Babylon 5 Mafia: Severed Dreams - Over

Kinetic · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:01 pm

You say that like I didn't understand the situation before you said it. I'm not going to easy lynch anyone based on an out of game reason. When you start moving out of game for primary reasons you set a very poor precedent that I for one won't follow.

If he becomes an issue in THIS game, then you can make your arguments and back them up with out of game evidence. However, in this case your out of game evidence is at best a null tell, by your own admission. You've yet to explain how his particular meta would make him more likely to be scum.

Until you can answer those questions, expect my vote not to fall on SSK based on those arguments.

Tarhalindur · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:05 pm

I confirm that Kinetic replaces MBPikamon (should have noted this earlier, but I was busy) - Tar

Kinetic · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:06 pm

I confirm that I am awesome pants. Glad to be back on the site (in a limited capacity, granted), and I still can't forget that Freaktown game Tar. Epic.

armlx · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:08 pm

You say that like I didn't understand the situation before you said it. I'm not going to easy lynch anyone based on an out of game reason. When you start moving out of game for primary reasons you set a very poor precedent that I for one won't follow.

I realize, I was more commenting on how you said he would be scummy if he active lurked, rather then just worthless and null.

Kinetic · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:10 pm

armlx wrote:
You say that like I didn't understand the situation before you said it. I'm not going to easy lynch anyone based on an out of game reason. When you start moving out of game for primary reasons you set a very poor precedent that I for one won't follow.

I realize, I was more commenting on how you said he would be scummy if he active lurked, rather then just worthless and null.

I'm sorry then, I thought you were advocating said policy lynch. That is my error then.

armlx · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:14 pm

No problem, my post was intentionally vague to see how far the baiting thing could go, but I think its about over now.

That said, Cybele seems like a fine place to start.

Unvote, Vote Cybele, FOS VisMaior

Kinetic · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:17 pm

Yes, something is nagging me as well about Cebele. I might turn my FOS into a vote should something come of this wagon.

Cybele · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:48 pm

Well, what seems to be the problem, boys? What strikes you as odd about me?

MafiaSSK · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 1:19 am

armlx wrote:
That said, Cybele seems like a fine place to start.

Unvote, Vote Cybele, FOS VisMaior

What are the reasonings for your Fos and your vote?

veerus · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:12 am

Policy lynch for meta reasons is stupid. If you want to go after lurkers, go after lurkers in this game. In fact, I will start:

Unvote; Vote: Tovarish

Other possible targets include:

FOS: populartajo
FOS: The Internet.

Also,

UnFOS: Kinetic/MBPikamon

Whatever happened to soaperguy?

veerus · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:45 am

mod:

Please note that I will be V/LA until Tuesday the 14th.

pacman281292 · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:16 am

ow... this V/LA sucks
MOD: Note the same veerus noted.

armlx · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 4:43 am

What are the reasonings for your Fos and your vote?

Cybele bit on the SSK wagon. I've explained why I was voting VisMaior to begin with.

What are your reasons for your vote/lac thereof?

Empking · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:00 am

Is a policy lynch actually being considered?

armlx · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:44 am

Empking wrote:Is a policy lynch actually being considered?

No, I'm pretty sure this was Darox setting up to trap scum on a policy wagon. Its a good trick, it just loses a lot of value between uses.

populartajo · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 5:52 am

Where have you seen this before?

Empking · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 6:05 am

oh thank goodness.

I was worried about that for a moment.

malthusis · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:23 am

We need some prodding. Mod: Prod Internet, DGB, Tovarish, and Vismaior.

(There's a few other people being on the cusp of the 72 hour rule)

VisMaior · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:48 am

Me? What for?

VisMaior · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 7:50 am

Also, the whole Kinetix-armlx interaction bothers me for some reason.

Kinetic · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:44 am

Would you care to explain what bothers you Vis? Or at least try to talk it out so I can try and respond?

VisMaior · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:08 am

Its more of a gut feling, really. I have the impression of unsincerity.

"SSK lurks a lot"
"Let him lurk first in THIS game, before lynching him"
"I realize, I was more commenting on how you said he would be scummy if he active lurked, rather then just worthless and null."
"Oh Im so sorry I unintentionally shed bad light on lyou! You are an honest man indeed! May I lick your private parts?"
"No worries, I intentionally did so, so you are not scummy at all. Go ahead. Lets lynch Cybele, Btw"
"Yessire, indeed!"

On second tought, maybe I`m reading too much into it.

populartajo · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:17 am

/win.
Thinking that maybe you're reading too much into it.
Job is kicking my ass right now. Will post in the weekend.

The Internet · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:36 am

Roger that, to avoid prod. Anyway, I could understand darox trying to sucker scum in. If he is genuinely sincere, then I can't support the lynch, as we are here to lynch scum, not lurkers. I'll be checking the vote record for wagon jumpers.

Natirasha · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Fri Oct 10, 2008 10:57 am

Yah, seriously I agree with PT.