In post 3165, Spiffeh wrote:
I dislike Shello's argument about his Brian Skies vote and it feels a little cherry-picked to have a reason to scum read him. I don't know how well I can articulate or substantiate this but I get the vibe that Shello entered their Cakez opinion with the intention of scum reading him in general.
You're not allowed to post something that makes me scumread you and then preempt my poke at skitter like this in a way that makes me townread you. Bad mouse wizard.
Maybe I should reconsider my Spiffeh scumread. I do think they are making good arguments. Maybe I should be considering Firebringer too. This is due to me thinking there is mafia in our neighborhood which is also not confirmed I guess. Though I'm also not sure on SirCakez.
Your whole preoccupation with my ngaf about what seems to be a vanilla hood and trying to make a big deal of it seems like busy work designed to make me look scummy, not a genuine belief that I'm supposed to care about who is in a neighborhood I haven't even tried reading for content more as town.
Yes, there is an OP with the neighborlist. No, there is nothing AI about not giving a shit about who the 6 people in that list are. Mechanically, I'm like 98% sure that neighborhood comp is nonrandom and I still don't give a shit about the neighborlist because until I have a good grasp of the game design and a good grasp of the game state that knowledge is worthless at best and likely to cause bias in my reading at worst.
This wasn't exactly my argument.
You posted that you popped into the neighborhood and saw hermit crab and firebringer talking. I pointed out that I was at the top of that page so it seemed a bit fake for you to go there and scroll to the bottom.
In post 3311, Firebringer wrote:
i don't see the reasons for cakez scum. I know i misread him all the time so im going to outsource my read on him but like wtf is the case there?
I repeat what i said like 10 pages agon brian skies, I get the feeling and reason he is wagoned. ITs just the fact he is always wagoned day 1 in games i play with him and he is always town when it happens that makes me go that this is bad.
I just really want to elim bingle and im too lazy to case him or lead the charge there. Nor do i think anyone will listen to me (but honestly just using that as an excuse not to put in the effort to try)
In post 3165, Spiffeh wrote:
I dislike Shello's argument about his Brian Skies vote and it feels a little cherry-picked to have a reason to scum read him. I don't know how well I can articulate or substantiate this but I get the vibe that Shello entered their Cakez opinion with the intention of scum reading him in general.
You're not allowed to post something that makes me scumread you and then preempt my poke at skitter like this in a way that makes me townread you. Bad mouse wizard.
Maybe I should reconsider my Spiffeh scumread. I do think they are making good arguments. Maybe I should be considering Firebringer too. This is due to me thinking there is mafia in our neighborhood which is also not confirmed I guess. Though I'm also not sure on SirCakez.
In post 3311, Firebringer wrote:
i don't see the reasons for cakez scum. I know i misread him all the time so im going to outsource my read on him but like wtf is the case there?
I repeat what i said like 10 pages agon brian skies, I get the feeling and reason he is wagoned. ITs just the fact he is always wagoned day 1 in games i play with him and he is always town when it happens that makes me go that this is bad.
I just really want to elim bingle and im too lazy to case him or lead the charge there. Nor do i think anyone will listen to me (but honestly just using that as an excuse not to put in the effort to try)
In post 3311, Firebringer wrote:
i don't see the reasons for cakez scum. I know i misread him all the time so im going to outsource my read on him but like wtf is the case there?
I repeat what i said like 10 pages agon brian skies, I get the feeling and reason he is wagoned. ITs just the fact he is always wagoned day 1 in games i play with him and he is always town when it happens that makes me go that this is bad.
I just really want to elim bingle and im too lazy to case him or lead the charge there. Nor do i think anyone will listen to me (but honestly just using that as an excuse not to put in the effort to try)
This post is pinging me
What part?
a) it feels whiteknight-y of you while not really committing to the townread
b) I guess I'm surprised by how much he wants Bingle
In post 3235, marcistar wrote:
I think morph is getting 3 cuz i said if we want mechanics we need to wait until 2 shots can go off so we can get accurate info. But then said it isnt realistic.
This sounds like a bad idea to me. I've never seen an invention-receiver able to use more than one invention in a night phase.
At least check with ceph on that.
As a reminder there is a time incentive to solving the hood
In post 3235, marcistar wrote:
I think morph is getting 3 cuz i said if we want mechanics we need to wait until 2 shots can go off so we can get accurate info. But then said it isnt realistic.
WRT dethy hood:
Claim the N1 invent and result on the first available day. Claim the N2 invent and result on the second available day. Claim the N3 invent and result on the third available day -> first time when usage of that information should be powerful. As such, dethy hood probably goes untested for a few days and we should focus on solving outside it for now.
I have a pet theory that it's 2 in our hood 2 in no hood 1 in dethy scum wise, but that theory is ungrounded and thus not worth acting on. It does mean that I'm not really interested in delineating between in our hood or not in our hood for limming, because legitimately 0-4 is the reasonable numbers I could see being scum in our hood and that's like... completely useless. I'll probably want to reevaluate that post massclaim. I feel better about a cakez lim post pooky case. Massclaim probably on D3 when scum have committed to killing in the dethy hood or not.
For this post too. Something bad happens if mafia are still in the hood by an unspecified time. I think if we get to day 4 we likely trip that. Though if we don't care about that and want to try to be more accurate by waiting for longer that is a choice that can be made. Not a bad one either, potentially.
<(") | (")>
