chosing both sides. Also, his post number 4 doesn't sit right with me.
I'm waiting with my vote, till I hear something from BSW's replacement.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
I said that you gave me the impression of not having read this game. And nothing you've done so far convinces me of otherwise. And you might have noticed now that I was asking my top 2 suspicions their opinion of DCJ. However, one is refusing to answer and the other chooses to pick both sides of DCJ being scummy or not. Besides, like I have said in this game, his defence of coming from a different place was NOT valid. But you never gave a response to that.
Anyway, you saying that I should make a case why I disagree with the hammer, I've given that at the start of this day. After Sens 'asked' my opinion about hewitt's play day 2, I've also given my opinion of his play day 2.
Besides, I rather attack the players who I see as scummy, like you.
Also, you still haven't responded to two of my points at post 406 which you can respond to:
I so agree with post 417.Zazie wrote:Using an attack against Hewitt he can't give a defence against as she's not giving the games she's gotten the meta from.
And meta reasons.
And post 424 is BS. I have taken a stand regarding hewitt.
Should I? IF (girl, you're way to confident in this) hewitt is indeed the lynch, then we'll have more days to look at if he isn't scum. I'm not convinced that hewitt is scum, so I'm already questioning those players of whom I believe could be scum for later days. If I'm not convinced in a case, I look at cases that can convince me and if they aren't there, I'll start them.sekinj wrote:How is it that you are the day's lynch and she hasn't mentioned you for a week?
I like post 437.
But hewitt, never answer/respond to a question before the player who has to answer/respond to it, has done so. You have seen now what could happen if you don't do this.
Sekinj wrote:@sens - while I believe a quick hammer is absolutely scummy, it doesn't absolutely make you scum. Plus, of course outcome of getting scum kind of clears up that situation. it's unlikely you would quickhammer your own buddy. and hewitt is correct, I'm not 100% on him, he is just my top suspect. that is another reason I'm not going to be talked into a hammer by you or emp, no one has done anything yet to outway my doubts on hewitt enough to hammer this long before deadline. while your quickhammer yesterday turned out okay, I'm not going to run the same risk.Sekinj wrote:i am very ready to hammer
Both of the above quotes were made 18 March (my time). What a quick change in opinion...Sekinj wrote:I think you are scum because you are being overdramatic in your reactions regarding dcj, and zwet. I cannot find meta to support your play in this game, and in fact the meta I do see is in direct contradiction. (no link because of ongoing games).
More votes on her please.
As on a sidenote, just in case Sekinj missed it:
Sekinj, I demand that you give the titles of the games you've gotten hewitt's meta from.Ignore the ''R''-
-
ZazieR Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Jack of All Trades
- Posts: 7567
- Joined: August 15, 2008
- Location: Lurking around MishMash and GD
No Sens, want to know why she (Sekinj is female) doesn't want to give the numbers of those games? Because Hewitt isn't dead in his ongoing games. Just check Open 104, Open 122 and Open 125. Those are his other games besides this one. And she's using that as argument why Hewitt is scum in this game, while she doesn't know his allignments in the other games.
And Sekinj, I have given my reason why DCJ's defence was not valid. I have said this many times already, yet you haven't given any comments about it, while believing DCJ's defence. So what did you think of my argument against his defence?
But I'm also wondering why you are ignoring my last two reasons why I'm voting you. Any reason for that?
Also, post 453 is just BS.
First a huge misrep. I'm questioning you about your intentions why you want to hammer hewitt. I don't want you to hammer hewitt, and I see no reason how you'd have gotten this impression as I have given reasons why his case is bad.
And you're doing nothing to change the lynch. You're only stalling it. If you were doing something to change, you'd have given a case against someone else. But you've only answered questions, talked about hewitt and defend yourself. You're using the last days to hear other players their opinion on hewitt. That's not trying to change it.
Besides, it doesn't surprise me that your stance hasn't changed about hewitt as he's the only player, besides yourself, you're focusing on.Ignore the ''R''
Copyright © MafiaScum. All rights reserved.