11 games isn't statistically significant, given the expected scum win percentage in those games. (Thok is a mathematician, I can't believe you guys were actually trying to argue that with him.)
"Statistically significant" shouldn't be a factor in determining a good title.
Actually suggesting a title makes it more likely a title will be given.
I don't think the 10-1 thing makes for a good title. It has never been the point of titles to point out good/bad players, records, etc. That's what the Scummies are for.
This thread is
not
for insults and the like. I am once again growing tired of this. Maybe I'll just shut down the title fairy thread and go back to assigning them arbitrarily. It's more fun that way.