Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jake Peralta

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13
31
Desk Duty / Re: Lennie Briscoe - Fifth Juror
« on: August 03, 2020, 12:08:54 pm »
That matches my recollections. It was very process of elimination.

There was a lot of anxiety about the prospect of the former 99th coalescing into a unified voting bloc.

32
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: August 02, 2020, 07:57:40 pm »
My skill at Mafia translated well to Survivor, I don't see why Leon's wouldn't.

33
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: August 02, 2020, 06:01:19 pm »
One of the two, aye.

No bets on which though.

34
Desk Duty / Re: Lennie Briscoe - Fifth Juror
« on: August 02, 2020, 06:31:14 am »
Yeah I started out trying to keep a detailed dossier on everyone and that fell apart before the first reassignment. I got better about writing stuff down post-merge, but still wasn’t very good about my confessional.

35
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: August 01, 2020, 05:29:58 pm »
Oh holy shit, that’s a brutal challenge. The item search is so straightforward I found half of them without the key in less than a minute. This is going to be a blistering time trial.

36
Desk Duty / Re: Lennie Briscoe - Fifth Juror
« on: August 01, 2020, 05:20:38 pm »
Sad to see you here, Lennie. What went down?

37
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: August 01, 2020, 12:32:13 pm »
That depends entirely on whether Penelope takes my advice or not.

As I understand things, Poirot and especially Lennie are running scared right now. We thought that alliance of five would hold together for at least another vote before falling apart.

Right now I see strong ties between Lennie and Poirot, Leon and Judy, Leon and Rust, Judy and Lucifer, perhaps Penelope and Rust, and perhaps Poirot and Penelope.

Lennie looks like he’s in trouble here, but everyone needs to look ahead. Right now, by my reckoning, Penelope, Poirot, and Judy have the most threatening cases before the jury, though if Poirot gets screwed again he’s out of that group.

Judy has consistently shown herself to be a predator. She’s been great at challenges, flips aggressively, and has the momentum. I believe she’s positioning herself to knock out all of Poirot, Lennie, and Penelope in sequence in order to reduce the final equation to herself and who she sees as goats.

I don’t have any idea what Rust and Lucifer’s plans are, aside from keeping their heads down and making a long shot/swing vote case to the jury.

My advice to Penelope was to leverage her covert alliance with Poirot to rally Poirot, Lennie, and (most likely) Rust for a majority, remove one of Judy’s supports (Leon, Lucifer) and then Judy herself. If it were me, I’d take Leon out now, but I’m biased.

If Penelope ignores me and sticks with Judy, we’ll probably see Lennie or perhaps Poirot go. If she pushes back, I’d expect Leon.

38
Jake Peralta / Re: Probable Final Entry
« on: July 31, 2020, 08:08:25 am »
Hello, Spectators!

The mods inform me that you have approximately nine hours left to read this. So a few observations:

1) This was my second game of Survivor, and the first I was booted early from.

2) I really did try to be as honest and ethical as I possibly could - that was not a ruse, character, or lipservice. I wasn't always successful, but so far as I recall I didn't tell a bald-faced lie until the last few hours as I was trying to stay alive.

3) That said, I allowed certain loopholes. If you've ever read Robert Jordan's Wheel of Time series, I based my ethical approach on theirs. They are:  1) To speak no word that is not true. 2) To make no weapon with which one man may kill another. 3) Never to use the One Power as a weapon except against Darkfriends or Shadowspawn, or in the last extreme defense of her life, the life of her Warder, or another Aes Sedai. That last one is a bit bound up in the lore of the series to be useful, but it felt wrong to not include all three. I took some general "do no harm" principles from 2+3, but the first was the important one. "Speak no word that is not true" has loopholes you can drive a truck through - the Aes Sedai in the books are constantly making neutral statements which are deliberately crafted to give a certain impression, which leads people to their own erroneous conclusions. For example, one of the characters in the first book is able to travel under an assumed name simply by introducing herself with, "I am called Alys." That's easy to make true by having her Warder (bodyguard) call her Alys once or twice, but it's not her name (Moiraine). I did that sort of thing on numerous occasions, whether planting an idea or allowing people to think things which were there. "I think a vote on Holly would be a good idea" might be true, but it doesn't commit. Other times, I was on board with a plan and then just never informed people when the plan changed. This was most visible on the vote when Scruff went out - I made a plan with Scruff, Rust, and Leon to save Rust by going for Lucifer instead, trying to bring Lennie on using the specter of the 99th. Lennie didn't go for it, so I acquiesced and flipped back to Rust. No one was lied to, but neither did I give Rust a heads-up.

4) I've got to learn who to trust. Some hits and misses this game. Scruff and Penelope were mistakes - maybe if I'd brought them in a bit more things might have been different, but I missed that Scruff was getting paranoid and I missed that Penelope always had her own agenda and wanted no part of bring second fiddle to mine. Lennie and Poirot were good bets, though. I know, Lennie always viewed me as a resource, but I bet big on Poirot and I think it paid off.

5) A guiding strategic principle was to make friends with everyone and gather as many potential allies as possible. That was wildly successful...TOO wildly, as a matter of fact. The only people I came into the merge not on good terms with were Lucifer and perhaps Judy, and I had good relationships with them both at various points. The problem seemed to be that there comes a point when success on that scale flips around to the other side - when everyone's your friend and/or ally, no one is.

6) Be way more careful with sharing long-term plans. I still need to analyze exactly what went wrong at the merge, which I can't do until everyone's cards are on the table post-game, but people were leaking all over the place. I want to say it was Penelope, but it also could have been Scruff, or even Leon. I don't know. I got overzealous with making plans, and that was ultimately what killed me.

7) Playing one side against the other only works if no one knows you're doing it. Obviously. Dummy.

8) NEVER PLAY IN THE SUMMER AGAIN. EVER.

9) REALLY. YOU DON'T HAVE TIME.

10) This was fun anyway.

Thanks for coming to my TED talk!

39
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: July 31, 2020, 04:04:32 am »
This challenge is going to take forever

40
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: July 30, 2020, 07:12:47 pm »
I feel a lot more free now. After the vote I actually played some non-Survivor games. It was nice.

I will never play a summer game again. The last month has been torture.

41
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: July 30, 2020, 07:12:08 pm »
Nah, I had a bad habit this game of focusing on new ventures to the exclusion of old friends. That was partly my limited time - the stolen minutes at work, sleep-deprived nights, they were a currency I had to spend sparingly. The other half of that was my negligence. Remember that old saw, "Make new friends but keep the old, one is silver but the other is gold"? Yeaaaaah I definitely forgot its value this game. I think things might have gone very differently had I been a lot more open with the Wheelmen.

42
Desk Duty / Re: Jake Peralta - Fourth Juror
« on: July 30, 2020, 07:08:34 pm »
Cool, glad we cleared the air. I learned a lot from this game, and wouldn't repeat those mistakes.

43
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: July 30, 2020, 06:28:34 pm »
The ironies of the fog of war, eh? Tracking a maximum of six conversations on the tribes was bad enough, but when I had to juggle ten, plus various multi-user alliance threads, it's easy to drop some balls. When one of those balls just had a big and very public falling-out with someone I thought was one of my closest allies, it came up you.

44
Desk Duty / Re: General Discussion
« on: July 30, 2020, 06:00:10 pm »
If anything, Grouch, I "gave up" on you out of loyalty to Scruff.

45
Desk Duty / Re: Jake Peralta - Fourth Juror
« on: July 30, 2020, 05:22:34 pm »
Most of what you're attributing to malice was stupidity.

Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 13