I am 'aving doubts about zis, because deep down, I think Mlle Hopps might be ze strongest challenge competitor 'ere. But I 'ave made decisions based on what I think ees going to 'appen with challenges before, and zey 'ave backfired on me. You can't try to anticipate eet too much.
Mlle Garcia ees clearly good at challenges too, but she mentioned zat our joint win was only 'er second individual win overall, and Mlle Hopps revealed to me (for really no reason) zat she 'ad been throwing, including ze challenge zat she won with ze cars.
I do think zat M. Kennedy will get 5th if Mlle Garcia wins Immunity. I believe zat with all of my 'eart. I think eet probably 'appens with Mlle Hopps too, but eet ees less certain, because eet would depend on M. Morningstar, and M. Morningstar could say zat 'e prefers to go to ze end with M. Kennedy and doesn't care if 'e ees weaker in challenges.
Mlle Hopps at ze final four I think would still take me to ze end. I think when she says F2, eet means something. And if I vote out Mlle Hopps, zat ees a bit more of a betrayal zan voting out Mlle Garcia. Would she forgive me for eet and cast 'er Jury vote for me? I'm confident zat Mlle Garcia definitely would still vote for me to win if I voted 'er out 'ere, or at least zat my odds of earning 'er vote wouldn't be drastically affected.
Zere are so many considerations on every level, and in ze end, I don't know zat zere ees a correct choice. I can see eet going both ways. Maintenant I am just leaning towards getting rid of Mlle Garcia, but Mlle Hopps' confidence in 'er ability and claim zat she was throwing challenges are really shaking me. Eet was such a mistake of 'er to tell me zat. She ees not zat good of a player. Why shouldn't I beat 'er in ze end? I really don't think she ees zat good of a player, not matter what zis constructed narrative says about 'er and me.