From my perspective I needed Lucifer to make up a lot of ground in this FTC. I wanted to provide both candidates with opportunities to wow me with things I wasn't aware of, but I was in a weird position where I knew a lot about both players games before coming in to the FTC.
My vote ultimately comes down to how aware of their game they were, there is a reason players like myself and Scruff are removed from the game when we are. Usually because we have our hands in too many pies which makes us very attractive votes at the end of the game.
From my pov, Lucifer was the opposite, someone to be brought along because they were saved a few times, didn't make huge waves and has nothing to really hold on to as a main reason to vote them. Going in I also felt that Poirot was a forerunner simply because of executing a plan through the whole game. I may be biased but we had a connection despite polar opposite ways of playing the game. Poirot went in to the back third of the game with a plan and executed it. Didn't always go his way, but the ultimate path remained the same.
Lucifer appears to have gone in with a plan of not losing. The problem was, he survived multiple tribals not through effort of his own, but from being strung along to be used later, and not just by me.
My vote is for Poirot.
At the end of the day, Lucifer did not provide enough cognisance to be a deserving winner.