Mini 673 - Game Over!

Simenon · Post Post #50 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:06 pm

hasdgfas wrote:
Simpor wrote:
Haterade wrote:Eh, random voting is just kind of annoying IMHO
It starts the discussions in the game..
Lots of things can start discussions in the game.

This, however, doesn't.

hasdgfas · Post Post #51 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:11 pm

Simenon wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Simpor wrote:
Haterade wrote:Eh, random voting is just kind of annoying IMHO
It starts the discussions in the game..
Lots of things can start discussions in the game.
This, however, doesn't.

discussing discussion is still discussion.

IH · Post Post #52 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 3:57 pm

Not useful discussion.

stark · Post Post #53 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 4:16 pm

stark wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
fuzzylightning wrote:Alright I have three votes on me, which I don't have a problem with because I am not in any real danger yet, but just wondering what exactly is the reasoning behind it, I know the first was because I put a joke vote on Simenon because there were already three wagons starting and I think the other is because I unvoted after being called out, but I am still rather confused as to the actual case against me.
You unvoted after being called out for wagoning. That's very scummy, because you're just doing it to not look scummy.

Well said. Beside, an "actual case" is impossible at this state in the game. Right now, because of above behaviors, atleast in my mind, you are the most suspicious.

Also, Mod, could you give the game a crazy awesome title so I can find it easier when I'm looking for it?

putting it in your watched topics could help...but sure
-dahill

Your title made my day. No joke. Fantastic.

I haven't figured out how to make watched topics yet/ I'm not that advanced.

In regards to the issue of discussion versus non-discussion, I think that the debate is a bit silly. Just let the discussion play out, regardless of its verbal value, and eventually, a

genuine

discussion will emerge. However, if we spend all of our time on discussing whether what were discussion has value as a discussion, we're going to get off track...

Simpor · Post Post #54 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:01 pm

stark wrote: I haven't figured out how to make watched topics yet/ I'm not that advanced.

The watched topics is at the bottom of the page to the left.. Small text "Watch this topic for replies".

IH are you aware that you have made two votes? vote on Haterade followed by a vote on FuzzyLightning. No unvote between...

Tomato · Post Post #55 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 8:36 pm

Simpor wrote:
stark wrote: I haven't figured out how to make watched topics yet/ I'm not that advanced.
The watched topics is at the bottom of the page to the left.. Small text "Watch this topic for replies".

IH are you aware that you have made two votes? vote on Haterade followed by a vote on FuzzyLightning. No unvote between...

Da Rules wrote:05. Please bold all votes such as Vote: ShadowLurker. Even if I see an unbolded vote, I will NOT count it. Unvotes are not required.

Also, IH and/or PEG should change avatar.

FaerieLord · Post Post #56 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:15 pm

Also, tomato should stop complaining ITT.

Tomato · Post Post #57 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:39 pm

Also, IH and/or PEG should change avatar.

Simpor · Post Post #58 (ISO) » Wed Sep 17, 2008 10:03 pm

Tomato wrote:
Simpor wrote:
stark wrote: I haven't figured out how to make watched topics yet/ I'm not that advanced.
The watched topics is at the bottom of the page to the left.. Small text "Watch this topic for replies".

IH are you aware that you have made two votes? vote on Haterade followed by a vote on FuzzyLightning. No unvote between...

Da Rules wrote:05. Please bold all votes such as Vote: ShadowLurker. Even if I see an unbolded vote, I will NOT count it. Unvotes are not required.
Also, IH and/or PEG should change avatar.

Technical Rules

02. Voting occurs by a simple Vote: Player and to unvote, just write Unvote.
When shifting a vote from one player to another, an unvote will be required for this game.
Unbolded votes will not be counted.

Rules in conflict?
Mod is an unvote required?

Simenon · Post Post #59 (ISO) » Thu Sep 18, 2008 12:45 am

hasdgfas wrote:
Simenon wrote:
hasdgfas wrote:
Simpor wrote:
Haterade wrote:Eh, random voting is just kind of annoying IMHO
It starts the discussions in the game..
Lots of things can start discussions in the game.
This, however, doesn't.
discussing discussion is still discussion.

The question is "does it start discussion". Because I took you up on it, you did manage to start a discussion, but it almost definitely would not have.

dahill1 · Post Post #60 (ISO) » Thu Sep 18, 2008 11:32 am

sorry for conflicting rules. unvoting isn't required but it helps

Haterade · Post Post #61 (ISO) » Fri Sep 19, 2008 2:46 am

fuzzylightning wrote:Why do you feel that way Haterade?

It might prompt discussion, but I just think it's kind of annoying.

fuzzylightning · Post Post #62 (ISO) » Fri Sep 19, 2008 7:14 pm

Fair enough, I was kinda hoping for some epic type of answer, but if thats the way you feel.

And the reason I unvoted was because it really was a joke, honestly I wasn't really thinking about, will I look scummy doing this, I was just getting a laugh in.

Simenon · Post Post #63 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 3:55 am

stark wrote:
Your title made my day. No joke. Fantastic.

I haven't figured out how to make watched topics yet/ I'm not that advanced.

In regards to the issue of discussion versus non-discussion, I think that the debate is a bit silly. Just let the discussion play out, regardless of its verbal value, and eventually, a
genuine
discussion will emerge. However, if we spend all of our time on discussing whether what were discussion has value as a discussion, we're going to get off track...

I took issue with it because it was a completely useless statement, not because it was a wrong discussion.

Flameaxe · Post Post #64 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:01 am

Good morning. A) The comment was useless. B) This debate has become silly, and useless.

HI SIM <3

Flameaxe · Post Post #65 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:03 am

Unvote Vot: Scot

Quality vote right here.

dahill1 · Post Post #66 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 5:54 am

Vote Count

(3) fuzzylightning: (pickemgenius, stark, IH)
(2) IH: (hasdgfas, Tomato)
(2) hasdgfas: (scotmany12, Simenon)
(1) scotmany12: (Flameaxe)
(1) Simenon: (Simpor)
(1) Tomato: (FaerieLord)

(2) Not voting: Haterade, fuzzylightning

Deadline: Oct. 6th - time still to be determined

IH · Post Post #67 (ISO) » Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:50 pm

Simpor, just curious, but what was the point in pointing out about my vote and unvote and such?

Simenon · Post Post #68 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:34 am

Unvote
Vote scot

With sixteen days left we should pressure the nonpeople.

Tomato · Post Post #69 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 1:50 am

Unvote, Vote: FaerieLord

Late OMGUS.

Also, IH and/or PEG should change avatar.

IH · Post Post #70 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 2:36 am

Tomato. No.

The end. Drop it.

Tomato · Post Post #71 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:23 am

I'm thinking of turning this into my gimmick for this game.

Also, IH and/or PEG should change avatar.

Simpor · Post Post #72 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:31 am

IH wrote:Simpor, just curious, but what was the point in pointing out about my vote and unvote and such?

I just noticed it while I was going through the voting.

To hatred and Fuzzy:
You are not voting yet? Haven't you found someone worth the vote?

IH · Post Post #73 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:53 am

I agree with Sim, btw.

Simenon · Post Post #74 (ISO) » Sun Sep 21, 2008 7:58 am

IH wrote:I agree with Sim, btw.

You are going to have to use a different abbreviation for this game.