No but I don’t think I’ve gathered enough information to make the statements you want. And if there’s one thing Ive learned it’s that everything I say can and will be used against me the minute someone wants to push me. I don’t want to give half-hearted reads until I feel more confident in what I’m feeling.
sure. all I want to know right now is if you have some scum reads. you don’t have to say who. or how strong. just whether you have some, or not.
mmm that’s also how I feel so idk why you called my not-many questions third degree, unless it felt like you were cracking under the pressure as scum. but I appreciate you’ll want someone else to talk to and i want sleep so for now I vanish
In post 282, ketchup777 wrote:
mmm that’s also how I feel so idk why you called my not-many questions third degree, unless it felt like you were cracking under the pressure as scum. but I appreciate you’ll want someone else to talk to and i want sleep so for now I vanish
In post 282, ketchup777 wrote:
mmm that’s also how I feel so idk why you called my not-many questions third degree, unless it felt like you were cracking under the pressure as scum. but I appreciate you’ll want someone else to talk to and i want sleep so for now I vanish
I guess I wrongly assume I’m easy to sort lol
not this time I guess. you being a radiating beacon of towniness before posting unfortunately doesn’t mean I can dump you as town before the game has started, unfortunately, much as I’d like to
I guess I have one final question actually. How much of your Enchant vote just now was sheeping Jackson? Would you have voted there if Jackson hadn’t? Or was Jackson the catalyst. Or was it entirely/mostly/partially/not your own thought? Enlighten me
I’d say 60% was Jack because it made me go back and reread Enchant. Plus, he straight up said he’s going to just lurk and that helps me in no way. Maybe a couple votes will re-engage him with the game, no matter his alignment. Which is what is most helpful to me.
In post 286, KayJayQueue wrote:
I’d say 60% was Jack because it made me go back and reread Enchant. Plus, he straight up said he’s going to just lurk and that helps me in no way. Maybe a couple votes will re-engage him with the game, no matter his alignment. Which is what is most helpful to me.
I don't think Enchant is going to affected by a few votes, is there anything else about Enchant that jumps out at you for being scummy?
But how so? I feel like Enchant has been consistent in calling out Jackson, and others for effectively claiming.....unless I missed some posts of theirs
But how so? I feel like Enchant has been consistent in calling out Jackson, and others for effectively claiming.....unless I missed some posts of theirs
Because he pretty much pressured experience into revealing his role and all his information. What he originally implied might not have gotten him killed before he could get more useful information for us. But now he’s definitely marked for dead. Yet the same person got upset others were claiming and admonished someone that brought up a bass claim.
Those two things, to me, are inconsistent. It felt like role fishing and then covering it up by subsequently being against any claims.
He tells experience to give all his info and then just a bit later makes fun of someone suggesting a mass claim when he was one pushing for info. It’s not consistent.
In post 266, ketchup777 wrote:
hmmm i think there’s a difference. experience had already heavily hinted they were informed and practically outed already. Whereas massclaim would reveal lots of us that have not really hinted at what role we have so is a lot more damaging
Ya I am with Ketchup here, Exp heavily hinted at some things......if you are gonna go that far, might as well give it all......and this really isn't Enchant being inconsistent
