sekinj wrote:CF
p0 - "Forgive me for keeping the possibility open that you're lying. =] " --
I never liked the ambivilance shown by CF's first post.
p1 - "@All: Question, what is the down side to a mafioso claiming miller?"
p2 - "I didn't ask you anything. No one asked you anything. ???" --
CF brings this up again later, questioning chuck pretty heavily as to what he was answering. This even makes CF put chuck as #3 on his early LoS... I'm not sure why CF put so much emphasis on this, and why he apparently considered it scummy.
p3 - "Nightwolf and Kairyuu's arguments have me leaning towards it hurting the town more than it helps. " --
looks like he is trying to buddy up to the players that seem the most town so far
p4 - "I'm going to throw out the idea that if no one has claimed miller by the end of page 5, we don't have any.<snip>I think any miller claims after page 5 can be considered lies, with reasonable exceptions." --
I don't liek that he felt the need to have to tie this down. What was the point of this? So that if anyone claimed miller later he could point back and say it was already scummy? I don't really see the need to define/discuss/warn about what actions will be considered scummy if they occure.
p7 - I make #2 on his LOS after calling him out on not making accusations. --
seems convenient. his only case at that point is the SL joke vote.
p12 - addresses SL asks her to verbalize a statement more thoroughly --
This is the first and last time he EVER addresses SL. the only other mentions of her name are when he is talkinga bout his case on me. That makes this really seem more like coaching than actual clarification.
p14 - "I think Sekinj could be a good lynch, and I'm considering Artem after a reread, now that you're claimed mason." --
this post was made Mon Oct 13th... keep this in mind...
p15 - one example of charter as scum and one as town --
sorry, I don't buy it. I'm in a game with charter that just now ended and his behavior in this game breaks your little scenario wide open. i don't buy it one bit. over-reacting is a null-tell, and has more to do with playstyle than alignment
p16 - defends not wanting Kair to claim fully. "Wolf, Germy, who are you looking at now?" --
the last part seems like he is trying to deflect in order to get the discussion off of himself
p17 - says my thoughts/defense had no bearing on his opinion
p18 - pushes me to vote
p20 -
seems liek too much of an appeal to the town. Instead of strongly stating a defense he asks if he should point out things, and post his earlier thoughts on afat (which are practically null now anyway)
p21 - "Did a reread of Artem, and I don't really see anything suspicious there, but I was iffy about him earlier in the game so I guess now I'm neutral."
-- this was posted Oct 16th (see his post#14) Artem had made 5 posts between the time CF did his first "reread" of artem and then this his second "reread" of artem.
A) what exactly in those 5 posts made artem go from being 'considered after my lynch' to 'nothing really suspicious' (maybe it was the purrr post). B) Why does CF feel that Artem needs to be reread so often?