Mini 591: Re-Infiltration - GAME OVER!

SensFan · Post Post #28 (isolation #0) » Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:39 am

Xtoxm wrote:Sens just got replaced for inactivity in another game i'm in, so he'll probably no-show here too, btw.

No, I was just not aware the day had commenced, but nice try.

Non-Random

Vote: rofl

.

SensFan · Post Post #31 (isolation #1) » Sat Apr 26, 2008 9:34 am

Xtoxm wrote:You got removed from another game for inactivity - Do you employ lurking as a strategy?

You do not know the circumstances behind me be replaced in that other game, so I will ask you to drop it. I have already given a perfectly good explanation for not posting here until now.

SensFan · Post Post #38 (isolation #2) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:19 am

I voted rofl cause he has a funny avatar, does it really matter?

SensFan · Post Post #40 (isolation #3) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:49 am

Actually, that's EXACTLY what I said. It was not a RANDOM vote, it was an ARBITRARY vote, hence, it was NON-RANDOM.

I have already asked you to drop the subject of my activity. Please do so, or I will request replacement.

SensFan · Post Post #43 (isolation #4) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:24 am

alvinz95 wrote:2. Are giving up by threatening to request replacement. Post 40

Unvote, Vote: alvin

Way to completely misrepresent what I said and take it out of context. What I said was that if Xtoxm continued to attack me personally on a matter that has no relation to this game, I would ask to be replaced. I play Mafia for fun, not to be attacked personally. If you had read the rules, you would have noticed a rule that anyone harming your ability to have fun will be dealt with.

SensFan · Post Post #45 (isolation #5) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:30 am

Meh, I will not answer questions not related to this game. Also loling that you call needing to be replaced in single game due to extenuating circumstances 'a meta'.

SensFan · Post Post #47 (isolation #6) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:40 am

My vote was arbitrarily placed earlier. Surely any in-game reason, however small, for voting should be enough for me to switch it? I do not at all support your lynch at this point, but you did something I found worth noting, while rofl had my vote for no good reason.

SensFan · Post Post #49 (isolation #7) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:51 am

If you actually want to meta me, I suggest reading the first few pages of Newbie 550, where I claimed to find a post scummy, then retracted that statement, for the sole purpose of fishing for reactions. In an ongoing Newb game, I did the same. In another game that I'm pretty sure is ongoing (I'm dead in it), I proxied my vote for the first 48 hours or so, again for reaction-fishing.

Long story made short, I was purposely ambiguous with calling my vote "non-random", intending to see who was overly eager to jump on my wagon afterwards with little to no reasoning. So far, Xtoxm and TM look sincere in their questions towards me, while I am far less sure of the motives of alvin and pojed.

FoS: pojed

SensFan · Post Post #51 (isolation #8) » Sun Apr 27, 2008 12:26 pm

pojedinac wrote:Ok, I'll believe your explanation of just testing the players' reactions with that vote. For now.
That means that I owe you an explanation on my vote, too. Well here it is:
You made a controversial move, and I don't do FOS. It's that simple.
This game doesn't have a deadline and the only way to put some pressure on anybody is to vote for them. FOSing just doesn't cut it.

Fair enough.

SensFan · Post Post #63 (isolation #9) » Mon Apr 28, 2008 9:37 am

Xtoxm wrote:I checked SF's said game, and he did indeed employ the same tactic as a townie.

You actually thought I'd lie about something so easily disprovable?

SensFan · Post Post #73 (isolation #10) » Mon Apr 28, 2008 2:15 pm

Xtoxm wrote:And it was pretty much the exact same thing. Ironic that the one you accused was actually scum. Must have been pretty worried about being called up on page one

Not to dwell on past games, but I successfully busted a Scum, got into a large argument with him, and only stopped when one of the ICs (his scumbuddy...) asked us both to 'cool it'...

SensFan · Post Post #128 (isolation #11) » Sun May 04, 2008 7:46 am

Was camping over the weekend. Will get caught up within 24 hours.

SensFan · Post Post #130 (isolation #12) » Mon May 05, 2008 12:45 am

Unvote, Vote: poj

Lynch -1.

SensFan · Post Post #132 (isolation #13) » Mon May 05, 2008 1:05 am

Sure. Any Scum that hammers him gets 1-for-1'd. In the meantime, he is pressured to at least give some sort of response that's not "LYNCH ME FOR THE GOOD OF THE GAME!!!"

SensFan · Post Post #140 (isolation #14) » Mon May 05, 2008 2:58 pm

roflcopter wrote:
Riceballtail wrote:Rofl, you should stop lurking... it's been 36 whole hours! I still support your lynch today. You've failed at finding scum, you can't make up your mind, and at this point everyone is too scummy that you can't really tell who's what anymore. Except your scumbuddies anyway.
get over yourself. i called you out for doing something scummy and since then all you can do is omgus at me over and over again. tunnel vision is not pro town.

SensFan wrote:Sure. Any Scum that hammers him gets 1-for-1'd. In the meantime, he is pressured to at least give some sort of response that's not "LYNCH ME FOR THE GOOD OF THE GAME!!!"
are you kidding? you are trying really hard to pass the buck to the hammer vote and pretend like you aren't actually just as responsible for the lynch. if poj is town this move stinks to high heaven.

unvote: poj

this wagon picked up steam way too fast and its becoming pretty apparent that something is rotten in the state of denmark. ythill's meta defense of poj is actually approriate and backs up the assertions he's made in this game. i still think he's wrong, but i no longer think that what he's done clearly marks him as scum.

sensfan on the other hand has clearly marked himself as scum.

vote: sensfan

@evilgorrilaz: you still haven't managed to actually say anything useful in any of your posts. active lurking is way scummier than straight up lurking. you go on the bad list.

bad list: rice, anatole, xtox, eg

Alright. So...why was my vote worse than the other 5?

SensFan · Post Post #144 (isolation #15) » Mon May 05, 2008 10:36 pm

Xtoxm wrote:
Any Scum that hammers him gets 1-for-1'd.
This implies that you know he's town...

unvote vote SF

No, actually. It implies that only Scum would quickhammer him before he has a chance to defend himself...

SensFan · Post Post #145 (isolation #16) » Mon May 05, 2008 10:41 pm

roflcopter wrote:
sens wrote:Alright. So...why was my vote worse than the other 5?
um... read that post you quoted through one more time and you'll see where i already explained that.

Hmm...Perhaps I need be more clear.

Those reasons are complete bullshit, and are extremely scummy and opportunistic. Why would my vote be any worse than the other 5, including your own. Hell, I even went out of my way to point out I was putting him a Lynch -1.

Better?

SensFan · Post Post #153 (isolation #17) » Tue May 06, 2008 3:02 pm

Talmadge Monroe wrote:I mean, really - if you're voting because you think they're scum, what is the point of attacking the next voter? If you have the conviction to put them at L-1, how do you condemn another person on the hammer? You obviously think the person is scum, so what would it matter to you?

I think he is Scum. I am not sure he is Scum. I want him to have time to answer any questions. I want him pressured to answer said questions.

SensFan · Post Post #200 (isolation #18) » Tue May 13, 2008 5:15 am

I'm here.