Heh we can actually confer on that but I don't know if we change it. That being said, i felt bad about this little assistant producer idea so i analyzed it further... i really think it's not as bad as it sounds. but you can see if you think my analysis is correct:
when does any one person's vote actually make a difference? Like, in a 6-2 vote anyone choosing to flip can only make it 7-1 or 5-3, no actual change in outcome. So when can an outcome be changed? Say theres a f3 with 8 normal jurors. I found 3 scenarios:
4-4-0. Anyone changing their vote here can change the outcome. But throwing a half vote into the mix changes the outcome too. So you are an equal value here.
3-3-2. Here anyone changing onto a three can change the outcome. But throwing a half vote into the mix changes the outcome too. So you are an equal value here.
4-3-1. Here is the one difference, where someone on the 4 can flip to the 3 to change it, but you couldn't. However, that's it: if the 4 flips onto the 1 instead, they've created a 3-3-2 where you're the tiebreaker. If the 1 flips onto the 3 they've created a 4-4-0 where you're the tiebreaker. And the people on the 3 can't change anything no matter where they go.
And that's actually the extent of the scenarios i can come up with. Maybe I'm missing something. But it doesn't seem like a bad spot really, i hope maybe? :)